Chromatin Stability as a Target for Cancer Treatment

Chromatin damage generated by DNA intercalators leads to degradation of RNA Polymerase II

In cancer therapy, DNA intercalators are mainly known for their capacity to kill cells by inducing DNA damage. Recently, several DNA intercalators have attracted much interest given their ability to inhibit RNA Polymerase I transcription (BMH-21), evict histones (Aclarubicin) or induce chromatin trapping of FACT (Curaxin CBL0137). Interestingly, these DNA intercalators lack the capacity to induce DNA damage while still retaining cytotoxic effects and stabilize p53. Herein, we report that these DNA intercalators impact chromatin biology by interfering with the chromatin stability of RNA polymerases I, II and III. These three compounds have the capacity to induce degradation of RNA polymerase II and they simultaneously enable the trapping of Topoisomerases TOP2A and TOP2B on the chromatin. In addition, BMH-21 also acts as a catalytic inhibitor of Topoisomerase II, resembling Aclarubicin. Moreover, BMH-21 induces chromatin trapping of the histone chaperone FACT and propels accumulation of Z-DNA and histone eviction, similarly to Aclarubicin and CBL0137. These DNA intercalators have a cumulative impact on general transcription machinery by inducing accumulation of topological defects and impacting nuclear chromatin. Therefore, their cytotoxic capabilities may be the result of compounding deleterious effects on chromatin homeostasis.

Mono-quinoxaline-induced DNA structural alteration leads to ZBP1/RIP3/MLKL-driven necroptosis in cancer cells

Evading the cellular apoptosis mechanism by modulating multiple pathways poses a sturdy barrier to effective chemotherapy. Cancer cell adeptly resists the apoptosis signaling pathway by regulating anti and pro-apoptotic proteins to escape cell death. Nevertheless, bypassing the apoptotic pathway through necroptosis, an alternative programmed cell death process, maybe a potential therapeutic modality for apoptosis-resistant cells. However, synthetic mono-quinoxaline-based intercalator-induced cellular necroptosis as an anti-cancer perspective remains under-explored. To address this concern, we undertook the design and synthesis of quinoxaline-based small molecules (3a-3l). Our approach involved enhancing the π-surface of the mandatory benzyl moiety to augment its ability to induce DNA structural alteration via intercalation, thereby promoting cytotoxicity across various cancer cell lines (HCT116, HT-29, and HeLa). Notably, the potent compound 3a demonstrated the capacity to induce DNA damage in cancer cells, leading to the induction of ZBP1-mediated necroptosis in the RIP3-expressed cell line (HT-29), where Z-VAD effectively blocked apoptosis-mediated cell death. Interestingly, we observed that 3a induced RIP3-driven necroptosis in combination with DNA hypomethylating agents, even in the RIP3-silenced cell lines (HeLa and HCT116). Overall, our synthesized compound 3a emerged as a promising candidate against various cancers, particularly in apoptosis-compromised cells, through the induction of necroptosis.

Comparison of cell response to chromatin and DNA damage

DNA-targeting drugs are widely used for anti-cancer treatment. Many of these drugs cause different types of DNA damage, i.e. alterations in the chemical structure of DNA molecule. However, molecules binding to DNA may also interfere with DNA packing into chromatin. Interestingly, some molecules do not cause any changes in DNA chemical structure but interfere with DNA binding to histones and nucleosome wrapping. This results in histone loss from chromatin and destabilization of nucleosomes, a phenomenon that we call chromatin damage. Although the cellular response to DNA damage is well-studied, the consequences of chromatin damage are not. Moreover, many drugs used to study DNA damage also cause chromatin damage, therefore there is no clarity on which effects are caused by DNA or chromatin damage. In this study, we aimed to clarify this issue. We treated normal and tumor cells with bleomycin, nuclease mimicking drug which cut predominantly nucleosome-free DNA and therefore causes DNA damage in the form of DNA breaks, and CBL0137, which causes chromatin damage without direct DNA damage. We describe similarities and differences between the consequences of DNA and chromatin damage. Both agents were more toxic for tumor than normal cells, but while DNA damage causes senescence in both normal and tumor cells, chromatin damage does not. Both agents activated p53, but chromatin damage leads to the accumulation of higher levels of unmodified p53, which transcriptional activity was similar to or lower than that of p53 activated by DNA damage. Most importantly, we found that while transcriptional changes caused by DNA damage are limited by p53-dependent activation of a small number of p53 targets, chromatin damage activated many folds more genes in p53 independent manner.

