Reduction in long-term disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-based treatment strategies

Aberrant B-cell activation and B-cell subpopulations in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis by clinical activity, autoantibody seropositivity, and treatment

Few studies analyze the role of B-cell subpopulations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathophysiology. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the differences in B-cell subpopulations and B-cell activation according to disease activity, RA subtype, and absence of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy. These subgroups were compared with control subjects (CS). One hundred and thirty-nine subjects were included, of which 114 were RA patients, and 25 were controls. Patients were divided into 99 with seropositive RA, 6 with seronegative RA, and 9 without DMARDs. The patients with seropositive RA were subclassified based on the DAS28 index. A seven-color multicolor flow cytometry panel was used to identify B-cell immunophenotypes and cell activation markers. There were no changes in total B-cell frequencies between RA patients and controls. However, a lower frequency of memory B cells and pre-plasmablasts was observed in seropositive RA compared to controls (P < 0.0001; P = 0.0043, respectively). In contrast, a higher frequency of mature B cells was observed in RA than in controls (P = 0.0002). Among patients with RA, those with moderate activity had a higher percentage of B cells (P = 0.0021). The CD69+ marker was increased (P < 0.0001) in RA compared to controls, while the CD40+ frequency was decreased in patients (P < 0.0001). Transitional, naïve, and double-negative B-cell subpopulations were higher in seronegative RA than in seropositive (P < 0.01). In conclusion, in seropositive and seronegative RA patients, there are alterations in B-cell activation and B-cell subpopulations, independently of clinical activity and DMARDs therapy.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biopharmaceuticals for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis: Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Etanercept

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease that causes joint destruction. The condition imposes a significant economic burden on patients and societies. The present study is aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Etanercept in treating rheumatoid arthritis in Iran.

Methods

This is a cost-effectiveness study of economic evaluation in which the Markov model was used. The study was carried out on 154 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Fars province taking Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Etanercept. The patients were selected through sampling. In this study, the cost data were collected from a community perspective, and the outcomes were the mean reductions in DAS-28 and QALY. The cost data collection form and the EQ-5D questionnaire were also used to collect the required data. The results were presented in the form of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and the sensitivity analysis was used to measure the robustness of the study results. The TreeAge Pro and Excel softwares were used to analyze the collected data.

Results

The results showed that the mean costs and the QALY rates in the Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Etanercept arms were $ 79,518.33 and 12.34, $ 91,695.59 and 13.25, and $ 87,440.92 and 11.79, respectively. The one-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. In addition, the results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) indicated that on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, Infliximab was in the acceptance area and below the threshold in 77% of simulations. The scatter plot was in the mentioned area in 81% and 91% of simulations compared with Adalimumab and Etanercept, respectively, implying lower costs and higher effectiveness than the other two alternatives. Therefore, the strategy was more cost-effective.

Conclusion

According to the results of this study, Infliximab was more cost-effective than the other two medications. Therefore, it is recommended that physicians use this medication as the priority in treating rheumatoid arthritis. It is also suggested that health policymakers consider the present study results in preparing treatment guidelines for RA.

Zinc finger domains as therapeutic targets for metal-based compounds - an update

Zinc finger proteins are one of the most abundant families of proteins and present a wide range of structures and functions. The structural zinc ion provides the correct conformation to specifically recognize DNA, RNA and protein sequences. Zinc fingers have essential functions in transcription, protein degradation, DNA repair, cell migration, and others. Recently, reports on the extensive participation of zinc fingers in disease have been published. On the other hand, much information remains to be unravelled as many genomes and proteomes are being reported. A variety of zinc fingers have been identified; however, their functions are still under investigation. Because zinc fingers have identified functions in several diseases, they are being increasingly recognized as drug targets. The replacement of Zn(ii) by another metal ion in zinc fingers is one of the most prominent methods of inhibition. From one side, zinc fingers play roles in the toxicity mechanisms of Ni(ii), Hg(ii), Cd(ii) and others. From the other side, gold, platinum, cobalt, and selenium complexes are amongst the compounds being developed as zinc finger inhibitors for therapy. The main challenge in the design of therapeutic zinc finger inhibitors is to achieve selectivity. Recently, the design of novel compounds and elucidation of the mechanisms of zinc substitution have renewed the possibilities of selective zinc finger inhibition by metal complexes. This review aims to update the status of novel strategies to selectively target zinc finger domains by metal complexes.

A prediction rule for lack of achievement of inactive disease with methotrexate as the sole disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the frequency of achievement of inactive disease (ID) in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with methotrexate (MTX) as the sole disease-modifyng antirheumatic (DMARD) therapy and to develop a prediction model for lack of attainment of ID.

METHODS

The clinical charts of consecutive patients started with MTX as the sole DMARD between 2000 and 2013 were reviewed. Patient follow-up was censored at first episode of ID or, in case ID was not reached, at last follow-up visit or when a biologic DMARD was prescribed. The characteristic at MTX start of patients who achieved or did not achieve ID were compared with univariate and multivariable analyses. Regression coefficients (β) of variables that entered the best-fitting logistic regression model were converted and summed to obtain a "prediction score" for lack of achievement of ID.

RESULTS

A total of 375 patients were included in the study. During MTX administration, 8.8% were given systemic corticosteroids and 44.1% intra-articular corticosteroids. After MTX start, 229 (61%) patients achieved ID after a median of 1.7 years, whereas 146 patients (39%) did not reach ID after a median of 1.2 years. On multivariable analysis, independent correlations with lack of achievement of ID were identified for the disease categories of systemic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and polyarthritis and C-reactive protein (CRP) >  1.4 mg/dl. The prediction score ranged from 0 to 3 and its cutoff that discriminated best between patients who achieved or did not achieve ID was > 0.5. The categories of systemic arthritis or ERA, both of which had a score greater than 0.5, were sufficient alone to predict a lower likelihood to reach ID. Polyarthritis and increased CRP, whose score was 0.5, assumed a predictive value only when present in association.

CONCLUSION

A conventional treatment regimen based on MTX as the sole DMARD led to achievement of ID in a sizeable proportion of children with JIA. Our findings help to outline the characteristics of patients who may deserve a synthetic DMARD other than MTX or the introduction of a biologic DMARD from disease outset.

Physicochemical characterization and phase I study of CMAB008, an infliximab biosimilar produced by a different expression system

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (Remicade), a chimeric monoclonal antibody against human TNFα, will inevitably face competition from biosimilar products, because of its effectiveness in autoimmune diseases and rapidly increasing market demand. According to guidelines for biosimilar development, the "biosimilar-expression system" may differ from that of the innovator, but more appropriate studies should be carried out to demonstrate the comparability between biosimilar and innovator. CMAB008 is an infliximab biosimilar candidate developed by the State Key Laboratory of Antibody Medicine and Targeted Therapy of China. Infliximab was expressed in SP2/0 cells, while CMAB008 was produced in a CHO-expression system.

