Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly

Perioperative Considerations in Older Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Review

With the growth of the older adult population, the number of older adults waitlisted for and undergoing kidney and liver transplantation has increased. Transplantation is an important and definitive treatment for this population. We present a contemporary review of the unique preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues that patients older than 65 y face when they undergo kidney or liver transplantation. We focus on geriatric syndromes that are common in older patients listed for kidney or liver transplantation including frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive dysfunction; discuss important considerations for older transplant recipients, which may impact preoperative risk stratification; and describe unique challenges in intraoperative and postoperative management for older patients. Intraoperative challenges in the older adult include using evidence-based best anesthetic practices, maintaining adequate perfusion pressure, and using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Postoperative concerns include controlling acute postoperative pain; preventing cardiovascular complications and delirium; optimizing immunosuppression; preventing perioperative kidney injury; and avoiding nephrotoxicity and rehabilitation. Future studies are needed throughout the perioperative period to identify interventions that will improve patients' preoperative physiologic status, prevent postoperative medical complications, and improve medical and patient-centered outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

Measurement Matters: A Metrological Approach to Renal Preimplantation Biopsy Evaluation to Address Uncertainty in Organ Selection

Background

Preimplantation biopsy combines measurements of injury into a composite index to inform organ acceptance. The uncertainty in these measurements remains poorly characterized, raising concerns variability may contribute to inappropriate clinical decisions.

Methods

We adopted a metrological approach to evaluate biopsy score reliability. Variability was assessed by performing repeat biopsies (n = 293) on discarded allografts (n = 16) using 3 methods (core, punch, and wedge). Uncertainty was quantified using a bootstrapping analysis. Observer effects were controlled by semi-blinded scoring, and the findings were validated by comparison with standard glass evaluation.

Results

The surgical method strongly determined the size (core biopsy area 9.04 mm2, wedge 37.9 mm2) and, therefore, yield (glomerular yield r = 0.94, arterial r = 0.62) of each biopsy. Core biopsies yielded inadequate slides most frequently. Repeat biopsy of the same kidney led to marked variation in biopsy scores. In 10 of 16 cases, scores were contradictory, crossing at least 1 decision boundary (ie, to transplant or to discard). Bootstrapping demonstrated significant uncertainty associated with single-slide assessment; however, scores were similar for paired kidneys from the same donor.

Conclusions

Our investigation highlights the risks of relying on single-slide assessment to quantify organ injury. Biopsy evaluation is subject to uncertainty, meaning each slide is better conceptualized as providing an estimate of the kidney's condition rather than a definitive result. Pooling multiple assessments could improve the reliability of biopsy analysis, enhancing confidence. Where histological quantification is necessary, clinicians should seek to develop new protocols using more tissue and consider automated methods to assist pathologists in delivering analysis within clinical time frames.

Renal transplantation in older adults: retrospective cohort study to examine the impact of the new 2019 kidney offering scheme on older adult transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

In 2019, a new kidney offering scheme was launched in the United Kingdom, aiming to better match estimated patient survival and graft life expectancy. The scheme's impact on older patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) is unknown. This study aims to compare the outcomes of older adult KT recipients before and after introduction of the 2019 scheme.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of older adults who underwent KT was undertaken. Group 1 were transplanted between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2019 (2006 allocation scheme) and group 2 between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021 (2019 offering scheme). An older adult was any person ≥60 years old at the time of KT. Univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

There were 107 older adult deceased donor KT recipients, 62 from group 1 and 45 from group 2. Median age at transplantation was 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-71) and 67 (IQR 64-73) years, respectively. Univariable analysis showed that re-intervention (OR 6.486, 95% CI 1.306-32.216, p = 0.022) and critical care admission (OR 5.619, 95% CI 1.448-21.812, p = 0.013) were significantly more likely in group 2. Group 2 recipients were significantly more likely to have a level 4 human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (OR 4.667, 95% CI 1.640-13.275, p = 0.004) and to have undergone previous KT (OR 4.691, 95% CI 1.385-15.893, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of the 2019 offering scheme was associated with re-intervention and critical care admission for older KT recipients. We also observed less-favourable HLA matches but more KT in difficult-to-match groups.

The Centennial Allograft: Cumulative Kidney and Liver Function for More Than 100 Years

The maximum cumulative life span of kidneys and livers first in donors and then in transplant recipients has not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine if cumulative organ function for more than 90 years is possible for transplanted kidneys and livers. This study included kidney and liver transplants from living or deceased donors ≥55 years. Cumulative organ function (COF) = Organ Age at Donation [Years] + Tx Allograft Function [Years]. Univariate and multivariable methods were used to describe characteristics and outcomes. Between 1987 and 2022, a total of 81,807 kidney and 37,099 liver transplants were included in this study. Of all kidney grafts 2.7% but 16.6% of all liver grafts reached the 90-year COF mark. There were only 2 living donor kidneys that surpassed the 100-year mark versus 29 deceased liver grafts. The longest kidney function was 104 years and longest liver function 108 years. Multivariate analysis showed that optimal donor and recipient selection and management are predictors for allograft longevity. COF in organs exceeding 100 physiologic years is possible. Extended organ longevity was 5 times more common for livers than kidneys. These analyses support that age alone should not exclude older kidney and liver donors from consideration for transplantation.

