1
|
Rekvig OP. The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1346619. [PMID: 38361929 PMCID: PMC10867267 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1346619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The basic initiative related to this study is derived from the fact that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a unique and fertile system science subject. We are, however, still far from understanding its nature. It may be fair to indicate that we are spending more time and resources on studying the complexity of classified SLE than studying the validity of classification criteria. This study represents a theoretical analysis of current instinctual SLE classification criteria based on "the causality principle." The discussion has its basis on the radical scientific traditions introduced by Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. They announced significant changes in our thinking of disease etiology through the implementation of the modern version of "the causality principle." They influenced all aspects of today's medical concepts and research: the transformation of medical science from studies of symptoms to study their causes, relevant for monosymptomatic diseases as for syndromes. Their studies focused on bacteria as causes of infectious diseases and on how the immune system adapts to control and prevent contagious spreading. This is the most significant paradigm shift in the modern history of medicine and resulted in radical changes in our view of the immune system. They described acquired post-infection immunity and active immunization by antigen-specific vaccines. The paradigm "transformation" has a great theoretical impact also on current studies of autoimmune diseases like SLE: symptoms and their cause(s). In this study, the evolution of SLE classification and diagnostic criteria is discussed from "the causality principle" perspective, and if contemporary SLE classification criteria are as useful as believed today for SLE research. This skepticism is based on the fact that classification criteria are not selected based on cogent causal strategies. The SLE classification criteria do not harmonize with Koch's and Pasteur's causality principle paradigms and not with Witebsky's Koch-derived postulates for autoimmune and infectious diseases. It is not established whether the classification criteria can separate SLE as a "one disease entity" from "SLE-like non-SLE disorders"-the latter in terms of SLE imitations. This is discussed here in terms of weight, rank, and impact of the classification criteria: Do they all originate from "one basic causal etiology"? Probably not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Petter Rekvig
- Section for Autoimmunity, Fürst Medical Laboratory, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Novikova TS, Ermakov EA, Kostina EV, Sinyakov AN, Sizikov AE, Nevinsky GA, Buneva VN. Hydrolysis of Oligodeoxyribonucleotides on the Microarray Surface and in Solution by Catalytic Anti-DNA Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45:9887-9903. [PMID: 38132463 PMCID: PMC10742339 DOI: 10.3390/cimb45120617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-DNA antibodies are known to be classical serological hallmarks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In addition to high-affinity antibodies, the autoantibody pool also contains natural catalytic anti-DNA antibodies that recognize and hydrolyze DNA. However, the specificity of such antibodies is uncertain. In addition, DNA binding to a surface such as the cell membrane, can also affect its recognition by antibodies. Here, we analyzed the hydrolysis of short oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs) immobilized on the microarray surface and in solution by catalytic anti-DNA antibodies from SLE patients. It has been shown that IgG antibodies from SLE patients hydrolyze ODNs more effectively both in solution and on the surface, compared to IgG from healthy individuals. The data obtained indicate a more efficient hydrolysis of ODNs in solution than immobilized ODNs on the surface. In addition, differences in the specificity of recognition and hydrolysis of certain ODNs by anti-DNA antibodies were revealed, indicating the formation of autoantibodies to specific DNA motifs in SLE. The data obtained expand our understanding of the role of anti-DNA antibodies in SLE. Differences in the recognition and hydrolysis of surface-tethered and dissolved ODNs need to be considered in DNA microarray applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana S. Novikova
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Evgeny A. Ermakov
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Elena V. Kostina
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Alexander N. Sinyakov
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Alexey E. Sizikov
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
- Institute of Clinical Immunology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630099 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Georgy A. Nevinsky
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Valentina N. Buneva
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Mughales JA. Anti-Nuclear Antibodies Patterns in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Correlation With Other Diagnostic Immunological Parameters. Front Immunol 2022; 13:850759. [PMID: 35359932 PMCID: PMC8964090 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.850759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are major immunodiagnostic tools in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, their clinical and pathogenic roles are not yet elucidated and are a subject of controversy. Objectives The aim of the study is to explore the pathogenic significance of ANA patterns among SLE patients, by analyzing their association with ANA titers, complement levels and other pathogenic immune markers, namely, anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), complements C3 and C4, rheumatoid factor (RF), anticardiolipin antibodies IgG (ACL IgG) and