Clinical Images: Osteoblastoma of the Ilium Mimicking Sacroiliitis

Surgical treatment scenario for osteoblastoma of the pelvis: Long-term follow-up results

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of different treatments for pelvic Osteoblastoma (OB).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients affected by primary pelvic OB from 3 oncologic referral centers. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. Local recurrence (LR) rate and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The primary treatment was radio-frequency ablation (RFA) in 4 patients (11.8%), curettage (ILC) in 21 (61.7%) and resection (EBR) in 9 (26.5%). Mean follow-up was 8.9 years (SD ± 6.6). Local recurrence free survival (LRFS) rate after primary surgery was 79.4% at 3 and 5 years. In details, LRFS rate at 3 and 5 years was 50.0% in RFA, 81.0% in ILC and 88.9% in EBR. Post-operative complications occurred in 6/34 patients (17.7%), in particular after EBR.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is the least invasive technique to treat OB but with high LR rate. Thus, it should be reserved to very small lesions. ILC is a suitable treatment for stage II OB. For stage III OB, EBR is the treatment of choice, despite an increased risk of complications. For selected stage III OB (relatively small, periacetabular area) ILC might be considered.

Osteoporosis in Rheumatic Diseases

The risk of osteoporosis and fragility fracture is increased in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Although the use of glucocorticoids is the major contributing factor, inflammation mediated by cytokines and growth factors and other medications, including the biologic and targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, also play important roles in bone remodeling. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF[Formula: see text] increase RANK expression and promote osteoclast activity while inhibiting osteoblast-mediated bone formation through the Dickkopf-1 pathway. Certain autoantibodies stimulate differentiation of the osteoclasts, resulting in localized bone resorption. This article covers the prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in patients with common rheumatic diseases and the role of inflammatory cytokines and other clinical factors. Controlling disease-related inflammation and optimizing the diagnostic and therapeutic instrumentation is needed to reduce fragility fractures in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore how imaging may assist diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis in rheumatology practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

A diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis is based on pattern recognition by synthesizing clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. In health care settings providing low threshold access to advanced imaging, sacroiliac joint MRI is the preferred imaging modality in clinically suspected axial spondyloarthritis. In daily routine, the optimum protocol to assess suspected inflammatory back pain combines sacroiliac joint and spine MRI fitting a 30-min slot. Contextual assessment of concomitant structural and active MRI lesions is key to enhance diagnostic utility. In women with postpartum back pain suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis, recent reports advocate waiting 6-12 months after delivery before acquiring sacroiliac joint MRI. Major unmet needs are consistent MRI protocols, standardized training modules on how to evaluate axial MRI, and timely dissemination of imaging advances into mainstream practice both in rheumatology and in radiology. In rheumatology practice, MRI has become indispensable to help diagnose early axial spondyloarthritis. However, major gaps in training and knowledge transfer to daily care need to be closed.

Incidence and risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus versus matched controls

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite recent improvements in the quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoporosis, and osteoporotic fractures are one of the major complications of SLE. Furthermore, limited data are available on the incidence and predictor of osteoporotic fractures in Korean patients with SLE. Herein, we aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in Korean SLE patients compared to those without SLE.

METHODS

SLE patients aged ≥ 40 years (n = 10,434; mean age, 51.3 ± 9.1 years; women, 89.7%) were selected from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, spanning a period from 2008 to 2014. Age- and sex-matched controls (n = 52,170) were randomly sampled in a 5:1 ratio from non-SLE individuals. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of osteoporotic fracture.

RESULTS

The incidence of osteoporotic fractures was significantly higher in the SLE patients (19.085 per 1,000 person-years) than in matched controls (6.530 per 1,000 person-years). According to the multivariable Cox proportional analysis, patients with SLE exhibited a higher osteoporotic fracture rate than the control group (hazards ratio, 2.964; 95% confidence interval, 2.754 to 3.188), even after adjustment for confounding variables. In the subgroup analysis, male SLE patients or SLE patients aged 40 to 65 years were associated with a higher osteoporotic fracture rate than women SLE patients or SLE patients aged ≥ 65 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found a 2.964-fold increased risk of osteoporotic fracture in SLE patients compared to age- and sex-matched non-SLE controls. Male or middle-aged SLE patients had a relatively higher fracture risk among patients with SLE.

Incidence of and risk factors for non-vertebral and vertebral fracture in female Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a five-year cohort study

Objective

The objective of this paper is to investigate the incidence of both non-vertebral and vertebral fracture in female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to identify risk factors for incident fracture.

Methods

In a five-year prospective study of 127 female Chinese SLE patients with an average age of 46.9 years (SD: 10.1 years), information on potential risk factors, including demographics, clinical data and bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and hip by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was collected at baseline. At follow-up, participants reported incident non-vertebral fracture during the study period. Semi-quantitative analysis was used to determine incident vertebral fracture on lateral thoracic and lumbar radiographs, defined as any vertebral body graded normal at baseline and at least mildly deformed (20%–25% reduction or more in any vertebral height) at follow-up.

Results

Nine incident non-vertebral fractures occurred in eight patients during the study period. Six patients had one or more incident vertebral fractures. The incidence of non-vertebral and vertebral fracture was 1.26 and 0.94 per 100 patient-years, respectively. In multivariate logistic analyses, independent variables associated with incident non-vertebral fracture were duration of glucocorticoid use and prevalent lumbar spine osteoporosis, while risk factors associated with incident vertebral fracture were higher organ damage and prevalent lumbar spine osteoporosis.

Conclusions

The incidence of fracture in SLE patients is lower than the prevalence reported in cross-sectional studies. Lumbar spine BMD appears to have a stronger relationship with incident fracture than hip BMD. This warrants further investigation regarding the optimal site of BMD measurement when predicting fracture risk in SLE patients.