Ex vivo kidney machine perfusion: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Machine perfusion is an organ preservation strategy used to improve function over simple storage in a cold environment. This article presents an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of machine perfusion in deceased donor kidneys.

METHODS

RCTs from November 2018 to July 2023 comparing machine perfusion versus static cold storage in kidney transplantation were evaluated for systematic review. The primary outcome in meta-analysis was delayed graft function.

RESULTS

A total 19 studies were included, and 16 comparing hypothermic machine perfusion with static cold storage were analysed. The risk of delayed graft function was lower with hypothermic machine perfusion (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.69 to 0.86), even in kidneys after circulatory death (RR 0.78, 0.68 to 0.90) or brain death (RR 0.73, 0.63 to 0.84). Full hypothermic machine perfusion decreased the risk of delayed graft function (RR 0.69, 0.60 to 0.79), whereas partial hypothermic machine perfusion did not (RR 0.92, 0.69 to 1.22). Normothermic machine perfusion or short-term oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion preservation after static cold storage was equivalent to static cold storage in terms of delayed graft function and 1-year graft survival.

CONCLUSION

Hypothermic machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function risks and normothermic approaches show promise.

Old for young kidney transplantation: a responsible option for our patients to reduce waiting time?

PURPOSE

The Eurotransplant Senior program allocating grafts from donors ≥ 65 years to recipients aged ≥ 65 years has proven good results within the last 20 years. However, "old" grafts are also allocated to younger recipients < 65 years, and this outcome of "old for young" kidney transplantations (KT) still lacks detailed investigations.

METHODS

All "old for young" KT performed at four tertiary referral centers were retrospectively compared including a recent follow-up, stratifying for "old for young" (donor ≥ 65 years to recipient < 65 years) vs. "very old for young" KT (donor ≥ 70 years to recipient < 65 years).

RESULTS

Overall, 99 patients were included with 56 (56.6%) "old for young" and 43 (43.4%) "very old for young" KT. The median waiting time did not differ (60.7 vs. 45.8 months, respectively) at comparable living donation rates (57.1% vs. 44.2%) as well as intra- and postoperative results. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 1; 133), the 3-year graft survival of 91% vs. 87% did not significantly vary. In subgroup analyses assessing living donation or donation after brain death (DBD) KT only, the graft survival was significantly longer for "old for young" KT within the living donation subgroup. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the presence of panel-reactive antibodies was the only significant impact factor on graft survival (HR 8.32, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This analysis clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the "old for young" approach, enabling favorable perioperative results as well as comparable data of graft- and overall survival, while reducing waiting time for eligible patients.

Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering

Objectives

This study aimed to identify distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients aged ≥80 and assess clinical outcomes among these unique clusters.

Design

Cohort study with machine learning (ML) consensus clustering approach.

Setting and participants

All very elderly (age ≥80 at time of transplant) kidney transplant recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database database from 2010 to 2019.

Main outcome measures

Distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients and their post-transplant outcomes including death-censored graft failure, overall mortality and acute allograft rejection among the assigned clusters.

Results

Consensus cluster analysis was performed in 419 very elderly kidney transplant and identified three distinct clusters that best represented the clinical characteristics of very elderly kidney transplant recipients. Recipients in cluster 1 received standard Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) non-extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from deceased donors. Recipients in cluster 2 received kidneys from older, hypertensive ECD deceased donors with a KDPI score ≥85%. Kidneys for cluster 2 patients had longer cold ischaemia time and the highest use of machine perfusion. Recipients in clusters 1 and 2 were more likely to be on dialysis at the time of transplant (88.3%, 89.4%). Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be preemptive (39%) or had a dialysis duration less than 1 year (24%). These recipients received living donor kidney transplants. Cluster 3 had the most favourable post-transplant outcomes. Compared with cluster 3, cluster 1 had comparable survival but higher death-censored graft failure, while cluster 2 had lower patient survival, higher death-censored graft failure and more acute rejection.

Conclusions

Our study used an unsupervised ML approach to cluster very elderly kidney transplant recipients into three clinically unique clusters with distinct post-transplant outcomes. These findings from an ML clustering approach provide additional understanding towards individualised medicine and opportunities to improve care for very elderly kidney transplant recipients.