IgM (ACL IgM), Beta-2 Glycoprotein 1 Antibodies (β2-GP) IgG (β2-IgM) and IgM (β2-IgM), and lupus anticoagulant (LA). Method A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 495 SLE patients, who were diagnosed and classified by consultant rheumatologists according to the new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 criteria. SLE immunodiagnostic profiles were analyzed including the following parameters: ANA antibody titers and staining patterns, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 levels, aCL, and anti-β2-GP and LA. Result The most frequently observed ANA patterns were the speckled (52.1%) and homogeneous (35.2%) patterns, while other patterns were rare representing less than 7% of the patients each. ANA titers were highest in patients with mixed pattern followed by the speckled pattern. Of all the investigated patterns, the peripheral pattern showed the most pathogenic immune profile, namely, highest levels of anti-dsDNA, lowest levels of C4, and highest levels of aCL and β2-GP IgG and IgM. Conclusion This retrospective study showed that speckled followed by homogeneous ANA patterns were predominant accounting for 52.1 and 35.2% of the patients. The ANA pattern showed several associations with other immune markers that are documented to have significant clinical implications in SLE. Peripheral, mixed, and speckled patterns were associated with higher profiles of immune markers indicative of a potential prognostic value of these patterns in SLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamil A. Al-Mughales
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Diagnostic Immunology Division, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Disease criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); the potential role of non-criteria autoantibodies. J Transl Autoimmun 2022; 5:100143. [PMID: 35072035 PMCID: PMC8761754 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with SLE show a broad spectrum of more than 200 autoantibodies. They can be pathogenic, predictive, prognostic or even an epiphenomenon. Here, we discuss different autoantibodies that have not been included in EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria. Most of them have been addressed to monitor and detect disease activity and not specifically as classification criteria. Indeed, markers to assess disease activity fluctuate as compared with classification criteria and their validation is different. The development of new methods will probably bring new clinical associations and be evaluated as potential classification criteria. Most of the autoantibodies described in SLE are of utility in monitoring disease activity. The validation of activity biomarkers is different from classification criteria biomarkers. The new methods coming into the clinical routine will bring new associations and potentially classification criteria.
Collapse
|
5
|
Angeletti A, Volpi S, Bruschi M, Lugani F, Vaglio A, Prunotto M, Gattorno M, Schena F, Verrina E, Ravelli A, Ghiggeri GM. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps-DNase Balance and Autoimmunity. Cells 2021; 10:cells10102667. [PMID: 34685647 PMCID: PMC8534732 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are macromolecular structures programmed to trap circulating bacteria and viruses. The accumulation of NETs in the circulation correlates with the formation of anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA antibodies and is considered a causative factor for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The digestion of DNA by DNase1 and DNases1L3 is the rate- limiting factor for NET accumulation. Mutations occurring in one of these two DNase genes determine anti-DNA formation and are associated with severe Lupus-like syndromes and lupus nephritis (LN). A second mechanism that may lead to DNase functional impairment is the presence of circulating DNase inhibitors in patients with low DNase activity, or the generation of anti-DNase antibodies. This phenomenon has been described in a relevant number of patients with SLE and may represent an important mechanism determining autoimmunity flares. On the basis of the reviewed studies, it is tempting to suppose that the blockade or selective depletion of anti-DNase autoantibodies could represent a potential novel therapeutic approach to prevent or halt SLE and LN. In general, strategies aimed at reducing NET formation might have a similar impact on the progression of SLE and LN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Angeletti
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (A.A.); (E.V.)
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.)
| | - Stefano Volpi
- Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases and Immunodeficiencies, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (S.V.); (M.G.); (F.S.); (A.R.)
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno Infantili, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bruschi
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.)
| | - Francesca Lugani
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.)
| | - Augusto Vaglio
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Marco Prunotto
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Marco Gattorno
- Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases and Immunodeficiencies, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (S.V.); (M.G.); (F.S.); (A.R.)
- Clinics of Pediatrics and Rheumatology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Schena
- Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases and Immunodeficiencies, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (S.V.); (M.G.); (F.S.); (A.R.)
| | - Enrico Verrina
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (A.A.); (E.V.)
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.)
| | - Angelo Ravelli
- Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases and Immunodeficiencies, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (S.V.); (M.G.); (F.S.); (A.R.)
| | - Gian Marco Ghiggeri
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (A.A.); (E.V.)
