Prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy

Antibiotic Bowel Decontamination in Gastrointestinal Surgery—A Single-Center 20 Years’ Experience

Objective

Anastomotic leakage, surgical site infections, and other infectious complications are still common complications in gastrointestinal surgery. The concept of perioperative antibiotic bowel decontamination demonstrates beneficial effects in single randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but data from routine clinical use are still sparse. Our aim was to analyze the data from the routine clinical use of perioperative antibiotic bowel decontamination in gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

Based on 20 years’ experience, we performed a retrospective analysis of all cases in oncologic gastrointestinal surgery with the use of antibiotic bowel decontamination in gastric, sigmoid, and rectal cancer. Clinical data and perioperative outcomes were analyzed, especially regarding anastomotic leakage, surgical site infections, and other infectious complications.

Results

A total of n = 477 cases of gastrointestinal surgery in gastric cancer (n = 80), sigmoid cancer (n = 168), and rectal cancer (n = 229) using a perioperative regimen of antibiotic bowel decontamination could be included in this analysis. Overall, anastomotic leakage occurred in 4.4% (2.5% gastric cancer, 3.0% sigmoid cancer, 6.1% rectal cancer) and surgical site infections in 9.6% (6.3% gastric cancer, 9.5% sigmoid cancer, 10.9% rectal cancer). The incidence of all infectious complications was 13.6% (12.5% gastric cancer, 11.3% sigmoid cancer, 15.7% rectal cancer). Mortality was low, with an overall rate of 1.1% (1.3% gastric cancer, 1.8% sigmoid cancer, 0.4% rectal cancer). Antibiotic decontamination was completed in 98.5%. No adverse effects of antibiotic bowel decontamination could be observed.

Conclusion

Overall, in this large cohort, we can report low rates of surgery-related serious morbidity and mortality when perioperative antibiotic bowel decontamination is performed. The rates are lower than other clinical reports. In our clinical experience, the use of perioperative antibiotic bowel decontamination appears to improve patient safety and surgical outcomes during gastrointestinal oncologic procedures in a routine clinical setting.

Incidence and prognostic significance of extranodal extension in isolated nodal recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a crucial prognostic factor of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the role of ENE in regional recurrence (rENE) remains unclear. The purpose of our study is to assess the salvage outcome according to the presence of rENE in oral cancer patients with isolated nodal recurrence.

METHODS

Oral cancer patients diagnosed with isolated nodal recurrence at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed. All patients were classified into two groups: with and without rENE. The treatment included salvage neck dissection (ND) ± metronomic chemotherapy, salvage ND and radiation (RT)/concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), Salvage RT/CCRT alone, metronomic chemotherapy, or supportive care.

RESULTS

We analyzed 198 patients, 156 with rENE and 42 without rENE. rENE presented more frequently in patients with initial ENE+ (OR = 3.17, p = 0.04), prior RT+ (OR = 2.96, p = 0.02), initial N2/N3 (OR = 2.76, p = 0.01), and recurrent LN size >1.5 cm (OR = 2.33, p = 0.03). The extent of rENE were also significantly different in these patients. The 2-year disease-free survival for patients with and without rENE were 15.7% and 31.7%, respectively (p = 0.002). The 2-year overall survival for patients with and without rENE were 19.6% and 43.9%, respectively (p = 0.004). For patients without rENE, those received salvage ND had better survival outcome (p < 0.001). By contrast, for patients with rENE, those received salvage RT/CCRT had better survival outcome (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The rENE is frequently present (78.79%) in OSCC patients with isolated nodal recurrence. Individualized treatment modalities based on the presence of rENE should be recommended to achieve better salvage outcomes.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a robust survival predictor in esophageal cancer patients: A pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Although extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) has been proposed to be incorporated into the staging system of esophageal cancer, the prognostic value of EC-LNI remains controversial with conflicting data available, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was undertaken using four public databases. Studies investigating the effects of EC-LNI on survival were included. In addition to analysis of the entire cohort, subset analyses were also performed to assess the impact of EC-LNI on patients receiving different treatment modalities.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooling 13 studies on overall survival (OS), we observed that presence of EC-LNI was associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 2.09, 95%CI: 1.63-2.68; p < 0.01). Nine studies describing disease-free survival (DFS) included, the pooled data revealed that presence of EC-LNI was associated with significantly worse DFS (HR = 1.89, 95%CI: 1.63-2.20; p < 0.001). Subset analyses of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated a survival disadvantage of EC-LNI on OS (HR = 1.928, 95%CI: 1.196-3.107; p = 0.007) and DFS (HR = 1.985, 95%CI: 1.585-2.487; p < 0.001). Similar result was also seen in patients receiving primary surgery (OS: HR = 2.219, 95%CI: 1.720-2.864; p < 0.001; DFS: HR = 1.659, 95%CI: 1.285-2.141; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EC-LNI is a strong prognostic predictor of inferior survival in patients with esophageal cancer irrespective of treatment modality. The currently pooled evidence indicates that EC-LNI has great potential to be incorporated into the future staging system.

