1
|
Hartup SM, Morgan JL, Cheng VWT, Barry PA, Copson E, Cutress RI, Dave R, Elsberger B, Fairbrother P, Hogan B, Horgan K, Kirwan CC, McIntosh SA, O’Connell RL, Patani N, Potter S, Rattay T, Sheehan L, Wyld L, Kim B. The MARECA (national study of management of breast cancer locoregional recurrence and oncological outcomes) study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Int J Surg Protoc 2024; 28:20-26. [PMID: 38433867 PMCID: PMC10905491 DOI: 10.1097/sp9.0000000000000018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite a UK 5-year breast cancer survival rate of 86.6%, patients may develop breast cancer recurrence within the same breast after breast conserving surgery, as well as in the remaining skin or chest wall after mastectomy or in the ipsilateral lymph glands. These recurrences, collectively termed locoregional recurrence (LRR), occur in around 8% of patients within 10 years of their original diagnosis. Currently, there is a lack of robust information on the presentation and prevalence of LRR with no UK-specific clinical guidelines available for the optimal management of this patient group. Additionally, there is a need to identify patterns of LRR presentation and their progression, which will enable prognostic factors to be determined. This will subsequently enable the tailoring of treatment and improve patient outcome. Methods The MARECA study is a prospective, multicentre cohort study recruiting patients diagnosed with breast cancer LRR +/- associated distant metastases. Over 50 UK breast units are participating in the study with the aim of recruiting at least 500 patients over a recruitment period of 24 months. The data collected will detail the tumour pathology, imaging results, surgical treatment, radiotherapy and systemic therapy of the primary and recurrent breast cancer. Study follow-up will be for up to 5 years following LRR diagnosis to determine subsequent oncological outcomes and evaluate potential prognostic factors. Discussion This study will address the current knowledge gap and identify subgroups of patients who have less successful treatment outcomes. The results will determine the current management of LRR and the prognosis of patients diagnosed with breast cancer LRR +/- distant metastases in the UK, with the aim of establishing best practice and informing future national guidelines. The results will direct future research and inform the design of additional interventional trials and translational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue M. Hartup
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Jenna L. Morgan
- Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield School of Medicine and Population Health, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield
| | - Vinton WT Cheng
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Peter A. Barry
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey
- The Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Ellen Copson
- Somers Cancer Research Building, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton
| | - Ramsey I. Cutress
- Somers Cancer Research Building, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton
| | - Rajiv Dave
- The Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital
| | - Beatrix Elsberger
- Aberdeen Breast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen
| | | | - Brian Hogan
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Kieran Horgan
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Cliona C. Kirwan
- The Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester
| | - Stuart A. McIntosh
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast
| | - Rachel L. O’Connell
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey
- The Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Neill Patani
- Department of Breast Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Shelley Potter
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol
| | - Tim Rattay
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary
- Department of Breast Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Lisa Sheehan
- Wessex Deanery, Southern House, Otterbourne, Winchester, UK
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield School of Medicine and Population Health, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield
| | - Baek Kim
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tekdogan B, Martineau J, Scampa M, Kalbermatten DF, Oranges CM. Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 89:86-96. [PMID: 38159475 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast-conserving surgery is the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to address these issues by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques to improve oncologic and esthetic outcomes. By incorporating breast reduction techniques into cancer surgery, wider margins of excision can be achieved, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an updated understanding of the surgical outcomes associated with oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles reporting post-operative outcomes following the oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty were included. A proportional meta-analysis of post-operative complications was performed to obtain their proportions and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). RESULTS Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 2711 oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty procedures in 2680 patients. The overall complication rate was 20% (95% CI: 15-25%). The positive margin rate following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty was 11% (95% CI: 6-17%). The re-excision rate was 6% (95% CI: 3-12%). The completion mastectomy rate was 3% (95% CI: 2-6%). CONCLUSIONS Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy and traditional breast-conserving surgery in the treatment of early-stage breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boran Tekdogan
