Single intravenous dose and steady-state oral dose pharmacokinetics of nicardipine in healthy subjects

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nicardipine; a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Nicardipine is a type of calcium channel blocker that is commonly used in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension, and related cardiovascular disorders. This systematic review assesses the reported pharmacokinetic (PK) and associated pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of nicardipine in humans.

AREAS COVERED

An exhaustive literature search using four internet databases was conducted up to 5 October 2023, which yielded 871 papers, of which 32 fulfilled the eligibility requirements by including human PK and related PD data. The area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of nicardipine rise proportionately with increasing dosage. One study revealed that AUC0-∞ of nicardipine was increased by 5-fold in hepatic cirrhosis patients compared to the control subjects. Moreover, related PD data in renal-impaired hypertensive patients revealed that a notable reduction in blood pressure was associated with nicardipine administration.

EXPERT OPINION

This review covers comprehensive data on clinical PK, drug-drug interaction studies, effects of dosage form on ADME, and associated PD parameters of nicardipine using all relevant published studies. The present study will also aid in the development and evaluation of PK models for suggesting model-informed dosing regimens.

PROSPERO NUMBER

CRD42024533051.

Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.

An Assessment of the Oral Bioavailability of Three Ca-Channel Blockers Using a Cassette-Microdose Study: A New Strategy for Streamlining Oral Drug Development

A cassette-microdose (MD) clinical study was performed to demonstrate its usefulness for identifying the most promising compound for oral use. Three Ca-channel blockers (nifedipine, nicardipine, and diltiazem) were chosen as model drugs. In the MD clinical study, a cassette-dose method was employed in which three model drugs were administered simultaneously. Both intravenous (i.v.) and oral (p.o.) administration studies were conducted to calculate the oral bioavailability (BA). For comparison, p.o. studies with therapeutic dose (ThD) levels were also performed. In all studies, blood concentrations of each drug were successfully determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with the lower limit of quantification of 0.2-2.0 pg/mL. Oral BA of nifedipine in the MD study was approximately 50% and in the same range with that obtained in the ThD study, whereas other two drugs showed significantly lower BA in the MD study, indicating a dose-dependent absorption. In addition, compared with the ThD study, absorption of nicardipine was delayed in the MD study. As a result, nifedipine was considered to be most promising for oral use. In conclusion, a cassette-MD clinical study is of advantage for oral drug development that enables to identify the candidate having desired properties for oral use.

Possibility of partial absorption of nicardipine by routes other than the hepato-portal system after oral administration in rats

The systemic availability of nicardipine after different routes of administration has been examined in rats, with particular attention to differentiating oral absorption from intestinal and hepatic metabolism. The quantities of nicardipine and its metabolite were determined by capillary column gas chromatography. A linear relationship was shown between the hepatic first-pass effect and dose after hepato-portal administration of nicardipine; the hepatic first-pass effect was calculated to be approximately 80%. However, the availability after oral and rectal administration was found to be more than twice that observed after hepato-portal administration. Partial avoidance of the hepatic first-pass effect after oral and rectal administration are estimated to be 37.3% and 35.2%, respectively, assuming that all absorbed molecules pass through the liver. These findings suggest that the absorption of nicardipine after oral administration also occurs by routes other than the hepato-portal system.

Influence of swelling degree on release of nicardipine hydrochloride from acrylic microspheres prepared by solvent evaporation method

The purpose of this study was to prepare and evaluate an enteric coated dosage form of nicardipine hydrochloride (NCH)-loaded microspheres for delivery over a 12-hr period. Microspheres containing Eudragit RS and L with different ratios were prepared by solvent evaporation method and the effect of swelling on the release rate and characteristics was investigated. The change in the diameters of microspheres with time in simulated intestinal fluid (pH 7.5) at 37 degrees C has been studied. Drug release was determined using the flow-through cell method, and related to the degree of swelling (Q) of the microspheres. Q values in turn depended on the ratio of Eudragit RS-L used. Release of NCH from microspheres increased with Eudragit L amount, but no controlled-release pattern was observed. Q values > or = 18.88 caused a slow initial release followed by an accelerated release. Microspheres with an Eudragit RS-L ratio of 1:5.7, Q value of 38.71, and drug release rate of 0.155% min-1 exhibited a remarkable delayed time for erosion to begin (120 min). Thus, microspheres prepared from this formulation may provide an effective enteric dosage form, releasing NCH at a predetermined rate.

Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets

The objectives of this work were to apply several profile comparison approaches to dissolution data of four different but bioequivalent metoprolol tartrate tablet formulations to (1) identify the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, (2) quantify the metric for comparing dissolution profiles of each method, (3) determine metric limits that are consistent with the observed bioequivalence, and (4) rationalize the observed metric limits with respect to the role of dissolution in overall metoprolol absorption. Dissolution was performed by the USP monograph method on four formulations of metoprolol tartrate tablets (Lopressor plus fast, medium, and slow dissolving test formulations). Three general approaches to compare dissolution profiles were examined; they were ANOVA-based, model-independent, and model-dependent approaches. It is concluded that model-independent approaches and several model-dependent approaches yielded numerical results that can serve as objective and quantitative metrics for comparing entire dissolution profiles of the four metoprolol tartrate formulations. However, these methods presented complications. Some metrics were dependent on the length of the dissolution profile and the sampling scheme. Results from the pairwise procedures also depended on the pairing assignment of individual profiles. In spite of complications, these methods suggested wide dissolution specification limits. Wide dissolution specifications were rationalized through an analysis of in vitro-in vivo relationships, which indicated metoprolol dissolution from these formulations was not the rate-limiting step; hence, a range of dissolution profiles can be expected to yield equivalent plasma profiles.

Application of a system analysis approach to population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nicardipine hydrochloride in healthy males

Nicardipine hydrochloride, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, possesses antihypertensive and arterial vasodilator properties. A system analysis approach, which makes fewer structural assumptions than compartmental methods, is presented for determining the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nicardipine hydrochloride in healthy males following a discontinuous infusion at four dose levels. The results indicate that the average total body clearance of nicardipine is 0.920 L/h/kg and the volume of distribution is 0.275 L/kg. Nicardipine hydrochloride has a mean residence time in the body of 1.27 h, of which 0.324 h were spent in the systemic circulation and the remainder in the periphery. The determined pharmacokinetic model was linked to a pharmacodynamic model that allowed the change in the mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate to be described and predicted. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was derived and the predictive power of the proposed model was assessed with a cross-validation technique that employs a relative predictive quotient for comparing the predictions to the fitted model. The results indicate that the proposed model describes the pharmacodynamics of nicardipine in healthy males and has good predictive ability when tested with a cross-validation procedure.

Lack of effect of isradipine on cyclosporin pharmacokinetics

The influence of isradipine as a long acting form (IcazR LP 5 mg) on cyclosporin pharmacokinetics was studied in six hypertensive renal transplant patients (mean age 37 yrs; mean body weight 62 kg). These patients received a mean daily cyclosporin dose of 307 mg in two equal intakes. Isradipine was orally administered once a day at a dose of 5 mg before the morning cyclosporin intake. Cyclosporin kinetics was assessed over a 0-12-h period, the day before (D-1) and 13 days (D+13) after isradipine treatment. Whole blood concentrations of cyclosporin were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) using the SandimmuneR-RIA kit (specific and non-specific monoclonal antibodies). Area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC), the maximum blood concentration (Cmax) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) on D-1 and D+13 were not significantly different whatever the specificity of the RIA method. For example, the mean AUC +/- sd values were 5,247 +/- 2,255 (D-1) vs 5,317 +/- 1,675 (D+13) microgram.1(-1).h for the specific and 20,905 +/- 8,317 vs 19,327 +/- 5,758 microgram.1(-1).h for the non-specific determinations. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin is not influenced by co-administration of isradipine at a therapeutic dosage. Moreover, the clinical results show that isradipine treatment was effective after 13 days administration (mean systolic blood pressure 132 vs 158 mm Hg, P < 0.05 and mean diastolic blood pressure 77 vs 93 mm Hg, P < 0.05 in supine position), and well tolerated throughout the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Simultaneous study of the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral nicardipine using a stable isotope

The systemic elimination of nicardipine has been studied by an initial oral administration of nicardipine followed 1.25 h later by intravenous injection of the deuterium-labelled molecule (D3 nicardipine). To check that intravenous kinetics was not modified by the oral administration, an i.v. injection of unlabelled nicardipine (D0 nicardipine) was also given. The study was carried out in six healthy male volunteers, aged between 24 and 27 years, according to a Latin square cross-over design. Similar values were found for each kinetic parameter after i.v. administration regardless of whether it was administered alone by that route or with an oral dose. The plasma level-time curves of nicardipine were described by a three open compartment model. The total plasma clearance was about 800 ml/min, the volume of distribution was of the order of 1 l/kg and the half-life of beta-elimination ranged from 4 to 5 h. The elimination rate constant beta was independent of the route of administration.