The need for new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis

Insights into the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A paradigm in medicine

Insights into rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have slowly evolved over the last century, but with breathtaking speed over the last 2 decades. While only aspirin and parenteral gold were available in early 20th century, the efficacy of sulfasalazine, glucocorticoids and methotrexate was established around its middle. Identification of pathogenetic pathways was slow, and until today the role of T-cells is enigmatic, while it is clear that genetics via the shared epitope and other genes as well as environmental factors including the metagenome play major roles. More clarity evolved on importance of proinflammatory cytokines, especially TNF and IL-6. The activation of osteoclasts, the culprits of bony joint damage, is amplified by the proinflammatory cytokines. The realization of TNF's central role led to the successful introduction of TNF-inhibitors and subsequently also inhibitors of other cytokines and cells as well as signal transduction. In parallel, the evolution of outcomes research has contributed importantly to RA management. At the turn to the 21st century, improvement criteria and continuous indices were created, allowing reliable therapeutic response determination, including definition of endpoints like remission. Also our understanding of the role of disease activity relative to disease pathology has increased, ultimately fostering the treat-to-target concept and recommendations and, thus, optimal outcomes for RA patients as never been seen before. Similar developments are now ultimately being introduced in the field of psoriatic arthritis. Here many of these aspects are reviewed from a very personal perspective of the author in the hopes of further helping parients with chronic forms of arthritis.

Opportunities and challenges for the discovery and validation of proteomic biomarkers for common arthritic diseases

Osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are most prevalent among all the rheumatic diseases, and currently, there are no reliable biochemical measures for early diagnosis or for predicting who is likely to progress. Early diagnosis is important for making decisions on treatment options and for better management of patients. This narrative review highlights the first-generation biomarkers identified over the last two decades and focuses on the discovery and validation of candidate OA biomarkers from recent mass-spectrometry-based proteomic studies for diagnosis and monitoring disease outcomes in human. It discusses the challenges and opportunities for discovery of novel biomarkers and progress in the development of techniques for measuring biomarkers, and provides directions for future discovery and validation of biomarkers for OA and rheumatoid arthritis.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update

Recent insights in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) necessitated updating the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) RA management recommendations. A large international Task Force based decisions on evidence from 3 systematic literature reviews, developing 4 overarching principles and 12 recommendations (vs 3 and 14, respectively, in 2013). The recommendations address conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GC); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, clazakizumab, sarilumab and sirukumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib). Monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and the targets of sustained clinical remission (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology-(ACR)-EULAR Boolean or index criteria) or low disease activity are discussed. Cost aspects were taken into consideration. As first strategy, the Task Force recommends MTX (rapid escalation to 25 mg/week) plus short-term GC, aiming at >50% improvement within 3 and target attainment within 6 months. If this fails stratification is recommended. Without unfavourable prognostic markers, switching to-or adding-another csDMARDs (plus short-term GC) is suggested. In the presence of unfavourable prognostic markers (autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions, failure of 2 csDMARDs), any bDMARD (current practice) or Jak-inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD is recommended. If a patient is in sustained remission, bDMARDs can be tapered. For each recommendation, levels of evidence and Task Force agreement are provided, both mostly very high. These recommendations intend informing rheumatologists, patients, national rheumatology societies, hospital officials, social security agencies and regulators about EULAR's most recent consensus on the management of RA, aimed at attaining best outcomes with current therapies.

Biomarkers predicting a need for intensive treatment in patients with early arthritis

The heterogeneous nature of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) complicates early recognition and treatment. In recent years, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that intervention during the window of opportunity can improve the response to treatment and slow—or even stop—irreversible structural changes. Advances in therapy, such as biologic agents, and changing approaches to the disease, such as the treat to target and tight control strategies, have led to better outcomes resulting from personalized treatment to patients with different prognostic markers. The various biomarkers identified either facilitate early diagnosis or make it possible to adjust management to disease activity or poor outcomes. However, no single biomarker can bridge the gap between disease onset and prescription of the first DMARD, and traditional biomarkers do not identify all patients requiring early aggressive treatment. Furthermore, the outcomes of early arthritis cohorts are largely biased by the treatment prescribed to patients; therefore, new challenges arise in the search for prognostic biomarkers. Herein, we discuss the value of traditional and new biomarkers and suggest the need for intensive treatment as a new surrogate marker of poor prognosis that can guide therapeutic decisions in the early stages of RA.