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Martineau
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Scampa
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel F Kalbermatten
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carlo M Oranges
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Courtney A, Clymo J, Parks R, Wilkins A, Brown R, O’Connell R, Dave R, Dillon M, Fatayer H, Gallimore R, Gandhi A, Gardiner M, Harmer V, Hookway L, Irwin G, Ives C, Mathers H, Murray J, O’Leary DP, Patani N, Paterson S, Potter S, Prichard R, Satta G, Teoh TG, Ziprin P, McIntosh S, Boland MR, Leff DR. Mastitis and Mammary Abscess Management Audit (MAMMA) in the UK and Ireland. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad333. [PMID: 37930678 PMCID: PMC10771135 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this multicentre prospective audit was to describe the current practice in the management of mastitis and breast abscesses in the UK and Ireland, with a specific focus on rates of surgical intervention. METHODS This audit was conducted in two phases from August 2020 to August 2021; a phase 1 practice survey and a phase 2 prospective audit. Primary outcome measurements for phase 2 included patient management pathway characteristics and treatment type (medical/radiological/surgical). RESULTS A total of 69 hospitals participated in phase 2 (1312 patients). The key findings were a high overall rate of incision and drainage (21.0 per cent) and a lower than anticipated proportion of ultrasound-guided aspiration of breast abscesses (61.0 per cent). Significant variations were observed regarding the rate of incision and drainage (range 0-100 per cent; P < 0.001) and the rate of needle aspiration (range 12.5-100 per cent; P < 0.001) between individual units. Overall, 22.5 per cent of patients were admitted for inpatient treatment, out of whom which 72.9 per cent were commenced on intravenous antibiotics. The odds of undergoing incision and drainage for a breast abscess or being admitted for inpatient treatment were significantly higher if patients presented at the weekend compared with a weekday (P ≤ 0.023). Breast specialists reviewed 40.9 per cent of all patients directly, despite the majority of patients (74.2 per cent) presenting within working hours on weekdays. CONCLUSIONS Variation in practice exists in the management of mastitis and breast abscesses, with high rates of incision and drainage in certain regions of the UK. There is an urgent need for a national best-practice toolbox to minimize practice variation and standardize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alona Courtney
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ruth Parks
- King’s Mill Hospital, Sutton-in-Ashfield, UK
| | | | - Ruth Brown
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Rajiv Dave
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Hiba Fatayer
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ashu Gandhi
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Gardiner
- The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Gareth Irwin
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Charlotte Ives
- The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - T G Teoh
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Ziprin
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stuart McIntosh
- Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Michael R Boland
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daniel Richard Leff
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fairhurst K, Roberts K, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Current use of drains and management of seroma following mastectomy and axillary surgery: results of a United Kingdom national practice survey. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:187-196. [PMID: 37878150 PMCID: PMC10787912 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07042-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Up to 40% of the 56,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy. Seroma formation following surgery is common, may delay wound healing, and be uncomfortable or delay the start of adjuvant treatment. Multiple strategies to reduce seroma formation include surgical drains, flap fixation and external compression exist but evidence to support best practice is lacking. We aimed to survey UK breast surgeons to determine current practice to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future trial. METHODS An online survey was developed and circulated to UK breast surgeons via professional and trainee associations and social media to explore current attitudes to drain use and management of post-operative seroma. Simple descriptive statistics were used to summarise the results. RESULTS The majority of surgeons (82/97, 85%) reported using drains either routinely (38, 39%) or in certain circumstances (44, 45%). Other methods for reducing seroma such as flap fixation were less commonly used. Wide variation was reported in the assessment and management of post-operative seromas. Over half (47/91, 52%) of respondents felt there was some uncertainty about drain use after mastectomy and axillary surgery and two-thirds (59/91, 65%) felt that a trial evaluating the use of drains vs no drains after simple breast cancer surgery was needed. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for a large-scale UK-based RCT to determine if, when and in whom drains are necessary following mastectomy and axillary surgery. This work will inform the design and conduct of a future trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Fairhurst