Effect of Age on Liver Transplantation Recipient Outcomes: Two Centers' Experience

BACKGROUND

Liver diseases epidemiology has changed with advances in perioperative care. Transplantation at large centers is favorable among older and younger recipients. Local limitations on transplantation for recipients older than 65 years were cancelled in 2014. This study evaluates the effects of age on the transplantation outcome of Israeli patients in the era after removal of the limitations on recipient age.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined prospective data on patients older than 18 years who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2019 at 2 transplantation centers. Patients were divided into 4 age groups (group 1: ≤59 years; group 2: 60-64 years; group 3: 65-69 years; and group 4: ≥70 years). Each group's associations of pretransplantation factors with outcome and survival were examined.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one recipients underwent 269 transplantations (mean age: 53 ± 12.61 y). There were 181 male (67.8%) and 88 female recipients (67.28%). Overall, 207 patients (79.6%) survived ≥12 months. One-year survival rates were 82.9%, 73.2%, 71.4%, and 93.8% for groups 1 to 4, respectively (not statistically significant; P = .11). One-year graft survival was similar between groups. More patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, or ischemic heart disease tended to survive <12 months. Cardiovascular complication was more common in older groups and affected survival.

CONCLUSION

Patient age alone should not be used to deny access to transplantation, which could benefit older nonfrail individuals. However, risk factors such as male sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and concomitant kidney-liver transplantation should be carefully considered.

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Older Individuals: An Ethical Legal and Psychological Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT) View

Living donor transplantation is the optimal treatment for suitable patients with end-stage kidney disease. There are particular advantages for older individuals in terms of elective surgery, timely transplantation, and early graft function. Yet, despite the superiority of living donor transplantation especially for this cohort, older patients are significantly less likely to access this treatment modality than younger age groups. However, given the changing population demographic in recent decades, there are increasing numbers of older but otherwise healthy individuals with kidney disease who could benefit from living donor transplantation. The complex reasons for this inequity of access are explored, including conscious and unconscious age-related bias by healthcare professionals, concerns relating to older living donors, ethical anxieties related to younger adults donating to aging patients, unwillingness of potential older recipients to consider living donation, and the relevant legislation. There is a legal and moral duty to consider the inequity of access to living donor transplantation, recognising both the potential disparity between chronological and physiological age in older patients, and benefits of this treatment for individuals as well as society.

[Liver transplantation in aged patients]

Due to the demographic changes and the increasing incidence of chronic, especially nutritively toxic liver diseases, the number of patients over 65 years of age with indications for liver transplantation is rising considerably. Patient age alone is not a contraindication for organ transplantation; however, in order to ensure the postoperative outcome, a structured interdisciplinary assessment is necessary, especially in older potential organ recipients. With knowledge of comorbidities, individualized prehabilitation enables the perioperative risk to be minimized. The postoperative morbidity in aged patients appears to be comparable to that of younger patients, especially after careful evaluation. Overall, there is a clear survival advantage compared with the best conservative treatment for liver disease. In addition to the perioperative procedure, differences in follow-up care and long-term outcome should also be considered. In this context, predominantly the pharmacological peculiarities, such as polypharmacy and the mutual influence of immunosuppression and comorbidities, have to be taken into account. In addition to old organ recipients, livers from old donors (so-called marginal organs) increasingly play a crucial role in transplantation medicine due to the organ shortage. These are more susceptible to ischemia reperfusion injury and thus put the recipient at a higher risk for delayed or lack of organ function recovery. New ethical issues are raised by the increasing age of donors and recipients, complicating decision making about organ acceptance or rejection for the transplantation physician.

Clinical Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Patients Over 60 Years Old: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Although advanced age is no longer considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplant, transplant in elderly patients with comorbid diseases remains debatable because of high risks with surgery. Here, we report patient outcomes in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 276 liver transplant recipients, grouped by age. Group 1 (≤59 years old) consisted of 247 recipients, and group 2 (≥60 years old) consisted of 29 recipients. Reviewed data included age, sex, cause of liver disease, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, survival, and posttransplant complications.

RESULTS

In both groups, most patients (n = 108) required liver transplant for hepatitis B virus. Mean age was 40 ± 12.3 and 63 ± 2.3 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with more men than women in both group 1 (71.7% vs 28.3%) and group 2 (75.9% vs 24.1%). No significant differences were shown between groups for patient characteristics, except group 1 had significantly higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Group 1 mean survival time was 10.2 ± 0.6 years, with patient survival rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of 65.5%, 53%, 46.3%, and 40%, respectively. In group 2, respective results were 10.6 ± 1.3 years and 75.9%, 68.6%, 61%, and 48.8% (no significant difference vs group 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant recipients >60 years of age had survival rates, acute rejection rates, and complications similar to younger recipients. Liver transplant should not be withheld from older recipients on the basis of age alone. However, comprehensive screening for comorbidities should be performed.