Immune response profiling in early rheumatoid arthritis: discovery of a novel interaction of treatment response with viral immunity

INTRODUCTION

It remains challenging to predict the outcomes of therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to identify immune response signatures that correlate with clinical treatment outcomes in patients with RA.

METHODS

A cohort of 71 consecutive patients with early RA starting treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was recruited. Disease activity at baseline and after 21 to 24 weeks of follow-up was measured using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). Immune response profiling was performed by analyzing multi-cytokine production from peripheral blood cells following incubation with a panel of stimuli, including a mixture of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lysates. Profiles identified via principal components analysis (PCA) for each stimulus were then correlated with the ΔDAS28 from baseline to follow-up. A clinically meaningful improvement in the DAS28 was defined as a decrease of ≥1.2.

RESULTS

A profile of T-cell cytokines (IL-13, IL-4, IL-5, IL-2, IL-12, and IFN-γ) produced in response to CMV/EBV was found to correlate with the ΔDAS28 from baseline to follow-up. At baseline, a higher magnitude of the CMV/EBV immune response profile predicted inadequate DAS28 improvement (mean PCA-1 scores: 65.6 versus 50.2; P = 0.029). The baseline CMV/EBV response was particularly driven by IFN-γ (P = 0.039) and IL-4 (P = 0.027). Among patients who attained clinically meaningful DAS28 improvement, the CMV/EBV PCA-1 score increased from baseline to follow-up (mean +11.6, SD 25.5), whereas among patients who responded inadequately to DMARD therapy, the CMV/EBV PCA-1 score decreased (mean -12.8, SD 25.4; P = 0.002). Irrespective of the ΔDAS28, methotrexate use was associated with up-regulation of the CMV/EBV response. The CMV/EBV profile was associated with positive CMV IgG (P <0.001), but not EBV IgG (P = 0.32), suggesting this response was related to CMV exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

A profile of T-cell immunity associated with CMV exposure influences the clinical response to DMARD therapy in patients with early RA. Because CMV latency is associated with greater joint destruction, our findings suggest that changes in T-cell immunity mediated by viral persistence may affect treatment response and possibly long-term outcomes of RA.

Can rheumatoid arthritis be prevented?

The discovery of elevations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related biomarkers prior to the onset of clinically apparent RA raises hopes that individuals who are at risk of future RA can be identified in a preclinical phase of disease that is defined as abnormalities of RA-related immune activity prior to the clinically apparent onset of joint disease. Additionally, there is a growing understanding of the immunologic processes that are occurring in preclinical RA, as well as a growing understanding of risk factors that may be mechanistically related to RA development. Furthermore, there are data supporting that treatment of early RA can lead to drug-free remission. Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that it may be possible to use biomarkers and other factors to accurately identify the likelihood and timing of onset of future RA, and then intervene with immunomodulatory therapies and/or risk factor modification to prevent the future onset of RA in at-risk individuals. Importantly, several clinical prevention trials for RA have already been tried, and one is underway. However, while our growing understanding of the mechanisms and natural history of RA development may be leading us to the implementation of prevention strategies for RA, there are still several challenges to be met. These include developing sufficiently accurate methods of predicting those at high risk of future RA so that clinical trials can be developed based on accurate rates of development of arthritis and subjects can be adequately informed of their risk of disease, identifying the appropriate interventions and biologic targets for optimal prevention, and addressing the psychosocial and economic aspects that are crucial to developing broadly applicable prevention measures for RA. These issues notwithstanding, prevention of RA may be within reach in the near future.

