Cyst-like lesions in finger joints detected by conventional radiography: comparison with 320-row multidetector computed tomography

Evaluation of Ultra-High-Resolution Cone-Beam CT Prototype of Twin Robotic Radiography System for Cadaveric Wrist Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) applications possess potential for dose reduction in musculoskeletal imaging. This study evaluates the ultra-high-resolution CBCT prototype of a twin robotic X-ray system in wrist examinations compared to high-resolution multidetector CT (MDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen wrists of body donors were examined with the CBCT scan mode and a 384 slice MDCT system. Radiation-equivalent low-dose (CTDI_vol(16cm)  = 3.3 mGy) and full-dose protocols (CTDI_vol(16cm)  = 13.8 mGy) were used for both systems. Two observers assessed image quality on a seven-point Likert scale. In addition, software-assisted quantification of signal intensity fractions in cancellous bone was performed. Fewer pixels with intermediate signal intensity were considered to indicate superior depiction of bone microarchitecture.

RESULTS

Subjective image quality in CBCT was superior to dose equivalent MDCT with p ≤ 0.03 for full-dose and p < 0.001 for low-dose scans, respectively. Median Likert values were 7/7 (reader 1 / reader 2) in full-dose CBCT, 6/6 in full-dose MDCT, 5/6 in low-dose CBCT and 3/3 in low-dose MDCT. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.936 (95% confidence interval, 0.897-0.961; p < 0.001), indicating excellent reliability. Objective analysis displayed smaller fractions of "indecisive" pixels with intermediate signal intensity for full-dose CBCT (0.57 [interquartile range 0.13]) compared to full-dose MDCT (0.68 [0.21]), low-dose CBCT (0.72 [0.19]), and low-dose MDCT (0.80 [0.15]) studies. No significant difference was observed between low-dose CBCT and full-dose MDCT.

CONCLUSION

The new CBCT prototype provides superior image quality for trabecula and bone marrow in cadaveric wrist studies and enables dose reduction up to 75% compared to high-resolution MDCT.

Perfusion in hand arthritis on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a randomized prospective study using MRI as a standard of reference

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) in detecting and quantitatively assessing perfusion parameters in patients with arthritis of the hand compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as a standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved randomized prospective single-centre study, 36 consecutive patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis underwent DCE-CT (320-row, tube voltage 80 kVp, tube current 8.25 mAs) and DCE-MRI (1.5 T) of the hand. Perfusion maps were calculated separately for mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP), relative blood volume (rBV), and relative blood flow (rBF) using four different decomposition techniques. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed in metacarpophalangeal joints II-V and in the wrist. Pairs of perfusion parameters in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI were compared using a two-tailed t test for paired samples and interpreted for effect size (Cohen's d). According to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS) scoring results, differentiation of synovitis-positive and synovitis-negative joints with both modalities was assessed with the independent t test.

RESULTS

The two modalities yielded similar perfusion parameters. Identified differences had small effects (d 0.01-0.4). DCE-CT additionally differentiates inflamed and noninflamed joints based on rBF and rBV but tends to underestimate these parameters in severe inflammation. The total dose-length product (DLP) was 48 mGy*cm with an estimated effective dose of 0.038 mSv.

CONCLUSION

DCE-CT is a promising imaging technique in arthritis. In patients with a contraindication to MRI or when MRI is not available, DCE-CT is a suitable alternative to detect and assess arthritis.

[Imaging modalities in psoriatic arthritis]

This review presents an overview of the range of imaging modalities used in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Conventional radiography is used to detect structural changes of the joints and tendon attachments. These changes occur late in the course of PsA hence conventional radiography contributes little to the early detection of PsA; however, the detection of periosteal proliferations on radiographs allows a relatively specific diagnosis of PsA. Skeletal scintigraphy and computed tomography are rarely used in PsA. Arthrosonography (ultrasound of the joints) is gaining increasing importance in the early identification of inflammatory soft tissue signs of PsA in the peripheral joints. Sonography enables early detection of synovitis and tenosynovitis as well as superficial erosions and also inflammatory processes of the tendon attachments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indispensable for identifying possible involvement of the axial skeleton. Moreover, it allows good visualization of periostitis and arthritis. High resolution microcomputed tomography is an interesting novel diagnostic tool which allows highly sensitive evaluation of the bone structure and can detect very tiny bone lesions where typical signs of PsA are omega-shaped erosions and small corona-like spikes. Another interesting new diagnostic technique is fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) with the Xiralite system which is highly sensitive for detecting inflammatory processes of the hands.