Chasing long-range evolutionary couplings in the AlphaFold era

Identifying protein conformational states in the Protein Data Bank: Toward unlocking the potential of integrative dynamics studies

Studying protein dynamics and conformational heterogeneity is crucial for understanding biomolecular systems and treating disease. Despite the deposition of over 215 000 macromolecular structures in the Protein Data Bank and the advent of AI-based structure prediction tools such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold, static representations are typically produced, which fail to fully capture macromolecular motion. Here, we discuss the importance of integrating experimental structures with computational clustering to explore the conformational landscapes that manifest protein function. We describe the method developed by the Protein Data Bank in Europe - Knowledge Base to identify distinct conformational states, demonstrate the resource's primary use cases, through examples, and discuss the need for further efforts to annotate protein conformations with functional information. Such initiatives will be crucial in unlocking the potential of protein dynamics data, expediting drug discovery research, and deepening our understanding of macromolecular mechanisms.

Exploring the Alternative Conformation of a Known Protein Structure Based on Contact Map Prediction

The rapid development of deep learning-based methods has considerably advanced the field of protein structure prediction. The accuracy of predicting the 3D structures of simple proteins is comparable to that of experimentally determined structures, providing broad possibilities for structure-based biological studies. Another critical question is whether and how multistate structures can be predicted from a given protein sequence. In this study, analysis of tens of two-state proteins demonstrated that deep learning-based contact map predictions contain structural information on both states, which suggests that it is probably appropriate to change the target of deep learning-based protein structure prediction from one specific structure to multiple likely structures. Furthermore, by combining deep learning- and physics-based computational methods, we developed a protocol for exploring alternative conformations from a known structure of a given protein, by which we successfully approached the holo-state conformations of multiple representative proteins from their apo-state structures.

Representing structures of the multiple conformational states of proteins

Biomolecules exhibit dynamic behavior that single-state models of their structures cannot fully capture. We review some recent advances for investigating multiple conformations of biomolecules, including experimental methods, molecular dynamics simulations, and machine learning. We also address the challenges associated with representing single- and multiple-state models in data archives, with a particular focus on NMR structures. Establishing standardized representations and annotations will facilitate effective communication and understanding of these complex models to the broader scientific community.

Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2

The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database contains predicted structures for millions of proteins. For the majority of human proteins that contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which do not adopt a stable structure, it is generally assumed that these regions have low AlphaFold2 confidence scores that reflect low-confidence structural predictions. Here, we show that AlphaFold2 assigns confident structures to nearly 15% of human IDRs. By comparison to experimental NMR data for a subset of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold (i.e., upon binding or under other specific conditions), we find that AlphaFold2 often predicts the structure of the conditionally folded state. Based on databases of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold, we estimate that AlphaFold2 can identify conditionally folding IDRs at a precision as high as 88% at a 10% false positive rate, which is remarkable considering that conditionally folded IDR structures were minimally represented in its training data. We find that human disease mutations are nearly fivefold enriched in conditionally folded IDRs over IDRs in general and that up to 80% of IDRs in prokaryotes are predicted to conditionally fold, compared to less than 20% of eukaryotic IDRs. These results indicate that a large majority of IDRs in the proteomes of human and other eukaryotes function in the absence of conditional folding, but the regions that do acquire folds are more sensitive to mutations. We emphasize that the AlphaFold2 predictions do not reveal functionally relevant structural plasticity within IDRs and cannot offer realistic ensemble representations of conditionally folded IDRs.