Validation of a prediction rule for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with recent onset undifferentiated arthritis

Objectives. To validate van der Helm-van Mil score (vHvM) and new ACR/EULAR criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Patients and Methods. Adult patients with UA (swelling ≥2 joints of less than 6 months duration, without diagnosis, and never treated with disease modifying drugs). Results. Ninety-one patients were included. Mean age: 55.6 years (SD: 17.4), 74% females. Median symptoms duration was 2 months (IR: 1–4 months). Mean van der Helm-van Mil score was 6.9 (SD: 2). After a mean followup of 6.2 months (SD: 6), 40.7% patients fulfilled ACR 1987 RA classification criteria, 28.6% fulfilled other diagnostic criteria, and 31% remained as UA. Receiver operator characteristic curve's (ROC's) area under the curve (AUC) for the vHvM score for diagnosis of RA was 0.83. A cutoff value of 6.94 showed sensitivity of 81% and 79.7% specificity. For the new ACR/EULAR criteria, the ROC AUC was 0.93, and a value equal to or greater than 6 showed 86.5% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Conclusion. van der Helm-van Mil prediction score and the new ACR/EULAR criteria proved to be valuable for the diagnosis of RA in patients with early UA.

Treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis and prevention of rheumatoid arthritis

Data now suggest that current strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should focus on early identification and diagnosis, followed by early initiation of DMARD therapy. Initiation of treatment in early RA-ideally, less than 3-6 months after symptom onset-improves the success of achieving disease remission and reduces joint damage and disability. While the optimal treatment regimen in early RA is unclear, use of initial DMARD mono- or combination therapy with prompt escalation to achieve low disease activity or remission is an appropriate approach. Ultimately, the goal of RA management should be the prevention of inflammatory joint disease and, thereby, prevention of disability. To date, studies have shown that pharmacologic interventions can delay progression from undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis to classifiable RA. However, further investigation is needed to identify asymptomatic individuals at high risk for future RA and to intervene early enough in the pathogenesis of RA to prevent progression to clinical disease.

Felty's syndrome autoantibodies bind to deiminated histones and neutrophil extracellular chromatin traps

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that autoantigen modifications by peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PAD-4) increase immunoreactivity.

METHODS

We assembled sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Felty's syndrome (FS), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides (AAVs), as well as sera from control subjects without autoimmune diseases. The sera were tested for binding to activated neutrophils, deiminated histones, and neutrophil extracellular chromatin traps (NETs). IgG binding to lipopolysaccharide-activated neutrophils was assessed with confocal microscopy, and binding to in vitro-deiminated histones was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting. In addition, we quantitated histone deimination in freshly isolated neutrophils from the blood of patients and control subjects.

RESULTS

Increased IgG reactivity with activated neutrophils, particularly binding to NETs, was paralleled by preferential binding to deiminated histones over nondeiminated histones by ELISA in a majority of sera from FS patients but only in a minority of sera from SLE and RA patients. Immunoblotting revealed autoantibody preference for deiminated histones H3, H4, and H2A in most FS patients and in a subset of SLE and RA patients. In patients with AAVs, serum IgG preferentially bound nondeiminated histones over deiminated histones. Increased levels of deiminated histones were detected in neutrophils from RA patients.

CONCLUSION

Circulating autoantibodies in FS are preferentially directed against PAD-4-deiminated histones and bind to activated neutrophils and NETs. Thus, increased reactivity with modified autoantigens in FS implies a direct contribution of neutrophil activation and the production of NET-associated nuclear autoantigens in the initiation or progression of FS.

Preclinical rheumatoid arthritis: identification, evaluation, and future directions for investigation

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) likely develops in several phases, beginning with genetic risk, followed by asymptomatic autoimmunity, then finally, clinically apparent disease. Investigating the phases of disease that exist prior to the onset of symptoms (ie, the preclinical period of RA) will lead to understanding of the important relationships between genetic and environmental factors that may lead to disease, as well as allow for the development of predictive models for disease, and ultimately preventive strategies for RA.