METHODS

In this study, infliximab and CMAB008 were compared on physicochemical and biological characterizations, including protein content, activity, physiochemical integrity, impurities, additives, and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

The results showed that they were highly similar and comparable, except some differences in glycosylation. As glycosylation profiles can influence immunogenicity and occurrence of allergy or other adverse reactions of antibody therapeutics, primary tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CMAB008 were evaluated. In the phase I clinical trial, plasma concentration of CMAB008 and antidrug antibodies were also measured using ELISA and bridging ELISA, respectively. CMAB008 exhibited favorable clinical tolerability, no adverse events in the 3 mg/kg single-dose group (recommended therapeutic dosage), and no serious adverse events in the multiple-dose group. Also, no injection-site reactions were observed in the experiment.

CONCLUSION

In summary, CMAB008 might have the potential to be an effective drug compared with infliximab.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Huangqi Guizhi Wuwutang granule in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by swelling, pain, and synovial damage. Effective methods lack in the treatment of RA. A traditional prescription in use for thousands of years in China, Huangqi Guizhi Wuwutang granule (HGWG) is still chosen to relieve pain and prevent joint malformation in RA patients. However, no evidence-based medical research has been organized to assess the effectiveness and safety of HGWG for RA.

METHODS/DESIGN

We will conduct a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine whether HGWG can relieve pain and protect joints. We will randomly divide 120 patients with active RA into 2 groups, treated for 12 weeks. Main measurement is the rate of ACR50 score (American College of Rheumatology) from the baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary measurements include rate of ACR20/70, change of Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, and AIS score. The time points are set as baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. In addition, the rate of ACR50 from the baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks' follow-up are also the secondary outcome measures.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this research will elucidate the efficacy and safety of HGWG and provide an alternative treatment for RA. In addition, our data will benefit the clinical decision-making on active RA and possibly be incorporated into future guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03593837.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with leflunomide or tacrolimus for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with leflunomide or tacrolimus at recommended dosages in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and tolerability of leflunomide 20 mg, leflunomide 10 mg, tacrolimus 3 mg, tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg, and placebo, based on the number of withdrawals of RA patients, were included. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Six RCTs including 1510 patients met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patient withdrawals owing to lack of efficacy was significantly lower in the leflunomide 20 mg (OR 0.17, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.08-0.34); leflunomide 10 mg (OR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.02-0.75); and tacrolimus 3 mg (OR 0.41, 95% CrI 0.21-0.74) groups than in the placebo group. Rank probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values indicated that leflunomide 20 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment based on the number of withdrawals owing to lack of efficacy (SUCRA = 0.8530), followed by leflunomide 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.8321), tacrolimus 3 mg (SUCRA = 0.4965), tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg (SUCRA = 0.3035), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0150). Patient withdrawals owing to adverse events did not differ significantly among the groups; however, withdrawals in the placebo group were fewer than those in the leflunomide 20 mg group (OR 0.22, 95% CrI 0.07-0.74). Placebo had the highest probability of being the most tolerable treatment (SUCRA = 0.8161) followed by tacrolimus 3 mg (SUCRA = 0.6490), tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg (SUCRA = 0.4857), leflunomide 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.4651), and leflunomide 20 mg (SUCRA = 0.0841). Leflunomide 20 mg, leflunomide 10 mg, and tacrolimus 3 mg were more efficacious than placebo, while leflunomide 20 mg was less tolerable than placebo. Leflunomide is likely to be more efficacious but less tolerable than tacrolimus for RA treatment.

Effect of Trichilia monadelpha (Meliaceae) extracts on bone histomorphology in complete Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis

AIM

This study aimed to assess the effect of petroleum ether extract (PEE), ethyl acetate extract (EthE), and ethanol extract (EAE) of Trichilia monadelpha stem bark on bone histomorphology in arthritis.

METHODS

Percentage inhibition of edema and arthritic scores in complete Freund's adjuvant-induced (0.1 ml of 5 mg/ml¹ of heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis in paraffin oil-injected subplantar into the right hind paw) arthritic Sprague-Dawley rats treated with PEE, EthE, or EAE (10,30, and 100 mg/kg¹, respectively), dexamethasone (0.3-3.0 mg/kg¹), or methotrexate (0.1-1.0 mg/kg¹) over a 28-day period were estimated. Rat paws were radiographed and scored. Body weights were taken and paw tissues were harvested for histopathological studies.

RESULTS

The extracts significantly (P ≤ 0.01-0.0001) and dose dependently reduced the polyarthritic phase of arthritis. EAE and PEE significantly (P ≤ 0.01-0.0001) minimized edema spread from acute arthritic phase (days 0-10) to polyarthritic phase (days 10-28). EthE improved which deteriorated body weight in arthritis. All extracts significantly (P ≤ 0.05-0.01) improved arthritic score; reducing erythema, swelling and joint rigidity, and also significantly (P ≤ 0.05-0.01) reduced hyperplasia, pannus formation, and exudation of inflammatory cells into synovial spaces.

CONCLUSION

The stem bark extracts of T. monadelpha reduce bone tissue damage and resorption associated with adjuvant-induced arthritis, hence could be useful in managing arthritis in humans.

Reliability and Validity of the Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS) in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

Secondary analyses were conducted using data from a 56-week, randomized controlled trial of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patient-reported outcome measures included the RA-WIS, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Pain, data for which were collected at baseline and at weeks 12, 16, 24, and 56. Data were analyzed for reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

Among 148 patients whose data were analyzed, more than half were women (56.1%) with a mean age of 46.8 years. On average, patients experienced RA symptoms for 8.7 months; the mean 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was 5.9, and the mean HAQ - Disability Index was 1.3. The RA-WIS demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability (α = 0.89 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91, respectively). At baseline and week 24, moderate to strong correlations were seen between RA-WIS total scores and the HAQ, the Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and the Pain Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire, ranging from 0.47 to 0.81 (all P < 0.0001). Mean RA-WIS total scores and work disability risk levels discriminated between clinical severity scores on the DAS28, the HAQ - Disability Index, and the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (all P < 0.05). Mean baseline to week 24 RA-WIS total change scores were significantly different among American College of Rheumatology responder groups (P ≤ 0.0001) and between DAS28 remission status groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide evidence supporting the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the RA-WIS for evaluating work disability in patients with RA in a clinical trial setting.

The incidence of upper and lower extremity surgery for rheumatoid arthritis among Medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

For elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis, aggressive immunosuppression can be difficult to tolerate, and surgery remains an important treatment option for joint pain and deformity. We sought to examine the epidemiology of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid arthritis among older individuals who were newly diagnosed with the disorder.

METHODS

We identified a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (sixty-six years of age and older) newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from 2000 to 2005, and followed these patients longitudinally for a mean of 4.6 years. We used univariate analysis to compare the time from the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis to the first operation among the 360 patients who underwent surgery during the study period.