Observational study of risk factors associated with clinical outcome among elderly kidney transplant recipients in Sweden - a decade of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (Ktx) in elderly has become increasingly accepted worldwide despite their higher burden of comorbidities. We investigated important risk factors affecting long-term patient and graft survival.

METHODS

We included all (n=747) Ktx patients >60 years from 2000 to 2012 in Sweden. Patients were age-stratified; 60-64, 65-69 and >70 years. Follow-up time was up to 10 years (median 7.9 years, 75% percentile >10 years). Primary outcome was 10-year patient survival in age-stratified groups. Secondary outcomes were 5- year patient and graft-survival in age-stratified groups and the impact of risk factors including Charlson comorbidity index on patient and graft-survival.

RESULTS

Mortality was higher in patients >70 years, after 10 years (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.24-3.04; p=0.004). Males had a higher 10-year risk of death (HR 1.39; CI 95% 1.04-1.86; p=0.024). Five-year patient survival did not differ between age-groups. In multivariate Cox analysis (n=500) hazard ratio for 10-year mortality was 4.6 in patients with Charlson comorbidity index ≥7 vs <4 (95% CI 2.42-8.62; p=0.0001) CONCLUSION: Higher Charlson comorbidity index identified ESKD patients with 4.6 times higher risk of death after Ktx. We suggest that this index should be used as a part of the pre-operative evaluation in elderly.

Kidney Transplant Outcomes in elderly Recipients: An Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry Study

BACKGROUND

There is an increase in elderly patients receiving kidney transplant internationally. This study describes elderly kidney transplant recipient outcomes in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

The study included all adult first kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand from 2000 to 2015. Survival and graft outcomes were compared between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (18-69 years) recipients using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 10651 kidney transplant recipients were included, of which 279 (2.6%) were elderly adults. The proportion of elderly recipients increased from 0.6 to 4.4% from 2000 to 2015. Compared with younger recipients, elderly recipients were more likely to receive kidneys from deceased donors, elderly donors, and expanded criteria donors. Elderly recipients experienced poorer patient survival with 1- and 5-year survival ranging from 96% to 97% and 79% to 81%, respectively, compared with 97% to 99% and 90% 95% in younger recipients, respectively. Elderly recipients experienced comparable rates of delayed graft function and, in living donor kidney recipients, lower rates of acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation in the elderly population is increasing. Although elderly recipients had inferior survival and graft outcomes, elderly recipients generally received poorer quality kidneys. The outcomes achieved in this cohort of elderly adults are encouraging, and improving elderly recipient outcomes should be an important focus for research.

Impact of age on the incidence of complications after liver transplantation: A single-center retrospective study

Background and objective

Advances in surgical technique, postoperative management, and immunosuppressive therapy have led to a steady increase in the number of patients undergoing organ transplantation. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications between young and elderly patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) at a single university hospital.

Method

The medical records of 253 patients who underwent LT between January 2010 and July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those younger than 65 years (group Y, n = 231) and those older than 65 years (group O, n = 22). Data on patient demographics, perioperative management, and postoperative complications were collected.

Results

The patients’ baseline characteristics, including underlying diseases and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, were not different between groups. Preoperative laboratory findings were not significantly different between the two groups, except for hemoglobin level. The total amounts of infused fluid and packed red blood cells were higher in group O than in group Y. The postoperative plasma creatinine level was higher in group O than in group Y; however, the incidence of postoperative complications was not considerably different between the two groups. In addition, there was no difference in the survival rate after LT depending on age.

Conclusion

With the development of medical technology, LT in elderly patients is not an operation to be avoided, and the prognosis is expected to improve. Therefore, continuous efforts to understand the disease characteristics and physical differences in elderly patients who require LT are essential.

Access to Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does Candidate Age Matter?

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) offers an effective alternative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its growing acceptance and longer life expectancy rates, survival data in older patients are conflicting and consensus guidelines are lacking in terms of a cut-off age range for operations.

STUDY DESIGN

We explored our prospectively maintained institutional database to identify patients diagnosed with HCC between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2019. Long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed in patients undergoing LT or hepatic resection, with patient age considered as the primary variable.

RESULTS

In total, 1,629 patients with HCC were identified, of whom 700 were considered for curative operations (LT, n = 538; resection, n = 162). Patients older than 65 years were less likely to be considered for LT (p < 0.01), although there were no age-related differences in the de-listing rate among age groups (p = 0.90). Older patients had overall survival (OS) outcomes comparable with younger patients after LT (3-year OS: 85.5% vs 84%; 5-year OS: 73.9% vs 77%; p = 0.26). Long-term survival was lower in the group who underwent resection, however, older patients still demonstrated equivalent OS outcomes (3-year OS: 59% vs 64.8%; 5-year OS: 44.8% vs 49%; p = 0.13). There were no differences in the development of local or distant metastatic disease between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although older candidates were less likely to be considered for LT in the management of HCC, judicious matching can lead to OS data comparable with their younger counterparts. Previous age misconceptions need to be challenged without the concern of worse long-term oncologic outcomes after surgery.