MR imaging of early rheumatoid arthritis

Early diagnosis and treatment have been recognized as essential for improving clinical outcomes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. However, diagnosis is somewhat difficult in the early stages of the disease because the diagnostic criteria were developed from data obtained in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis and therefore are not readily applicable. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasingly being used in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis due to its capacity to help identify the key pathologic features of this disease entity at presentation. MR imaging has demonstrated greater sensitivity for the detection of synovitis and erosions than either clinical examination or conventional radiography and can help establish an early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. It also allows the detection of bone marrow edema, which is thought to be a precursor for the development of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis as well as a marker of active inflammation. In addition, MR imaging can help differentiate rheumatoid arthritis from some clinical subsets of peripheral spondyloarthropathies by allowing identification of inflammation at the insertions of ligaments and tendons (enthesitis).

Identification of undiagnosed inflammatory arthritis in a community health fair screen

OBJECTIVE

To identify individuals with undiagnosed inflammatory arthritis (IA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a community health fair screen, and to establish in a health fair setting the diagnostic accuracy of combinations of the Connective Tissue Disease Screening Questionnaire (CSQ) and autoantibody testing for IA.

METHODS

Screening for IA/RA was performed at health fair sites using a combination of the CSQ, joint examination, rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody testing. IA was defined as > or =1 swollen joint suggestive of synovitis on joint examination by a trained clinician.

RESULTS

Six hundred one subjects were screened; 51.0% participated because of joint symptoms (pain, stiffness, or swelling). Eighty-four subjects (14.0%) had > or =1 swollen joint, designated as IA on joint examination. Of the 601 subjects screened, 9 (1.5%) had IA and met > or =4 of 7 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA but had no prior diagnosis of RA, and 15 (2.5%) had IA and RF and/or anti-CCP positivity, suggesting early RA. The diagnostic accuracy of combinations of the CSQ and autoantibody testing for the identification of IA yielded maximal sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 95.3%, 99.2%, 71.4%, and 97.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Health fair screening may be an effective approach for the identification of individuals with undiagnosed IA/RA. A combination of the CSQ and autoantibody testing alone has clinically useful diagnostic accuracy for the detection of IA. Decisions regarding which methodology to use for future health fair IA/RA screening will depend on goals of screening and funding.

The use of data from early arthritis clinics for clinical research

Many early arthritis clinics have been started in the past decade. A major objective of these clinics is to improve our understanding of early arthritis in its undifferentiated form and to help provide guidance, recommendations, or criteria for diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making in patients with such presentation. Increasingly, they will allow aspects of pathogenesis - including autoantibodies and potential genetic markers - to be included in the set of clinical predictors that a rheumatologist is presented with. From an analytical perspective, usually logistic regression modelling is used to identify the best predictors of potentially long-lasting and/or erosive disease. Classification tree analysis might be another way to analyse data, and has the advantage that the results are easier to interpret than statistical parameters. In the past, many such projects have been published, none of which has achieved widespread use. Currently, the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism are in the process of defining new criteria for rheumatoid arthritis that will allow earlier diagnosis and treatment of patients and definition of patients with early disease for inclusion in clinical trials.

[Treating undifferentiated arthritis. What, when, how and how long?]

With the establishment of early arthritis clinics, patients can now be increasingly attended early in the course of their disease. This means that a significant proportion of these patients cannot be classified into a specific diagnosis using the traditional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. In these patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), even more important than assigning a diagnosis is the need to distinguish between patients who will develop a persistent and/or erosive disease and will be candidates for prompt treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), and patients in whom the disease is self limiting. Serologic markers in combination with clinical features at presentation, integrated into predictive models, are the tools currently available to the clinician for identifying these patients. Several studies have demonstrated the advantages of early treatment in UA.

Developments in the clinical understanding of rheumatoid arthritis

The changes occurring in the field of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the past decade or two have encompassed new therapies and, in particular, a new look at the clinical characteristics of the disease in the context of therapeutic improvements. It has been shown that composite disease activity indices have special merits in following patients, that disease activity governs the evolution of joint damage, and that disability can be dissected into several components--among them disease activity and joint damage. It has also been revealed that aiming at any disease activity state other than remission (or, at worst, low disease activity) is associated with significant progression of joint destruction, that early recognition and appropriate therapy of RA are important facets of the overall strategy of optimal clinical control of the disease, and that tight control employing composite scores supports the optimization of the therapeutic approaches. Finally, with the advent of novel therapies, remission has become a reality and the treatment algorithms encompassing all of the above-mentioned aspects will allow us to achieve the rigorous aspirations of today and tomorrow.

