"Direct" and "Indirect" Effects of Histone Modifications: Modulation of Sterical Bulk as a Novel Source of Functionality

Bioorthogonal Labeling and Enrichment of Histone Monoaminylation Reveal Its Accumulation and Regulatory Function in Cancer Cell Chromatin

Histone monoaminylation (i.e., serotonylation and dopaminylation) is an emerging category of epigenetic mark occurring on the fifth glutamine (Q5) residue of H3 N-terminal tail, which plays significant roles in gene transcription. Current analysis of histone monoaminylation is mainly based on site-specific antibodies and mass spectrometry, which either lacks high resolution or is time-consuming. In this study, we report the development of chemical probes for bioorthogonal labeling and enrichment of histone serotonylation and dopaminylation. These probes were successfully applied for the monoaminylation analysis of in vitro biochemical assays, cells, and tissue samples. The enrichment of monoaminylated histones by the probes further confirmed the crosstalk between H3Q5 monoaminylation and H3K4 methylation. Finally, combining the ex vivo and in vitro analyses based on the developed probes, we have shown that both histone serotonylation and dopaminylation are highly enriched in tumor tissues that overexpress transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) and regulate the three-dimensional architecture of cellular chromatin.

Bioorthogonal labeling and enrichment of histone monoaminylation reveal its accumulation and regulatory function in cancer cell chromatin

Histone monoaminylation ( i . e ., serotonylation and dopaminylation) is an emerging category of epigenetic mark occurring on the fifth glutamine (Q5) residue of H3 N-terminal tail, which plays significant roles in gene transcription. Current analysis of histone monoaminylation is mainly based on site-specific antibodies and mass spectrometry, which either lacks high resolution or is time-consuming. In this study, we report the development of chemical probes for bioorthogonal labeling and enrichment of histone serotonylation and dopaminylation. These probes were successfully applied for the monoaminylation analysis of in vitro biochemical assays, cells, and tissue samples. The enrichment of monoaminylated histones by the probes further confirmed the crosstalk between H3Q5 monoaminylation and H3K4 methylation. Finally, combining the ex vivo and in vitro analyses based on the developed probes, we have shown that both histone serotonylation and dopaminylation are highly enriched in tumor tissues that overexpress transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) and regulate the three-dimensional architecture of cellular chromatin.

TOC

The Effects of Histone H2B Ubiquitylations on the Nucleosome Structure and Internucleosomal Interactions

Eukaryotic gene compaction takes place at multiple levels to package DNA to chromatin and chromosomes. Two of the most fundamental levels of DNA packaging are at the nucleosome and dinucleosome stacks. The nucleosome is the basic gene-packing unit and is composed of DNA wrapped around a histone core. Nucleosomes stack with one another for further compaction of DNA. The first stacking step leads to dinucleosome formation, which is driven by internucleosomal interactions between various parts of two nucleosomes. Histone proteins are rich targets for post-translational modifications, some of which affect the structure of the nucleosome and the interactions between nucleosomes. These effects are often implicated in the regulation of various genomic transactions. In particular, histone H2B ubiquitylation has been associated with facilitated transcription and hexasome formation. Here, we employed semi-synthetically ubiquitylated histone H2B and single-molecule FRET to investigate the effects of H2B ubiquitylations at lysine 34 (H2BK34) and lysine 120 (H2BK120) on the structure of the nucleosome and the interactions between two nucleosomes. Our results suggest that H2BK34 ubiquitylation widens the DNA gyre gap in the nucleosome and stabilizes long- and short-range internucleosomal interactions while H2BK120 ubiquitylation does not affect the nucleosome structure or internucleosomal interactions. These results suggest potential roles for H2B ubiquitylations in facilitated transcription and hexasome formation while maintaining the structural integrity of chromatin.

Histone Modifications, Internucleosome Dynamics, and DNA Stresses: How They Cooperate to “Functionalize” Nucleosomes

Tight packaging of DNA in chromatin severely constrains DNA accessibility and dynamics. In contrast, nucleosomes in active chromatin state are highly flexible, can exchange their histones, and are virtually “transparent” to RNA polymerases, which transcribe through gene bodies at rates comparable to that of naked DNA. Defining mechanisms that revert nucleosome repression, in addition to their value for basic science, is of key importance for the diagnosis and treatment of genetic diseases. Chromatin activity is largely regulated by histone posttranslational modifications, ranging from small chemical groups up to the yet understudied “bulky” ubiquitylation and sumoylation. However, it is to be revealed how histone marks are “translated” to permissive or repressive changes in nucleosomes: it is a general opinion that histone modifications act primarily as “signals” for recruiting the regulatory proteins or as a “neutralizer” of electrostatic shielding of histone tails. Here, we would like to discuss recent evidence suggesting that histone ubiquitylation, in a DNA stress–dependent manner, can directly regulate the dynamics of the nucleosome and their primary structure and can promote nucleosome decomposition to hexasome particles or additionally stabilize nucleosomes against unwrapping. In addition, nucleosome repression/ derepression studies are usually performed with single mononucleosomes as a model. We would like to review and discuss recent findings showing that internucleosomal interactions could strongly modulate the dynamics and rearrangements of nucleosomes. Our hypothesis is that bulky histone modifications, nucleosome inherent dynamics, internucleosome interactions, and DNA torsions could act in cooperation to orchestrate the formation of different dynamic states of arrayed nucleosomes and thus promote chromatin functionality and diversify epigenetic programming methods.