Apparent stereoselectivity in propafenone uptake by human and rat erythrocytes

Targeted Protein Degraders- The Druggability Perspective

Targeted Protein degraders (TPDs) show promise in harnessing cellular machinery to eliminate disease-causing proteins, even those previously considered undruggable. Especially if protein turnover is low, targeted protein removal bestows lasting therapeutic effect over typical inhibition. The demonstrated safety and efficacy profile of clinical candidates has fueled the surge in the number of potential candidates across different therapeutic areas. As TPDs often do not comply with Lipinski's rule of five, developing novel TPDs and unlocking their full potential requires overcoming solubility, permeability and oral bioavailability challenges. Tailored in-vitro assays are key to precise profiling and optimization, propelling breakthroughs in targeted protein degradation.

Whole blood or plasma: what is the ideal matrix for pharmacokinetic-driven drug candidate selection?

In the present era of drug development, quantification of drug concentrations following pharmacokinetic studies has preferentially been performed using plasma as a matrix rather than whole blood. However, it is critical to realize the difference between measuring drug concentrations in blood versus plasma and the consequences thereof. Pharmacokinetics using plasma data may be misleading if concentrations differ between plasma and red blood cells (RBCs) because of differential binding in blood. In this review, factors modulating the partitioning of drugs into RBCs are discussed and the importance of determining RBC uptake of drugs for drug candidate selection is explored. In summary, the choice of matrix (plasma vs whole blood) is an important consideration to be factored in during drug discovery.

Chiral Serum Pharmacokinetics of 4-Fluoroamphetamine after Controlled Oral Administration: Can (R)/(S) Concentration Ratios Help in Interpreting Forensic Cases?

Over the last two decades, misuse of 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) became an emerging issue in many European countries. Stimulating effects last for 4-6 hours and can impact psychomotor performance. The metabolism of amphetamine-type stimulants is stereoselective and quantification of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers has been suggested for assessing time of use. To date no data on enantioselective pharmacokinetics is available for 4-FA in serum samples. An enantioselective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method was developed using a chiral Phenomenex® Lux 3 μm AMP column. Validation of the method showed satisfactory selectivity, sensitivity, linearity (0.5-250 ng/mL), precision and accuracy. Recreational stimulant users orally ingested two doses (100 mg, n=12, and 150 mg, n=5) of 4-FA. Blood samples were drawn prior to application and over a period of 12 hours after ingestion and analyzed for 4-FA enantiomers. Peak concentrations and corresponding times did not differ significantly between the enantiomers (mean (R)/(S)-ratio at tmax 1.05, 0.85-1.16). With mean 12.9 (8.3-16.1) hours, apparent elimination half-lives (t1/2) were significantly (p < 0.01) longer for (R)-4-FA than for (S)-4-FA (6.0 hours; range 4.4-10.2 hours) and independent of the dose given. Over time, (R)/(S)-concentration-ratios were linearly increasing in all subjects to maximum ratios of 2.00 (1.08-2.77) in the last samples (after 12 hours). The slopes of the (R)/(S)-ratio exhibited marked inter-individual differences (0.023 to 0.157 h-1, mean 0.095 h-1). Ratios higher than 1.60 only appeared earliest after a minimum of 6 hours and therefore suggest the absence of acute drug effects. Different elimination half-lives of enantiomers lead to constantly increasing (R)/(S)-concentration-ratios. Consequently, ratios of 4-FA enantiomers in serum are a promising indicator for assessment of the time of drug consumption.

Drug disposition in three dimensions: an update on stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics

Many marketed drugs are chiral and are administered as the racemate, a 50:50 combination of two enantiomers. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers are well documented. Because of enantioselectivity in pharmacokinetics, results of in vitro pharmacodynamic studies involving enantiomers may differ from those in vivo where pharmacokinetic processes will proceed. With respect to pharmacokinetics, disparate plasma concentration vs time curves of enantiomers may result from the pharmacokinetic processes proceeding at different rates for the two enantiomers. At their foundation, pharmacokinetic processes may be enantioselective at the levels of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. In some circumstances, one enantiomer can be chemically or biochemically inverted to its antipode in a unidirectional or bidirectional manner. Genetic consideration such as polymorphic drug metabolism and gender, and patient factors such as age, disease state and concomitant drug intake can all play a role in determining the relative plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of a racemic drug. The use of a nonstereoselective assay method for a racemic compound can lead to difficulties in interpretation of data from, for example, bioequivalence or dose/concentration vs effect assessments. In this review data from a number of representative studies involving pharmacokinetics of chiral drugs are presented and discussed.

Route-dependent stereoselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its activeO-demethylated metabolite in rats

The effects of route of administration on the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol (T) and its active metabolite (M1) were studied in rats. A single 20 mg/kg dose of racemic T was administered through intravenous, intraperitoneal, or oral route to different groups of rats, and blood and urine samples were collected. Samples were analyzed using chiral chromatography, and pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Following intravenous injection, there was no stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of T. Both enantiomers showed clearance values (62.5 +/- 27.2 and 64.4 +/- 39.0 ml/min/kg for (+)- and (-)-T, respectively) that were equal or higher than the reported liver blood flow in rats. Similar to T, the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) of M1 did not exhibit stereoselectivity after intravenous administration of the parent drug. However, the systemic availability of (+)-T was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of its antipode following intraperitoneal (0.527 +/- 0.240 vs. 0.373 +/- 0.189) and oral (0.307 +/- 0.136 vs. 0.159 +/- 0.115) administrations. The AUC of the M1 enantiomers, on the other hand, remained mostly nonstereoselective regardless of the route of administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that the stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of oral T is due to stereoselective first pass metabolism in the liver and, possibly, in the gastrointestinal tract. The direction and extent of stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of T and M1 in rats were in agreement with those previously reported in humans, suggesting that the rat may be a suitable model for enantioselective studies of T pharmacokinetics.