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is increasingly important as new therapies can halt the disease in its early stages. Antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) are widely used for RA diagnosis, but are not in the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria for RA Classification. We developed and tested the performance characteristics of new criteria for RA classification, incorporating anti-CCP.

METHODS

We identified all subjects seen in our arthritis centre with rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-CCP tested simultaneously between 1 January and 30 June 2004 and reviewed their medical records for the ACR criteria, rheumatologists' diagnoses, RF and anti-CCP. We revised the ACR criteria in two ways: (a) adding anti-CCP, and (b) replacing rheumatoid nodules and erosions with anti-CCP (CCP 6 criteria). We compared sensitivity and specificity of all criteria, in all subjects and in subjects with arthritis symptoms </=6 months.

RESULTS

Medical records of 292 subjects were analysed: mean age was 54 years, 82% were women, and mean symptom duration was 4.1 years. 17% were RF positive and 14% were anti-CCP positive at initial testing. 78 (27%) had definite RA per treating rheumatologist at latest follow-up. The CCP 6 criteria increased sensitivity for RA classification for all subjects regardless of symptom duration: 74% vs 51% for ACR criteria with a loss in specificity (81% vs 91%). Sensitivity was greatly improved in subjects with symptoms < or =6 months: 25% vs 63% for ACR criteria with a decrease in specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCP 6 criteria improved upon the sensitivity of the ACR criteria, most remarkably for subjects with symptoms < or =6 months and could be used for the classification of subjects for RA in clinical studies.

Early rheumatoid arthritis in Italy: study of incidence based on a two-level strategy in a sub-area of Florence (Scandicci-Le Signe)

The concept of Early Arthritis represents a new diagnostic-therapeutic strategy in modern rheumatology. Even if many Early Arthritis clinics are starting up, we do not yet know the frequency of this pathology in the Italian population. With the collaboration of 20 general practictioners (GPs) operating in the municipalities of Scandicci, Lastra a Signa and Signa, we assessed the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis and of new cases of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (ERA) in the period from 1.09.2005 to 31.08.2006. The general population over 18 years old in the three municipalities according to the political electoral lists in April 2006 was as follows: Scandicci 42,474 (Males 20,290; Females 22,184), Lastra a Signa 15,368 (M 7,458; F 7,910) and Signa 13,372 (M 6,439; F 6,933). The total number of patients followed by the 20 GPs was 32,521 according to the records of ASL10 Florence. In one year 920 patients were referred by their GPs to a rheumatologist with suspected early undifferentiated arthritis according to Emery's criteria. The patients underwent a rheumatological examination and the rheumatoid factor IgM, hidden rheumatoid factors (IgG and IgA) and IgG antibodies anti-CCP (anti-cyclic citrullinate peptides) with a semiquantitative immuno-enzymatic test ELISA were investigated. In one year we observed 32 new cases of Rheumatoid Arthritis, of which 8 were males and 24 were females. The rate of incidence with respective intervals of confidence of 95% was 0.98 per thousand (0.64-1.32 per thousand). The average age was 47.7 +/- 10.5 in the females and 54.9 +/- 10.3 in the males. The patients had an average history of illness in months of 5.2 +/- 1.3 F versus 4.6 +/- 1.1 M, number of tender joints 6.2 +/- 2.3 F versus 5.3 +/- 2.2 M, number of swollen joints 4.8 +/- 1.4 F versus 4.2 +/- 1.5 M, a global assessment of 64.3 +/- 10 F versus 53 +/- 12 M, ESR (mm/h) 49.2 +/- 11.3 F versus 43.3 +/- 12.5 M, CRP (mg/dl) 2.8 +/- 1.3 F versus 2.3 +/- 1.4 M, DAS28 5.55 +/- 1.2 F versus 5.19 +/- 1.3 M, HAQ 2.5 +/- 0.4 F, 2.2 +/- 0.3 M. The rates of incidence in the Italian population affected by early rheumatoid arthritis are higher than those found in some European populations, such as those of the UK and Finland, but less than those found in the population of USA. The different data reported in the literature seem to be due to the different methods of assessing ERA and to the different types of samples studied.

