Oral cleft recurrence risk and subsequent maternal fertility preferences and behavior in Brazil

Maternal Folic Acid Supplementation and the Risk of Oral Clefts in Offspring

INTRODUCTION

There is controversial evidence from the literature regarding the protective effect of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy against orofacial clefts. The authors undertook this meta-analysis to assess whether folate supplementation during pregnancy can reduce the risk of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate only (CPO) in infants.

METHODS

Eligible articles were identified by searching databases, including PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ISI (Web of Knowledge) to September 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of maternal supplementation on oral clefts. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using Stata software. Publication bias was assessed by the Begg and Egger test. (Registration ID: CRD42018083922) RESULTS:: Out of the 1630 articles found in the authors' initial literature searches, 6 cohort studies, and 31 case-control studies were included in the authors' final meta-analysis. The results of the main analysis revealed that maternal folate supplementation was associated with a modest but statically significant decreased risk of all cleft subtypes (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.78). Folic acid intake alone was inversely associated with CL/P (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.85,) but to a lesser extent than CPO (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 053-1.04). Multivitamin intake had a significant protective effect for CL/P (OR = 0.65 95% CI = 0.55-0.80) as well as CPO (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.53-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that maternal supplementation in early pregnancy reduces the risk of nonsyndromic CL/P and CPO in infants. These data can serve to reassure women planning a pregnancy to consume multivitamins during the periconception period to protect against oral clefts.

The recurrence risk of genetic complex diseases

Complex inherited diseases affected by an interaction between collective effects of the genotype at one or multiple loci either to increase or to lower susceptibility to disease, combined with a variety of environmental exposures that may trigger, accelerate, exacerbate, or protect against the disease process. The new aspects of genetic techniques have been opened for diagnosis and analysis of inherited disorders. While appropriate Mendelian laws is applied to estimate the recurrence risk of single gene diseases, using empirical recurrence risks are the most important and available method to evaluate pedigree of complex (multifactorial), chromosomal, and unknown etiology disorders. Although, generally, empirical recurrent risks are not accurate, either because of the difference of gene frequencies and environmental factors among populations or heterogeneity of disease; using results of plenty family population studies, computerized estimating programs, genotyping technologies, and Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), can make it possible nowadays to estimate these risks. The specific family situation and importance recurrence risks of some common complex genetic diseases will be presented in this review and some important multifactorial disorders’ recurrence risks will be summarized to help genetic counselors for supporting families and representing better view of genetic disorders.

Psychosocial well-being of parents of children with oral clefts

BACKGROUND

Parents of children with oral clefts may be impacted psychosocially in several ways, but empirical evidence remains relatively sparse. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of psychosocial well-being of parents of affected children.

METHODS

The study included a total sample of 287 parents (171 mothers and 116 fathers) of children with oral clefts. Parents completed validated psychosocial instruments to measure social avoidance and distress, fear of negative evaluation scale, self-esteem and interpersonal support. Regression analysis was used to evaluate how selected child, parent and household characteristics relate to psychosocial outcomes focusing on child's cleft type, sex and age, differences between mothers and fathers, marital status and household income.

RESULTS

Fathers had higher self-esteem than mothers (P = 0.01) and lower concern of being negatively judged by others (P < 0.0001) but also had lower perception of having someone to talk to about their problems (P = 0.01). High household income was associated with greater self-esteem and perception of social support (<0.05). Parents of male affected children had greater perception of social support than parents of female affected children (P = 0.04). No significant differences in parental psychosocial status measures were found by cleft type. Similarly, there is little evidence of changes with child age, except for an increase in parental distress and decline in self-esteem during mid-adolescence (age 15-17 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that mothers and fathers of children with oral clefts may differ in their psychosocial adjustment and that mothers may overall experience more psychosocial problems than fathers. Also, parents from less wealthy households may be at greater risk. Parental psychosocial status should be considered in holistic family-based treatment approaches to reduce burden on affected families and improve their well-being.