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, GenoaLargo Gaslini, 16148 Genoa, Italy; (M.B.); (F.L.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
González LA, Ugarte-Gil MF, Alarcón GS. Systemic lupus erythematosus: The search for the ideal biomarker. Lupus 2020; 30:181-203. [PMID: 33307987 DOI: 10.1177/0961203320979051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
During the last decades, there has been an increased interest in the discovery and validation of biomarkers that reliably reflect specific aspects of lupus. Although many biomarkers have been developed, few of them have been validated and used in clinical practice, but with unsatisfactory performances. Thus, there is still a need to rigorously validate many of these novel promising biomarkers in large-scale longitudinal studies and also identify better biomarkers not only for lupus diagnosis but also for monitoring and predicting upcoming flares and response to treatment. Besides serological biomarkers, urinary and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers have emerged for assessing both renal and central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus, respectively. Also, novel omics techniques help us to understand the molecular basis of the disease and also allow the identification of novel biomarkers which may be potentially useful for guiding new therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Alonso González
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Hospital Universitario de San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Perú.,School of Medicine, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú
| | - Graciela S Alarcón
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pisetsky DS, Lipsky PE. New insights into the role of antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 16:565-579. [PMID: 32884126 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-020-0480-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic autoimmune disease characterized by antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) that form immune complexes that mediate pathogenesis by tissue deposition or cytokine induction. Some ANAs bind DNA or associated nucleosome proteins, whereas other ANAs bind protein components of complexes of RNA and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Levels of anti-DNA antibodies can fluctuate widely, unlike those of anti-RBP antibodies, which tend to be stable. Because anti-DNA antibody levels can reflect disease activity, repeat testing is common; by contrast, a single anti-RBP antibody determination is thought to suffice for clinical purposes. Experience from clinical trials of novel therapies has provided a new perspective on ANA expression during disease, as many patients with SLE are ANA negative at screening despite previously testing positive. Because trial results suggest that patients who are ANA negative might not respond to certain agents, screening strategies now involve ANA and anti-DNA antibody testing to identify patients with so-called 'active, autoantibody-positive SLE'. Evidence suggests that ANA responses can decrease over time because of the natural history of disease or the effects of therapy. Together, these findings suggest that, during established disease, more regular serological testing could illuminate changes relevant to pathogenesis and disease status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Pisetsky
- Departments of Medicine and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center and Medical Research Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang TY, Wang YF, Zhang Y, Shen JJ, Guo M, Yang J, Lau YL, Yang W. Identification of Regulatory Modules That Stratify Lupus Disease Mechanism through Integrating Multi-Omics Data. MOLECULAR THERAPY. NUCLEIC ACIDS 2019; 19:318-329. [PMID: 31877408 PMCID: PMC6938958 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Although recent advances in genetic studies have shed light on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), its detailed mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, using datasets on SLE transcriptomic profiles, we identified 750 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in T and B lymphocytes and peripheral blood cells. Using transcription factor (TF) binding data derived from chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project, we inferred networks of co-regulated genes (NcRGs) based on binding profiles of the upregulated DEGs by significantly enriched TFs. Modularization analysis of NcRGs identified co-regulatory modules among the DEGs and master TFs vital for each module. Remarkably, the co-regulatory modules stratified the common SLE interferon (IFN) signature and revealed SLE pathogenesis pathways, including the complement cascade, cell cycle regulation, NETosis, and epigenetic regulation. By integrative analyses of disease-associated genes (DAGs), DEGs, and enriched TFs, as well as proteins interacting with them, we identified a hierarchical regulatory cascade with TFs regulated by DAGs, which in turn regulates gene expression. Integrative analysis of multi-omics data provided valuable molecular insights into the molecular mechanisms of SLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-You Wang
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Yong-Fei Wang
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Jiangshan Jane Shen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Collaborative Innovation Center for Birth Defect Research and Transformation of Shandong Province, Jining Medical University, Jining, China; Lupus Research Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China
| | - Mengbiao Guo
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Yu Lung Lau
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| | - Wanling Yang
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghiggeri GM, D’Alessandro M, Bartolomeo D, Degl’Innocenti ML, Magnasco A, Lugani F, Prunotto M, Bruschi M. An Update on Antibodies to Necleosome Components as Biomarkers of Sistemic Lupus Erythematosus and of Lupus Flares. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20225799. [PMID: 31752186 PMCID: PMC6888059 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with variable clinical expression. It is a potentially devastating condition affecting mostly women and leading to clinically unpredictable outcomes. Remission and flares may, in fact, alternate over time and a mild involvement limited to few articular sites may be followed by severe and widespread organ damage. SLE is the prototype of any autoimmune condition and has, for this reason, attracted the interest of basic immunologists. Therapies have evolved over time and clinical prognosis has, in parallel, been improved. What clinicians still lack is the possibility to use biomarkers of the disease as predictors of outcome and, in this area, several studies are trying to find solutions. Circulating autoantibodies are clearly a milestone of clinical research and the concrete possibility is to integrate, in the future, classical markers of activation (like C3) with target organ autoantibodies. Anti-dsDNA antibodies represent a basic point in any predictive attempt in SLE and should be considered the benchmark for any innovative proposal in the wide field of target organ pathologies related to SLE. DNA is part of the nucleosome that is the basic unit of chromatin. It consists of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer made of 2 copies each of Histone 2A, 2B, 3, and 4. The nucleosome has a plastic organization that varies over time and has the potential to stimulate the formation of antibodies directed to the whole structure (anti-nucleosome) or its parts (anti-dsDNA and anti-Histones). Here, we present an updated review of the literature on antibodies directed to the nucleosome and the nucleosome constituents, i.e., DNA and Histones. Wetriedto merge the data first published more than twenty years ago with more recent results to create a balanced bridge between old dogma and more recent research that could serve as a stimulus to reconsider mechanisms for SLE. The formation of large networks would provide the chance of studying large cohorts of patients and confirm what already presented in small sample size during the last years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Marco Ghiggeri
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy (D.B.); (A.M.)
