Sterilization of sealed PVDF pouches containing decellularized scaffold by electrical stimulation

Sterilization Effects on Nitric Oxide-Releasing Glucose Sensors

Nitric oxide (NO) release from S-nitrosothiol-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles imbedded in the diffusion limiting layer of a glucose sensor has been demonstrated as an effective strategy for mitigating the foreign body response common to sensor implantation, resulting in improved analytical performance. With respect to potential clinical translation of this approach, the effects of sterilization on NO-releasing biosensors require careful evaluation, as NO donor chemistry is sensitive to temperature and environment. Herein, we evaluated the influence of multiple sterilization methods on 1) sterilization success; 2) NO payload; and 3) sensor performance to establish the commercialization potential of NO-releasing glucose sensors. Sensors were treated with ethylene oxide gas, the most common sterilization method for intricate medical devices, which led to undesirable (i.e., premature) release of NO. To reduce NO loss, alternative sterilization methods that were studied included exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light and immersion in 70% ethanol (EtOH). Sterilization cycle times required to reach a 10-6 sterility assurance level were determined for both UV light and 70% EtOH against Gram-negative and -positive bacteria. The longest sterilization cycle times (258 s and 628 s for 70% EtOH and UV light, respectively) resulted in a negligible impact on benchtop sensor performance. However, sterilization with 70% ethanol resulted in a reduced NO-release duration. Ultraviolet light exposure for ~10 min proved successful at eliminating bacteria without compromising NO payloads or durations and presents as the most promising method for sterilization of these sensors. In addition, storage of NO-releasing sensor membranes at -20 and -80°C resulted in preservation of NO release for 6 and 12 months, respectively.

The impact of pelvic floor electrical stimulation on vaginal microbiota and immunity

Pelvic floor electrical stimulation (ES) is an effective treatment for pelvic floor dysfunction. However, the impact of ES on vaginal microbiota and local inflammatory response is yet poorly understood. Therefore, we designed a longitudinal study to investigate the impact of ES on vaginal microbiota and cytokines. A total of 170 participants were recruited into the study at Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China, from December 2021 to April 2022. They were divided into two groups concerning the follow-up: long-term cohort (n = 147) following up to seven treatment sessions and short-term cohort (n = 23) following up to 7 h after a 30-min treatment. Paired vaginal discharge samples were collected from 134 individuals. Vaginal microbiota was characterized by 16S rRNA sequencing, and local cytokines concentrations were detected by the cytometric bead array method. A significant increase in the relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. was observed after ES treatment (P < 0.001). In addition, L. crispatus (P = 0.012) and L. gasseri (P = 0.011) also increased significantly. Reduced microbial diversity was observed in the vaginal microbiota after the treatment. In the long-term cohort, a significant downregulation of IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-17A, and TNF-α was compared with baseline. However, the short-term cohort presented with an elevated IL-6 level at 7 h after the treatment. In conclusion, this study suggested that transvaginal electrical stimulation might help to restore and maintain a healthy vaginal microbiota dominated by Lactobacillus, reducing the risk of vaginal inflammation.