Effect of H2-receptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in the rat and monkey

Capecitabine: an overview of the side effects and their management

Xeloda (capecitabine), a thymidine phosphorylase activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is currently the only universally approved orally administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug. It belongs to a newer generation of orally administered fluoropyrimidines. It has been developed because of the clinical need for efficient, tolerable and convenient agents, which do not require continuous infusion. Capecitabine is not a cytotoxic drug in itself, but via a three-step enzymatic cascade, it is converted to 5-FU mainly within human cancer cells. While the drug compares favorably with 5-FU in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and pretreated breast cancer, it also has an improved toxicity profile, mainly of gastrointestinal and dermatologic effects with a significantly lower incidence of grade 3/4 myelotoxicity compared with infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Capecitabine's selective activation within the tumor allows for less systemic toxicity events. A gradient of fluoropyrimidine toxicity is observed: high in the US and low in East Asia. In addition, there is a discrepancy in tolerance of dose among patients treated in the US vs. Europe. Although patients can take the drug orally in the convenience of their own home, the key to successful management of capecitabine is the clinician's awareness of its severe, but low in incidence, adverse effects, and the patients' education, emphasizing compliance with the treatment plan, prevention and timely recognition of its toxicities.

Effects of acid antisecretory drugs on mucus barrier of the rat against 5-fluorouracil-induced gastrointestinal mucositis

OBJECTIVE

Acid antisecretory agents are used for the prophylaxis of cancer chemotherapy (CT)-induced gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis. Although these drugs seem to be clinically beneficial, data on their effects on the GI mucosal defense during CT treatment are scant. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of omeprazole, lansoprazole, and lafutidine on mucin, a major mucus component, during 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment, as a CT regimen.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Rats, weighing approximately 230 g, were divided into five groups. The control group was administered 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose orally once daily for 5 days. The second, third, fourth, and fifth groups were treated with 5-FU (50 mg/kg), 5-FU plus omeprazole (10 mg/kg), 5-FU plus lansoprazole (10 mg/kg), and 5-FU plus lafutidine (30 mg/kg) in the same way, respectively. The rats were sacrificed on the sixth day, and their stomachs and small intestines were removed. Using anti-mucin monoclonal antibodies, we compared the immunoreactivity in different areas of the rats' GI tracts as well as the mucin content.

RESULTS

Body-weight decreased in rats in the 5-FU group. Lafutidine, but neither omeprazole nor lansoprazole, inhibited the 5-FU-induced weight loss. Mucosal damage and reduced mucin content in stomach and small intestine were observed in rats receiving 5-FU alone. In the stomach, all antisecretory drugs caused the protective effects against 5-FU-induced mucosal injury and alleviation of the decreased mucin accumulation. In the jejunum and ileum, lafutidine, but neither omeprazole nor lansoprazole, ameliorated the 5-FU-induced mucosal damage and decreased mucin accumulation.

CONCLUSION

Lafutidine could offer the possibility of more effective prevention of CT-induced mucositis through the activation of GI mucus cells.