RESULTS

In our study cohort, 589 procedures were performed among 360 patients, and 132 patients (37%) underwent multiple procedures. The rate of upper extremity reconstruction was 0.9%, the rate of lower extremity reconstruction was 1.2%, and knee arthroplasty was the most common procedure performed initially (31%) and overall (29%). Upper extremity procedures were performed sooner than lower extremity procedures (fourteen versus twenty-five months; p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, surgery rates declined with age for upper and lower extremity procedures (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Knee replacement remains the most common initial procedure among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, upper extremity procedures are performed earlier than lower extremity procedures. Understanding the patient and provider factors that underlie variation in procedure rates can inform future strategies to improve the delivery of care to patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a selective, B-cell depleting, biologic agent for treating refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeted against CD 20 that is promoted as therapy for patients who fail to respond to other biologics. There is evidence to suggest that rituximab is effective and well tolerated when used in combination with methotrexate for RA.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rituximab for the treatment of RA.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a search (until January 2014) in electronic databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science), clinical trials registries, and websites of regulatory agencies. Reference lists from comprehensive reviews were also screened.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All controlled trials comparing treatment with rituximab as monotherapy or in combination with any disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (traditional or biologic) versus placebo or other DMARD (traditional or biologic) in adult patients with active RA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and abstracted data from each study.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies with 2720 patients. For six studies selection bias could not be evaluated and two studies were considered to have low risk of bias. The level of evidence ranged from low to high, but was rated as moderate for most outcomes. We have prioritised reporting of rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate since this is the approved dose and most commonly used combination. We also reported data on other combinations and doses as supplementary information in the results section of the review.American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response rates were statistically significantly improved with rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone at 24 to 104 weeks. The RR for achieving an ACR 50 at 24 weeks was 3.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 4.6); 29% of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate achieved the ACR 50 compared to 9% of controls. The absolute treatment benefit (ATB) was 21% (95% CI 16% to 25%) with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6 (95% CI 4 to 9).At 52 weeks, the RR for achieving clinical remission (Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 joints < 2.6) with rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate compared with methotrexate monotherapy was 2.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.5); 22% of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate achieved clinical remission compared to 11% of controls. The ATB was 11% (95% CI 2% to 20%) with a NNT of 7 (95% CI 4 to 13).At 24 weeks, the RR for achieving a clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (> 0.22) for patients receiving rituximab combined with methotrexate compared to patients on methotrexate alone was 1.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.1). The ATB was 24% (95% CI 12% to 36%) with an NNT of 5 (95% CI 3 to 13). At 104 weeks, the RR for achieving a CMI in HAQ (> 0.22) was 1.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6). The ATB was 24% (95% CI 16% to 31%) with a NNT of 5 (95% CI 3 to 7).At 24 weeks, the RR for preventing radiographic progression in patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate was 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4) compared to methotrexate alone; 70% of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate had no radiographic progression compared to 59% of controls. The ATB was 11% (95% CI 2% to 19%) and the NNT was 10 (95% CI 5 to 57). Similar benefits were observed at 52 to 56 weeks and 104 weeks.Statistically significantly more patients achieved a CMI on the physical and mental components of the quality of life, measured by the Short Form (SF)-36, in the rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate-treated group compared with methotrexate alone at 24 to 52 weeks (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.4; NNT 4, 95% CI 3 to 8 and RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9; NNT 8, 95% CI 5 to 19, respectively); 34 and 13 more patients out of 100 showed an improvement in the physical component of the quality of life measure compared to methotrexate alone (95% CI 5% to 84%; 95% CI 7% to 8%, respectively).There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in the rates of withdrawals because of adverse events or for other reasons (that is, withdrawal of consent, violation, administrative, failure to return) in either group. However, statistically significantly more people receiving the control drug withdrew from the study compared to those receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate at all times (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.50; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.91; RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.82; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, respectively). At 104 weeks, 37% withdrew from the control group and 20% withdrew from the rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate group. The absolute risk difference (ARD) was -20% (95% CI -34% to -5%) with a number needed to harm (NNH) of 7 (95% CI 5 to 11).A greater proportion of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate developed adverse events after their first infusion compared to those receiving methotrexate monotherapy and placebo infusions (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9); 26% of those taking rituximab plus methotrexate reported more events associated with their first infusion compared to 16% of those on the control regimen with an ARD of 9% (95% CI 5% to 13%) and a NNH of 11 (95% CI 21 to 8). However, no statistically significant differences were noted in the rates of serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from eight studies suggests that rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate is significantly more efficacious than methotrexate alone for improving the symptoms of RA and preventing disease progression.

Recurrent pneumothorax after etanercept therapy in a rheumatoid arthritis patient: a case report

The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are refractory to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs is gradually increasing. Etanercept is the first anti-TNF agent to be approved for RA treatment and is also the most widely used. However, aggravation of interstitial lung disease after etanercept treatment in RA patients has been reported recently. We report the first case of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax with progression of interstitial lung disease after initiating etanercept therapy. The withdrawal of etanercept and a change to adalimumab, a different class of TNF inhibitor, achieved clinical stabilization.

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of biannual peripheral magnetic resonance imaging, radiography and standard of care disease progression monitoring on pharmacotherapeutic escalation in rheumatoid and undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Permanent joint damage is a major consequence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the most common and destructive form of inflammatory arthritis. In aggressive disease, joint damage can occur within 6 months from symptom onset. Early, intensive treatment with conventional and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can delay the onset and progression of joint damage. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or radiography (X-ray) over standard of care as tools to guide DMARD treatment decision-making by rheumatologists for the care of RA.

Methods

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial has been designed. Rheumatoid and undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis patients will undergo an MRI and X-ray assessment every 6 months. Baseline adaptive randomization will be used to allocate participants to MRI, X-ray, or sham-intervention groups on a background of standard of care. Prognostic markers, treating physician, and baseline DMARD therapy will be used as intervention allocation parameters. The outcome measures in rheumatology RA MRI score and the van der Heijde-modified Sharp score will be used to evaluate the MRI and X-ray images, respectively. Radiologists will score anonymized images for all patients regardless of intervention allocation. Disease progression will be determined based on the study-specific, inter-rater smallest detectable difference. Allocation-dependent, intervention-concealed reports of positive or negative disease progression will be reported to the treating rheumatologist. Negative reports will be delivered for the sham-intervention group. Study-based radiology clinical reports will be provided to the treating rheumatologists for extra-study X-ray requisitions to limit patient radiation exposure as part of diagnostic imaging standard of care. DMARD treatment dose escalation and therapy changes will be measured to evaluate the primary objective. A sample size of 186 (62 per group) patients will be required to determine a 36% difference in pharmacological treatment escalation between the three groups with intermediate dispersion of data with 90% power at a 5% level of significance.

Discussion

This study will determine if monitoring RA and undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis patients using MRI and X-ray every 6 months over 2 years provides incremental evidence over standard of care to influence pharmacotherapeutic decision-making and ultimately hinder disease progression.

Trial registration

This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00808496 (registered on 12 December 2008).

Multidrug resistance protein-1 expression, function and polymorphisms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis not responding to methotrexate

OBJECTIVE

To study the expression, function and polymorphism of MDR-1 protein on the peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients with RA following treatment with MTX and its relationship with response to therapy.

