SEAM-PsA: Seems Like Methotrexate Works in Psoriatic Arthritis?

Pathways driving tendinopathy and enthesitis: siblings or distant cousins in musculoskeletal medicine?

Tendinopathy and enthesitis share clinical, anatomical, and molecular parallels. However, their relationship is complex, presenting challenges in diagnosis and treatment. The biomechanics underlying these pathologies, together with relative immune and stromal contributions to pathology, are characterised by crucial comparative elements. However, methodologies used to study enthesitis and tendinopathy have been divergent, which could account for discrepancies in how these conditions are perceived and treated. In this Review, we summarise key clinical parallels between these two common presentations in musculoskeletal medicine and address factors that currently preclude development of more effective therapeutics. Furthermore, we describe molecular similarities and disparities that govern pathological mechanisms in tendinopathy and enthesitis, thus informing translational studies and treatment strategies.

Perspectives on Treatment Burden for Methotrexate and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Among Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe patients' perspectives on the burden associated with methotrexate (MTX) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Between May 2019 and March 2020, patients receiving MTX and/or a TNFi for either PsA or RA were randomly sampled from the FORWARD data bank and were invited to participate in semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews explored patients' perspectives on treatment burden and experiences with MTX and TNFi and were conducted until data saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach and NVivo v12.0 software.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 patients with PsA and 24 patients with RA participated in the interviews. Participants were predominantly women (mean age: 67 years). Nine major themes related to treatment burden were explored, including treatment side effects and their management, psychological burden, effect on daily functioning and work participation, challenges with accessing and administering therapies, financial difficulties or economic impact, and family planning or breastfeeding. Patients receiving MTX mostly reported side effects as the major burden, while cost and concerns with accessing and administering medication were major challenges reported by TNFi users. Treatment discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness was high for PsA, while discontinuation due to medication cost was high for RA.

CONCLUSION

Patients experience a wide range of burden associated with treatments used for PsA and RA. Health care practitioners should consider these challenges when prescribing therapy and strive toward reducing this burden by understanding patients' concerns and needs and involving them in decision making.

Side Effects of Methotrexate and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Differences in Tolerability Among Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective

To examine the prevalence of side effects with methotrexate (MTX) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

This retrospective analysis, conducted between January 2000 and January 2019, used data from the FORWARD databank. Adult patients enrolled in the registry with self‐reported and physician‐confirmed diagnosis of PsA or RA were included if they had completed at least one questionnaire before initiating and within 12 months following initiation of MTX or a TNFi. The primary outcome was to examine the prevalence of side effects with MTX and TNFi within the year following treatment initiation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between PsA and RA and the reporting of their side effects.

Results

Overall, 116 patients with PsA and 4247 patients with RA newly initiated MTX, and 124 patients with PsA and 4361 patients with RA newly initiated a TNFi. Patients with PsA were more likely to report MTX‐related side effects than those with RA (44.8% vs. 29.4%), whereas similar proportions of patients with PsA and RA reported TNFi‐related side effects within the first year (24.2% and 22.8%, respectively). Additionally, patients with PsA initiating MTX were more likely to report nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, depression, and tinnitus than patients with RA initiating MTX or those with PsA or RA initiating a TNFi.

Conclusion

Patients with PsA reported more side effects than patients with RA, and this difference was more pronounced in those receiving MTX versus TNFi.

Potential Impact of Sex and Body Mass Index on Response to Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis: Post-hoc Analysis of Results From the SEAM-PsA Trial

Objective

In this post-hoc analysis, we examined the potential impact of sex and body mass index (BMI) on response in the SEAM-PsA trial (NCT02376790), a 48-week, phase 3, randomized controlled trial that compared outcomes with methotrexate monotherapy, etanercept monotherapy, and methotrexate+etanercept combination therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) naïve to methotrexate and biologics.

Methods

We evaluated key outcomes at Week 24 stratified by sex (male vs female) and BMI (≤30kg/m2 vs >30kg/m2), including the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20), minimal disease activity (MDA), very low disease activity (VLDA), and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS). We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, normal approximation, logistic model, and analysis of covariance.

Results

A total of 851 patients completed the SEAM-PsA trial. Higher proportions of men than women who received methotrexate+etanercept combination therapy achieved ACR20 (71.5% vs 58.3%; P=0.0194), MDA (45.8% vs 25.2%; P=0.0003), and VLDA (19.1% vs 9.4%; P=0.0273), and men achieved better PASDAS (–3.0 vs –2.3; P=0.0004). Patients with BMI≤30kg/m2 generally had better outcomes than those with BMI>30kg/m2 in some treatment arms for ACR20, MDA, VLDA, and PASDAS; however, there was no consistent pattern regarding the treatment arm in which the difference occurred.