The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: a medical overview

As part of the investigation into the burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the access to treatment, this article reviews the medical aspects of the disease. RA is mediated by a variety of pathogenic events which culminate in the activation of B-cells, T-cells and other cell populations and lead to secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. These events result in signs and symptoms of active disease, such as pain and swelling, joint damage and disability, the three cornerstones of the clinical expression of RA. Active disease leads to joint damage and both to disability, whereby joint destruction is associated with the irreversible portion of disability. The diagnosis of RA is based on characteristic clinical and laboratory features, however, these may not be obvious in early disease. Therapy aims at interfering with disease activity, ideally leading to remission, as well as at retarding, ideally holding or even healing, joint destruction. This can be achieved by using disease modifying anirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Among the chemical DMARDs, methotrexate is the anchor drug, although there exist many more such agents. Among the biological compounds, TNF-inhibitors have been in use for more than one decade, and co-stimulation blockade and B-cell targeted therapy have been recent additions to the armamentarium. Therapeutic outcome can be predicted by clinical means.

Research in hand osteoarthritis: time for reappraisal and demand for new strategies. An opinion paper

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis of the hands is a prevalent musculoskeletal disease with a considerable effect on patients' lives, but knowledge and research results in the field of hand osteoarthritis are limited. Therefore, the Disease Characteristics in Hand OA (DICHOA) initiative was founded in early 2005 with the aim of addressing key issues and facilitating research into hand osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To review and discuss current knowledge on hand osteoarthritis with regard to aetiopathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, biomarkers and clinical outcome measures.

METHODS

Recommendations were made based on a literature review.

RESULTS

Outcomes of hand osteoarthritis should be explored, including patient perspective on the separate components of disease activity, damage and functioning. All imaging techniques should be cross-validated for hand osteoarthritis with clinical status, including disease activity, function and performance, biomarkers and long-term outcome. New imaging modalities are available and need scoring systems and validation. The role of biomarkers in hand osteoarthritis has to be defined.

CONCLUSION

Future research in hand osteoarthritis is warranted.

Diagnostic impact of contemporary biomarker assays for rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The impetus towards early treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires more reliable disease markers than the non-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) rheumatoid factor (RF). To determine the accuracy of newer biomarkers for RA testing for antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP Ab), IgA- and IgG-RF and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) levels, measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were compared with IgM-RF isotyping.

METHODS

Serum samples were investigated in patients with an established diagnosis of RA (n = 54), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (n = 36), and non-inflammatory conditions (n = 18) (cohort A), and in 234 consecutive outpatients in a blinded fashion (cohort B). Non-parametric analysis of areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristics were performed.

RESULTS

The presence of anti-CCP Ab had the highest accuracy (96%) in distinguishing RA patients in cohort A and cohort B (accuracy 83%), and in both cohorts combined (accuracy 87%). This was related to the high specificity of anti-CCP Ab for RA (95-96%), even though IgM-RF was the most sensitive test (87-96%). Sensitivity (15-48%) and specificity (66-69%) of COMP as a marker for RA was low. Combining results of anti-CCP Ab and IgM-RF or any of the other assays did not increase the diagnostic accuracy for RA.

CONCLUSION

The presence of anti-CCP Ab is the most accurate biomarker for RA in both selected and unselected cohorts, while the COMP assay is not very useful in RA diagnosis. Combining assays for anti-CCP Ab and IgM-RF or IgA-RF does not enhance RA diagnosis.

A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: how to guide individual treatment decisions

OBJECTIVE

In patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), methotrexate is effective for inhibiting symptoms, structural damage, and progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, 40-50% of patients with UA experience spontaneous remission. Thus, adequate decision-making regarding treatment of patients with early UA requires identification of those patients in whom RA will develop.