Living Donor Liver Transplant in Patients Aged 60 Years or Older: Experience from a Large Volume Centre in India

BACKGROUND

With ageing population and higher prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in older patients, more and more living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) are being considered in this group of patients as eligibility for deceased donor liver transplant is restricted to those aged 65 years and younger. However, the short- and long-term outcomes of this group have not been reported from India, which does not have a robust national health scheme. The aim of this study was to provide guidelines for transplant in this group.

METHODS

All patients aged 60 years and older (group 1) who underwent LDLT in our centre between January 2006 and December 2017 were studied. A propensity score-matched group in 1:2 ratio was created with comparable sex and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (group 2). The 2 groups were compared for duration of hospital stay, surgical complications, hospital mortality and 1-, 3- and 5-year survival.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 207 patients, and group 2 had 414 patients. The number of patients in group 1 gradually increased with time from 4 in 2006 to 33 in 2017 accounting for 15% of total cases. Group 1 had more patients with viral hepatitis, NASH and HCC, and they had a higher 30-day mortality due to cardiorespiratory complications. Although 1- and 3-year survival was similar, the 5-year survival was significantly lower in group 1.

CONCLUSION

Five-year survival was lower in the elderly group due to cardiorespiratory complications and recurrence of HCC. Outcomes in the elderly group can be improved with better patient selection and preventing HCC recurrence.

Liver transplantation and aging

An increase in the average life expectancy, paralleled by a demographic shift in the population with end-stage liver disease lies behind the rising demand for liver transplantation (LT) among the elderly. Some of the most common indications for LT including hepatocellular carcinoma, alcohol-related liver disease, chronic hepatitis C and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease tend to affect older patients. Transplant professionals are faced with an increasing demand for LT among elderly patients in an age of organ shortage and it is important that risk and benefits are carefully weighed in order to achieve the optimum use of precious liver grafts.

Medical Contraindications to Transplant Listing in the USA: A Survey of Adult and Pediatric Heart, Kidney, Liver, and Lung Programs

INTRODUCTION

Listing practices for solid organ transplantation are variable across programs in the USA. To better characterize this variability, we performed a survey of psychosocial listing criteria for pediatric and adult heart, lung, liver, and kidney programs in the USA. In this manuscript, we report our results regarding listing practices with respect to obesity, advanced age, and HIV seropositivity.

METHODS

We performed an online, forced-choice survey of adult and pediatric heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant programs in the USA.

RESULTS

Of 650 programs contacted, 343 submitted complete responses (response rate = 52.8%). Most programs have absolute contraindications to listing for BMI > 45 (adult: 67.5%; pediatric: 88.0%) and age > 80 (adult: 55.4%; pediatric: not relevant). Only 29.5% of adult programs and 25.7% of pediatric programs consider HIV seropositivity an absolute contraindication to listing. We found that there is variation in absolute contraindications to listing in adult programs among organ types for BMI > 45 (heart 89.8%, lung 92.3%, liver 49.1%, kidney 71.9%), age > 80 (heart 83.7%, lung 76.9%, liver 68.4%, kidney 29.2%), and HIV seropositivity (heart 30.6%, lung 59.0%, kidney 16.9%, liver 28.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

We argue that variability in listing enhances access to transplantation for potential recipients who have the ability to pursue workup at different centers by allowing different programs to have different risk thresholds. Programs should remain independent in listing practices, but because these practices differ, we recommend transparency in listing policies and informing patients of reasons for listing denial and alternative opportunities to seek listing at another program.

The Frailty Risk Score predicts length of stay and need for rehospitalization after kidney transplantation in a retrospective cohort: a pilot study

Background

Frailty is a widely used measure in older patients as a predictor of poor outcomes after hospitalization and surgery. There is a growing body of data in kidney transplantation suggesting frailty can predict adverse outcomes. There is interest in using chart review measures of frailty and multimorbidity, as they may be equally predictive as physical measurement. This approach holds promise for patient evaluation, identifying candidates for prehabilitation, and targeting resources towards those anticipated to have an increased rate of clinical challenges after kidney transplantation. Frail patients who are often older may place a large resource and economic burden on transplant programs.

Methods

We applied a previously published chart review–based approach in a retrospective, pilot study to calculate the Frailty Risk Score (FRS) utilizing a cohort of kidney transplant patients. We reviewed concurrent comorbidities using the Charlson comorbidity (CM) score to determine the feasibility and utility of applying this approach in transplant patients to predict post-transplant outcomes such as length of hospitalization and the need for rehospitalization.