Conclusion

Improved outcomes were observed more in men than in women for MDA and PASDAS with methotrexate+etanercept combination therapy. Patients with BMI≤30kg/m2 had better outcomes than those with BMI>30kg/m2 with no clear pattern regarding treatment received. These findings suggest that contextual factors such as sex and BMI may affect response to PsA therapy.

Patient-reported outcomes data in patients with psoriatic arthritis from a randomised trial of etanercept and methotrexate as monotherapy or in combination

Objectives

We examined patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in The Study of Etanercept And Methotrexate in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA); a 48-week, phase 3, randomised controlled trial that compared outcomes with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, etanercept monotherapy, and MTX+ etanercept in patients with PsA.

Methods

Efficacy endpoints included: mean changes from baseline and proportion of patients who reported improvements≥minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at week 24 in treatment groups for Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain (PtGAJP) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS), and Mental Component Summary, and eight domain scores. PROs were analysed as reported (observed), without multiplicity adjustment; therefore, p values are descriptive.

Results

At week 24, patients receiving etanercept monotherapy or MTX+ etanercept combination reported greater improvements (p≤0.05) in PtGA, PtGAJP and SF-36 PCS scores compared with those receiving MTX monotherapy. Compared with MTX monotherapy, higher proportions of patients receiving etanercept monotherapy and combination therapy reported improvements≥MCID in PtGA (etanercept vs MTX, p=0.005) and PtGAJP (MTX +etanercept vs MTX, p=0.038). Across PROs, proportions of patients reporting scores≥age and gender-matched normative values at week 24 ranged from 20.8% to 51.0% with MTX monotherapy, 30.9% to 48.8% with etanercept monotherapy, and 30.6% to 52.3% with MTX+ etanercept combination.

Conclusions

Patients receiving etanercept monotherapy or MTX+ etanercept reported greater improvements from baseline in several PROs compared with those receiving MTX monotherapy. PROs should be incorporated in discussions between patients and clinicians regarding their treatment choices as they can help determine which treatments are more beneficial in patients with PsA.

Autoimmunity in 2019

Based on the PubMed data, we have been performing a yearly evaluation of the publications related to autoimmune diseases and immunology to ascertain the relative weight of the former in the scientific literature. It is particularly intriguing to observe that despite the numerous new avenues of immune-related mechanisms, such as cancer immunotherapy, the proportion of immunology manuscripts related to autoimmunity continues to increase and has been approaching 20% in 2019. As in the previous 13 years, we performed an arbitrary selection of the peer-reviewed articles published by the major dedicated Journals and discussed the common themes which continue to outnumber peculiarites in autoimmune diseases. The investigated areas included systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), autoantibodies (autoAbs), and common therapeutic avenues and novel pathogenic mechanisms for autoimmune conditions. Some examples include new pathogenetic evidence which is well represented by IL21 or P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) in SLE or the application of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), mass cytometry, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and flow cytometry for the analysis of different cellular populations in RA. Cumulatively and of interest to the clinicians, a large number of findings continue to underline the importance of a strict relationship between basic and clinical science to define new pathogenetic and therapeutic developments. The therapeutic pipeline in autoimmunity continues to grow and maintain a constant flow of new molecules, as well illustrated in RA and PsA, and this is most certainly derived from the new basic evidence and the high-throughput tools applied to autoimmune diseases.

A dermatologist perspective in the pharmacological treatment of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with psoriasis in 20-30% of patients. PsA presents as a heterogeneous disease involving different domains and burdened by an important impact on function and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Dermatologists play an important role in the early detection of PsA because in most patients PsA develop after cutaneous psoriasis. The ideal goal of treating patients with PsA is to optimize the controls of symptoms, improve quality of life, and prevent structural damage and disability. The choice of treatment in patients with PsA should take into account also the skin signs and symptoms. Treatment options include NSAIDs, synthetic DMARDSs, anti-TNF-α agents, anti-IL-12/IL-23 agents, anti-IL-17 agents, PDE4 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and co-stimulatory blockers. A narrative review based on electronic searches on PubMed® database was performed. Original articles assessing either the role of the dermatologist in the management of PsA and the available treatments for PsA were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Among different treatments, some drugs show more efficacy in joint signs and symptoms, and poor response on the skin and vice versa. The perspective of the dermatologist in a multidisciplinary setting may provide a helpful tool in the management of patients with PsA.