The survival of curaxins in the cancer arena

With DNA damage being a primary anti-cancertarget, a need has arisen for the development of an approach that is a harmlessfor normal tissues but allows for cancer cell-specific cytotoxicity. Previous researchfrom K. Gurova's suggests that small compounds, namely curaxins that bind theDNA can cause chromatin instability and cell death in a cancer cell-specificmanner. In this brief perspective commentary, we investigate how the scientificcommunity has further developed this anti-cancer approach.

Aclarubicin stimulates RNA polymerase II elongation at closely spaced divergent promoters

Anthracyclines are a class of widely prescribed anticancer drugs that disrupt chromatin by intercalating into DNA and enhancing nucleosome turnover. To understand the molecular consequences of anthracycline-mediated chromatin disruption, we used Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) to profile RNA polymerase II during anthracycline treatment in Drosophila cells. We observed that treatment with the anthracycline aclarubicin leads to elevated levels of RNA polymerase II and changes in chromatin accessibility. We found that promoter proximity and orientation affect chromatin changes during aclarubicin treatment, as closely spaced divergent promoter pairs show greater chromatin changes when compared to codirectionally oriented tandem promoters. We also found that aclarubicin treatment changes the distribution of noncanonical DNA G-quadruplex structures both at promoters and at G-rich pericentromeric repeats. Our work suggests that the cancer-killing activity of aclarubicin is driven by the disruption of nucleosomes and RNA polymerase II.

Updates in KMT2A Gene Rearrangement in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The KMT2A (formerly MLL) encodes the histone lysine-specific N-methyltransferase 2A and is mapped on chromosome 11q23. KMT2A is a frequent target for recurrent translocations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or mixed lineage (biphenotypic) leukemia (MLL). Over 90 KMT2A fusion partners have been identified until now, including the most recurring ones—AFF1, MLLT1, and MLLT3—which encode proteins regulating epigenetic mechanisms. The presence of distinct KMT2A rearrangements is an independent dismal prognostic factor, while very few KMT2A rearrangements display either a good or intermediate outcome. KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) ALL affects more than 70% of new ALL diagnoses in infants (<1 year of age), 5–6% of pediatric cases, and 15% of adult cases. KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) ALL is characterized by hyperleukocytosis, a relatively high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement, an aggressive course with early relapse, and early relapses resulting in poor prognosis. The exact pathways of fusions and the effects on the final phenotypic activity of the disease are still subjects of much research. Future trials could consider the inclusion of targeted immunotherapeutic agents and prioritize the identification of prognostic factors, allowing for the less intensive treatment of some infants with KMT2A ALL. The aim of this review is to summarize our knowledge and present current insight into the mechanisms of KMT2A-r ALL, portray their characteristics, discuss the clinical outcome along with risk stratification, and present novel therapeutic strategies.

