1
|
Staniczek J, Manasar-Dyrbuś M, Rybak-Krzyszkowska M, Kondracka A, Orszulak D, Niziński K, Sadłocha M, Drosdzol-Cop A, Stojko R, Illa M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between young maternal age and fetal abnormalities. Sci Rep 2024; 14:22562. [PMID: 39343828 PMCID: PMC11439902 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74015-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Fetal anomalies among young women and adolescents pose major public health concerns. This systematic review aims to elucidate the relationship between young maternal age and the incidence of fetal abnormalities. According to the systematic review and meta-analysis PRISMA protocol, cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies were scrutinized to include 80,393,450 participants across diverse regions. The meta-analysis utilized Odds Ratios (OR) as the effect measure, adopting a random-effects model. The screening process involved 157 selected and verified manuscripts, which ultimately resulted in the final inclusion of 20 studied in the meta-analysis. The criterion for young maternal age was the age of ≤ 20 years. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled OR of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.82-1.05, p = 0.252), indicating no statistically significant association between young maternal age (≤ 20 years) and fetal anomalies. However, considerable heterogeneity (I² = 96.21%) was noted, prompting the use of a random-effects model to derive the reported results. The meta-analysis did not find statistically significant differences in the occurrence of congenital anomalies in fetuses of younger women than in overall population. Although due to significant heterogeneity of the analyzed studies, and a risk of bias, caution should be exercised when interpreting the results, further investigation may be warranted to understand the relationship between maternal age and risk of fetal anomalies. Nevertheless, the study shows significant differences, which diminish in collective analysis, suggests that factors beyond age may be influential. Specifically, the limited access to or quality of healthcare in certain regions could be a more critical factor than maternal age itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Staniczek
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
| | - Maisa Manasar-Dyrbuś
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland
| | | | - Adrianna Kondracka
- Department of Obstetrics and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, 20-059, Poland
| | - Dominika Orszulak
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland
| | - Kacper Niziński
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland
| | - Marcin Sadłocha
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Drosdzol-Cop
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland
| | - Rafał Stojko
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland
| | - Miriam Illa
- BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08028, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahn D, Kim J, Kang J, Kim YH, Kim K. Congenital anomalies and maternal age: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:484-498. [PMID: 35288928 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several studies have reported on the maternal age-associated risks of congenital anomalies. However, there is a paucity of studies with comprehensive review of anomalies. We aimed to quantify the risk of birth defects in children born to middle-aged mothers compared with that in children born to young or older mothers. MATERIAL AND METHODS We classified maternal ages into three groups: young (<20 years old), middle (20-34 years old) and older age (≥35 years old). Observational studies that met our age criteria were eligible for inclusion. The articles searched using the Embase and MEDLINE databases were those published from 1989 to January 21, 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. If heterogeneity exceeded 50%, the random effect method was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect method was used. Prospero registration number: CRD42021235229. RESULTS We included 15 cohort, 14 case-control and 36 cross-sectional studies. The pooled unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of any congenital anomaly was 1.64 (1.40-1.92) and 1.05 (0.95-1.15) in the older and young age groups, respectively (very low quality of evidence). The pooled unadjusted odds ratio of chromosomal anomaly was 5.64 (5.13-6.20) and 0.69 (0.54-0.88) in the older and young age groups, respectively. The pooled unadjusted odds ratio of non-chromosomal anomaly was 1.09 (1.01-1.17) and 1.10 (1.01-1.21) in the older and young age groups, respectively (very low quality of evidence). The incidence of abdominal wall defects was increased in children of women in the young maternal age group. CONCLUSIONS We identified that very low quality evidence suggests that women in the older maternal age group had increased odds of having children with congenital anomalies compared with those in the 20-34 year age group. There was no increase in odds of children with congenital anomalies in women of <20 year age group except for abdominal defects compared with those in the 20-34 year age group. The results stem from very low quality evidence with no adjustment of confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damin Ahn
- School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jieon Kim
- School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Junyeong Kang