METHODS

RA patients naïve to MTX/DMARD- and glucocorticoid were enrolled. Expression and function of MDR-1 was carried out by flow cytometry at baseline and after 4 months of therapy. MDR-1 expression was measured by relative fluorescence intensities and percentage of positive cells. MDR-1 function was assessed by Rhodamine efflux in presence or absence of verapamil. Patients with reduction in disease activity score 28 ≥1.2 were defined as responders and <1.2 as non-responders. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR-1 gene, 3435T, 1236T and 2677T/A were studied.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients of RA were grouped into responders (n = 41), and non-responders (n = 11) as per the defined criteria. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, sex ratio or duration of illness, MTX dose and follow-up duration. The expression and function of the MDR-1 protein reduced significantly in the responder group after the treatment with MTX when compared to the baseline evaluation. The decrease was significant when compared to the non-responders at the fourth month. MDR-1 expression and function either increased or remained the same in the non-responder group after treatment with MTX. MTX unresponsiveness was not related to any of the three polymorphisms studied.

CONCLUSION

Persistent expression and function of MDR-1 identifies a subset of RA patients not responding to MTX. Its early recognition may help in appropriately modulating therapy.

Utilization patterns of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients

This study was conducted to investigate disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) utilization in Korean elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We used data from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims database. The study subjects were defined as patients aged 65 yr or older with at least two claims with a diagnosis of RA. DMARD use was compared by the patients' age-group, gender, medical service, and geographic divisions. The patterns of DMARD use in mono- and combination therapy were calculated. RA medication use was calculated by the number of defined daily doses (DDD)/1,000 patients/day. A total of 166,388 patients were identified during the study period. DMARD use in RA patients was 12.0%. The proportion of DMARD use was higher in the younger elderly, females, and patients treated in big cities. Hydroxychloroquine was the most commonly used DMARD in monotherapy, and most of the combination therapies prescribed it with methotrexate. DMARD use in elderly RA patients was noticeably low, although drug prescriptions showed an increasing trend during the study period, clinicians may need to pay more attention to elderly RA patients.

The decline in joint replacement surgery in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a concomitant increase in the intensity of anti-rheumatic therapy: a nationwide register-based study from 1995 through 2010

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Drug-based treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved markedly over the past 2 decades. Using nationwide register data, we studied how this has affected the rates of hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow replacement from 1995 to 2010.

METHODS

The number of primary joint replacements was obtained from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. To test the hypothesis that improvements in medical treatment of RA reduce the need for joint replacements, we also collected data about purchases of different disease-modifying anti-rheumatic agents (DMARDs) and biological drugs from the nationwide drug registers.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of primary joint replacements for RA declined from 19 per 10(5) in 1995 to 11 per 10(5) in 2010. The decline was greater for upper-limb operations than for lower-limb operations. At the same time, the numbers of individuals using methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine (the most commonly used DMARDs) increased 2- to 4-fold.

INTERPRETATION

Our results are in accordance with observations from other countries, and indicate that the use of joint replacements in RA has decreased dramatically. Our data suggest that effective medical therapy is the most likely explanation for this favorable development.

Pharmacokinetic consideration of synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Current treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) focuses on tight disease control and remission. The present understanding of the immune-pathological process of RA, mechanism of synthetic DMARDs and the clinical experience of the drugs have raised certain concerns over their clinical use.

AREAS COVERED

The review summarizes latest concepts in the pathogenesis of RA, and the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of commonly used synthetic DMARDs. It also covers the principle of enzyme and receptor kinetics, and limitation of current knowledge on RA disease measures.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need to rationalize the use of synthetic DMARDs to help improve RA treatment. One recommendation to assist the rationalization of this treatment is by the construction of suitable models of the disease process, thereby augmenting treatment options. Currently, the dosage and duration of this type of treatment is based on its overall effect and clinical outcome. Each DMARD will confer its effect on a specific component of the multilevel, multicellular, pathological process of RA. Furthermore, developing definitive biomarkers could help to better assess the disease at its various stages instead of using conventional RA measures for drug titration and to help in the rationalization of drug regimen. Integrating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties into this model will also help in improving treatment outcomes.

Oral tolerance and OVA-induced tolerogenic dendritic cells reduce the severity of collagen/ovalbumin-induced arthritis in mice

Dietary proteins play an important role in the regulation of systemic immune response, in a phenomenon known as oral tolerance (OT). To evaluate the effects of OT on a murine model of type II collagen (CII) plus ovalbumin (OVA)-induced arthritis (CIA), mice were fed with OVA either before or after CIA induction. OT significantly reduced the paw edema and synovial inflammation, as well as serum levels of anti-CII, the ex vivo proliferation and inflammatory cytokine production by spleen cells from CIA mice. The frequencies of Foxp3(+) and IL-10(+) cells were higher, whereas IFNγ(+) cells and IL-17(+) cells were lower, among gated CD4(+) spleen T cells from tolerized CIA mice than in those from non-tolerized CIA mice. Adoptive transfer of tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs) before CIA induction mimics the effects observed in the OT. We demonstrate here that bystander suppression induced by OT can modify the course of CIA and tolerogenic DCs play a role this phenomenon.

Risk factors of gastrointestinal and hepatic adverse drug reactions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biomedical combination therapy and Chinese medicine

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The exploration of risk factors on the gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions (GI ADRs) and hepatic ADRs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with traditional Chinese medicien (CM) and convertional Western Medicien (WM) therapy will benifit the clincial drug administration.

METHODS

A multi-center, randomized-clinical trial was conducted on RA patients in China. After 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, the efficacy and safety of WM therapy and CM therapy were evaluated. The Chi-square and logistic regression were conducted to analyze the correlations between the biological parameters, CM symptoms and the ADRs.

RESULTS

505 patients were recruited from 9 centers and randomly assigned into WM therapy group (n=251) or CM group (n=254). 397 of them completed the 24 week treatment (194 in WM and 203 in CM group). Total ADRs incidence and withdrawal rates were similar in two groups. For the patients treated with WM, logistic regression analysis showed that CRP level was negatively related to GI ADRs (p<0.05), dizziness was positively related to GI ADRs (p<0.05); and IgG level and chills were positively related to hepatic ADRs (p<0.01, p<0.05). In the patients treated with CM, no laboratory measurements were found related with GI ADRs and hepatic ADRs, lassitude and nocturia were risk factors for GI ADRs, cold extremities for hepatic ADRs, respectively (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

CRP in normal scale and dizziness were the risk factors for GI ADRs, higher IgG level and chills were the risk factors for hepatic ADRs in the RA patients treated with conventional WM therapy. Lassitude and nocturia were the risk factors for GI ADRs, and cold extremities were the risk factors for hepatic ADRs in the RA patients treated with CM therapy.

Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether any benefits from adjunctive homeopathic intervention in patients with RA are due to the homeopathic consultation, homeopathic remedies or both.