The prognostic value of tumor deposits and the impact on the TNM classification system in esophageal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prognostic significance of tumor deposits (TDs), isolated tumor foci lacking residual lymph nodes, in esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with EC undergoing esophagectomy between 2005 and 2017 was conducted. The prognostic value of TD was evaluated using a Cox regression model. Patients from different sources and periods were split into discovery and validation sets. A propensity score matching model was used in the validation set to reduce the confounding bias. The impact of TD on the TNM classification system was evaluated.

RESULTS

The discovery and validation sets included 179 and 2875 patients, respectively. Propensity-matched patients with and without TDs were constructed in the validation set with 132 patients in each group. Overall survival (p < .001 and p = .004, respectively) and disease-free survival (p < .001 and p = .019, respectively) were both decreased in TD positive patients in the discovery set and propensity-matched groups of validation set. Classifying patients with TDs into pN3 stage improved the discriminative power of the current TNM staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

TD is an independent prognostic factor for EC. The inclusion of TD in the TNM staging system may upstage appropriate patients to help guide therapy, and future studies are warranted.

Characterization of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics in Stage II-IIIA Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact and clinicopathological characteristics of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ECLNI) in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unknown in the context of the eighth edition N classification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients with stage II-IIIA LUAD who underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. The correlations of ECLNI presence and clinicopathological profiles were analyzed. We also assessed the impact of ECLNI on the postoperative survival of pN1 and pN2 LUAD patients.

RESULTS

ECLNI-positive status was more common in patients with high lymph node yield and in patients with multiple stations involved. The logistic regression model identified tumor spread through air spaces, micropapillary component, cribriform component, and nodal stage as predictive factors for ECLNI presence. LUAD patients with ECLNI presence had an increased risk of locoregional recurrence compared with those without (p < 0.001). Presence of ECLNI was confirmed as an independent risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) in the entire cohort. Among the 61 patients with ECLNI(+)pN2 disease, our analysis revealed that adjuvant radiation was a significant predictor of improved RFS and OS. In addition, ECLNI status provides additional precision in stratifying pN1 and pN2 patients with significantly different RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that ECLNI remains a strong prognosticator of unfavorable OS and RFS for LUADs in the context of the eighth edition N classification. Adjuvant radiation should be actively considered for pN1b and pN2 LUAD patients with ECLNI presence.

Prognostic Impact of Extranodal Extension in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Resection After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis has emerged as an important prognostic factor in many malignancies, including rectal cancer. However, its significance in patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) has not been extensively investigated. We therefore assessed ENE and its prognostic impact in a large series of consecutive rectal cancer patients with lymph node metastasis after PCRT and curative resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2014, a total of 1925 patients with rectal cancer underwent surgical resection after PCRT. Medical records of 469 patients with pathologic node positivity were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 469 patients, 118 (25.2%) presented with ENE. ENE was observed more frequently in those with advanced tumor stage (higher ypT, ypN, and ypStage), lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. Five-year disease-free survival rate was lower in patients with ENE-positive tumors than those with ENE-negative tumors (36.1% vs. 52.3%, P = .003). Similarly, 5-year overall survival rate was lower in patients with ENE-positive tumors than those with ENE-negative tumors (60.2% vs. 70.6%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of ENE was an independent poor prognostic factor for disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.412; 95% confidence interval, 1.074-1.857; P = .013) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.531; 95% confidence interval 1.149-2.039; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

The presence of ENE in patients with rectal cancer undergoing PCRT is a negative prognostic factor, reflecting poor survival outcome.