- School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Hak Kim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Yangsan, Pusan National University, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.,Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Yangsan, Pusan National University, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.,Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Kihun Kim
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dewberry LC, Kalia N, Vazquez J, Hilton SA, Zaretsky MV, Behrendt N, Galan HL, Marwan AI, Liechty KW. Determining maternal risk factors for gastroschisis using colorado's birth registry database. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55:1002-1005. [PMID: 32173119 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF STUDY Gastroschisis is a congenital abdominal wall defect which results in herniation of abdominal contents. The objective of this study was to determine the maternal risk factors for gastroschisis in Colorado. METHODS A case-control study was performed using the Birth Registry database from 2007 to 2016. The outcome was gastroschisis, and the main variable was maternal age which was divided into <21, 21-30, and >30 years of age. Descriptive analysis, bivariate analysis, and logistic regression was performed. RESULTS There were 236 cases of gastroschisis compared to 944 controls. Maternal age did vary significantly between groups (23.4 ± 5 years (cases) vs. 28.7 ± 5.9 years (controls); p < 0.0001). Unadjusted analysis demonstrated that those with young maternal age (<21 years of age) had a 14.14 (95% CI 8.44-23.67) higher odds of gastroschisis compared to those >30 years of age. Independent risk factors for gastroschisis were exposure to prenatal and first trimester cigarettes, prenatal and first trimester alcohol, and chlamydia infection. The odds (4.41, 95% CI 1.36-14.26) of gastroschisis were highest in those with first trimester cigarette exposure and young maternal age (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Young maternal age, cigarette exposure, alcohol exposure, and chlamydia infection increase the odds of gastroschisis. The interaction between young maternal age and first trimester cigarette exposure significantly increases the odds of gastroschisis. TYPE OF STUDY Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindel C Dewberry
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, 1016 Cook Street, Denver, CO 80206.
| | | | | | - Sarah A Hilton
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO
| | | | - Nicholas Behrendt
- Colorado Fetal Care Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - Henry L Galan
- Colorado Fetal Care Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - Ahmed I Marwan
- Colorado Fetal Care Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - Kenneth W Liechty
- Colorado Fetal Care Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Denver, CO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feldkamp ML, Arnold KE, Krikov S, Reefhuis J, Almli LM, Moore CA, Botto LD. Risk of gastroschisis with maternal genitourinary infections: the US National birth defects prevention study 1997-2011. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026297. [PMID: 30928950 PMCID: PMC6475179 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the association between occurrence and timing of maternal self-reported genitourinary tract infection (urinary tract infections [UTIs] and/or sexually transmitted infection [STI]) and risk for gastroschisis in the offspring. DESIGN Population-based case-control study. SETTING National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite study in the USA. PARTICIPANTS Mothers of 1366 gastroschisis cases and 11 238 healthy controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Crude and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS Genitourinary infections were frequent in case (19.3%) and control women (9.9%) during the periconceptional period (defined as 3 months prior to 3 months after conception). UTI and/or STI in the periconceptional period were associated with similarly increased risks for gastroschisis (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8; aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3, respectively). The risk was increased with a UTI before (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4 to 4.5) or after (aOR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6) conception only among women ≥25 years of age. The risk was highest among women <20 years of age with an STI before conception (aOR 3.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 8.4) and in women ≥25 years of age, the risk was similar for before (aOR 2.9; 95% CI 1.0 to 8.5) and after (aOR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 6.1) conception. A specific STI pathogen was reported in 89.3% (50/56) of cases and 84.3% (162/191) of controls with Chlamydia trachomatis the most common (25/50 cases, 50%; 58/162 controls, 36%) and highest among women <20 years of age (16/25 cases, 64%; 22/33 controls, 67%). CONCLUSIONS UTI and/or STI were associated with an increased risk for gastroschisis, with the strength of the association varying by maternal age and timing of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia L Feldkamp
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kathryn E Arnold
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sergey Krikov
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jennita Reefhuis
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lynn M Almli
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Carter Consulting, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cynthia A Moore
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lorenzo D Botto
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|