Impact of stereoselectivity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs

Many antiarrhythmic drugs introduced into the market during the past three decades have a chiral centre in their structure and are marketed as racemates. Most of these agents, including disopyramide, encainide, flecainide, mexiletine, propafenone and tocainide, belong to class I antiarrhythmics, whereas verapamil is a class IV antiarrhythmic agent. Except for encainide and flecainide, there is substantial stereoselectivity in one or more of the pharmacological actions of chiral antiarrhythmics, with the activity of enantiomers differing by as much as 100-fold or more for some of these drugs. The absorption of chiral antiarrhythmics appears to be nonstereoselective. However, their distribution, metabolism and renal excretion usually favour one enantiomer versus the other. In terms of distribution, plasma protein binding is stereoselective for most of these drugs, resulting in up to two-fold differences between the enantiomers in their unbound fractions in plasma and volume of distribution. For disopyramide, stereoselective plasma protein binding is further complicated by nonlinearity in the binding at therapeutic concentrations. Hepatic metabolism plays a significant role in the elimination of these antiarrhythmics, accounting for >90% of the elimination of mexiletine, propafenone and verapamil. Additionally, in most cases, significant stereoselectivity is observed in different pathways of metabolism of these drugs. For some drugs, such as propafenone and verapamil, the stereoselectivity in metabolism is further complicated by nonlinearity in one or more of the metabolic pathways. Further, the metabolism of a number of chiral antiarrhythmics, such as mexiletine, propafenone, encainide and flecainide, cosegregates with debrisoquine/sparteine hydroxylation phenotype. Therefore, it is not surprising that a wide interindividual variability exists in the metabolism of these drugs. Excretion of the unchanged enantiomers in urine is an important pathway for the elimination of disopyramide, flecainide and tocainide. The renal clearances of both disopyramide and flecainide exceed the filtration rate for these drugs, suggesting the involvement of active tubular secretion. However, the stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of these drugs, if any, is minimal. Similarly, there is no stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of tocainide, a drug that undergoes tubular reabsorption in addition to glomerular filtration. Overall, substantial stereoselectivity has been observed in both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral antiarrhythmic agents. Because the effects of these drugs are related to their plasma concentrations, this information is of special clinical relevance.

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of propafenone and its major metabolites in healthy Chinese volunteers

The stereoselective pharmacokinetics of propafenone (PPF) and its active metabolite 5-hydroxypropafenone (5-OHP) as well as their glucuronide and sulfate conjugates have been investigated, in order to clarify the relationship between metabolism and stereoselective disposition of PPF in humans. After oral administration of 300 mg racemic PPF hydrochloride to 10 healthy Chinese subjects, the areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) for (S)-PPF were significantly higher (S/R ratio, 1.50+/-0.17) and the apparent oral clearance significantly lower (S/R ratio, 0.68+/-0.07) than those parameters for (R)-PPF. In contrast, the AUCs of PPF glucuronide (PPF-G) were lower for (S)-PPF-G than for the (R)-enantiomer (S/R ratio, 0.83+/-0.12). The partial clearance of (S)-PPF by glucuronidation pathway was lower than that of (R)-PPF and the enantiomeric ratio was 0.62+/-0.04. The t(max) values of PPF glucuronide diastereoisomers showed no statistically significant differences between each other, but were much shorter than the corresponding values of the parent drug, implying that glucuronidation may be the 'first-choice' pathway in presystemic metabolism of PPF. Glucuronidation of 5-OHP favored the (S)-enantiomer, whereas the sulfation showed a large preference for the (R)-enantiomer. After beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis, no significant differences were observed in AUCs between 5-OHP enantiomers (including unconjugated and conjugated 5-OHP). The results suggest that the significant difference in disposition between PPF enantiomers may be, at least in part attributed to stereoselective metabolism in the glucuronidation pathway.

Stereochemical aspects of pharmacotherapy

Over the past 15 years stereoselectivity has become a well-recognized consideration in clinical pharmacology. Drugs that have an asymmetric center or plane of symmetry within their molecular structure are said to be chiral. They are available as pairs of nonsuperimposable mirror images, called enantiomers, that share essentially the same physicochemical properties. These three-dimensional structural differences, however, can translate into enantiospecific pharmacologic or pharmacokinetic properties, which may be important in understanding the clinical pharmacology of chiral drugs. Most chiral drugs are available as the racemate, in which equal proportions of the two enantiomers are administered concurrently. The pharmacologic and disposition properties of many chiral drugs are documented to be stereospecific, and this has influenced the regulatory requirements for the approval of new drug candidates. Due to this influence on new drug development, the possible issues surrounding racemic drugs will undoubtedly affect the types of pharmaceuticals that are used clinically in the next century. Accordingly, considerable advances have been made in producing optically pure drug. It should be emphasized, however, that stereochemically pure drugs are not necessarily superior to the respective racemates.