Long-term outcomes of clinical and pathological-staged T3 N3 esophageal cancer

Locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with poor long-term survival. Pre- and post-treatment stages may differ because of neoadjuvant therapy and inaccuracies in staging. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients staged with clinical T3 N3 and pathological T3 N3 carcinoma of the esophagus and determine differences between the groups. Consecutive patients from a single unit between 2010 and 2018 were included with either clinical (cT3 N3) or pathological (pT3 N3) esophageal cancer. Outcomes were compared between patients that underwent esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant treatment and those patients staged cT3 N3 treated non-surgically (NSR). Patients were staged using the TNM 8. This study included 156 patients, 63 patients were staged cT3 N3 initially and had NSR treatment, only three of these had radical treatment. Of the remaining 93 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 34 were initially staged as cT3 N3, 54 were found to be pT3 N3 having been staged earlier initially, and five were unchanged before and after treatment. Median overall survival (OS) for surgical cT3 N3 patients was significantly longer than pT3 N3 and NSR (median: NR vs 19 vs 8 months, P < 0.001). Twenty-seven patients with cT3 N3 had lower staging following treatment, while three had a higher stage. T3 N3 disease carries a poor prognosis. Within this cohort, cT3 N3 disease treated surgically has a high 5-year OS suggesting possible over-staging and stage migration due to neoadjuvant therapy. Those not having surgery, have a dismal prognosis. The impact of neoadjuvant treatment cannot be predicted and, current staging modalities may be inaccurate. Clinical stage should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding management and prognosis.

The Prognostic Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ELNI) in esophageal cancer has not been fully investigated. We aim to assess its incidence and prognostic significance in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with and without neoadjuvant treatments.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC in a single medical center was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with positive lymph node involvement were classified as either with ELNI or without ELNI (intracapsular lymph node involvement, ILNI). The impact of ELNI on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease recurrence was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients, including 179 without (NCRT -) and 157 with (NCRT +) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were included. Seventy-two of 179 (40.2%) patients in NCRT - group were with positive lymph node, of whom 19 (26.4%) had ELNI, whereas 49 (31.2%) patients in NCRT + group had positive lymph node, of whom 25 (51.0%) had ELNI. In NCRT + group, patients with ELNI had worse outcome compared to those with ILNI in 5-year OS (10.4 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.008), and DFS (5.3 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.008). The presence of ELNI was also associated with more distant recurrence (p = 0.03). In contrast, there was no survival difference between patients with ELNI and ILNI in NCRT - group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ILNI, ELNI is a significant poor prognostic factor in patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant treatments, but not in those with primary surgery.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The preferred neoadjuvant treatment for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is still matter of debate. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the different impact of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) alone.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 30th June 2018. Studies comparing survival of patients who underwent CTRT or CT alone before surgery for GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Median OS, 5-year OS, complete pathologic response (pCR), locoregional and distant failure rates were also calculated.

RESULTS

22 studies including 18,260 patients were considered for the final analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that combined CTRT do not significantly reduce the risk of death (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07; P = 0.41) but has a positive impact on the risk of relapse (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97; P = 0.01) compared to CT alone. Addition of RT to CT alone significantly increased the odds of pCR by 2.8 (95% CI 2.27-3.47; P < 0.001) and reduced the risk of locoregional failure (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.39-0.91; P = 0.01) but not the risk of distant metastases (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59-1.11; P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant CTRT with CT for adenocarcinoma of GEJ, we found no difference in terms of median OS, despite a higher pCR rate and a reduced risk of locoregional recurrences for the combined approach. Further studies, preferably large randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm these results.

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical surgery : Long-term results

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate long-term treatment results following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and radical surgery in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma (AC) of the oesophagus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 102 consecutive patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 44-86 years) and AC of the oesophagus were evaluated of whom 84 received a full CRT. A group of 51 patients was treated with neoadjuvant intent followed by radical surgery. A total dose of 50.4 Gy with mostly weekly paclitaxel/fluorouracil chemotherapy was administered. Six to eight weeks following CRT, a transthoracic subtotal oesophageal and proximal gastric resection was performed. Survival curves for overall survival and no evidence of disease (NED) survival (primary endpoints) were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier, and possible prognostic factors were evaluated by the log-rank test as well as by a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 48 months (range, 14-134 months). Overall and NED survival rates for patients of the study group (n = 51) were 40 and 32%, respectively, at 5 years. Age (p = 0.04), ypT category (p = 0.1) and the development of distant metastases (p = 0.05) were identified as (marginally) independent prognostic variables with impact on survival. Median survival time for patients of the study group (n = 51) was 45 ± 18 months (95%CI 9-81 months). Clear resection margins were achieved in 46/51 patients (92%). Regression rates with complete regression rare residual cancer and increased number of residual cells, but predominantly fibrosis were 33, 41, and 10%, respectively. Patterns of failure revealed local with distant recurrence in 2/51 (4%), regional recurrence alone in 2/51 (4%), and distant metastases in 27/51 (53%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant CRT in patients with AC of the oesophagus followed by thoracoabdominal surgery is a locally very effective concept. A significant tumour regression in almost 75% of the patients may stimulate prospective trials on the omission of radical surgery for some elderly patients. Due to a high rate of distant metastases further investigations in terms of effective systemic therapy may be warranted.