Time-dependent trends in cardiovascular adverse events during follow-up after carotid or iliofemoral endarterectomy

Characteristics of peripheral blood cells are independently related to major adverse cardiovascular events after carotid endarterectomy

Background and aims

Patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) still have a residual risk of 13% of developing a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) within 3 years. Inflammatory processes leading up to MACE are not fully understood. Therefore, we examined blood cell characteristics (BCCs), possibly reflecting inflammatory processes, in relation to MACE to identify BCCs that may contribute to an increased risk.

Methods

We analyzed 75 pretreatment BCCs from the Sapphire analyzer, and clinical data from the Athero-Express biobank in relation to MACE after CEA using Random Survival Forests, and a Generalized Additive Survival Model. To understand biological mechanisms, we related the identified variables to intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH).

Results

Of 783 patients, 97 (12%) developed MACE within 3 years after CEA. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) (HR 1.23 [1.02, 1.68], p = 0.022), CV of lymphocyte size (LACV) (HR 0.78 [0.63, 0.99], p = 0.043), neutrophil complexity of the intracellular structure (NIMN) (HR 0.80 [0.64, 0.98], p = 0.033), mean neutrophil size (NAMN) (HR 0.67 [0.55, 0.83], p < 0.001), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (HR 1.35 [1.09, 1.66], p = 0.005), eGFR (HR 0.65 [0.52, 0.80], p < 0.001); and HDL-cholesterol (HR 0.62 [0.45, 0.85], p = 0.003) were related to MACE. NAMN was related to IPH (OR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], p = 0.02).

Conclusions

This is the first study to present a higher RDW and MCV and lower LACV, NIMN and NAMN as biomarkers reflecting inflammatory processes that may contribute to an increased risk of MACE after CEA.

Mast Cell Distribution in Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Differs Significantly by Histological Segment

OBJECTIVE

Mast cells (MCs) are important contributors to atherosclerotic plaque progression. For prospective studies on mast cell contributions to plaque instability, the distribution of intraplaque MCs needs to be elucidated. Plaque stability is generally histologically assessed by dividing the plaque specimen into segments to be scored on an ordinal scale. However, owing to competitive use, studies may have to deviate to adjacent segments, yet intersegment differences of plaque characteristics, especially MCs, are largely unknown. Therefore, the hypothesis that there is no segment to segment difference in MC distribution between atherosclerotic plaque segments was tested, and intersegment associations between MCs and other plaque characteristics was investigated.

METHODS

Twenty-six carotid atherosclerotic plaques from patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy included in the Athero-Express Biobank were analysed. The plaque was divided in 5 mm segments, differentiating between the culprit lesion (segment 0), adjacent segments (-1/+1) and more distant segments (-2/+2) for the presence of MCs. The associations between the intersegment distribution of MCs and smooth muscle cells, macrophage content, and microvessel density in the culprit lesion were studied.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference in MCs/mm² between the different plaque segments (p < .001) was found, with a median of 2.79 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.63 - 7.10) for the culprit lesion, 1.34 (IQR 0.26 - 4.45) for the adjacent segment, and 0.62 (0.14 - 2.07) for the more distant segment. Post hoc analyses showed that intersegment differences were due to differences in MCs/mm² between the culprit and adjacent segment (p = .037) and between the culprit lesion and the more distant segment (p < .001). MCs/mm² in multiple different segments were positively correlated with microvessel density and macrophage content in the culprit lesion.

CONCLUSION

MC numbers reveal significant intersegment differences in human carotid plaques. Future histological studies on MCs should use a standardised segment for plaque characterisation as plaque segments cannot be used interchangeably for histological MC analyses.

Elevated Lp(a) (Lipoprotein[a]) Levels Increase Risk of 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Following Carotid Endarterectomy

Background and Purpose:

General population studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) levels are an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease and subsequent cardiovascular events. The role of Lp(a) for the risk of secondary MACE in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is unknown. Our objective is to assess the association of elevated Lp(a) levels with the risk of secondary MACE in patients undergoing CEA.

Methods:

Lp(a) concentrations were determined in preoperative blood samples of 944 consecutive patients with CEA included in the Athero-Express Biobank Study. During 3-year follow-up, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death, were documented.