Comparison of cell response to chromatin and DNA damage

DNA-targeting drugs may damage DNA or chromatin. Many anti-cancer drugs damage both, making it difficult to understand their mechanisms of action. Using molecules causing DNA breaks without altering nucleosome structure (bleomycin) or destabilizing nucleosomes without damaging DNA (curaxin), we investigated the consequences of DNA or chromatin damage in normal and tumor cells. As expected, DNA damage caused p53-dependent growth arrest followed by senescence. Chromatin damage caused higher p53 accumulation than DNA damage; however, growth arrest was p53-independent and did not result in senescence. Chromatin damage activated the transcription of multiple genes, including classical p53 targets, in a p53-independent manner. Although these genes were not highly expressed in basal conditions, they had chromatin organization around the transcription start sites (TSS) characteristic of most highly expressed genes and the highest level of paused RNA polymerase. We hypothesized that nucleosomes around the TSS of these genes were the most sensitive to chromatin damage. Therefore, nucleosome loss upon curaxin treatment would enable transcription without the assistance of sequence-specific transcription factors. We confirmed this hypothesis by showing greater nucleosome loss around the TSS of these genes upon curaxin treatment and activation of a p53-specific reporter in p53-null cells by chromatin-damaging agents but not DNA-damaging agents.

Chromatin and Cancer: Implications of Disrupted Chromatin Organization in Tumorigenesis and Its Diversification

A hallmark of cancers is uncontrolled cell proliferation, frequently associated with an underlying imbalance in gene expression. This transcriptional dysregulation observed in cancers is multifaceted and involves chromosomal rearrangements, chimeric transcription factors, or altered epigenetic marks. Traditionally, chromatin dysregulation in cancers has been considered a downstream effect of driver mutations. However, here we present a broader perspective on the alteration of chromatin organization in the establishment, diversification, and therapeutic resistance of cancers. We hypothesize that the chromatin organization controls the accessibility of the transcriptional machinery to regulate gene expression in cancerous cells and preserves the structural integrity of the nucleus by regulating nuclear volume. Disruption of this large-scale chromatin in proliferating cancerous cells in conventional chemotherapies induces DNA damage and provides a positive feedback loop for chromatin rearrangements and tumor diversification. Consequently, the surviving cells from these chemotherapies become tolerant to higher doses of the therapeutic reagents, which are significantly toxic to normal cells. Furthermore, the disorganization of chromatin induced by these therapies accentuates nuclear fragility, thereby increasing the invasive potential of these tumors. Therefore, we believe that understanding the changes in chromatin organization in cancerous cells is expected to deliver more effective pharmacological interventions with minimal effects on non-cancerous cells.

Aclarubicin stimulates RNA polymerase II elongation at closely spaced divergent promoters

Anthracyclines are a class of widely prescribed anti-cancer drugs that disrupt chromatin by intercalating into DNA and enhancing nucleosome turnover. To understand the molecular consequences of anthracycline-mediated chromatin disruption, we utilized CUT&Tag to profile RNA polymerase II during anthracycline treatment in Drosophila cells. We observed that treatment with the anthracycline aclarubicin leads to elevated levels of elongating RNA polymerase II and changes in chromatin accessibility. We found that promoter proximity and orientation impacts chromatin changes during aclarubicin treatment, as closely spaced divergent promoter pairs show greater chromatin changes when compared to codirectionally-oriented tandem promoters. We also found that aclarubicin treatment changes the distribution of non-canonical DNA G-quadruplex structures both at promoters and at G-rich pericentromeric repeats. Our work suggests that the anti-cancer activity of aclarubicin is driven by the effects of nucleosome disruption on RNA polymerase II, chromatin accessibility and DNA structures.

How germline genes promote malignancy in cancer cells

Cancers often express hundreds of genes otherwise specific to germ cells, the germline/cancer (GC) genes. Here, we present and discuss the hypothesis that activation of a "germline program" promotes cancer cell malignancy. We do so by proposing four hallmark processes of the germline: meiosis, epigenetic plasticity, migration, and metabolic plasticity. Together, these hallmarks enable replicative immortality of germ cells as well as cancer cells. Especially meiotic genes are frequently expressed in cancer, implying that genes unique to meiosis may play a role in oncogenesis. Because GC genes are not expressed in healthy somatic tissues, they form an appealing source of specific treatment targets with limited side effects besides infertility. Although it is still unclear why germ cell specific genes are so abundantly expressed in cancer, from our hypothesis it follows that the germline's reproductive program is intrinsic to cancer development.

