1
|
Moodie EEM, Talbot D. On "Reflections on the concept of optimality of single decision point treatment regimes". Biom J 2023; 65:e2300027. [PMID: 37797173 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202300027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
This is a discussion of "Reflections on the concept of optimality of single decision point treatment regimes" by Trung Dung Tran, Ariel Alonso Abad, Geert Verbeke, Geert Molenberghs, and Iven Van Mechelen. The authors propose a thoughtful consideration of optimization targets and the implications of such targets for the resulting optimal treatment rule. However, we contest the assertation that targets of optimization have been overlooked and suggest additional considerations that researchers must contemplate as part of a complete framework for learning about optimal treatment regimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica E M Moodie
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Denis Talbot
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moodie EEM. Causal inference for oncology: past developments and current challenges. Int J Biostat 2023; 19:273-281. [PMID: 36054829 DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we review some important early developments on causal inference in medical statistics and epidemiology that were inspired by questions in oncology. We examine two classical examples from the literature and point to a current area of ongoing methodological development, namely the estimation of optimal adaptive treatment strategies. While causal approaches to analysis have become more routine in oncology research, many exciting challenges and open problems remain, particularly in the context of censored outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica E M Moodie
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahar RK, McGuinness MB, Chakraborty B, Carlin JB, IJzerman MJ, Simpson JA. A scoping review of studies using observational data to optimise dynamic treatment regimens. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:39. [PMID: 33618655 PMCID: PMC7898728 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01211-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) formalise the multi-stage and dynamic decision problems that clinicians often face when treating chronic or progressive medical conditions. Compared to randomised controlled trials, using observational data to optimise DTRs may allow a wider range of treatments to be evaluated at a lower cost. This review aimed to provide an overview of how DTRs are optimised with observational data in practice. METHODS Using the PubMed database, a scoping review of studies in which DTRs were optimised using observational data was performed in October 2020. Data extracted from eligible articles included target medical condition, source and type of data, statistical methods, and translational relevance of the included studies. RESULTS From 209 PubMed abstracts, 37 full-text articles were identified, and a further 26 were screened from the reference lists, totalling 63 articles for inclusion in a narrative data synthesis. Observational DTR models are a recent development and their application has been concentrated in a few medical areas, primarily HIV/AIDS (27, 43%), followed by cancer (8, 13%), and diabetes (6, 10%). There was substantial variation in the scope, intent, complexity, and quality between the included studies. Statistical methods that were used included inverse-probability weighting (26, 41%), the parametric G-formula (16, 25%), Q-learning (10, 16%), G-estimation (4, 6%), targeted maximum likelihood/minimum loss-based estimation (4, 6%), regret regression (3, 5%), and other less common approaches (10, 16%). Notably, studies that were primarily intended to address real-world clinical questions (18, 29%) tended to use inverse-probability weighting and the parametric G-formula, relatively well-established methods, along with a large amount of data. Studies focused on methodological developments (45, 71%) tended to be more complicated and included a demonstrative real-world application only. CONCLUSIONS As chronic and progressive conditions become more common, the need will grow for personalised treatments and methods to estimate the effects of DTRs. Observational DTR studies will be necessary, but so far their use to inform clinical practice has been limited. Focusing on simple DTRs, collecting large and rich clinical datasets, and fostering tight partnerships between content experts and data analysts may result in more clinically relevant observational DTR studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K Mahar
- Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
- Cancer Health Services Research Unit, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Myra B McGuinness
- Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bibhas Chakraborty
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - John B Carlin
- Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research Unit, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie A Simpson
- Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moodie EEM, Krakow EF. Precision medicine: Statistical methods for estimating adaptive treatment strategies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020; 55:1890-1896. [PMID: 32286507 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0871-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
SERIES EDITORS' NOTE The beauty of science is that all the important things are unpredictable. Freeman Dyson In the typescript which follows, Moodie and Krakow tackle the topical issue of precision medicine and statistical methods for estimating adaptive treatment strategies. This may be the most difficult typescript in our series so far for non-statisticians to understand. It even has equations! But please bear with the authors and give it a chance. One needs not to understand the equations to get the thrust of the strategy.Precision medicine as we discuss elsewhere, is misnamed. In statistics and mathematics precision refers to getting the same answer again and again. It does not mean getting the correct answer, the term for which is accuracy, not precision. However, precision is the current buzz word so there's no point trying to get this straight. When we think about precision we need to consider two elements, reproducibility and replicability. Reproducibility means you give me your data and computer code and I come to the same conclusion you did. Replicability is another matter. I try to replicate your experiment and hopefully reach the same conclusion. In medicine, replicability is obviously more important than reproducibility but things which cannot be reproduced are unlikely to be replicated.As the authors discuss, one can think about precision medicine as one does a family vacation. A best vacation depends on several co-variates: where you live, your prior travel experiences, advice from family and friends, online reviews, Wikitravel, cost, your travel budget, if you have kids and many other co-variates. Consequently, there is unlikely to be a best vacation for everyone. Yours might be a week at the Ritz Carlton Cancun with dinner at Careyes and ours, a week at the Pfister Hotel in Milwaukee with dinner at Mader's German Restaurant (bring simvastatin). Similarly, it is unlikely there is a best therapy of acute myeloid leukemia, a best donor, a best conditioning regimen, a best posttransplant immune suppressive regimen etc. and certainly no best combination of these co-variates for your patient.The question Moodie and Krakow tackle is how we can determine the best therapy or combination of therapies for someone receiving a haematopoietic cell transplant. Although the default answer is typically: randomized clinical trials are the gold standard, these inform us of the outcome of a cohort of subjects, not individuals. In many instances, although a new therapy may be shown to be better than an old one in a controlled randomized trial the benefit is not uniformly distributed. Some subjects in the experimental cohort may do worse with the new therapy compared with controls, others better. The question is who are the winners and losers? We cannot do a controlled randomized trial of one person. Moodie and Krakow discuss statistical tools to help us sort this out.Again, please do not be put off by the equations; forgetaboutit. The overriding message is not so complex, and important. We are always standing by on twitter @BMTStats to help. But don't confuse us with Match.com. And, by the way, Freeman Dyson was a professor at the Institute for Advanced Studies at Princeton but never got his PhD.Robert Peter Gale, Imperial College London, and Mei-Jie Zhang, Medical College of Wisconsin, Center for International Blood and Marrow Research (CIBMTR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica E M Moodie
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave W, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A2, Canada
| | - Elizabeth F Krakow
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gallardo DI, Gómez YM, Gómez HW, de Castro M. On the use of the modified power series family of distributions in a cure rate model context. Stat Methods Med Res 2019; 29:1831-1845. [DOI: 10.1177/0962280219876962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a generalization of the power series cure rate model for the number of competing causes related to the occurrence of the event of interest. The model includes distributions not yet used in the cure rate models context, such as the Borel, Haight and Restricted Generalized Poisson distributions. The model is conveniently parameterized in terms of the cure rate. Maximum likelihood estimation based on the Expectation Maximization algorithm is discussed. A simulation study designed to assess some properties of the estimators is carried out, showing the good performance of the proposed estimation procedure in finite samples. Finally, an application to a bone marrow transplant data set is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego I Gallardo
- Departamento de Matemática, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Atacama, Chile
| | - Yolanda M Gómez
- Departamento de Matemática, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Atacama, Chile
| | - Héctor W Gómez
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad de Antofagasta, Chile
| | - Mário de Castro
- Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|