Pharmacokinetics of intravenous chlorzoxazone in rats with dehydration and rehydration: effects of food intakes

Effects of water deprivation on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline and one of its metabolites, 1,3-dimethyluric acid, after intravenous and oral administration of aminophylline to rats

It has been reported that the expressions of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1/2, 2B1/2 and 3A1/2 were not changed in rats with water deprivation for 72 h (rat model of dehydration) compared with the controls. It has been also reported that 1,3-dimethyluric acid (1,3-DMU) was formed from theophylline via CYP1A1/2 in rats. Hence, it could be expected that the formation of 1,3-DMU could be comparable between the two groups of rats. As expected, after both intravenous and oral administration of theophylline at a dose of 5 mg/kg to the rat model of dehydration, the AUC of 1,3-DMU was comparable to the controls. After both intravenous and oral administration of theophylline to the rat model of dehydration, the Cl(r) of both theophylline and 1,3-DMU was significantly slower than the controls. This could be due to significantly smaller urinary excretions of both theophylline and 1,3-DMU since the AUC of both theophylline and 1,3-DMU were comparable between the two groups of rats. The smaller urinary excretion of both theophylline and 1,3-DMU could be due to urine flow rate-dependent timed-interval renal clearance of both theophylline and 1,3-DMU in rats.

Effects of water deprivation on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in rats

It was reported that metformin was mainly metabolized via hepatic CYP2C11, 2D1 and 3A1/2 in rats, and in a rat model of dehydration, the expressions of hepatic CYP2C11 and 3A1/2 were not changed. Hence, it could be expected that the Cl(nr) of metformin is comparable between two groups of rats if the contribution of CYP2D1 in the rat model of dehydration is not considerable. It was also reported that the timed-interval renal clearance of metformin was dependent on the urine flow rate in rats. In the rat model of dehydration, the 24 h urine output was significantly smaller than in the controls. Hence, the urinary excretion of metformin was expected to be smaller than the controls. The above expectations were proven as follows. After intravenous administration of metformin (100 mg/kg) to the rat model of dehydration, the Cl(nr) were comparable between the two groups of rats. After both intravenous and oral administration of metformin (both 100 mg/kg) to the rat model of dehydration, the 24 h urinary excretion of the drug was significantly smaller than in the controls. After oral administration of metformin to the rat model of dehydration, the AUC was significantly greater (99.2% increase) than the controls.

Effects of glucose supplementation on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous chlorzoxazone in rats with water deprivation for 72 h

It was reported that in rats with water deprivation for 72 h with food (dehydration rat model), the expression of CYP2E1 was 3-fold induced with an increase in mRNA level and glucose supplementation instead of food during 72-h water deprivation (dehydration rat model with glucose supplementation) inhibited the CYP2E1 induction in dehydration rat model. It was also reported that chlorzoxazone (CZX) is metabolized to 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone (OH-CZX) mainly via CYP2E1 in rats. Hence, the effects of glucose supplementation on the pharmacokinetics of CZX and OH-CZX were investigated after intravenous administration of CZX at a dose of 25 mg/kg to control male Sprague-Dawley rats and dehydration rat model and dehydration rat model with glucose supplementation. Based on the above mentioned results of CYP2E1, it could be expected that increased formation of OH-CZX in dehydration rat model could decrease in dehydration rat model with glucose supplementation. This was proven by the following results. In dehydration rat model with glucose supplementation, the AUC of OH-CZX was significantly smaller (1900 versus 1050 microg min/ml), AUC(OH-CZX)/AUC(CZX) ratio was considerably smaller (105 versus 34.3%), C(max) was significantly lower (20.6 versus 8.08 microg/ml), total amount excreted in 24-h urine as unchanged OH-CZX was significantly smaller (62.3 versus 42.7% of intravenous dose of CZX), and in vitro V(max) (2.18 versus 1.20 nmol/min/mg protein) and CL(int) (0.0285 versus 0.0171 ml/min/mg protein) were significantly slower than those in dehydration rat model.

