The Feasibility and Outcomes of Genetic Testing for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Disorders on an Inpatient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Service

An integrated clinical approach to children at genetic risk for neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions: interdisciplinary collaboration and research infrastructure

BACKGROUND

A sizeable proportion of pathogenic genetic variants identified in young children tested for congenital differences are associated with neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders (NPD). In this growing group, a genetic diagnosis often precedes the emergence of diagnosable developmental concerns. Here, we describe DAGSY (Developmental Assessment of Genetically Susceptible Youth), a novel interdisciplinary 'genetic-diagnosis-first' clinic integrating psychiatric, psychological and genetic expertise, and report our first observations and feedback from families and referring clinicians.

METHODS

We retrieved data on referral sources and indications, genetic and NPD diagnoses and recommendations for children seen at DAGSY between 2018 and 2022. Through a survey, we obtained feedback from twenty families and eleven referring clinicians.

RESULTS

159 children (mean age 10.2 years, 57.2% males) completed an interdisciplinary (psychiatry, psychology, genetic counselling) DAGSY assessment during this period. Of these, 69.8% had a pathogenic microdeletion or microduplication, 21.5% a sequence-level variant, 4.4% a chromosomal disorder, and 4.4% a variant of unknown significance with emerging evidence of pathogenicity. One in four children did not have a prior NPD diagnosis, and referral to DAGSY was motivated by their genetic vulnerability alone. Following assessment, 76.7% received at least one new NPD diagnosis, most frequently intellectual disability (24.5%), anxiety (20.7%), autism spectrum (18.9%) and specific learning (16.4%) disorder. Both families and clinicians responding to our survey expressed satisfaction, but also highlighted some areas for potential improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

DAGSY addresses an unmet clinical need for children identified with genetic variants that confer increased vulnerability for NPD and provides a crucial platform for research in this area. DAGSY can serve as a model for interdisciplinary clinics integrating child psychiatry, psychology and genetics, addressing both clinical and research needs for this emerging population.

[Genetic Diagnostics in Everyday Clinical Practice in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Indications, Framework Conditions, Hurdles, and Proposed Solutions]

Genetic Diagnostics in Everyday Clinical Practice in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Indications, Framework Conditions, Hurdles, and Proposed Solutions Abstract: Health insurance covers medically necessary genetic testing in Germany. Diagnostic genetic testing has become increasingly important for child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP), reflected by the rising number of national guidelines relevant to CAP, including genetic testing in the recommended diagnostic work-up. However, implementation of theses guidelines in routine clinical care is lacking. This article provides a concise overview of the relevance of genetic testing in CAP-related national guidelines. It outlines the legal and financial framework for genetic testing in Germany. Furthermore, it points out barriers to implementation and offers potential solutions. It then provides examples from clinical practice highlighting the potential benefits patients and their family members might have from receiving a genetic diagnosis. The article closes by outlining future CAP-relevant areas in which genetic testing may become clinically relevant.

A Collaborative Psychiatric-Genetics Inpatient Care Delivery Model Improves Access to Clinical Genetic Evaluation, Testing, and Diagnosis for Patients With Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and global developmental delay are among the most common indications for referral to clinical genetics evaluation; and clinical genetic testing is indicated for people with neurodevelopmental disorders. There are known barriers to care in accessing clinical genetics evaluation for this patient population. We created a collaborative psychiatric–genetics consultation service and psychiatric–genetics outpatient clinic with the goal to improve care delivery to patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. Two years after the launch of this pilot program, our data demonstrate improved access to genetics evaluation with shorter wait times and fewer patients lost to follow-up. Perhaps most importantly, new genetic diagnoses changed medical care for the majority of patients.

Next-generation gene panel testing in adolescents and adults in a medical neuropsychiatric genetics clinic

Intellectual disability (ID) encompasses a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental disorders that may present with psychiatric illness in up to 40% of cases. Despite the evidence for clinical utility of genetic panels in pediatrics, there are no published studies in adolescents/adults with ID or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study was approved by our institutional research ethics board. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of all patients evaluated between January 2017 and December 2019 in our adult neuropsychiatric genetics clinic at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), who had undergone a comprehensive ID/ASD gene panel. Thirty-four patients aged > 16 years, affected by ID/ASD and/or other neuropsychiatric/behavioral disorders, were identified. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in one-third of our cohort (32%): 8 single-nucleotide variants in 8 genes (CASK, SHANK3, IQSEC2, CHD2, ZBTB20, TREX1, SON, and TUBB2A) and 3 copy number variants (17p13.3, 16p13.12p13.11, and 9p24.3p24.1). The presence of psychiatric/behavioral disorders, regardless of the co-occurrence of ID, and, at a borderline level, the presence of ID alone were associated with positive genetic findings (p = 0.024 and p = 0.054, respectively). Moreover, seizures were associated with positive genetic results (p = 0.024). One-third of individuals presenting with psychiatric illness who met our red flags for Mendelian diseases have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants which can be identified using a comprehensive ID/ASD gene panel (~ 2500 genes) performed on an exome backbone.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists' Perceptions of Utility and Self-rated Knowledge of Genetic Testing Predict Usage for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with numerous genetic syndromes.1 Practice guidelines from various medical specialty societies, such as American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), American College of Medical Genetics, American Neurological Association, and American Academy of Pediatrics, indicate that genetic testing should be part of the evaluation for ASD.1-4 Studies have shown, however, that many patients do not receive indicated genetic testing; reported rates of testing vary widely, ranging from 1.5% to 60% of patients receiving genetic testing as part of the evaluation for ASD.4-8 Child and adolescent psychiatrists practicing in the United States (approximately 8300)9 far outnumber developmental behavioral pediatricians (approximately 900) and child neurologists (approximately 900), but in 1 study child and adolescent psychiatrists were the least likely to order genetic testing during the evaluation of patients with ASD diagnoses.6 Thus, it is critical to understand attitudes of child and adolescent psychiatrists toward genetic testing and other barriers to genetic testing to optimize adherence to practice guidelines for appropriate genetic testing in people with ASD. A survey to capture the current practice, knowledge, and perceptions toward genetic testing was developed by content matter experts that included child and adolescent psychiatrists, psychologists, and genetic counselors as well as lawyers, anthropologists, and bioethicists with expertise in ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics.

Autism Spectrum Disorder and Genetic Testing: Parents' Attitudes-Data from Turkish Sample

We aimed to examine the opinions of parents' having a child with ASD, on genetic testing, in a Turkish sample. 951 parents' attitudes towards genetic testing were included. 89.1% of the parents did not take a genetic test during pregnancy. 87.6% of the parents agreed to take a genetic test if it could explain the cause of ASDs. 93% agreed to take a genetic test, if it would help to have a better treatment in the future. 63.8% of the participants would approve the storage of their DNA samples for the future studies. 94.8% considered being informed about the purpose of taking DNA material for the early diagnosis and 84.2% considered being suggested genetic tests for early diagnosis as important.