- Centre for Surgical Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
| | - K Roberts
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - P Fairbrother
- Independent Cancer Patient Voice (ICPV), London, England
| | - S Potter
- Centre for Surgical Research, Department of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agrawal A, Romics L, Thekkinkattil D, Soliman M, Kaushik M, Barmpounakis P, Mortimer C, Courtney CA, Goyal A, Garreffa E, Carmichael A, Lane RA, Rutherford C, Kim B, Achuthan R, Pitsinis V, Goh S, Ray B, Grover K, Vidya R, Murphy J. 'PartBreCon' study. A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study to assess outcomes following PARTial BREast reCONstruction with chest wall perforator flaps. Breast 2023; 71:82-88. [PMID: 37544090 PMCID: PMC10430575 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial breast reconstruction with a pedicled chest wall perforator flap (CWPF) enables breast conservation in a higher tumour: breast volume ratio scenario. Since there is limited evidence, this retrospective cohort study aimed to ascertain immediate (30-days) and medium-term (follow-up duration) surgical outcomes. METHODS STROBE-compliant protocol ascertained CWPF outcomes between March 2011-March 2021. UK centres known to perform CWPF were invited to participate if they performed at least 10 cases. Data were retrospectively collected, including patient demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics, and surgical and oncological outcomes. Statistical analysis (R™) included multivariable logistic regression and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Across 15 centres, 507 patients with median age (54 years, IQR; 48-62), body mass index (25.4 kg/m2, IQR; 22.5-29), tumour size (26 mm, IQR; 18-35), and specimen weight (62 g, IQR; 40-92) had following flap types: LiCAP (54.1%, n = 273), MiCAP/AiCAP (19.6%, n = 99), LiCAP + LTAP (19.8%, n = 100) and TDAP (2.2%, n = 11). 30-days complication rates were in 12%: haematoma (4.3%, n = 22), wound infection (4.3%, n = 22), delayed wound healing (2.8%, n = 14) and flap loss (0.6%, n = 3; 1 full) leading to readmissions (2.6%, n = 13) and re-operations (2.6%, n = 13). Positive margins (n = 88, 17.7%) led to 15.9% (n = 79) re-excisions, including 7.5% (n = 37) at the planned 2nd of 2-stage surgery and 1.8% (n = 9) mastectomy. At median 23 months (IQR; 11-39) follow-up, there were 1.2% (n = 6) symmetrisations; recurrences: local (1%), regional/nodal (0.6%) and distant (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS This large multicentre cohort study demonstrates acceptable complication and margin re-excision rates. CWPF extends the range of breast conservation techniques. Further studies are required for long-term oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Agrawal
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
| | - L Romics
- New Victoria Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | - M Soliman
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK; Mansoura University, Egypt.
| | - M Kaushik
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - P Barmpounakis
- Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | - A Goyal
- Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
| | | | - A Carmichael
- University Hospital of Derby and Burton, Belvedere Road, Burton on Trent, UK.
| | - R A Lane
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | - B Kim
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | - R Achuthan
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | | | - S Goh
- Peterborough Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
| | - B Ray
- Harrogate NHS Trust, Harrogate, UK.
| | | | - R Vidya
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
| | - J Murphy
- Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davies C, Whisker L, Skillman J, Macmillan D, Holcombe C, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in the UK: results of the ANTHEM national practice questionnaire. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023:10.1007/s10549-023-06924-0. [PMID: 37213038 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06924-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) may be a better option than mastectomy ± immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for women with breast cancer but studies directly comparing the techniques are lacking. We surveyed UK breast units to determine the current practice of OPBCS to inform the design of a future comparative study. METHODS An electronic survey was developed to explore the current practice of OPBCS. This included the local availability of volume displacement and/or replacement techniques; number of cases performed; contraindications and approach to contralateral symmetrisation. Summary data for each survey item were calculated and overall provision of care examined. RESULTS 58 UK centres completed the survey, including 43 (74%) stand-alone breast and 15 (26%) combined breast/plastics units. Over 40% of units (n = 24) treated more than 500 cancers/year. Most units offered volume displacement techniques (TMs) (97%). Over two-thirds (n = 39. 67%) of units offered local perforator flaps (LPF). Approximately a half of units (10/19) not performing LPF were planning to introduce them in the next 12-24 months. A third (n = 19, 33%) of units routinely performed simultaneous contralateral symmetrisation mostly with two-surgeon operating. There were limited oncological restrictions to OPBCS with no contraindications for multifocal cancers in most centres; 65% of units (36/55) offered OPBCS for multicentric disease. Extensive DCIS was a contraindication in a minority of units. CONCLUSIONS OPBCS is widely available in the UK but contraindications and approaches to contralateral symmetrisation were variable. Work is now needed to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of OPBCS vs mastectomy ± IBR to support informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Davies