Hepatic Disposition of the Cytochrome P450 2E1 Marker Chlorzoxazone and its Hydroxylated Metabolite in Isolated Perfused Rat Livers

The steady-state disposition of chlorzoxazone (CZX) and its hydroxylated metabolite 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone (HCZX) was determined in a single-pass isolated perfused rat liver (IPRL) model using constant CZX concentrations of 10-200 microM. The concentrations of CZX, HCZX, and/or HCZX glucuronide in the perfusate, bile, and liver tissues were measured and kinetic parameters calculated. Upon an increase in CZX inlet concentrations from 10 to 200 microM, its extraction ratio sharply declined from 0.681 to 0.087. This was associated with a saturable formation of HCZX, which was rapidly and completely metabolized to its glucuronide conjugate. Whereas the biliary excretion of CZX was negligible, that of HCZX was substantial (up to 40% of the generated metabolite). Overall, 79-93% of the CZX dose (10-200 microM) was recovered in our model as CZX and HCZX. Additionally, HCZX accounted for 56% (200 microM) to 71% (10 microM) of the extracted CZX dose. Further, a preliminary study using the preformed HCZX showed a complete (100%) recovery of the metabolite as its conjugate. Therefore, the unrecovered portion of CZX dose in our study (7-21% of the administered dose or 29-44% of the extracted dose at inlet CZX concentrations of 10-200 microM) is most likely due to parallel metabolism of CZX to other metabolites.

Effects of water deprivation for 72 hours on the pharmacokinetics of DA-7867, a new oxazolidinone, in rats

The pharmacokinetic parameters of DA-7867 were compared after intravenous and oral administration at a dose of 10 mg/kg in control rats and in rats with water deprivation for 72 h (rat model of dehydration). After intravenous administration in the rat model of dehydration, the Cl(nr) (0.654 versus 0.992 ml/min/kg) and Cl(r) (0.0273 versus 0.0784 ml/min/kg) values were significantly slower than in the controls. The slower Cl(nr) could be due mainly to a significantly smaller total amount of unchanged DA-7867 recovered from the gastrointestinal tract at 24 h (GI(24 h): 5.16% versus 9.21% of intravenous dose) due to impaired liver function in the rat model of dehydration. The slower Cl(r) could be due mainly to a significantly smaller 24 h urinary excretion of unchanged drug (Ae(0-24 h): 4.41% versus 7.75% of intravenous dose) due to urine flow rate-dependent Cl(r) of DA-7867 in the rat model of dehydration. Hence, the Cl was significantly slower in the rat model of dehydration (0.677 versus 1.07 ml/min/kg). After intravenous administration in the rat model of dehydration, the V(ss) of DA-7867 was significantly smaller than in the controls (396 versus 506 ml/kg) due mainly to significantly smaller free (unbound to plasma proteins) fractions of DA-7867 in plasma (6.90% versus 29.2%) in the rat model of dehydration. After oral administration in the rat model of dehydration, the AUC was significantly greater than that in controls (10800 versus 7060 microg min/ml) due mainly to a significantly smaller Ae(0-24 h) than in controls (3.50% and 6.17% of oral dose).

Pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in rats with water deprivation for 72 hours

Dehydration can occur by excessive sweating, polyuria, severe diarrhea and hyperthermia. Previous studies reported that the expressions of CYP1A1/2 and 3A1(23)/2 were not changed in male Sprague-Dawley rats with 72 h water deprivation (dehydrated rats), and that the metabolism of omeprazole is mainly catalysed via CYP1A1/2, 2D1 and 3A23/2 in rats. Hence, it could be expected that the hepatic metabolism of omeprazole would not be changed considerably in dehydrated rats, if the contribution of CYP2D1 to the metabolism of omeprazole in dehydrated rats is not considerable. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole were compared after intravenous (20 mg/kg) and oral (40 mg/kg) administration in control rats and in dehydrated rats. After intravenous administration, the time-averaged nonrenal clearance (Cl(nr)) values of omeprazole were comparable between the two groups of rats. This could be supported by comparable in vitro intrinsic clearance (Cl(int)) values for the disappearance of omeprazole in rat hepatic microsomes and the comparable free (unbound to plasma proteins) fractions of omeprazole in plasma in the two groups of rats. After oral administration, the AUC values of omeprazole were also comparable in the two groups of rats. The above data suggest that the dehydration state did not affect considerably the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in rats.