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, IRCCS IstitutoGianninaGaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (F.L.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: (+39)-010-380742; Fax: (+39)-010-395214
| | - Matteo D’Alessandro
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy (D.B.); (A.M.)
| | - Domenico Bartolomeo
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy (D.B.); (A.M.)
| | - Maria Ludovica Degl’Innocenti
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy (D.B.); (A.M.)
| | - Alberto Magnasco
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy (D.B.); (A.M.)
| | - Francesca Lugani
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, IRCCS IstitutoGianninaGaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (F.L.); (M.B.)
| | - Marco Prunotto
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Maurizio Bruschi
- Laboratory of Molecular Nephrology, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, IRCCS IstitutoGianninaGaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy; (F.L.); (M.B.)
- Fondazione per le MalattieRenalinel Bambino, 16100 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Is systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is occurring more frequently now than in decades past? Despite improvements in the identification of patients with SLE, the development of new classification criteria, and the recognition of several biomarkers used alone or in combination, the diagnosis of SLE is still a challenge for clinicians, in particular early in the course of the disease, which makes the recognition of secular trends difficult to ascertain. Lacking a uniform definition of preclinical lupus or incomplete lupus, it is difficult to predict accurately which patients would go on to develop SLE. We will briefly review the classification criteria, early or preclinical SLE, the epidemiology of SLE, antinuclear antibodies-negative SLE, and biomarkers of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M F Ugarte-Gil
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
- School of Medicine, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú
| | - L A González
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - G S Alarcón
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Challenges and Advances in SLE Autoantibody Detection and Interpretation. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40674-019-00122-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
12
|
Soni C, Reizis B. DNA as a self-antigen: nature and regulation. Curr Opin Immunol 2018; 55:31-37. [PMID: 30261321 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
High-affinity antibodies to double-stranded DNA are a hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are thought to contribute to disease flares and tissue inflammation such as nephritis. Notwithstanding their clinical importance, major questions remain about the development and regulation of these pathogenic anti-DNA responses. These include the mechanisms that prevent anti-DNA responses in healthy subjects, despite the constant generation of self-DNA and the abundance of DNA-reactive B cells; the nature and physical form of antigenic DNA in SLE; the regulation of DNA availability as an antigen; and potential therapeutic strategies targeting the pathogenic DNA in SLE. This review summarizes current progress in these directions, focusing on the role of secreted DNases in the regulation of antigenic extracellular DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Soni
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Boris Reizis
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dumestre-Pérard C, Clavarino G, Colliard S, Cesbron JY, Thielens NM. Antibodies targeting circulating protective molecules in lupus nephritis: Interest as serological biomarkers. Autoimmun Rev 2018; 17:890-899. [PMID: 30009962 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most frequent and severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), considered as the major predictor of poor prognosis. An early diagnosis of LN is a real challenge in the management of SLE and has an important implication in guiding treatments. In clinical practice, conventional parameters still lack sensitivity and specificity for detecting ongoing disease activity in lupus kidneys and early relapse of nephritis. LN is characterized by glomerular kidney injury, essentially due to deposition of immune complexes involving autoantibodies against cellular components and circulating proteins. One of the possible mechanisms of induction of autoantibodies in SLE is a defect in apoptotic cells clearance and subsequent release of intracellular autoantigens. Autoantibodies against soluble protective molecules involved in the uptake of dying cells, including complement proteins and pentraxins, have been described. In this review, we present the main autoantibodies found in LN, with a focus on the antibodies against these protective molecules. We also discuss their pathogenic role and conclude with their potential interest as serological biomarkers in LN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Dumestre-Pérard
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France; BNI TIMC-IMAG, UMR5525, CNRS-Université Grenoble Alpes, BP170, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
| | - Giovanna Clavarino
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France; BNI TIMC-IMAG, UMR5525, CNRS-Université Grenoble Alpes, BP170, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - Sophie Colliard
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - Jean-Yves Cesbron
- Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France; BNI TIMC-IMAG, UMR5525, CNRS-Université Grenoble Alpes, BP170, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vordenbäumen S, Böhmer P, Brinks R, Fischer-Betz R, Richter J, Bleck E, Rengers P, Göhler H, Zucht HD, Budde P, Schulz-Knappe P, Schneider M. High diagnostic accuracy of histone H4-IgG autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018; 57:533-537. [PMID: 29267954 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Diagnosis of SLE relies on the detection of autoantibodies. We aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of histone H4 and H2A variant antibodies in SLE. Methods IgG-autoantibodies to histones H4 (HIST1H4A), H2A type 2-A (HIST2H2AA3) and H2A type 2-C (HIST2H2AC) were measured along with a standard antibody (SA) set including SSA, SSB, Sm, U1-RNP and RPLP2 in a multiplex magnetic microsphere-based assay in 153 SLE patients [85% female, 41 (13.5) years] and 81 healthy controls [77% female, 43.3 (12.4) years]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess diagnostic performance of individual markers. Logistic regression analysis was performed on a random split of samples to determine the additional value of histone antibodies in comparison with SA by likelihood ratio test and determination of diagnostic accuracy in the remaining validation samples. Results Microsphere-based assay showed good interclass correlation (mean 0.85, range 0.73-0.99) and diagnostic performance in receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve (AUC) range 84.8-93.2) compared with routine assay for SA parameters. HIST1H4A-IgG was the marker with the best individual diagnostic performance for SLE vs healthy (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 95% at 90% specificity). HIST1H4A-IgG was an independent significant predictor for the diagnosis of SLE in multivariate modelling (P < 0.0001), and significantly improved prediction of SLE over SA parameters alone (residual deviance 45.9 vs 97.1, P = 4.3 × 10-11). Diagnostic accuracy in the training and validation samples was 89 and 86% for SA, and 95 and 89% with the addition of HIST1H4A-IgG. Conclusion HIST1H4A-IgG antibodies improve diagnostic accuracy for SLE vs healthy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Vordenbäumen
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| | - Paloma Böhmer
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| | - Ralph Brinks
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| | - Rebecca Fischer-Betz
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| | - Jutta Richter
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| | - Ellen Bleck
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nordal E, Rypdal V, Christoffersen T, Aalto K, Berntson L, Fasth A, Herlin T, Nielsen S, Peltoniemi S, Straume B, Zak M, Rygg M. Incidence and predictors of Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a Nordic long-term cohort study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2017; 15:66. [PMID: 28821293 PMCID: PMC5562983 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-017-0195-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) varies around the world. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and predictors of uveitis in a Nordic population-based cohort. METHODS Consecutive JIA cases from defined geographical areas in Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway with disease onset between January 1997 to June 2000 were followed for median 98 months in this prospective longitudinal cohort study. Potential clinical and immunological predictors of uveitis were identified with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Uveitis occurred in 89 (20.5%) of the 435 children with regular ophtalmologic follow-up among the 500 included. Chronic asymptomatic uveitis developed in 80 and acute symptomatic uveitis in 9 children. Uveitis developed at a median interval of 0.8 (range - 4.7 to 9.4) years after onset of arthritis. Predictors of uveitis were age < 7 years at JIA onset (Odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 3.5), presence of antihistone antibodies (AHA) > 15 U/ml (OR 4.8 (1.8 to 13.4)) and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (OR 2.4 (1.5 to 4.0)). Mean combined IgM/IgG AHA was significantly higher in the uveitis group (19.2 U/ml) than in the non-uveitis group (10.2 U/ml) (p = 0.002). Young age at JIA onset predicted uveitis in girls (p < 0.001), but not in boys (p = 0.390). CONCLUSION Early-onset arthritis and presence of AHA in girls, as well as presence of ANA in both genders, were significant predictors of chronic uveitis. The high incidence of uveitis in this long-term Nordic JIA cohort may have severe implications in a lifelong perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Nordal
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of North Norway, and Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Veronika Rypdal
- 0000000122595234grid.10919.30Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of North Norway, and Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Terje Christoffersen
- 0000000122595234grid.10919.30Department of Ophtalmology, University Hospital of North Norway, and Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kristiina Aalto
- 0000 0004 0410 2071grid.7737.4Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lillemor Berntson
- 0000 0004 1936 9457grid.8993.bDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Fasth
- 0000 0000 9919 9582grid.8761.8Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Troels Herlin
- 0000 0004 0512 597Xgrid.154185.cDepartment of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Susan Nielsen
- grid.475435.4Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Suvi Peltoniemi
- 0000 0004 0410 2071grid.7737.4Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bjørn Straume
- 0000000122595234grid.10919.30Department of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marek Zak
- grid.475435.4Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marite Rygg
- 0000 0001 1516 2393grid.5947.fDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and Department of Pediatrics, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Keyel PA. Dnases in health and disease. Dev Biol 2017; 429:1-11. [PMID: 28666955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