METHODS

A prediction rule was developed using data from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic, an inception cohort of patients with recent-onset arthritis (n = 1,700). The patients who presented with UA were selected (n = 570), and progression to RA or another diagnosis in this group was monitored for 1 year of followup. The clinical characteristics with independent predictive value for the development of RA were selected using logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of the prediction rule was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). Cross-validation controlled for overfitting of the data (internal validation). An independent cohort of patients with UA was used for external validation.

RESULTS

The prediction rule consisted of 9 clinical variables: sex, age, localization of symptoms, morning stiffness, the tender joint count, the swollen joint count, the C-reactive protein level, rheumatoid factor positivity, and the presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. Each prediction score varied from 0 to 14 and corresponded to the percent chance of RA developing. For several cutoff values, the positive and negative predictive values were determined. The AUC values for the prediction rule, the prediction model after cross-validation, and the external validation cohort were 0.89, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients who present with UA, the risk of developing RA can be predicted, thereby allowing individualized decisions regarding the initiation of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in such patients.

Formative research in clinical trial development: attitudes of patients with arthritis in enhancing prevention trials

In preparation for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA), formative research was conducted to enhance the design of such trials. The objectives of this research were to (1) determine patients' educational needs as they relate to the necessary elements of informed consent; and (2) assess patients' interest in enrolling in a hypothetical prevention trial. In-depth interviews were conducted with nine patients. Seven patients were women and all but one white. The mean age was 48 years. During the 4-month enrolment period, only three patients with EIA were identified; six patients with longer duration of symptoms were also interviewed. Most patients were able to express the primary aim of a hypothetical prevention trial presented. Factors cited by patients favouring enrolment were potential for direct medical benefit and knowledge that they would be withdrawn from the trial if they developed symptoms. Factors cited by patients against enrolment were the inclusion of a placebo and general uncertainty regarding treatment required by the RCT design. Pending larger-scale empirical projects to explore patients' attitudes about prevention trials, small-scale formative research in advance of such trials ought to be conducted.

Early rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides novel and updated information on pathogenesis, referral, and clinical characteristics as well as therapeutic approaches in early rheumatoid arthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early referral is important, but new classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis need to be elaborated. Predictive markers for rheumatoid arthritis are still confined to autoantibodies; respective algorithms have been presented. Other biomarkers will still have to prove their usefulness. Magnetic resonance imaging and sonography do not appear to sufficiently distinguish between early rheumatoid and nonrheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis has become milder at presentation in recent years. In its very early stages, the cytokine profile reflects T-cell activation and switches to abundant proinflammatory cytokines thereafter. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs plus glucocorticoids are highly effective, as is early use of tumor necrosis factor blockers plus methotrexate. Tight control of disease activity and subsequent therapeutic adjustments are highly effective. Disease activity indices that are simple to calculate have been presented and validated. Early intensive therapy may lead to decrease in disability and cost reduction in rheumatoid arthritis.

SUMMARY

Understanding of early arthritis is increasing, especially in prognostic and therapeutic respects, and new treatment strategies appear to improve the outcome in patients with early arthritis. Nevertheless, much remains to be studied to better address the issue of early rheumatoid arthritis.

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has changed dramatically in the past decade as advancements in the understanding of the pathobiology of the disease have led to novel therapeutic agents. The recognition that early diagnosis and treatment leads to improvements in morbidity and mortality has altered the therapeutic strategy such that early therapy is now considered the standard of care. This review focuses on the challenges in making the diagnosis of early RA, including a broad differential diagnosis for inflammatory polyarthritis, poor performance of the standard classification criteria, difficulty in clinical assessment of synovitis, absence of absolute laboratory tests, inability of conventional radiography to detect bony changes early, and barriers to rheumatology care. Additionally, the pathogenesis of RA is highlighted, with particular emphasis on cytokine biology as it relates to therapeutic regimens. Relevant clinical trials in early RA are reviewed and discussed, including trials of combination disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological therapy. The role of induction therapy as a novel therapeutic approach is highlighted. The search for predictors of response is reviewed and the external validity of the trials is analysed. Finally, the trials in early RA therapy suggest that swift intervention with combinations of medications is required for patients with severe RA. However, further research is needed to determine which regimen is appropriate for the individual patient with RA.