Expert Perspective: Management of Refractory Inflammatory Myopathy

Effectiveness of generic tofacitinib in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM)-a retrospective analysis from Indian Myositis Registry (MyoIN)

OBJECTIVES

Determine domain-based-outcomes and steroid-sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in IIM.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study wherein clinical phenotype, autoantibody profile, prior immunosuppressives, and outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months were retrieved for IIM patients prescribed tofacitinib. Overall clinical response was assessed as complete or partial remission as per physician judgment. Changes in cutaneous and calcinosis domain were recorded as per physician global assessment (PGA), lung domain as per medical research council (MRC) dyspnea scale, and muscle strength by Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients of IIM with mean age 38.7 ± 16 years; (76.2% (N = 32) women), median duration of illness 48 (19;88) months were included. Commonest indication for initiating tofacitinib was either for refractory or as steroid sparing for cutaneous domain (N = 25/42, 59.5%) followed by calcinosis (N = 16/42, 38%). Overall complete and/or partial remission was achieved in 23/37 (64.8%), 30/35 (85.7%), and 29/30 (96.6%) patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, there was a reduction in prednisolone dose, with absolute decrease from a daily dose of 17.5 mg (IQR 5;50) to 2.5 mg (IQR 0;5) (p < 0.001). Individual domain assessments revealed improvement in cutaneous domain [16/25 (64%)] and calcinosis [6/15 (40%)]. Adverse effects included herpes zoster (N = 2/42, 4.8%) and dyslipidemia (N = 4/42, 9.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with generic tofacitinib significantly reduces the daily dose of corticosteroids and is effective in cutaneous domain including calcinosis in IIM.

KEY POINTS

• This multicenter retrospective study is the first real-world data from India, elucidating steroid sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in patients with inflammatory myositis. • Domain-based outcome assessment suggests good clinical improvement especially in cutaneous domain, even those with refractory disease. • Modest benefits were evident in calcinosis, but its effect on the muscle and pulmonary domain appears limited.

Past, Present, and Future in Dermatomyositis Therapeutics

Purpose of review

This review highlights current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM). Current clinical evidence, in addition to recently published and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in development, are summarized in this review.

Recent findings

There has been significant progress in the research and development of potential treatments in DM. The FDA recently approved Octagam® 10% Immune Globulin Intravenous (IVIg) for the treatment of DM. Several drug targets are being explored as viable therapeutic options in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; at the forefront of these are JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib and baricitinib) and T-cell co-stimulation blockers (i.e. abatacept). In addition, clinical trials are currently under way for therapeutics targeting novel molecular pathways, including immunoproteasome inhibitors, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, complement inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

Summary

With the large number of clinical trials, multiple novel therapeutics in development, and improved classification and outcome measures, the treatment landscape for DM will continue to rapidly evolve in the coming years as more options become available.

Characterisation of Disease Patterns of Dermatomyositis with Different Initial Manifestations

Purpose

To determine the characteristics and prognoses of dermatomyositis (DM) by comparing the difference in initial symptoms.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the patients diagnosed with DM from 1 January 2019 to 1 January 2021. Based on the firstly presented symptoms, patients were divided into five groups, namely rash group, muscle weakness group, arthritis group, respiratory symptom group and atypical symptom group. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded. All patients were followed up until 31 May 2021.

Results

In total 136 DM patients, rash (40%) was the most common initial symptom, followed by respiratory symptoms (22%), arthritis (20%), muscle weakness (10%) and atypical symptoms (8%). Rash group and atypical group had a higher positive rate of anti-TIF1γ antibodies than arthritis group and respiratory symptom group (P < 0.05). Respiratory symptom and arthritis groups had a higher positive rate of anti-Ro52 antibodies than rash and muscle weakness groups (P < 0.05). Respiratory group had a higher incidence of ILD than rash and atypical groups. The FVC and DLCO in respiratory group were significantly lower than rash group, arthritis group and atypical group (P < 0.05). The survival rate of rash group was significantly higher than muscle weakness group and arthritis group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

DM patients with different initial manifestations had different myositis antibodies and prognoses.