METHODS

Exploratory double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted from January 2008 to July 2008, in patients with active stable RA receiving conventional therapy. Eighty-three participants from three secondary care UK outpatient clinics were randomized to 24 weeks of treatment with either homeopathic consultation (further randomized to individualized homeopathy, complex homeopathy or placebo) or non-homeopathic consultation (further randomized to complex homeopathy or placebo). Co-primary outcomes: ACR 20% improvement (ACR20) criteria and patient monthly global assessment (GA).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

28-joint DAS (DAS-28), tender and swollen joint count, disease severity, pain, weekly patient and physician GA and pain, and inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Fifty-six completed treatment phase. No significant differences were observed for either primary outcome. There was no clear effect due to remedy type. Receiving a homeopathic consultation significantly improved DAS-28 [mean difference 0.623; 95% CI 0.1860, 1.060; P = 0.005; effect size (ES) 0.70], swollen joint count (mean difference 3.04; 95% CI 1.055, 5.030; P = 0.003; ES 0.83), current pain (mean difference 9.12; 95% CI 0.521, 17.718; P = 0.038; ES 0.48), weekly pain (mean difference 6.017; 95% CI 0.140, 11.894; P = 0.045; ES 0.30), weekly patient GA (mean difference 6.260; 95% CI 0.411, 12.169; P = 0.036; ES 0.31) and negative mood (mean difference - 4.497; 95% CI -8.071, -0.923; P = 0.015; ES 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Homeopathic consultations but not homeopathic remedies are associated with clinically relevant benefits for patients with active but relatively stable RA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current controlled trials, http://www.controlled-trials.com/, ISRCTN09712705.

Trends in health of older adults in the United States: past, present, future

The decline in late-life disability prevalence in the United States was one of the most important developments in the well-being of older Americans in the 1980s and 1990s, but there is no guarantee that it will continue into the future. We review the past literature on trends in disability and other health indicators and then estimate the most recent trends in biomarkers and limitations for both the population aged 65 and older and those aged 40 to 64, the future elderly. We then investigate the extent to which trends in education, smoking, and obesity can account for recent trends in limitations and discuss how these three factors might influence future prospects for late-life health. We find that improvements in the health of the older population generally have continued into the first decade of the twenty-first century. The recent increase in the proportion of the younger population needing help with activities of daily living is concerning, as is the doubling of obesity in the last few decades. However the increase in obesity has recently paused, and favorable trends in education and smoking are encouraging.

Self-management strategies used during flares of rheumatoid arthritis in an ethnically diverse population

OBJECTIVES

 Effective management of flares of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can improve symptoms and may delay disease progression. The practice of rheumatologists in managing a flare has been studied, but patients' experiences of, and responses to, disease flares remain poorly defined. This study aimed to address this issue.

METHODS

 Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 patients from an ethnically diverse population who had suffered a recent RA flare. Open questions were asked regarding patients' definitions of a flare, causal attribution, self-management strategies, their triggers to consult health professionals, and the information they had received about RA flares from health professionals. Transcripts were studied using the grounded theory approach to identify themes.

RESULTS

 Flares were usually described as worsening joint pain and swelling. Over-use of joints was identified as the most common cause of a flare, and commonly used self-management strategies included rest, gentle exercise and warming the joints. There was some variation in causal attribution and self-management with ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

 This study identified a link between causal attribution of flares and the resultant self-management strategies. A perceived trigger of the flare in some patients formed a focus for their self-management strategies, whereas those who could not identify a cause aimed mainly to alleviate symptoms. A better understanding of patients' perspective in the context of disease flares will allow the development of educational programmes to facilitate more effective self-management of this important manifestation of disease.

Efficacy of roxithromycin in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that antibodies to oral anaerobic bacteria are elevated in the serum and synovial fluids of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Macrolide antibiotics are active against oral anaerobic bacteria.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of roxithromycin in patients with early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This was a double-blind trial. We enrolled adult patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who had not previously received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and randomized them to receive either once-daily oral roxithromycin 300 mg or once-daily oral placebo for 3 months. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients who had a 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (an ACR 20 response) at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures were 50% improvement and 70% improvement according to ACR criteria (an ACR 50 response and an ACR 70 response, respectively). The 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) was also calculated. Clinical remission was defined as DAS28 score <2.6, and a low level of disease activity was defined as DAS28 score <3.2 but > or =2.6. Adverse event data (eg, example, type, severity, time of occurrence, time to resolution) were obtained from physical examinations and patient self-reporting.

RESULTS

The roxithromycin group had 16 patients (mean [SD] age, 45 [4] years; 11 women, 5 men; all white). The placebo group had 15 patients (mean [SD] age, 42 [5] years; 10 women, 5 men; all white). A significantly greater percentage of patients treated with 300 mg of roxithromycin experienced an ACR 20 re- sponse at 3 months, compared with those who received placebo (75% [n = 12] vs 20% [n = 3]; P = 0.002). Greater percentages of patients treated with 300 mg of roxithromycin also achieved ACR 50 responses (56% [n = 9] vs 7% [n = 1]; P = 0.003) and ACR 70 responses (44% [n = 7] vs 0%; P = 0.004) compared with patients who received placebo. At month 3, DAS28 response rates were significantly greater with once-daily roxithromycin 300 mg than with once-daily placebo (P < 0.001). Adverse events were reported for 11 patients (69%) in the roxithromycin group and 7 patients (47%) in the placebo group. The most common adverse events (>5%) were nausea, abdominal pain, headache, and dry mouth. There were no dose-limiting toxic effects. One participant in the roxithromycin group withdrew from the study because of severe emesis; two withdrew from the placebo group because of lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

In these adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 3-month treatment with roxithromycin significantly improved the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and was generally well tolerated. Future studies should investigate the relationship between disease activity and serum or joint antibodies to anaerobic bacteria.

Early treatment with, and time receiving, first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug predicts long-term function in patients with inflammatory polyarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the influence of early disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment on long-term functional outcome in patients with recent-onset inflammatory polyarthritis (IP), and the impact of the duration of first and subsequent DMARD treatment.

METHODS

642 subjects from a primary care registry of patients with new-onset IP, recruited 1990-4, were followed up for 10 years. Mean change in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores between baseline and 10 years were compared by time to, and time receiving, first DMARD treatment and total time receiving treatment, using linear regression. Adjustment for time-dependent confounders and censoring was performed using marginal structural weights.

RESULTS

When adjusted for baseline and subsequent disease severity, those treated early (<6 months from symptom onset) experienced a non-significant improvement in function compared with those never treated (adjusted mean difference in change (adj_MDIC) in HAQ -0.24; 95% CI -0.58 to 0.09); and a significant benefit for each additional month of treatment within 6 months of the onset of symptoms (adj_MDIC -0.10; 95% CI -0.19 to -0.02). Patients who discontinued their first DMARD within 6 months experienced a significant deterioration in long-term function (adj_MDIC in HAQ 0.28; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.52), while those who continued their first treatment for > 3 years experienced an improvement (adj_MDIC in HAQ -0.37; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The importance of time to, and response to, first DMARD treatment and total duration of DMARD treatment in modifying the 10-year function in patients with IP has been demonstrated.