Results

Sixty kidney transplant recipients were evaluated by chart review, 23 characterized as older (> = 60) and 37 younger (ages 30–59). Median FRS score was 3 (range 1–7). Higher FRS was significantly associated with increased patient age (high FRS 19% in younger patients, 43% in older patients). Increased CM score was also associated with increased patient age. Patients with a high FRS stayed in the hospital for an average of 8 days, compared with 5.7 days for a low FRS. Patients with high FRS were readmitted an average of 2.9 times compared with an average of 1.1 for those with a low FRS. FRS score remained significant for predicting outcomes after adjustment for patient age.

Conclusion

Elevated FRS prior to transplantation was associated with increased hospital stay and the need for readmission in kidney transplant recipients. This analysis demonstrates the potential strength of chart review in evaluating frailty prior to transplantation, permitting risk stratification and targeting of resources for rehabilitation and close post-transplant monitoring. Frail patients may benefit from targeted “prehabilitation” to attenuate the associated adverse clinical outcomes.

Survival Outcomes After Liver Transplantation in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

AIM

This study aims to evaluate survival rates in elderly patients after liver transplantation (LT) and to analyze the factors associated with mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study includes 535 patients over the age of 18 who had undergone LT in our clinic between June 2004 and January 2018. Data were collected prospectively and scanned retrospectively. Data concerning the patients' age, sex, LT indication, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, presence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC), coexisting disease, LT types, and post-transplant survival were investigated. The patients were grouped under 2 categories (18-59 years of age and 60 years of age and over) and were compared in terms of their characteristics. In patients aged 60 and over, the causes of mortality and related factors were investigated.

RESULTS

The study included 535 patients, 458 (85.6%) of whom were between 18 and 59 years of age and 77 (14.4%) were over 60 years of age. The median follow-up period was 86.7 (1 to 247) months. The elderly group's survival rate was significantly lower than that of the younger group (P = .002). In elderly patients, survival rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 67.4%, 56.4%, 53.8%, and 46.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients, factors that increase post-LT mortality require thorough consideration. Equally important is the physiological status of the candidates for transplantation. Correct patient selection in the preoperative stage and good postoperative care can provide successful survival results in elderly patients.

Characterizing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressant medicines and patient outcomes in elderly renal transplant patients

This review examines what is currently known about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of commonly prescribed immunosuppressant medicines, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate and prednisolone, in elderly renal transplant recipients, and reported patient outcomes in this cohort. Renal transplantation is increasing rapidly in the elderly, however, currently, long-term patient outcomes are relatively poor compared to younger adults. Some studies have suggested that elderly recipients may have higher dose-adjusted exposure and/or lower clearance of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporine; with one study reporting up to 50% reduction in tacrolimus exposure in the elderly. Elderly transplant recipients do not appear to have higher dosage-adjusted exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA). The effects of ageing on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone are unknown. Only one study has examined how aging effects drug target enzymes, reporting no difference in baseline inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity and MPA-induced IMPDH activity in elderly compared to younger adult renal transplant recipients. In elderly transplant recipients, immunosenescence likely lowers the risk of acute rejection, but increases the risk of drug-related adverse effects. Currently, the three main causes of death in elderly renal transplant recipients are cardiovascular disease, infection and malignancy. One study has showed that renal transplant recipients aged over 65 years are seven times more likely to die with a functioning graft compared with young adults (aged 18-29 years). This suggests that an optimal balance between immunosuppressant medicine efficacy and toxicity is not achieved in elderly recipients, and further studies are needed to foster long-term graft and patient survival. Lower maintenance immunosuppressant targets in elderly recipients may decrease patient susceptibility to drug side effects, however, further studies are required and appropriate targets need to be established.

Predictors of Early and Late Mortality in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Older kidney patients with chronic kidney disease benefit significantly from kidney transplantation. However, these older transplant recipients have greater mortality after transplantation than younger transplant recipients. Understanding the impact of comorbidities on post-transplant mortality can improve risk stratification and patient selection.

METHODS

A single-center analysis of 3105 kidney transplant recipients was performed over a 12-year period. Comorbidities associated with death were evaluated in older and younger transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The 2 most important factors associated with increased mortality in the first 100 days after transplant were recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted odds ratios, 3.29 and 5.80, respectively), with no statistically significant impact of recipient comorbidities. In the later post-transplant period (after the first 100 days), recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] of 2.14 and 2.29, respectively) remained predictors of mortality. We also found that donor age ≥60 and the recipient having cardiovascular disease and diabetes were independent predictors of increased mortality. There was a statistically significant interaction between diabetes and heart disease and recipient age ≥60, with a lesser impact on late mortality in older patients compared to younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that comorbidities have a larger impact later after transplantation, with less effect on older recipients. These observations suggest that certain comorbid conditions should be evaluated differently in older patients compared to younger ones.

