A Kuhnian revolution in molecular biology: Most genes in complex organisms express regulatory RNAs

lncRNAs in vascular senescence and microvascular remodeling

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as critical regulators of vascular senescence and microvascular remodeling, processes that significantly contribute to the development of age-related diseases in organs such as the kidneys, heart, and lungs. Through mechanisms like chromatin remodeling, transcriptional regulation, and posttranscriptional modifications, lncRNAs modulate gene expression, thereby influencing cellular processes such as apoptosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and angiogenesis. In chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary disorders, lncRNAs play a central role in promoting vascular dysfunction, endothelial cell aging, and fibrosis. This review focuses on how lncRNAs contribute to endothelial dysfunction, fibrosis, and vascular aging, emphasizing their roles in disease progression within the kidneys, heart, and lungs, where lncRNA-mediated vascular changes play a significant role in disease progression. Understanding the interactions between lncRNAs, vascular senescence, and microvascular remodeling offers promising avenues for developing targeted therapeutic strategies to mitigate the impact of aging on vascular health.

From the genome's perspective: Bearing somatic retrotransposition to leverage the regulatory potential of L1 RNAs

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genomic elements constituting a big fraction of eukaryotic genomes. They ignite an evolutionary arms race with host genomes, which in turn evolve strategies to restrict their activity. Despite being tightly repressed, TEs display precisely regulated expression patterns during specific stages of mammalian development, suggesting potential benefits for the host. Among TEs, the long interspersed nuclear element (LINE-1 or L1) has been found to be active in neurons. This activity prompted extensive research into its possible role in cognition. So far, no specific cause-effect relationship between L1 retrotransposition and brain functions has been conclusively identified. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that interactions between L1 RNAs and RNA/DNA binding proteins encode specific messages that cells utilize to activate or repress entire transcriptional programs. We summarize recent findings highlighting the activity of L1 RNAs at the non-coding level during early embryonic and brain development. We propose a hypothesis suggesting a mutualistic relationship between L1 mRNAs and the host cell. In this scenario, cells tolerate a certain rate of retrotransposition to leverage the regulatory effects of L1s as non-coding RNAs on potentiating their mitotic potential. In turn, L1s benefit from the cell's proliferative state to increase their chance to mobilize.

Long-read RNA sequencing can probe organelle genome pervasive transcription

40 years ago, organelle genomes were assumed to be streamlined and, perhaps, unexciting remnants of their prokaryotic past. However, the field of organelle genomics has exposed an unparallel diversity in genome architecture (i.e. genome size, structure, and content). The transcription of these eccentric genomes can be just as elaborate - organelle genomes are pervasively transcribed into a plethora of RNA types. However, while organelle protein-coding genes are known to produce polycistronic transcripts that undergo heavy posttranscriptional processing, the nature of organelle noncoding transcriptomes is still poorly resolved. Here, we review how wet-lab experiments and second-generation sequencing data (i.e. short reads) have been useful to determine certain types of organelle RNAs, particularly noncoding RNAs. We then explain how third-generation (long-read) RNA-Seq data represent the new frontier in organelle transcriptomics. We show that public repositories (e.g. NCBI SRA) already contain enough data for inter-phyla comparative studies and argue that organelle biologists can benefit from such data. We discuss the prospects of using publicly available sequencing data for organelle-focused studies and examine the challenges of such an approach. We highlight that the lack of a comprehensive database dedicated to organelle genomics/transcriptomics is a major impediment to the development of a field with implications in basic and applied science.

Coding, or non-coding, that is the question

The advent of high-throughput sequencing uncovered that our genome is pervasively transcribed into RNAs that are seemingly not translated into proteins. It was also found that non-coding RNA transcripts outnumber canonical protein-coding genes. This mindboggling discovery prompted a surge in non-coding RNA research that started unraveling the functional relevance of these new genetic units, shaking the classic definition of "gene". While the non-coding RNA revolution was still taking place, polysome/ribosome profiling and mass spectrometry analyses revealed that peptides can be translated from non-canonical open reading frames. Therefore, it is becoming evident that the coding vs non-coding dichotomy is way blurrier than anticipated. In this review, we focus on several examples in which the binary classification of coding vs non-coding genes is outdated, since the same bifunctional gene expresses both coding and non-coding products. We discuss the implications of this intricate usage of transcripts in terms of molecular mechanisms of gene expression and biological outputs, which are often concordant, but can also surprisingly be discordant. Finally, we discuss the methodological caveats that are associated with the study of bifunctional genes, and we highlight the opportunities and challenges of therapeutic exploitation of this intricacy towards the development of anticancer therapies.

Are non-protein coding RNAs junk or treasure?: An attempt to explain and reconcile opposing viewpoints of whether the human genome is mostly transcribed into non-functional or functional RNAs

The human genome project's lasting legacies are the emerging insights into human physiology and disease, and the ascendance of biology as the dominant science of the 21st century. Sequencing revealed that >90% of the human genome is not coding for proteins, as originally thought, but rather is overwhelmingly transcribed into non-protein coding, or non-coding, RNAs (ncRNAs). This discovery initially led to the hypothesis that most genomic DNA is "junk", a term still championed by some geneticists and evolutionary biologists. In contrast, molecular biologists and biochemists studying the vast number of transcripts produced from most of this genome "junk" often surmise that these ncRNAs have biological significance. What gives? This essay contrasts the two opposing, extant viewpoints, aiming to explain their bases, which arise from distinct reference frames of the underlying scientific disciplines. Finally, it aims to reconcile these divergent mindsets in hopes of stimulating synergy between scientific fields.

Long Non-Coding RNAs as "MYC Facilitators"

In this article, we discuss a class of MYC-interacting lncRNAs (long non-coding RNAs) that share the following criteria: They are direct transcriptional targets of MYC. Their expression is coordinated with the expression of MYC. They are required for sustained MYC-driven cell proliferation, and they are not essential for cell survival. We refer to these lncRNAs as "MYC facilitators" and discuss two representative members of this class of lncRNAs, SNHG17 (small nuclear RNA host gene) and LNROP (long non-coding regulator of POU2F2). We also present a general hypothesis on the role of lncRNAs in MYC-mediated transcriptional regulation.