A comparison of the tablet-based and paper-based versions of the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire for quality-of-life assessment in patients with chronic venous disease

Background

The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) is the most widely-used questionnaire to assess chronic venous disease. Because the first item requires patients to agree to draw their veins, its paper form has been called into question leading to the development of a tablet version that has simplified its application. However, the literature still lacks a comparison of these tools.

Objectives

To compare agreement between scores, questionnaire completion time, and user-friendliness between paper-based and tablet-based versions of the AVVQ.

Methods

In a prospective, multicenter trial, consecutive patients were asked to complete paper-based and tablet-based versions of the AVVQ. Scores, questionnaire completion time, data entry time, and degree of user difficulty were compared.

Results

Data were collected from 88 patients, 22.7% had completed primary school and 43.2% had higher education. Most patients (88.6%) reported that the tablet version was easy to use. Median time to complete the questionnaire and compute scores was 4 minutes for the tablet version and 9.5 minutes for the paper version (p<0.001). Mean AVVQ scores obtained by patients did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.431).

Conclusions

In this study, paper and tablet versions of the AVVQ yielded similar scores, with the tablet version saving time when considering the entire process needed to apply the questionnaire and compute data.

Predicting factors of patient satisfaction after varicose vein surgery at a university hospital in Nepal

INTRODUCTION

Varicose veins are a common vascular problem with a high prevalence, yet they are often neglected. The main objective of this study was to explore the patient satisfaction after varicose vein surgery, along with its predicting factors. To our knowledge, no similar study has been conducted in Nepal to date.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent varicose vein surgery at Dhulikhel Hospital from September 2019 to February 2020. The satisfaction level after the surgery was assessed using a 10-point Likert scale questionnaire during a telephone interview with their verbal consent. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were performed to identify the predicting factors of patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Among a total of 84 patients interviewed, 53.6% were male. The mean age of the participants was 43.13 ± 13.62 years. The mean patient satisfaction score was 42 ± 5.5, with nursing service, discharge teaching and hospital service being the highest scoring items in terms of patient satisfaction. Linear regression revealed age ≤40 years as a predictor of higher patient satisfaction (β=0.258, p=0.015) while early stage of varicose veins (β=-0.233, p=0.026) and duration of post-operative follow-up (β=-0.25, p=0.021) were negative predictors of patient satisfaction. This means that patients with C2-C3 venous disease and longer duration of postoperative follow-up tended to have lower satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSION

The overall patient satisfaction following varicose vein surgery was very good, and the major predictors of better satisfaction were age ≤40 years, C4-C6 clinical classification of venous disease and the shorter duration of follow-up after surgery.

Clinical assessment of endovenous thermal ablation combined with concomitant phlebectomy for the treatment of lower limb varicose veins with or without poor glycemic control

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical results of endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy for unilateral varicose veins based on diabetic management.

METHODS

The study reviewed 501 patients who underwent endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy for unilateral varicose veins, including 337 nondiabetics (control group) and 164 diabetics. Diabetics with hemoglobin A1c ≥7% were classified as the poor glycemic control group, and hemoglobin A1c <7% as the good glycemic control group. Surgical outcomes were assessed by Venous Clinical Severity Score. The Chronic Venous disease quality of life Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life.

RESULTS

Lower limb varicose veins can be treated successfully with endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy in patients with or without poor glycemic control, accompanied by a significant improvement in health status. For patients with initial varicose veins (preoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score <10), the results revealed satisfactory improvements in Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality of life among the control, poor glycemic control, and good glycemic control groups. Patients with advanced varicose veins (preoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score ≥10) also showed an obvious amelioration concerning venous symptoms and quality of life. However, the extent of improvement varied among the 3 groups. Patients subjected to advanced varicose veins with the condition of poor glycemic control exhibited a less desirable improvement in postoperative health conditions compared with the control and good glycemic control groups, especially in edema relief and ulcer healing.

CONCLUSION

Endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy is safe and effective in the treatment of varicose veins with or without poor glycemic control. Clinical attempts at hemoglobin A1c management may contribute to improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced varicose veins.

Different management options for primary varicose veins in females: A prospective study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term follow-up results of different management modalities in treating primary uncomplicated lower limb female varicosities.

Methods

A prospective study took place within a 3-year period from June 2010 until May 2012. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group I (n = 35) included those who underwent open surgical treatment. Group II (n = 25) included those who subjected to ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (USGFS). While group III (n = 20) included those who treated with endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). The patients were followed up for 6 years.

Results

All selected patients were female aged from 35-62 years with a mean of 47 ± 7.6 years. Thirty-five patients (43.75%) were treated surgically by saphenofemoral junction disconnection (SFJD), and great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping; 25 patients (31.25%) with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and the remaining 20 patients (25%) were treated with endovenous laser therapy. A significant success rate of GSV ablation was obtained for the endovenous laser therapy treated group over the ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy treated patients (P = .023). There was no significant difference between the surgically treated group and those group treated with endovenous laser therapy (P = .85). Recurrence was observed following long-term follow-up after 6 years in 8.5% in group I, 36% in group II, and 10% in group III, respectively. Venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and health-related quality of life score (HRQOLS) improved significantly in all treated groups.

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up of patients with primary superficial varicosities among females is mandatory to elucidate the postoperative recurrence, especially those who underwent ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. In addition to the observation of the development of newly formed varicosities in susceptible individuals which might develop later following long-term follow-up.

The Discord Outcome Analysis (DOA) as a Reporting Standard at Three Months and Five Years in Randomised Varicose Vein Treatment Trials

OBJECTIVES

Treatment success for chronic superficial venous insufficiency could be defined as an improvement in three domains: (i) disease specific quality of life, (ii) clinical severity, (iii) reflux. The aim was to report these at five years using a Venn diagram to profile the outcomes: a discord outcome analysis (DOA).

METHODS

Patients (n = 50 patients/legs in each treated group) were randomised to endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with concurrent phlebectomies vs. ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). Outcomes were assessed using three domains: (i) Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ), (ii) venous clinical severity score (VCSS), (iii) venous filling index (VFI) of air plethysmography. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the final score after treatment from the baseline score before treatment to quantify the improvement. This was followed by a DOA profile for each patient where a discord was defined as the percentage of patients with a numerical deterioration in one or two domains.

RESULTS

The median [interquartile range] follow up was 68 [64-72] months. Follow up in all three domains was EVLA: 45/50, UGFS: 42/50. On ultrasound examination, GSV occlusion at some point above the knee was 93% for EVLA and 64% for UGFS (p = .001). There was no significant difference in improvement between the two treatment groups in the VCSS and the VFI. However, the EVLA group had a statistically significant AVVQ improvement (p = .004). Using a DOA, only 76% EVLA versus 60% UGFS had success in all three domains. Using improvement thresholds, this reduced to 54% and 39%, respectively. The commonest discord pattern was an improvement in the VCSS and VFI but deterioration in the AVVQ.

CONCLUSIONS

A DOA demonstrated that the definition of success is reduced if deterioration in one or two domains is taken into account. A DOA should be considered as a reporting standard for comparative analyses.