Liver transplantation in elderly patients: a systematic review and first meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elderly recipients are frequently discussed by the scientific community but objective indication for this parameter has been provided. The aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence on liver transplantation for elderly patients to assess graft and patient survival.

METHODS

A literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was carried out from January 2000 to August 2018. Clinical studies comparing the outcomes of liver transplantation in adult younger (<65 years) and elderly (>65 years) populations were analyzed. The primary outcomes were patient mortality and graft loss rates. This review was registered (Number CRD42017058261) as required in the international prospective register for systematic review protocols (PROSPERO).

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included involving a total of 242,487 patients (elderly: 23,660 and young: 218,827) were included in this study. In the meta-analysis, the elderly group had patient mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.63; P = 0.09; I2 = 48%) and graft (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.81-1.47; P = 0.59; I2 = 12%) loss rates comparable to those in the young group.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients have similar long-term survival and graft loss rates as young patients. Liver transplantation is an acceptable and safe curative option for elderly transplant candidates.

The future of surgery

By someone who should know

Outcome after liver transplantation in elderly recipients (>65 years) - A single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) in elderly recipients is controversially discussed in the literature with only little data on long-term outcome available. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of LT in elderly recipients (>65 years).

METHODS

Between 1989-2016, 139 patients >65 years-old were listed for liver transplantation, and 76 (55%) were transplanted. Patient outcome and characteristics were evaluated separately for the time period before (1989-2004) and after (2005-2016) MELD-implementation. Post-transplant outcome was compared between the elderly cohort and LT-recipients aged 18-65 years (n = 1395).

RESULTS

Overall survival of patients >65 years was better in the MELD-era compared to the earlier period (1- and 5-year-survival: 73%, 60% vs. 69%, 37%, respectively; p = 0.055). The main differences between the two groups included higher recipient age (p = 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.001), higher donor age (p < 0.001), less need of intraoperative red blood cells (p = 0.008) and a lower number of postoperative rejections (p = 0.03) after 2004. Comparing the overall survival of patients transplanted in the MELD-era aged 18-65 years vs. >65 years displayed comparable 1- and 5 year-survival rates (81%, 68% vs. 73% and 60%, respectively, p = 0.558).

CONCLUSION

In the modern era, outcome of patients receiving LT with >65 years is comparable to <65 year-old patients. After careful evaluation, patients >65 years old should be considered for LT.

Increased T cell immunosenescence and accelerated maturation phenotypes in older kidney transplant recipients

Older kidney transplant recipients experience increased rates of infection and death, and less rejection, compared with younger patients. However, little is known about immune dysfunction in older compared with younger kidney transplant recipients and whether it is associated with infection. We evaluated T cell phenotypes including maturation, immune senescence, and exhaustion in a novel investigation into differences in older compared with younger patients receiving identical immune suppression regimens. We evaluated PBMC from 60 kidney transplant recipients (23 older and 37 matched younger patients) by multiparameter immune phenotyping. Older kidney transplant recipients demonstrated decreased frequency of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and increased frequency of terminally differentiated, immune senescent, and NK T cells expressing KLRG1. There was a trend towards increased frequency of T cell immune senescence in patients experiencing infection in the first year after transplantation, which reached statistical significance in a multivariate analysis. This pilot study reveals immune dysfunction in older compared with younger transplant recipients, and suggests a likely mechanism for increased vulnerability to infection. The ability to assess T cell maturation and immune senescence in transplant recipients offers the potential for risk stratification and customization of immune suppression to prevent infection and rejection after transplantation.

Holistic Long-Term Care Over Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplantation is an optimal method of renal replacement therapy in patients with phase V chronic kidney disease. Elderly patients (older than 60 years) with a kidney transplant create a significant and constantly growing pool of patients with this type of organ transplantation. In this group of patients, long-term care should be particularly stringent and vigilant. Apart from typical conditions associated with chronic kidney disease and possible post-transplant complications as well as side effects of immunosuppressive treatment, the patient also experiences changes and limitations associated with the progress of age and diseases typical for old age, characterized by a higher risk of infection, and changed pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Undoubtedly, patients should remain under the medical care of qualified transplantologists, but constant cooperation with a general practitioner and geriatrician would be of added value. Study results show that although most of the elderly kidney recipients have constant contact with their general practitioners, and almost half of them use private care, contribution of the geriatrician to the transplant care system is unsatisfactory, and elderly kidney recipients would expect more extensive outpatient care.