The Combination of Curaxin CBL0137 and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat Delays KMT2A-Rearranged Leukemia Progression

Rearrangements of the Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL/KMT2A) gene are present in approximately 10% of acute leukemias and characteristically define disease with poor outcome. Driven by the unmet need to develop better therapies for KMT2A-rearranged leukemia, we previously discovered that the novel anti-cancer agent, curaxin CBL0137, induces decondensation of chromatin in cancer cells, delays leukemia progression and potentiates standard of care chemotherapies in preclinical KMT2A-rearranged leukemia models. Based on the promising potential of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as targeted anti-cancer agents for KMT2A-rearranged leukemia and the fact that HDAC inhibitors also decondense chromatin via an alternate mechanism, we investigated whether CBL0137 could potentiate the efficacy of the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia models. The combination of CBL0137 and panobinostat rapidly killed KMT2A-rearranged leukemia cells by apoptosis and significantly delayed leukemia progression and extended survival in an aggressive model of MLL-AF9 (KMT2A:MLLT3) driven murine acute myeloid leukemia. The drug combination also exerted a strong anti-leukemia response in a rapidly progressing xenograft model derived from an infant with KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia, significantly extending survival compared to either monotherapy. The therapeutic enhancement between CBL0137 and panobinostat in KMT2A-r leukemia cells does not appear to be mediated through cooperative effects of the drugs on KMT2A rearrangement-associated histone modifications. Our data has identified the CBL0137/panobinostat combination as a potential novel targeted therapeutic approach to improve outcome for KMT2A-rearranged leukemia.

Updated Understanding of the Causes of Cancer, and a New Theoretical Perspective of Combinational Cancer Therapies, a Hypothesis

We present an integrative understanding of cancer as a metabolic multifactorial, multistage disease. We focus on underlying genetics-environmental interactions, evidenced by telomere changes. A range of genetic and epigenetic factors, including physical agents and predisposing factors such as diet and lifestyle are included. We present a structured model of the causes of cancer, methods of investigations, approaches to cancer prevention, and polypharmaceutical multidisciplinary complex treatment within a framework of personalized medicine. We searched PubMed, National Cancer Institute online, and other databases for publications regarding causes of cancer, reports of novel mitochondrial reprogramming, epigenetic, and telomerase therapies and state-of-the-art investigations. We focused on multistep treatment protocols to enhance early detection of cancer, and elimination or neutralization of the causes and factors associated with cancer formation and progression.Our aim is to suggest a model therapeutic protocol that incorporates the patient's genome, metabolism, and immune system status; stage of tumor development; and comorbidity(ies), if any. Investigation and treatment of cancer is a challenge that requires further holistic studies that improve the quality of life and survival rates, but are most likely to aid prevention.

Automated assessment of DNA ploidy, chromatin organization, and stroma fraction to predict prognosis and adjuvant therapy response in patients with stage II colorectal carcinoma

DNA ploidy, tumor stroma, and chromatin organization have important implications in tumorigenesis and patient outcome. Automated image cytometry tools were developed to quantitatively measure DNA ploidy (P), stroma fraction (S), and chromatin organization or Nucleotyping (N). This study aimed to discover their clinical value in different stages of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a Chinese patient population. A total of 496 CRC patients of stages I, II, and LMCRC (liver metastatic CRC) were enrolled in this study. Stage II CRC patients with diploidy, low-stroma, or chromatin homogenous status predicted significantly higher 5-year OS and DFS. We constructed a PSN-panel enabled the stage II patients to be further stratified into low-, middle-, high-risk groups, the 5-year OS (89.5% vs 67.9% vs 60.9%, P<0.001) and DFS (86.0% vs 62.3% vs 53.6%, P<0.001) were stratified significantly. In addition, when combined the PSN-panel with T stage or MSS status in stage II patients, the PSN-low risk patients showed significant longer 5-year OS and DFS than the PSN-high risk patients in T3 (OS: 86.3% vs 65.3%, P=0.015; DFS: 83.5 vs 59.8%, P=0.013) or MSS (OS: 86.4% vs 63.9%, P=0.005; DFS: 85.5 vs 57.8%, P=0.003) patients. Finally, in the group of stage II patients with at least one high-risk factor (non-diploidy, high-stroma, chromatin heterogenous), patients who received adjuvant therapy showed significantly longer OS (72.1% vs 48.3%, P=0.007) and DFS (64.5% vs 43.9%, P=0.015) than those who did not receive adjuvant therapy. In contrast, P, S, N couldn't predict the prognosis of stage I and LMCRC patients. Overall, our data demonstrate that the PSN panel is an accurate prognostic tool that can guide treatment decisions for Chinese stage II CRC patients.

The FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) complex: Its roles in DNA repair and implications for cancer therapy

Genomic DNA in the nucleus is wrapped around nucleosomes, a repeating unit of chromatin. The nucleosome, consisting of octamer of core histones, is a barrier for several cellular processes that require access to the naked DNA. The FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT), a histone chaperone complex, is involved in nucleosome remodeling via eviction or assembly of histones during transcription, replication, and DNA repair. Increasing evidence suggests that FACT plays an important role in multiple DNA repair pathways including transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER) of UV-induced damage, DNA single- and double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair, and base excision repair (BER) of oxidized or alkylated damaged bases. Further, studies have shown overexpression of FACT in multiple types of cancer and its association with drug resistance and patients' poor prognosis. In this review, we discuss how FACT is accumulated at the damage site and what functions it performs. We describe the known mechanisms by which FACT facilitates repair of different types of DNA damage. Further, we highlight the recent advances in a class of FACT inhibitors, called curaxins, which show promise as a new adjuvant therapy to sensitize multiple types of cancer to chemotherapy and radiation.

Substituent effect of benzyl moiety in nitroquinoxaline small molecules upon DNA binding: Cumulative destacking of DNA nucleobases leading to histone eviction

Cooperative disruption of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds, as well as base-destacking, is shown to be triggered by a quinoxaline-based small molecule consisting of an N,N-dimethylaminopropyl tether, and a para-substituted benzyl moiety. This events lead to superstructure formation and DNA condensation as evident from biophysical experiments and classical molecular dynamics simulations. The DNA superstructure formation by mono-quinoxaline derivatives is highly entropically favored and predominantly driven by hydrophobic interactions. Furthermore, oversupercoiling of DNA and base-destacking cumulatively induces histone eviction from in-vitro assembled nucleosomes at lower micromolar concentrations implicating biological relevance. The DNA structural modulation and histone eviction capacity of the benzyl para-substituents are in the order: -I > -CF₃> -Br > -Me > -OMe > -OH, which is largely guided by the polarity of benzyl para-substituent and the resulting molecular topology. The most hydrophobic derivative 3c with para-iodo benzyl moiety causes maximal disruption of base pairing and generation of superstructures. Both these events gradually diminish as the polarity of the benzyl para-substituent increases. On the other hand, quinoxaline derivatives having heterocyclic ring instead of benzyl ring, or in the absence of N,N-dimethylamino head-group, is incapable of inducing any DNA structural change and histone eviction. Further, the quinoxaline compounds displayed potent anticancer activities against different cancer cell lines which directly correlates with the hydrophobic effects of the benzyl para-substituents. Overall, the present study provides new insights into the mechanistic approach of DNA structural modulation driven histone eviction guided by the hydrophobicity of synthesized compounds leading to cellular cytotoxicity towards cancer cells.

Dual Targeting of Chromatin Stability By The Curaxin CBL0137 and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat Shows Significant Preclinical Efficacy in Neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

We investigated whether targeting chromatin stability through a combination of the curaxin CBL0137 with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, panobinostat, constitutes an effective multimodal treatment for high-risk neuroblastoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The effects of the drug combination on cancer growth were examined in vitro and in animal models of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. The molecular mechanisms of action were analyzed by multiple techniques including whole transcriptome profiling, immune deconvolution analysis, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, assays to assess cell growth and apoptosis, and a range of cell-based reporter systems to examine histone eviction, heterochromatin transcription, and chromatin compaction.