Improving healthcare consumer effectiveness: an Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool (ANSWER) for people with early rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should use DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) within the first three months of symptoms in order to prevent irreversible joint damage. However, recent studies report the delay in DMARD use ranges from 6.5 months to 11.5 months in Canada. While most health service delivery interventions are designed to improve the family physician's ability to refer to a rheumatologist and prescribe treatments, relatively little has been done to improve the delivery of credible, relevant, and user-friendly information for individuals to make treatment decisions. To address this care gap, the Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool (ANSWER) will be developed and evaluated to assist people in making decisions about the use of methotrexate, a type of DMARD. The objectives of this project are: 1) to develop ANSWER for people with early RA; and 2) to assess the extent to which ANSWER reduces people's decisional conflict about the use of methotrexate, improves their knowledge about RA, and improves their skills of being 'effective healthcare consumers'.

METHODS/DESIGN

Consistent with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, the development process of ANSWER will involve: 1.) creating a storyline and scripts based on the best evidence on the use of methotrexate and other management options in RA, and the contextual factors that affect a patient's decision to use a treatment as found in ERAHSE; 2.) using an interactive design methodology to create, test, analyze and refine the ANSWER prototype; 3.) testing the content and user interface with health professionals and patients; and 4.) conducting a pilot study with 51 patients, who are diagnosed with RA in the past 12 months, to assess the extent to which ANSWER improves the quality of their decisions, knowledge and skills in being effective consumers.

DISCUSSION

We envision that the ANSWER will help accelerate the dissemination of knowledge and skills necessary for people with early RA to make informed choices about treatment and to manage their health. The latest in animation and online technology will ensure ANSWER fills a knowledge translation gap, focusing on the next generation of people living with RA.

Changes in the rates of joint surgery among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in California, 1983-2007

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved markedly over the past 25 years.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether rates of joint surgery, a long-term consequence of poorly controlled RA, have changed over this period.

METHODS

In this population-based, serial cross-sectional study of patients with RA aged >or=40 years in California, trends in annual rates of total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, total ankle arthroplasty or arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty or arthrodesis from 1983 to 2007 were examined.

RESULTS

Rates of joint surgery peaked in the 1990 s and since have decreased. Among patients aged 40-59 years, rates of knee surgery in 2003-2007 were 19% lower than in 1983-1987 (adjusted rate ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87, p<0.0001), while rates of hip surgery in 2003-2007 were 40% lower (p<0.0001). Rates of knee and hip surgery did not decrease in patients aged >or=60 years but increased as observed in the general population. Compared with rates of ankle and wrist surgery in the mid-1980s, rates in the mid-2000s decreased significantly in both age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of joint surgery in RA peaked in the 1990 s and have declined thereafter, suggesting that longterm outcomes of RA are improving.

Comparison of drug retention rates and causes of drug discontinuation between anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet drug discontinuation is common. The aim of this study was to compare treatment retention rates and specific causes of anti-TNF discontinuation in a population-based RA cohort.

METHODS

All patients treated with etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management RA cohort between 1997 and 2006 were included in the study. Causes of treatment discontinuation were broadly categorized as adverse events (AEs) or nontoxic causes, and further subdivided into specific categories. Specific causes of treatment interruption were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model and adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 2,364 anti-TNF treatment courses met the inclusion criteria. Treatment discontinuation was reported 803 times: 309 with etanercept, 249 with infliximab, and 245 with adalimumab. Drug inefficacy represented the largest single cause of treatment discontinuation (55.8% of cases). The median time of receiving anti-TNF therapy was 37 months, but discontinuation rates differed between the 3 anti-TNF agents (P < 0.001), with shorter retention rates for infliximab (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 99% confidence interval [99% CI] 1.01-1.51). The specific causes of treatment discontinuation revealed an increased risk of AEs with infliximab (HR 1.4, 99% CI 1.003-1.96), mostly due to an increased risk of infusion or allergic reactions (HR 2.11, 99% CI 1.23-3.62). Other discontinuation causes were equally distributed between the anti-TNF agents.

CONCLUSION

In this population, infliximab was associated with higher overall discontinuation rates compared with etanercept and adalimumab, which is mainly due to an increased risk of infusion or allergic reactions.

Favorable outcome of early treatment of new onset child and adolescent migraine-implications for disease modification

There is evidence that the prevalence of migraine in children and adolescents may be increasing. Current theories of migraine pathophysiology in adults suggest activation of central cortical and brainstem pathways in conjunction with the peripheral trigeminovascular system, which ultimately results in release of neuropeptides, facilitation of central pain pathways, neurogenic inflammation surrounding peripheral vessels, and vasodilatation. Although several risk factors for frequent episodic, chronic, and refractory migraine have been identified, the causes of migraine progression are not known. Migraine pathophysiology has not been fully evaluated in children. In this review, we will first discuss the evidence that early therapeutic interventions in the child or adolescent new onset migraineur, may halt or limit progression and disability. We will then review the evidence suggesting that many adults with chronic or refractory migraine developed their migraine as children or adolescents and may not have been treated adequately with migraine-specific therapy. Finally, we will show that early, appropriate and optimal treatment of migraine during childhood and adolescence may result in disease modification and prevent progression of this disease.

Work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence, accrual over time, and risk factors of work disability in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

We studied 432 patients from an inception cohort. Work disability was measured from a single self-report question. Data were prospectively collected and included sociodemographic information, clinical lupus features including activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 update [SLEDAI-2K]), damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index), and organ involvement, as well as health status (Short Form 36 [SF-36]), comorbidity, and medication use. Student's t-test and Wilcoxon's rank sum test were used to compare continuous variables and chi-square tests were used for dichotomous variables. Descriptive survival curves of time to work disability were presented. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to describe the relationships between clinically relevant factors and work disability.

RESULTS

Of 432 patients, 88% were women and 73% were white. Within the first year of diagnosis, 47% of patients were employed, 7% had a disability, and 7% were on sick leave. Overall, work disability was found in 98 (23%) patients. Risk factors for work disability found in the multivariate regression analysis were younger age at diagnosis, less education, fibromyalgia, hypertension, higher first-visit SLEDAI-2K score, and lower first-visit SF-36 score.

CONCLUSION

Work disability is frequent in patients with SLE, with a cumulative prevalence of 23%. Work disability was associated with a complex array of health factors, including comorbidity, physical and mental health limitations, and clinical features of lupus, that warrant increased attention in future research.

Achievement of a state of inactive disease at least once in the first 5 years predicts better outcome of patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the achievement of inactive disease in the first 5 years predicts a more favorable outcome of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

We reviewed clinical charts of 123 patients who started taking methotrexate, were followed for at least 5 years, and received a yearly assessment in the first 5 years. At each yearly visit, the presence of inactive disease was assessed. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) patients who never reached inactive disease; (2) patients who reached inactive disease in only 1 visit; and (3) patients who reached inactive disease in > or = 2 visits. Outcome was evaluated after 6 to 18 years (median 7.1 yrs) by assessing the following clinical measures: restricted joint count, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index (JADI), and Poznanski score of radiographic damage.