Potentially inappropriate liver transplantation in the era of the "sickest first" policy - A search for the upper limits

Liver transplantation has emerged as a highly efficient treatment for a variety of acute and chronic liver diseases. However, organ shortage is becoming an increasing problem globally, limiting the applicability of liver transplantation. In addition, potential recipients are becoming sicker, thereby increasing the risk of losing the graft during transplantation or in the initial postoperative period after liver transplantation (three months). This trend is challenging the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system, where the sickest candidates are prioritised and no delisting criteria are given. The weighting of the deontological demand for "equity", trying to save every patient, regardless of the overall utility; and "efficiency", rooted in utilitarianism, trying to save as many patients as possible and increase the overall quality of life of patients facing the same problem, has to be reconsidered. In this article we are aiming to overcome the widespread concept of futility in liver transplantation, providing a definition of potentially inappropriate liver transplantation and giving guidance on situations where it is best not to proceed with liver transplantation, to decrease the mortality rate in the first three months after transplantation. We propose "absolute" and "relative" conditions, where early post-transplant mortality is highly probable, which are not usually captured in risk scores predicting post-transplant survival. Withholding liver transplantation for listed patients in cases where liver transplant is not deemed clearly futile, but is potentially inappropriate, is a far-reaching decision. Until now, this decision had to be discussed extensively on an individual basis, applying explicit communication and conflict resolution processes, since the model for end-stage liver disease score and most international allocation systems do not include explicit delisting criteria to support a fair delisting process. More work is needed to better identify cases where transplantation is potentially inappropriate and to integrate and discuss these delisting criteria in allocation systems, following a societal debate on what we owe to all liver transplant candidates.

Are Octogenarians With End-Stage Renal Disease Candidates for Renal Transplantation?

Background

Elderly patients are the fastest-growing group in need of renal transplantation. This study puts focus on renal transplant recipients in their 80th year or longer at time of engraftment. Is there evidence to support an absolute upper age limit for renal transplantation?

Methods

Recipients in their 80th year or longer, transplanted between 1983 and 2015, were included. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Renal Registry in the end of October 2015. Graft and patient survivals were compared with recipients aged 70 to 79 years at transplantation.

Results

Forty-seven patients older than 79 years were transplanted in the defined period. Median age 80.1 years, 81% were men. Median time on dialysis before transplantation was 18.5 months. All patients received an allograft from a deceased donor (median donor age, 61.8 years). In the death-censored graft survival model, there was no statistical difference between the groups. We found improved patient and graft survivals after introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and induction with basiliximab. Patients transplanted before 2000 had increased risk of death compared with those transplanted after 2000 (hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.7). Median uncensored graft survival for patients transplanted after the year 2000 was 5.0 year (95% confidence interval, 2.4-7.6). Median patient survival was 5.0 years (3.1-6.9) and 5-year patient survival was 55%.

Conclusions

Age by itself should not be an absolute contraindication against renal transplantation. An estimated 5-year survival rate of 55% post-engraftment for an 80-year-old patient is in our opinion more than acceptable.

The authors reveal an estimated 5 years survival rate of 55% postengraftment for an 80 years old patient with end-stage renal disease. In carefully selected octogenarians, kidney transplantation has an acceptable estimated 5 years survival rate in their opinion.

An ex vivo comparison of adenosine and lidocaine solution and University of Wisconsin solution for hypothermic machine perfusion of porcine kidneys: potential for development

BACKGROUND

The optimal hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) solution has not yet been developed. An adenosine and lidocaine (AL) solution has been shown to be protective in cardiac preservation. The aim of the present study was to examine a modified AL solution with low Ca²⁺, 16 mM Mg²⁺, and 4% albumin on kidney preservation compared with University Wisconsin solution (UW).

METHODS

Twenty donation of organs after cardiac death porcine kidneys underwent HMP for 10 h (AL, n = 10; UW, n = 10) and then 2 h of normothermic reperfusion. Perfusion dynamics, functional parameters, histology, and real-time microdialysis were used to assess kidney responses and viability.

RESULTS

During HMP, modified AL-perfused kidneys maintained higher flow rates (21.5 versus 17.9 mL/min/100 g, P = 0.01), with perfusion flow index during the first 3 h 25% greater than with UW (AL = 0.50 ± 0.2, UW = 0.40 ± 0.17 mL/min/100 g/mmHg; P = 0.03), followed by an increase in UW kidneys which was not significantly different to AL over the remaining 7 h (0.54 versus 0.55 mL/min/100 g/mmHg, respectively). During warm reperfusion, there were no significant differences between the two HMP groups in creatinine clearance, oxygen, and glucose consumption between groups. Modified AL kidneys had significantly lower perfusate lactates (3.1 versus 4.1 mmol/L, P = 0.04) during reperfusion and lower cortical lactate levels (AL = 0.66 ± 0.31, UW = 0.89 ± 0.53 mM, P = 0.33). Histology showed similar degrees of reperfusion injury.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that HMP with modified AL solution showed improved perfusion compared with UW and lower perfusate lactate levels during warm reperfusion. Further modification of the AL composition is warranted and may lead to more rapid kidney stabilization and improved graft viability assessment, potentially expanding donor pools.