RESULTS

The combination of CBL0137 and panobinostat enhanced nucleosome destabilization, induced an IFN response, inhibited DNA damage repair, and synergistically suppressed cancer cell growth. Similar synergistic effects were observed when combining CBL0137 with other HDAC inhibitors. The CBL0137/panobinostat combination significantly delayed cancer progression in xenograft models of poor outcome high-risk neuroblastoma. Complete tumor regression was achieved in the transgenic Th-MYCN neuroblastoma model which was accompanied by induction of a type I IFN and immune response. Tumor transplantation experiments further confirmed that the presence of a competent adaptive immune system component allowed the exploitation of the full potential of the drug combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CBL0137 and panobinostat is effective and well-tolerated in preclinical models of aggressive high-risk neuroblastoma, warranting further preclinical and clinical investigation in other pediatric cancers. On the basis of its potential to boost IFN and immune responses in cancer models, the drug combination holds promising potential for addition to immunotherapies.

Molecular Mechanisms of Oncogenesis through the Lens of Nucleosomes and Histones

At the cellular level, cancer is the disease of both the genome and the epigenome, and the interplay between genetic mutations and epigenetic states may occur at the level of elementary chromatin units, the nucleosomes. They are formed by a segment of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins. In this review, we survey various mechanisms of cancer etiology and progression mediated by histones and nucleosomes. In particular, we discuss the effects of mutations in histones, changes in their expression and slicing on epigenetic dysregulation and carcinogenesis. The links between cancer phenotypes and differential expression of histone variants and isoforms are summarized. Finally, we discourse the geometric and steric effects of DNA compaction in nucleosomes on DNA mutation rate, interactions with transcription factors, including pioneer transcription factors, and prospects of cancer cells' genome and epigenome editing.

Chromatin Trapping of Factors Involved in DNA Replication and Repair Underlies Heat-Induced Radio- and Chemosensitization

Hyperthermia has been used as an adjuvant treatment for radio- and chemotherapy for decades. In addition to its effects on perfusion and oxygenation of cancer tissues, hyperthermia can enhance the efficacy of DNA-damaging treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although it is believed that the adjuvant effects are based on hyperthermia-induced dysfunction of DNA repair systems, the mechanisms of these dysfunctions remain elusive. Here, we propose that elevated temperatures can induce chromatin trapping (c-trapping) of essential factors, particularly those involved in DNA repair, and thus enhance the sensitization of cancer cells to DNA-damaging therapeutics. Using mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we identified proteins that could potentially undergo c-trapping in response to hyperthermia. Functional analyses of several identified factors involved in DNA repair demonstrated that c-trapping could indeed be a mechanism of hyperthermia-induced transient deficiency of DNA repair systems. Based on our proteomics data, we showed for the first time that hyperthermia could inhibit maturation of Okazaki fragments and activate a corresponding poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-dependent DNA damage response. Together, our data suggest that chromatin trapping of factors involved in DNA repair and replication contributes to heat-induced radio- and chemosensitization.

Prevention of Chromatin Destabilization by FACT Is Crucial for Malignant Transformation

Histone chaperone FACT is commonly expressed and essential for the viability of transformed but not normal cells, and its expression levels correlate with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. FACT binds several components of nucleosomes and has been viewed as a factor destabilizing nucleosomes to facilitate RNA polymerase passage. To connect FACT's role in transcription with the viability of tumor cells, we analyzed genome-wide FACT binding to chromatin in conjunction with transcription in mouse and human cells with different degrees of FACT dependence. Genomic distribution and density of FACT correlated with the intensity of transcription. However, FACT knockout or knockdown was unexpectedly accompanied by the elevation, rather than suppression, of transcription and with the destabilization of chromatin in transformed, but not normal cells. These data suggest that FACT stabilizes and reassembles nucleosomes disturbed by transcription. This function is vital for tumor cells because malignant transformation is accompanied by chromatin destabilization.