RESULTS

In the first 5 years, 62 patients (50.4%) were noted to have active disease at their yearly visit, 40 patients (32.5%) were noted to have inactive disease only once, and 21 patients (17.1%) were noted to have inactive disease in > or = 2 visits. Patients who achieved inactive disease 1 or more times had lower restricted joint count (p = 0.007) and JADI-Articular score (p = 0.004) at last followup visit than those who never reached such a state. A similar trend, although not significant, was observed for CHAQ and Poznanski score of radiographic damage.

CONCLUSION

Attainment of the state of inactive disease at least once in the first 5 years was found to be associated with less longterm joint damage and with a trend toward less functional impairment.

Why is late-life disability declining?

CONTEXT

Late-life disability has been declining in the United States since the 1980s. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation into the reasons for this trend.

METHODS

The study draws on evidence from two sources: original data analyses and reviews of existing studies. The original analyses include trend models of data on the need for help with daily activities and self-reported causes of such limitations for the population aged seventy and older, based on the National Health Interview Surveys from 1982 to 2005.

FINDINGS

Increases in the use of assistive and mainstream technologies likely have been important, as have declines in heart and circulatory conditions, vision, and musculoskeletal conditions as reported causes of disability. The timing of the improvements in these conditions corresponds to the expansion in medical procedures and pharmacologic treatment for cardiovascular disease, increases in cataract surgery, increases in knee and joint replacements, and expansion of medications for arthritic and rheumatic conditions. Greater educational attainment, declines in poverty, and declines in widowhood also appear to have contributed. Changes in smoking behavior, the population's racial/ethnic composition, the proportion of foreign born, and several specific conditions were eliminated as probable causes.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial reductions in old-age disability between the early 1980s and early 2000s are likely due to advances in medical care as well as changes in socioeconomic factors. More research is needed on the influence of health behaviors, the environment, and early- and midlife factors on trends in late-life disability.

Rapid and deep control of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis with infliximab and its correlation with acute-phase reactants

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with predominant joint involvement and possible systemic compromise, which leads to a handicapped status and poor quality of life. An optimal approach to treat RA requires early and intensive intervention with close monitoring of treatment response. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers are recommended in cases of active RA after the unsuccessful use of effective disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs); even adding them to treatment or replacing these drugs. Anti-TNF therapies have been demonstrated to reduce significant joint damage and to relieve symptoms during a prolonged time (see Scott and Kingsley, 2006). The efficacy of infliximab in an open-label trial is summarized with respect to speed of onset of action, durability of response, and its correlation between clinical and laboratory parameters. Safety for long-term treatment is also summarized. We studied 105 RA patients with more than 3 years' history of disease during 24 months on i.v. infliximab (75 completed study). We evaluated ACR responses at base line, and at 1, 6, 12, 16, 52, 77, and 104 weeks. Morning stiffness, swollen and tender joints, HAQ, SF-36% (PCS/MCS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), erythrosedimentation rate (ESR), transaminases, rheumatoid factor (RF) levels, hemogram, and adverse events profile were all assessed. The treatment offered rapid and sustained clinical improvements as revealed by ACR responses and marked changes in the parameters previously described. Important changes were made in functional status and acute-phase reactants. Finally, infliximab was considered well tolerated and did not affect the safety profile of this trial.

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine sulphate in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial--an Indian experience

OBJECTIVE

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used for a long time worldwide as a therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This trial was designed to determine whether HCQ was efficacious and safe in Indian patients with RA.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The trial was a multicentre, placebo controlled, randomized and double-blind study. One hundred and twenty-two patients with RA were enrolled in 3 different centres for the trial (26 males and 96 females in the age group of 18-60 years). Patients were randomized to receive either hydroxychloroquine tablets (n = 61) two tablets of 200 mg daily or placebo (n = 61) two tablets daily. After 8 weeks all patients received one tablet of hydroxychloroquine 200 mg daily for 4 weeks. Every patient also received one tablet of Nimesulide 100 mg twice daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessment of response at 12 weeks using modified ACR 20 (American College of Rheumatology 20) criteria where Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was replaced by ARA (American Rheumatology Association) functional class.

RESULTS

40.4% of patients on hydroxychloroquine showed improvement by modified ACR response criteria whereas only 20.7% (p = 0.02) showed improvement in the placebo group. No significant side effects were observed in any of the patients. There were no ocular toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydroxychloroquine was found to be an effective and well-tolerated drug in rheumatoid arthritis in Indian patients.

Effects of clarithromycin in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of clarithromycin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a 6-month, monocenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 81 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis were treated with either once-daily oral clarithromycin (500 mg) or daily oral placebo for 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients who had a 20% improvement according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (an ACR 20 response) at 6-months. Secondary outcome measures were 50% improvement and 70% improvement according to ACR criteria (an ACR 50 response and an ACR 70 response, respectively).

RESULTS

A significantly greater percentage of patients treated with 500 mg clarithromycin met the ACR 20 response at 6 months compared with patients who received placebo (59 vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Greater percentages of patients treated with 500 mg clarithromycin also achieved ACR 50 responses (34 vs. 10%; p < 0.001) and ACR 70 responses (20 vs. 3%; p = 0.003) compared with patients who received placebo, respectively. Clarithromycin was well tolerated. There were no dose-limiting toxic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis, treatment with clarithromycin significantly improved the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. Clarithromycin has been shown to be effective against rheumatoid arthritis.

The Use of Biological Agents in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common and potentially devastating condition which did not have good treatment options until recently. Pharmacological treatment should not just comprise anti-inflammatory agents and corticosteroids. The current therapeutic approach is to start a disease modifying agent early in the illness to prevent eventual joint damage. Older disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) include methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. Newer ones such as leflunomide and cyclosporine are also used. A recent advance in the management of rheumatoid arthritis is the use of biological agents which block certain key molecules involved in the pathogenesis of the illness. They include tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents such as infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, the anti-CD 20 agent rituximab and CTLA-4 Ig abatacept. Other agents which are in development include anti-IL6 tocilizumab, anti-CD22 and anti-lymphostat B. In this review, the efficacy and side effects of these agents, their impact on current clinical practice and future trends are discussed. Key words: Abatacept, Anti-TNF, Rituximab

Autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: a review

Emerging insights into the importance of B cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as highlighted by the efficacy of B cell depletion is one factor that has contributed to the upsurge of interest in the potential role of autoantibodies both as disease markers and with respect to a pathogenic role. Since the initial description of rheumatoid factor (RF), a large number of both disease-specific and non-specific autoantibodies have been described in patients with RA including antibodies to type II collagen (CII), immunoglobulin binding protein (BiP) and antibodies directed at citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) and other citrullinated proteins such as vimentin (anti-Sa) . Despite some overlap the serological profile of RA does appear to be distinct from other diseases such as SLE . Although the precise mechanisms responsible for the formation of these antibodies have not been well defined their presence must reflect the interaction between T and B cells believed to be relevant to the pathogenesis of RA. The specificity of the association of such factors as anti-CCP and anti-BiP with RA may reflect unique pathogenic events leading to the processing and presentation of the "cryptic self" . Ease of measurement and stability make autoantibodies attractive diagnostic and prognostic markers particularly in early disease when it may be difficult to distinguish self-limiting synovitis from persistent disease . The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of the spectrum of autoantibodies thus far characterised in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, and discuss their diagnostic, prognostic and pathogenetic relevance.