DNA degradation is critical to healthy organism development and survival. Two nuclease families that play key roles in development and in disease are the Dnase1 and Dnase2 families. While these two families were initially characterized by biochemical function, it is now clear that multiple enzymes in each family perform similar, non-redundant roles in many different tissues. Most Dnase1 and Dnase2 family members are poorly characterized, yet their elimination can lead to a wide range of diseases, including lethal anemia, parakeratosis, cataracts and systemic lupus erythematosus. Therefore, understanding these enzyme families represents a critical field of emerging research. This review explores what is currently known about Dnase1 and Dnase2 family members, highlighting important questions about the structure and function of family members, and how their absence translates to disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Keyel
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shi G, Abbott KN, Wu W, Salter RD, Keyel PA. Dnase1L3 Regulates Inflammasome-Dependent Cytokine Secretion. Front Immunol 2017; 8:522. [PMID: 28533778 PMCID: PMC5420570 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus arises in humans and mice lacking the endonuclease Dnase1L3. When Dnase1L3 is absent, DNA from circulating apoptotic bodies is not cleared, leading to anti-DNA antibody production. Compared to early anti-DNA and anti-chromatin responses, other autoantibody responses and general immune activation in Dnase1L3−/− mice are greatly delayed. We investigated the possibility that immune activation, specifically inflammasome activation, is regulated by Dnase1L3. Here, we report that Dnase1L3 inhibition blocked both NLR family, pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) and NLRC4 inflammasome-mediated release of high-mobility group box 1 protein and IL-1β. In contrast to IL-1β release, Dnase1L3 inhibition only mildly impaired NLRP3-dependent pyroptosis, as measured by propidium iodide uptake or LDH release. Mechanistically, we found that Dnase1L3 was needed to promote apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation and recruitment domain (ASC) nuclear export and speck formation. Our results demonstrate that Dnase1L3 inhibition separates cytokine secretion from pyroptosis by targeting ASC. These findings suggest that Dnase1L3 is necessary for cytokine secretion following inflammasome activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilan Shi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Kennady N Abbott
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Wenbo Wu
- School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Russell D Salter
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Peter A Keyel
- Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Adamichou C, Bertsias G. Flares in systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis, risk factors and preventive strategies. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2017; 28:4-12. [PMID: 32185248 PMCID: PMC7045928 DOI: 10.31138/mjr.28.1.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in the treatment, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often experience disease exacerbations (flares) of varying severity. Their diagnosis is primarily made on clinical grounds after exclusion of other diseases or disturbances, primarily infections, and can be assisted by the use of validated clinical indices. Serological tests such as serum complement fractions and anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, are helpful in monitoring SLE activity, but they lack high diagnostic accuracy. Flares are more frequent in patients with persistent immunological and clinical activity, and have been described as significant risk factor for development of irreversible end-organ damage. Accordingly, prevention of flares has been recognized as a distinct therapeutic target in SLE and involves adequate control of disease activity, use of hydroxychloroquine, maintaining immunosuppressive or biologic therapy for several years, and avoiding non-compliance issues. The future holds promise for the discovery of biomarkers that will accurately predict or diagnose SLE flares, thus allowing for the implementation of patient-tailored preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Adamichou
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - George Bertsias
- University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Autoantibodies against Modified Histone Peptides in SLE Patients Are Associated with Disease Activity and Lupus Nephritis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165373. [PMID: 27780265 PMCID: PMC5079581 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Persistent exposure of the immune system to death cell debris leads to autoantibodies against chromatin in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Deposition of anti-chromatin/chromatin complexes can instigate inflammation in multiple organs including the kidney. Previously we identified specific cell death-associated histone modifications as targets of autoantibodies in SLE. In this study we addressed, in a large cohort of SLE patients and controls, the question whether plasma reactivities with specific histone peptides associated with serology and clinical features. Plasma from SLE patients with and without lupus nephritis, disease controls, and healthy controls, were tested in ELISA with histone H4 peptide acetylated at lysines 8, 12 and 16 (H4pac), H2B peptide acetylated at lysine 12 (H2Bpac), H3 peptide trimethylated at lysine 27 (H3pme), and their unmodified equivalents. SLE patients displayed a higher reactivity with the modified equivalent of each peptide. Reactivity with H4pac showed both a high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (91%) for SLE, while H2Bpac exhibited a high specificity (96%) but lower sensitivity (69%). Reactivity with H3pme appeared not specific for SLE. Anti-H4pac and anti-H2Bpac reactivity demonstrated a high correlation with disease activity. Moreover, patients reacting with multiple modified histone peptides exhibited higher SLEDAI and lower C3 levels. SLE patients with renal involvement showed higher reactivity with H2B/H2Bpac and a more pronounced reactivity with the modified equivalent of H3pme and H2Bpac. In conclusion, reactivity with H4pac and H2Bpac is specific for SLE patients and correlates with disease activity, whereas reactivity with H2Bpac is in particular associated with lupus nephritis.
