A young woman with a photosensitive pruritic rash on her face and upper trunk

Dermatomyositis: An Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Dermatomyositis is a rare inflammatory disease with characteristic cutaneous findings and varying amounts of systemic involvement. Patients may present with skin disease alone, have concomitant muscle disease, or have extracutaneous manifestations such as pulmonary disease or an associated malignancy. Given such diverse presentations, dermatomyositis is both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. However, a prompt diagnosis is of utmost importance to institute adequate therapy and screen patients for an associated malignancy. Dermatologists should play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of patients with dermatomyositis as cutaneous disease tends to be chronic, negatively impact quality of life, and be more recalcitrant to therapy. In this review, we discuss diagnosis, with a focus on myositis-specific antibodies and their associated phenotypes. We also review therapies available for this often refractory skin disease.

Dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis is one of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. It is characterized clinically by progressive symmetrical proximal muscle weakness and a characteristic rash. There are patients with rash who have little or no muscle disease. Although the process primarily attacks the skin and the muscles, it is a systemic disease with frequent manifestations in the gastrointestinal tract and pulmonary system. Dermatomyositis has been linked to internal malignancy in somewhere between 15% and 25%. Therapy for the muscle disease includes systemic corticosteroids with or without an immunosuppressive agent. Therapy of the skin disease begins with photoprotection and topical corticosteroids, but also includes the use of antimalarial agents and immunomodulatory therapies.

A systematic review of adult-onset clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (dermatomyositis siné myositis): a missing link within the spectrum of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

Classical dermatomyositis (CDM) patients display the hallmark cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis (DM), proximal muscle weakness, and laboratory evidence of myositis. The epidemiology and management of both adult-onset and juvenile-onset CDM has been well characterized. However, the clinical significance of the hallmark inflammatory cutaneous manifestations of DM occurring in individuals who have no clinically significant muscle weakness and normal muscle enzymes for prolonged periods of time (ie, 6 months or longer) has not been clear. The term amyopathic DM (ADM) (synonymous with DM siné myositis) has been proposed to draw attention to such individuals. A related form of DM, "hypomyopathic DM" [HDM], is the presence of DM skin disease for 6 months or longer in individuals who have no muscle weakness but who are found to have some evidence of muscle inflammation upon testing (muscle enzyme levels, electromyogram, muscle biopsy, muscle magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Clinically amyopathic DM (CADM) is a designation that has been proposed for patients having either ADM or HDM. The clinically amyopathic component of this designation was coined to emphasize the fact that the only clinical problem being experienced by these patients at the time of diagnosis is their DM skin disease. Our personal experience suggests that the CADM subphenotype might be more prevalent in adults than has been thought previously. To test this hypothesis and address questions relating to the optimal management and prognosis of such patients, we have systematically reviewed the published literature in this area.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of the published literature on adult-onset CADM as defined in Table 1 through May 1, 2004.

RESULTS

We identified 291 adult-onset CADM cases (18 years or older) reported from over 19 countries. The average duration of DM skin disease was 3.74 years (range, 6 months [by definition] to > 20 years), and 73% were female. Among 37 patients with HDM who were identified, the average duration of disease was 5.4 years, and none had developed clinically significant weakness at the time of the reports. Thirty-seven of the reported CADM patients developed muscle weakness greater than 6 months after onset of their skin disease (15 months to 6 years). For the sake of this discussion, such patients have been analyzed under the designation of "CADM --> CDM." Somewhat surprisingly, 36/291 (13%) of the identified published CADM patients developed interstitial lung disease. Incidental to our review, we also identified 10 published cases of individuals having DM skin disease and interstitial lung disease without muscle weakness, 7 of whom died from interstitial lung disease less than 6 months after onset of their DM skin disease (the term pre-myopathic DM coined by others has been used here to refer to such patients). In addition, an associated internal malignancy was found in 41/291 (14%) of the identified CADM cases. A positive antinuclear antibody was reported in 63% and myositis-specific autoantibodies (eg, Jo-1, Mi-2) in only 3.5% of the reported CADM patients in which such data were available.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this analysis suggests that the CADM subphenotype is more common than has been thought previously and that such patients may comprise a relatively high proportion of DM patients followed by dermatologists. Some CADM patients also have been observed to develop overt proximal muscle weakness years after onset of their DM skin disease. In addition, CADM patients appear to be at risk of developing the same potentially fatal disease associations/complications for which CDM patients are at risk (eg, interstitial lung disease and internal malignancy). Population-based studies of the epidemiology and optimal management of CADM patients, including efforts to identify risk factors associated with potentially fatal outcomes such as late-onset muscle weakness, interstitial lung disease, and malignancy, are needed. As an incidental finding to this literature review, we also identified a small number of reported cases of often-fatal interstitial lung disease occurring shortly after the onset of DM skin disease (< 6 months) in the complete absence of muscle weakness. This subphenotype, referred to as "pre-myopathic DM," is one with which dermatologists should be aware as early diagnosis and aggressive management can be lifesaving.

Lues and lupus: syphilis mimicking systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Malar rash and photosensitivity are common findings in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, a number of inflammatory, dermatologic, infectious or drug-induced conditions may mimic cutaneous findings of SLE. These typically include seborrheic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, rosacea, polymorphous light eruption, syphilis and dermatomyositis sine myositis. Herein we describe a patient with fever, malar rash, alopecia, photosensitivity, arthralgias and lymphadenopathy who was subsequently diagnosed with secondary syphilis. In this case report we review clinical and histopathological findings in the differential diagnosis of malar rash and photosensitivity and discuss the overlapping features of syphilis and SLE.

Amyopathic dermatomyositis

Amyopathic dermatomyositis is a variant of dermatomyositis that is characterized by the typical skin rash but without the muscle abnormalities. It has been proposed that the amyopathic and myopathic forms of dermatomyositis exist on a continuum, a concept that is supported by family and genetic studies and the observation that a small proportion of amyopathic patients transform to a frankly myopathic state. The amyopathic state is defined by a lack of muscle weakness and through diagnostic tests, including serum muscle enzymes, electromyogram studies, and muscle biopsies, that are usually normal or show only minimal abnormalities. Despite the lack of weakness, many patients complain of debilitating fatigue. More sensitive measures of muscle function, such as P-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy, suggest that muscle metabolism is abnormal in amyopathic patients. The amyopathic form is more commonly seen in adults than in children, although juvenile cases are reported. Some early series suggested no association with underlying malignancies, but recent reports indicate that malignancies occur. Determining whether a patient has amyopathic rather than myopathic disease may have prognostic implications.