•

FACT is essential for viability of the tumor, but not for normal cells

•

FACT level depends on transcription, but transcription does not depend on FACT

•

FACT preserves nucleosomes during transcription to maintain chromatin integrity

•

FACT maintains chromatin in destabilized state during malignant transformation

HIV chromatin is a preferred target for drugs that bind in the DNA minor groove

The HIV genome is rich in A but not G or U and deficient in C. This nucleotide bias controls HIV phenotype by determining the highly unusual composition of all major HIV proteins. The bias is also responsible for the high frequency of narrow DNA minor groove sites in the double-stranded HIV genome as compared to cellular protein coding sequences and the bulk of the human genome. Since drugs that bind in the DNA minor groove disrupt nucleosomes on sequences that contain closely spaced oligo-A tracts which are prevalent in HIV DNA because of its bias, it was of interest to determine if these drugs exert this selective inhibitory effect on HIV chromatin. To test this possibility, nucleosomes were reconstituted onto five double-stranded DNA fragments from the HIV-1 pol gene in the presence and in the absence of several minor groove binding drugs (MGBDs). The results demonstrated that the MGBDs inhibited the assembly of nucleosomes onto all of the HIV-1 segments in a manner that was proportional to the A-bias, but had no detectable effect on the formation of nucleosomes on control cloned fragments or genomic DNA from chicken and human. Nucleosomes preassembled onto HIV DNA were also preferentially destabilized by the drugs as evidenced by enhanced nuclease accessibility in physiological ionic strength and by the preferential loss of the histone octamer in hyper-physiological salt solutions. The drugs also selectively disrupted HIV-containing nucleosomes in yeast as revealed by enhanced nuclease accessibility of the in vivo assembled HIV chromatin and reductions in superhelical densities of plasmid chromatin containing HIV sequences. A comparison of these results to the density of A-tracts in the HIV genome indicates that a large fraction of the nucleosomes that make up HIV chromatin should be preferred in vitro targets for the MGBDs. These results show that the MGBDs preferentially disrupt HIV-1 chromatin in vitro and in vivo and raise the possibility that non-toxic derivatives of certain MGBDs might serve as a novel class of anti-HIV agents.

Histone Chaperone FACT and Curaxins: Effects on Genome Structure and Function

The histone chaperone FACT plays important roles in essentially every chromatin-associated process and is an important indirect target of the curaxin class of anti-cancer drugs. Curaxins are aromatiс compounds that intercalate into DNA and can trap FACT in bulk chromatin, thus interfering with its distribution and its functions in cancer cells. Recent studies have provided mechanistic insight into how FACT and curaxins cooperate to promote unfolding of nucleosomes and chromatin fibers, resulting in genome-wide disruption of contact chromatin domain boundaries, perturbation of higher order chromatin organization, and global disregulation of gene expression. Here, we discuss the implications of these insights for cancer biology.

DNA G-Quadruplexes (G4s) Modulate Epigenetic (Re)Programming and Chromatin Remodeling: Transient Genomic G4s Assist in the Establishment and Maintenance of Epigenetic Marks, While Persistent G4s May Erase Epigenetic Marks

Here, the emerging data on DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) as epigenetic modulators are reviewed and integrated. This concept has appeared and evolved substantially in recent years. First, persistent G4s (e.g., those stabilized by exogenous ligands) were linked to the loss of the histone code. More recently, transient G4s (i.e., those formed upon replication or transcription and unfolded rapidly by helicases) were implicated in CpG island methylation maintenance and de novo CpG methylation control. The most recent data indicate that there are direct interactions between G4s and chromatin remodeling factors. Finally, multiple findings support the indirect participation of G4s in chromatin reshaping via interactions with remodeling-related transcription factors (TFs) or damage responders. Here, the links between the above processes are analyzed; also, how further elucidation of these processes may stimulate the progress of epigenetic therapy is discussed, and the remaining open questions are highlighted.