Comparative study of clinical characteristics of amniotic rupture sequence with and without body wall defect: further evidence for separation

Limb body wall complex: Its delineation and relationship with amniotic bands using clustering methods

BACKGROUND

Despite the numerous reports on the limb body wall complex (LBWC), this association has never been adequately defined. Amniotic bands (AB) are frequently present but their role remains unclear. Since most reports were based on clinical and often subjective diagnoses, the aim of this work was to define LBWC and the role of AB, minimizing subjectivity.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the ECLAMC maternity hospitals network database. A total of 450 live and stillborn infants, born during 1967-2013, with AB or the LBWC were selected. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify cases into homogeneous groups (sharing similar associated defects); robustness of the classification was confirmed with a discriminant analysis. The frequency of associated defects was compared among groups; those whose frequency differed significantly were included in a logistic regression to establish their association within each group.

RESULTS

The cluster analysis identified two groups: a body wall defect (BWD) predominating in one, AB in the other. These groups were further divided into: BWD (cases with only BWD), AB (with only AB), BWD + AB, and NONE (with neither). Association with caudal defects and lower limb amelia was observed for BWD, with cephalic defects and upper limb amputations for BWD + AB.

CONCLUSIONS

The results, obtained with the least possible subjectivity, indicated that BWD and BWD + AB are different conditions. Since BWD specifically associates with amelia, we propose that this defect and not any limb deficiency should be considered as inclusion criterium and that it should be included in the BWD acronym as LBWC.

The prevalence of amnion rupture sequence, limb body wall defects and body wall defects in Alberta 1980-2012 with a review of risk factors and familial cases

Prevalence rates of amnion rupture sequence, limb body wall defect, and body wall defects vary widely. Comparisons are difficult due to small case numbers and the lack of agreement of definition, classification, and pathogenesis. This study reports the prevalence of cases classified in five distinct categories. The Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System data on live births, stillbirths, and terminations of pregnancy (<20 weeks gestation) occurring between 1980 through 2012 with the ICD-10 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Adaptation codes used for congenital constriction bands (Q79.80) and body wall complex (Q89.7) were reviewed. During the 33-year-study period, there were 153 eligible cases ascertained from 1,411,652 live births and stillbirths, giving a prevalence of 1.08/10,000 total births. There were more males (52%) than females (45%) and 3% were of unknown sex. The average maternal age, birth weight, and gestation was 27 years, 2,701 g, and 35 weeks, respectively. Limb deficiencies occurred in 78% of cases. Amniotic bands with limb deficiency was the most common phenotype (48%). Digital limb deficiency was the most frequent type (56%); however, cases with body wall defects had more severe types of limb deficiencies. The upper limbs only were affected more times (44%), and there was no side preference. Most cases are sporadic but a number of familial occurrences have been reported although some have insufficient documentation and others misdiagnosed. A review of putative risk factors gives conflicting results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Complex of amniotic deformities, adhesions, mutilations: Endless debate]

Amniotic deformities, adhesions, mutilations (ADAM) complex is a broad heterogeneous spectrum of congenital anomalies. ADAM complex is characterized by constriction rings, amputation of fingers or limbs and the presence of the amniotic band. However, it may also involve craniofacial disruptions, body wall defects and internal organ abnormalities. The aim of this review is to present the results found in regard to ADAM complex from its historical background, clinical manifestations, epidemiology, etc. In particular, our attention was focused on demonstrating the varying etiopathogenesis theories of ADAM complex and their contradictions. The study was conducted using the databases of PubMed, EBSCO host, Ovid, SpringerLink, Scopus, nature.com, JAMA and ScienceDirect with the following keywords for the search: "amniotic band syndrome", "amniotic band sequence", "Streeter dysplasia", "ADAM complex". In this study we used 22 full-text articles. Patients with ADAM complex require a complete pre- and postnatal evaluation to integrate the diagnosis and to decide on timely treatment. It is important for clinicians and surgeons to possess knowledge of this entity. Further research is necessary to establish a nosological basis.

An unusual amniotic rupture sequence with thoracoabdominal restricting band, low-set posterior hairline, and trapezius contracture

Amniotic rupture sequence is associated with defects of variable severity and at different sites. Analysis of the literature reveals difficulties in the classification, which, in addition to uncertainties surrounding its causes, make diagnosis of unusual presentations rather difficult. We present an unusual case of a thoracoabdominal restrictive band from the umbilicus to a low-set posterior hairline with severe trapezius contracture, sternoclavicular dislocation, and no associated craniofacial or limb abnormalities. Amnion rupture sequence with adhesion band seems to be the most probable cause of this rare combination of anomalies.