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Lisa Whisker
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Joanna Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Douglas Macmillan
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Christopher Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | | | - Shelley Potter
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, Learning and Research Building, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koppiker C, Joshi S, Mishra R, Kelkar DA, Chigurupati P, Joshi A, John J, Kadu S, Bagdia A, Thakkar D, Deshmukh C, Allampati H, Sharan G, Dhar U, Nare S, Nagarkar S, Busheri L, Varghese B, Pai M. Therapeutic mammoplasty: a "wise" oncoplastic choice-lessons from the largest single-center cohort from Asia. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1131951. [PMID: 37124516 PMCID: PMC10141318 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1131951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The majority of breast cancer patients from India usually present with advanced disease, limiting the scope of breast conservation surgery. Therapeutic mammoplasty (TM), an oncoplastic technique that permits larger excisions, is quite promising in such a scenario and well suited to breast cancer in medium-to-large-sized breasts with ptosis and in some cases of large or multifocal/multicentric tumors. Here, we describe our TM cohort of 205 (194 malignant and 11 benign) patients from 2012 to 2019 treated at a single surgeon center in India, the largest Asian dataset for TM. Methods All patients underwent treatment after careful discussions by a multidisciplinary tumor board and patient counseling. We report the clinicopathological profiles and surgical, oncological, cosmetic, and patient-related outcomes with different TM procedures. Results The median age of breast cancer patients was 49 years; that of benign disease patients was 41 years. The breast cancer cohort underwent simple (n = 84), complex (n = 71), or extreme (n = 44) TM surgeries. All resection margins were analyzed through intra-operative frozen-section assessment with stringent rad-path analysis protocols. The margin positivity rate was found to be 1.4%. A majority of the cohort was observed to have pT1-pT2 tumors, and the median resection volume was 180 cc. Low post-operative complication rates and good-to-excellent cosmetic scores were observed. The median follow-up was 39 months. We observed 2.07% local and 5.7% distal recurrences, and disease-specific mortality was 3.1%. At median follow-up, the overall survival was observed to be 95.9%, and disease-free survival was found to be 92.2%. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) showed good-to-excellent scores for all types of TMs across BREAST-Q domains. Conclusion We conclude that in India, a country where women present with large and locally advanced tumors, TM safely expands the indications for breast conservation surgery. Our results show oncological and cosmetic outcomes at acceptable levels. Most importantly, PROM scores suggest improved overall wellbeing and better satisfaction with the quality of life. For patients with macromastia, this technique not only focuses on cancer but also improves self-image and reduces associated physical discomfort often overlooked by women in the Indian setting. The popularization of this procedure will enable Indian patients with breast cancer to receive the benefits of breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaitanyanand Koppiker
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
- International School of Oncoplastic Surgery, Pune, India
- Jehangir Hospital, Pune, India
- *Correspondence: Chaitanyanand Koppiker,
| | - Sneha Joshi
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | - Rupa Mishra
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | - Devaki A. Kelkar
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | | | - Anjali Joshi
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | - Jisha John
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | - Shweta Kadu
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | | | - Deepti Thakkar
- International School of Oncoplastic Surgery, Pune, India
| | - Chetan Deshmukh
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
| | | | - Gautam Sharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Upendra Dhar
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
- Jehangir Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Smeeta Nare
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | - Sanket Nagarkar
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| | - Laleh Busheri
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
| | - Beenu Varghese
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
| | - Mugdha Pai
- Orchids Breast Health Centre, Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune, India