Collapse
|
20
|
Larosa M, Iaccarino L, Gatto M, Punzi L, Doria A. Advances in the diagnosis and classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2016; 12:1309-1320. [PMID: 27362864 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2016.1206470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases. Patients with SLE display a wide spectrum of clinical and serological findings that can mislead and delay the diagnosis. Diagnostic criteria have not been developed yet, whereas several sets of classification criteria are available; however, none of them has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, i.e. the hallmark of diagnostic criteria. Nevertheless, classification criteria are often misused as diagnostic criteria, which may affect earliness of diagnosis and lead to more misdiagnosed cases. Areas covered: In this review, we compare old and new classification criteria, discussing their application and pinpointing their limitations in the management of patients. Moreover, we will focus on current and novel biomarkers for SLE diagnosis, highlighting their predictive value and applicability in clinical practice. Expert commentary: SLE diagnosis still represents a challenge, remaining largely based on a clinical judgment. Besides SLE diagnosis, even its classification is still challenging to date. Indeed, although classification of SLE seems to be achieved more frequently with the 2012 SLICC criteria than with the previous 1997 ACR criteria, this last-updated 2012 set might be improved. Notably, diagnostic and classification criteria should be applied to any subject in the world, and consequently they should include immunological variables validated in different populations, which is still an unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maddalena Larosa
- a Department of Medicine - DIMED, Division of Rheumatology , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Luca Iaccarino
- a Department of Medicine - DIMED, Division of Rheumatology , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Mariele Gatto
- a Department of Medicine - DIMED, Division of Rheumatology , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Leonardo Punzi
- a Department of Medicine - DIMED, Division of Rheumatology , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Andrea Doria
- a Department of Medicine - DIMED, Division of Rheumatology , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sisirak V, Sally B, D'Agati V, Martinez-Ortiz W, Özçakar ZB, David J, Rashidfarrokhi A, Yeste A, Panea C, Chida AS, Bogunovic M, Ivanov II, Quintana FJ, Sanz I, Elkon KB, Tekin M, Yalçınkaya F, Cardozo TJ, Clancy RM, Buyon JP, Reizis B. Digestion of Chromatin in Apoptotic Cell Microparticles Prevents Autoimmunity. Cell 2016; 166:88-101. [PMID: 27293190 PMCID: PMC5030815 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 289] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Antibodies to DNA and chromatin drive autoimmunity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Null mutations and hypomorphic variants of the secreted deoxyribonuclease DNASE1L3 are linked to familial and sporadic SLE, respectively. We report that DNASE1L3-deficient mice rapidly develop autoantibodies to DNA and chromatin, followed by an SLE-like disease. Circulating DNASE1L3 is produced by dendritic cells and macrophages, and its levels inversely correlate with anti-DNA antibody response. DNASE1L3 is uniquely capable of digesting chromatin in microparticles released from apoptotic cells. Accordingly, DNASE1L3-deficient mice and human patients have elevated DNA levels in plasma, particularly in circulating microparticles. Murine and human autoantibody clones and serum antibodies from human SLE patients bind to DNASE1L3-sensitive chromatin on the surface of microparticles. Thus, extracellular microparticle-associated chromatin is a potential self-antigen normally digested by circulating DNASE1L3. The loss of this tolerance mechanism can contribute to SLE, and its restoration may represent a therapeutic opportunity in the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanja Sisirak
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Benjamin Sally
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Vivette D'Agati
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Wilnelly Martinez-Ortiz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Z Birsin Özçakar
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, 06100, Turkey
| | - Joseph David
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Ali Rashidfarrokhi
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Ada Yeste
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Casandra Panea
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Asiya Seema Chida
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Milena Bogunovic
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Ivaylo I Ivanov
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Francisco J Quintana
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Inaki Sanz
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Keith B Elkon
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Mustafa Tekin
- Department of Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Fatoş Yalçınkaya
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, 06100, Turkey
| | - Timothy J Cardozo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Robert M Clancy
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jill P Buyon
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Boris Reizis
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gatto M, Iaccarino L, Ghirardello A, Punzi L, Doria A. Clinical and pathologic considerations of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of lupus nephritogenic autoantibodies: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun 2016; 69:1-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