Is shared care with annual hospital review better value for money than predominantly hospital-based care in patients with established stable rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness and cost effectiveness acceptability of symptom control delivered by shared care (SCSC) and aggressive treatment delivered in hospital (ATH) for established rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Economic data were collected within the British Rheumatoid Outcome Study Group randomised controlled trial of SCSC and ATH. A broad perspective was used (UK National Health Service, social support services and patients). Cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, net benefit statistics and cost effectiveness acceptability curves were estimated. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. Sensitivity analysis tested the robustness of the results to analytical assumptions.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) cost per person was 4540 pounds (4700) in the SCSC group and 4440 pounds (4900) in the ATH group. The mean (SD) QALYs per person for 3 years were 1.67 (0.56) in the SCSC group and 1.60 (0.60) in the ATH group. If decision makers are prepared to pay > or = 2000 pounds to gain 1 QALY, SCSC is likely to be cost effective in 60-90% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary economic analysis and sensitivity analyses indicate that SCSC is likely to be more cost effective than ATH in 60-90% of cases. This result seems to be robust to assumptions required by the analysis. This study is one of a limited number of randomised controlled trials to collect detailed resource use and health status data and estimate the costs and QALYs of treatment for established RA. This trial is one of the largest RA studies to use the EuroQol.

Leflunomide: long-term clinical experience and new uses

Leflunomide (Arava, Aventis Pharmaceuticals) is an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity. This agent has demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Both the efficacy and safety of leflunomide are maintained with long-term administration in patients with RA. Leflunomide compares favourably with other biological and non-biological agents used to treat RA in the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. Economic studies indicate that leflunomide is a cost-effective option in the treatment of RA. New investigations with leflunomide have focused mainly on combination regimens for the treatment of RA and the use of leflunomide in other inflammatory or autoimmune disorders.

Comparing the long-term clinical outcome of treatment with methotrexate or sulfasalazine prescribed as the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with inflammatory polyarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and functional outcome at 2 and 5 years in patients with inflammatory polyarthritis treated with either methotrexate (MTX) or sulfasalazine (SSZ) as the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).

METHODS

Patients recruited to a primary-care-based inception cohort of patients with inflammatory polyarthritis were eligible for this analysis if they were started on either SSZ (n = 331) or MTX (n = 108) as their first DMARD within 3 months. Outcomes assessed included the Disease Activity Score (DAS)28, Health Assessment Questionnaire, radiological erosions (Larsen Score) and cumulative mortality with the proportions still on the original treatment. To overcome potential bias in allocation to these two treatments, a propensity score was calculated based on baseline disease status variables.

RESULTS

are expressed as the mean difference between MTX and SSZ, both unadjusted and adjusted for propensity score.

RESULTS

The baseline differences between the two groups disappeared after adjusting for propensity score. At 2 and 5 years there were few differences in the clinical outcomes, either unadjusted or after adjustment for propensity. By contrast, at 5 years the proportion that was erosive was lower in the MTX group: odds ratio 0.3 (95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.8), with a 31% lower Larsen Score after adjustment. At both time points, those treated with MTX were at least twice as likely to remain on that drug as those treated with SSZ.

CONCLUSION

Long-term clinical outcome is similar in patients prescribed MTX and SSZ, although it would seem that MTX has greater potential to suppress erosions, which supports it being the first DMARD of choice.

Measuring Process of Arthritis Care: The Arthritis Foundation’s Quality Indicator Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the scientific evidence that supports each of the explicit process measures in the Arthritis Foundation's Quality Indicator Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

METHODS

For each of the 27 measures in the Arthritis Foundation's Quality Indicator set, a comprehensive literature review was performed for evidence that linked the process of care defined in the indicator with relevant clinical outcomes and to summarize practice guidelines relevant to the indicators.

RESULTS

Over 7500 titles were identified and reviewed. For each of the indicators the scientific evidence to support or refute the quality indicator was summarized. We found direct evidence that supported a process-outcome link for 15 of the indicators, an indirect link for 7 of the indicators, and no evidence to support or refute a link for 5. The processes of care described in the indicators for which no supporting/refuting data were found have been assumed to be so essential to care that clinical trails assessing their importance have not, and probably never will be, performed. The process of care described in all but 2 of the indicators is recommended in 1 or more practice guidelines.

CONCLUSION

There are sufficient scientific evidence and expert consensus to support the Arthritis Foundation's Quality Indicator Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis, which defines a minimal standard of care that can be used to assess health care quality for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Potential for altering rheumatoid arthritis outcome

The potential for disproportionately altering outcome in the early stages of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was first hypothesized in the early 1990s. This window of opportunity hypothesis for therapeutic intervention in RA is based on the existence of a time frame within which there is a potential for a greater response to therapy, resulting in sustained benefits or, perhaps most important, a chance of cure. Given the persistent, progressive, damaging, inflammatory nature of RA, this approach to altering outcome in the early stages seems attractive.

The need for tighter rheumatoid arthritis control in a South African public health care center

OBJECTIVE

Medical facilities are restricted in public health care centers in South Africa and patients that enroll in these centers are socioeconomically deprived. We investigated the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on disability in both a public health care and a private care center.

METHODS

The disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) and an extensive range of disease and non-disease-related patient characteristics were recorded in 359 RA subjects, 196 public care and 163 private care patients. We compared the data between both patient groups and identified potential predictors of the HAQ-DI by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median (range) HAQ-DI was 1.625 (0 to 3) in the public care patients and 0.500 (0 to 3) in the private care patients (P < 0.0001). As compared with private care patients, public care patients were more often African (P < 0.0001) and of mixed ancestry (P < 0.01) and less often White (P < 0.0001). Public care patients also had higher current disease activity scores (P < 0.0001) (except for tender joint counts and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate), higher cumulative disease activity or disease severity scores (joint deformities) (P < 0.0001), a higher frequency of tuberculosis (P < 0.01), and were more often treated with prednisone (P < 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression models, a HAQ-DI of >1 was independently predicted by current disease activity (swollen joint count) (P < 0.004), cumulative disease activity (joint deformities) (P < 0.005), being under public care (P < 0.008), and prednisone use (P < 0.04). Racial differences were not independently predictive of disability.

CONCLUSION

Results of disease outcome measurements were poorer in our public care patients than in our private care patients. Facilities that allow for tighter disease activity control of RA are needed in South African public care centers.