Results:

After 3 years follow-up, Kaplan-Meier cumulative event rates for MACE were 15.4% in patients with high Lp(a) levels (>137 nmol/L; >80th cohort percentile) and 10.2% in patients with low Lp(a) levels (≤137 nmol/L; ≤80th cohort percentile; log-rank test: P =0.047). Cox regression analyses adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors revealed a significant association between high Lp(a) levels and 3-year MACE with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.07–2.66). One-third of MACE occurred within 30 days after CEA, with an adjusted hazard ratio for the 30-day risk of MACE of 2.05 (95% CI, 1.01–4.17). Kaplan-Meier curves from time point 30 days to 3 years onward revealed no significant association between high Lp(a) levels and MACE. Lp(a) levels were not associated with histological carotid plaque characteristics.

Conclusions:

High Lp(a) levels (>137 nmol/L; >80th cohort percentile) are associated with an increased risk of 30-day MACE after CEA. This identifies elevated Lp(a) levels as a new potential risk factor for secondary cardiovascular events in patients after carotid surgery. Future studies are required to investigate whether Lp(a) levels might be useful in guiding treatment algorithms for carotid intervention.

Real-world experience of extracranial carotid artery interventions for atherosclerotic disease during a 10-year period

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of carotid disease treatment with endarterectomy or stenting (CEA or CAS) in a real-world setting during a 10-year period.

METHODS

A single center retrospective study with prospectively collected data including patients (symptomatic or asymptomatic) being treated with CEA or CAS. Survival, restenosis, stroke and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 413 patients (mean age of 69±3.5 years; 80%, 333/413 males) were treated with CEA (83.7%, 346/413) or CAS (16.3%, 67/413). Most of the patients were asymptomatic (60%, 248/413). The incidence of in-hospital stroke and death was 0.5% (2/413) and 0.7% (3/413), respectively. The survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 98%, 94.7% and 90.6%, respectively. The freedom of re-stenosis at 1, 3 and 5 years was 99%, 98% and 90.5%, respectively. The freedom of any stroke at 1, 3 and 5 years was 99%, 97% and 94.8%, respectively. The freedom of MACE at 1, 3 and 5 years was 97.6%, 91.5% and 86.3%, respectively. Symptomatic presentation was associated with higher rates of restenosis after CEA and higher rate of mortality (P=0.025) and MACE (P=0.022) after CAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid interventions remain durable treatment methods of carotid disease. Long-term outcomes regarding mortality, restenosis, and risk of stroke or MACE are similar between CAS and CEA for asymptomatic patients. Symptomatic presentation may be associated with higher rates of restenosis after CEA and higher rate of mortality and MACE after CAS, however larger studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Local Delivery of miR-21 Stabilizes Fibrous Caps in Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Lesions

miRNAs are potential regulators of carotid artery stenosis and concordant vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Hence, we analyzed miRNA expression in laser captured micro-dissected fibrous caps of either ruptured or stable plaques (n = 10 each), discovering that miR-21 was significantly downregulated in unstable lesions. To functionally evaluate miR-21 in plaque vulnerability, miR-21 and miR-21/apolipoprotein-E double-deficient mice (Apoe-/-miR-21-/-) were assessed. miR-21-/- mice lacked sufficient smooth muscle cell proliferation in response to carotid ligation injury. When exposing Apoe-/-miR-21-/- mice to an inducible plaque rupture model, they presented with more atherothrombotic events (93%) compared with miR-21+/+Apoe-/- mice (57%). We discovered that smooth muscle cell fate in experimentally induced advanced lesions is steered via a REST-miR-21-REST feedback signaling pathway. Furthermore, Apoe-/-miR-21-/- mice presented with more pronounced atherosclerotic lesions, greater foam cell formation, and substantially higher levels of arterial macrophage infiltration. Local delivery of a miR-21 mimic using ultrasound-targeted microbubbles into carotid plaques rescued the vulnerable plaque rupture phenotype. In the present study, we identify miR-21 as a key modulator of pathologic processes in advanced atherosclerosis. Targeted, lesion site-specific overexpression of miR-21 can stabilize vulnerable plaques.