23
|
Dema B, Charles N. Autoantibodies in SLE: Specificities, Isotypes and Receptors. Antibodies (Basel) 2016; 5:antib5010002. [PMID: 31557984 PMCID: PMC6698872 DOI: 10.3390/antib5010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Revised: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a wide spectrum of auto-antibodies which recognize several cellular components. The production of these self-reactive antibodies fluctuates during the course of the disease and the involvement of different antibody-secreting cell populations are considered highly relevant for the disease pathogenesis. These cells are developed and stimulated through different ways leading to the secretion of a variety of isotypes, affinities and idiotypes. Each of them has a particular mechanism of action binding to a specific antigen and recognized by distinct receptors. The effector responses triggered lead to a chronic tissue inflammation. DsDNA autoantibodies are the most studied as well as the first in being characterized for its pathogenic role in Lupus nephritis. However, others are of growing interest since they have been associated with other organ-specific damage, such as anti-NMDAR antibodies in neuropsychiatric clinical manifestations or anti-β2GP1 antibodies in vascular symptomatology. In this review, we describe the different auto-antibodies reported to be involved in SLE. How autoantibody isotypes and affinity-binding to their antigen might result in different pathogenic responses is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Dema
- Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, INSERM UMR1149, CNRS ERL8252, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine site Bichat, Laboratoire d'Excellence Inflamex, DHU FIRE, Paris 75018, France.
| | - Nicolas Charles
- Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, INSERM UMR1149, CNRS ERL8252, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine site Bichat, Laboratoire d'Excellence Inflamex, DHU FIRE, Paris 75018, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Antibodies that recognize and bind to DNA (anti-DNA antibodies) are serological hallmarks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and key markers for diagnosis and disease activity. In addition to common use in the clinic, anti-DNA antibody testing now also determines eligibility for clinical trials, raising important questions about the nature of the antibody-antigen interaction. At present, no 'gold standard' for serological assessment exists, and anti-DNA antibody binding can be measured with a variety of assay formats, which differ in the nature of the DNA substrates and in the conditions for binding and detection of antibodies. A mechanism called monogamous bivalency--in which high avidity results from simultaneous interaction of IgG Fab sites with a single polynucleotide chain--determines anti-DNA antibody binding; this mechanism might affect antibody detection in different assay formats. Although anti-DNA antibodies can promote pathogenesis by depositing in the kidney or driving cytokine production, they are not all alike, pathologically, and anti-DNA antibody expression does not necessarily correlate with active disease. Levels of anti-DNA antibodies in patients with SLE can vary over time, distinguishing anti-DNA antibodies from other pathogenic antinuclear antibodies. Elucidation of the binding specificities and the pathogenic roles of anti-DNA antibodies in SLE should enable improvements in the design of informative assays for both clinical and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Pisetsky
- Medical Research Service, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Box 151G, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The inclusion of 'the anti-DNA antibody' by the ACR and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) as a criterion for systemic lupus erythematosus does not convey the diverse origins of these antibodies, whether their production is transient or persistent (which is heavily influenced by the nature of the inducing antigens), the specificities exerted by these antibodies or their clinical impact-or lack thereof. A substantial amount of data not considered in clinical medicine could be added from basic immunology evidence, which could change the paradigms linked to what 'the anti-DNA antibody' is, in a pathogenic, classification or diagnostic context.
Collapse
|
26
|
The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014:368274. [PMID: 24804269 PMCID: PMC3996305 DOI: 10.1155/2014/368274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Autoantibodies directed to chromatin components date back to the discovery of the LE cell and the LE cell phenomenon circa 1950, and subsequent evidence that major components of that reaction were chromatin components and histones in particular. Over time, immunoassays ranging from ELISA and line immunoassays to more modern bead-based assays incorporated histone and DNA mixtures, purified histones, and purified nucleosomes leading to a more thorough understanding of the genesis and pathogenetic relationships of antibodies to chromatin components in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune conditions. More recently, interest has focussed on other components of chromatin such as high mobility group (HMG) proteins both as targets of B cell responses and pro-inflammatory mediators. This review will focus on immunoassays that utilize chromatin components, their clinical relationships, and newer evidence implicating HMG proteins and DNA neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as important players in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Collapse
|