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research: A Joint Initiative of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune and Prashanti Cancer Care Mission (PCCM), Pune, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oncoplastic breast surgery in elderly primary breast cancer: time to serve more surgically? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-022-02009-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Joukainen S, Laaksonen E, Vanninen R, Kaarela O, Sudah M. Dual-Layer Rotation: A Versatile Therapeutic Mammoplasty Technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6716-6727. [PMID: 35711016 PMCID: PMC9492593 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11977-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Multifocal or complex breast lesions are a challenge for breast-conserving surgery, particularly surgery in small breasts or those located in the upper inner quadrant. The dual-layer rotation technique exploits the idea of manipulating the skin and glandular tissue in separate layers to fill the resection cavity via vertical mammoplasty if skin excision is not required, except in the central area. Methods The authors performed a retrospective review of consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent DLR mammoplasty between 2017 and 2019 at a single institution. Clinical data, reoperations, surgical complications, delays in adjuvant treatments, and the need for late revisional surgery were evaluated. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated objectively and subjectively from photographs. Results The study included 46 breasts of 40 patients. Tumors were located in the UIQ (30%, 14/46) or in multiple quadrants (22%, 10/46). One third (33%, 13/40) of the patients had a small breast cup size (A–B). Negative margins were primarily achieved in 45 of the 46 breasts. Major complications occurred in three patients, who needed reoperation, and adjuvant therapy was delayed for one of these patients. Late refinement surgery was needed for two patients. The objective and subjective aesthetic outcomes were good or excellent regardless of the tumor position. Conclusion As a novel oncoplastic approach, DLR mammoplasty offers a one-step procedure to treat selected breast cancer patients with challenging resection defects due to different breast sizes or lesion locations. The technique preserves the breast’s natural appearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarianna Joukainen
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Elina Laaksonen
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.,Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Outi Kaarela
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mazen Sudah
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wolska J, Ammari T, Turnbull A, Johns N, Stafova D, Mensa M, Schaverien M, Raine C, Dixon M, Majdak-Paredes E. Comparison of long-term outcomes of breast conservation and reconstruction after mastectomy using BREAST-Q. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:2930-2940. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Cavalcante FP, Abdala E, Weissmann L, Ferreira CEDS, Amorim G, de Oliveira VM, Guilgen G, Landeiro L, Pinho JRR, Pulchinelli Á, Ribeiro H, Souza R, Rosa DD. Impact of COVID-19 Disease in Early Breast Cancer Management: A Summary of the Current Evidence. JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2100357. [PMID: 35594492 PMCID: PMC9173577 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
An expert panel on breast cancer and COVID-19 disease was convened to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic for early breast cancer (eBC) management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edson Abdala
- Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Weissmann
- Emílio Ribas Infectious Disease Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Unaerp School of Medicine, Guarujá, SP, Brazil
- Brazilian Society of Infectology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Gilberto Amorim
- Oncologia D'Or, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Brazilian Breast Cancer Study Group (GBECAM), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Vilmar Marques de Oliveira
- Brazilian Society of Mastology, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Santa Casa de São Paulo Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Gisah Guilgen
- Brazilian Breast Cancer Study Group (GBECAM), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Curitiba Cancer and Transplant Institute, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
- Nossa Senhora das Graças Hospital, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Luciana Landeiro
- Núcleo de Oncologia da Bahia (NOB)—Oncoclínicas Group, Salvador, BA, Brazil
| | - João Renato Rebello Pinho
- Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- School of Medicine, Medical Research Laboratories LIM 03/07, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Álvaro Pulchinelli
- Brazilian Society of Clinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Fleury Group, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Heber Ribeiro
- Brazilian Society of Oncology Surgery, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Rafael Souza
- Cancer Treatment Institute (ITC), Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
| | - Daniela Dornelles Rosa
- Brazilian Breast Cancer Study Group (GBECAM), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Moinhos de Vento Hospital, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee A, Kwasnicki RM, Khan H, Grant Y, Chan A, Fanshawe AEE, Leff DR. Outcome reporting in therapeutic mammaplasty: a systematic review. BJS Open 2021; 5:6459423. [PMID: 34894122 PMCID: PMC8665419 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is an oncological procedure which combines tumour resection with breast reduction and mastopexy techniques. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated the oncological safety of TM but reporting of critically important outcomes, such as quality of life, aesthetic and functional outcomes, are limited, piecemeal or inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to identify all outcomes reported in clinical studies of TM to facilitate development of a core outcome set. Methods Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched from inception to 5 August 2020. Included studies reported clinical outcomes following TM for adult women. Two authors screened articles independently for eligibility. Data were extracted regarding the outcome definition and classification type (for example, oncological, quality of life, etc.), time of outcome reporting and measurement tools. Results Of 5709 de-duplicated records, 148 were included in the narrative synthesis. The majority of studies (n = 102, 68.9 per cent) reported measures of survival and/or recurrence; approximately three-quarters (n = 75, 73.5 per cent) had less than 5 years follow-up. Aesthetic outcome was reported in half of studies (n = 75, 50.7 per cent) using mainly subjective, non-validated measurement tools. The time point at which aesthetic assessment was conducted was highly variable, and only defined in 48 (64.0 per cent) studies and none included a preoperative baseline for comparison. Few studies reported quality of life (n = 30, 20.3 per cent), functional outcomes (n = 5, 3.4 per cent) or resource use (n = 28, 18.9 per cent). Conclusion Given the oncological equivalence of TM and mastectomy, treatment decisions are often driven by aesthetic and functional outcomes, which are infrequently and inconsistently reported with non-validated measurement tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Hasaan Khan
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yasmin Grant
- Department of BioSurgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Abigail Chan
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Angela E E Fanshawe
- Department of Breast Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel R Leff
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Chest Wall Perforator Flaps and Therapeutic Mammoplasty. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3811. [PMID: 34513544 PMCID: PMC8423390 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Chest wall perforator flaps (CPF) and therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) are often done in patients with anticipated poor cosmetic outcome with level 1 breast conservation surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the complications and oncological outcomes between CPF and TM. Methods: Prospectively collected data of breast conservation surgery between September 2016 and January 2021 by a single surgeon were reviewed. Specific outcomes included complications needing intervention, re-excision and mastectomy rate, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis. Patients were followed up at 3 months and then every 12 months. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test and independent t test, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between CPF and TM with regard to patient characteristics except for BMI and bra cup size, which was significantly higher in the TM group. One patient who had TM returned to the operating room for a hematoma evacuation, and one patient who had CPF had fat grafting, for unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome. Five of the 30 patients having CPF had further re-excision surgery for inadequate margins, but none needed mastectomy, and four of the 43 patients having TM had further surgery (one had re-excision of margins and three had mastectomy) and this was not statistically significant (P = 0.346). There was no locoregional recurrence in CPF and TM groups after a median follow-up of 22 months and 25 months, respectively. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in early complications and oncological outcomes between CPF and TM.
Collapse
|
14
|
Can supine breast magnetic resonance imaging help hit the target in extreme oncoplastic surgery? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2788-2796. [PMID: 34412958 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical value of supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for tumor localization in breast cancer patients with large or multifocal tumors detected by prone MRI, scheduled for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS). Outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent wide local excision (WLE) or OBCS without MRI guidance. METHODS Over a 2-year period, consecutive patients with large or multifocal disease scheduled for OBCS with MRI-only findings were invited to participate (Group-1). Supplementary supine MRI was performed, and tumor margins were marked in the surgical position. Consecutive patients with early, non-palpable breast cancer who underwent WLE (Group-2) or OBCS (Group-3) were included for comparisons. The primary outcome was reoperation due to an insufficient margin. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and delayed adjuvant treatment. RESULTS Altogether, 102 breasts (98 patients) were analyzed. All preoperative demographic data were comparable among the three groups. Multifocality, tumor-to-breast volume ratio, and the volume of excised breast tissue were significantly greater in Group-1 than in Groups-2 and 3. Operation time was longer and the need for axillary clearance or surgery for both breasts was more common in Groups-1 and 3 than in Group-2. Adequate margins were achieved in all patients in Groups-1 and 2, and one patient underwent re-excision in Group-3. CONCLUSIONS Supine MRI in the surgical position is a new, promising method to localize multifocal, large tumors visible on MRI. Its short-term outcomes were comparable with those of conventional WLE and OBCS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Almeida NR, Brenelli FP, Dos Santos CC, Torresan RZ, Shinzato JY, Cardoso-Filho C, Duarte GM, de Azevedo NS, Zeferino LC. Comparative study of surgical and oncological outcomes in oncoplastic versus non oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer treatment. JPRAS Open 2021; 29:184-194. [PMID: 34258368 PMCID: PMC8259297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Oncoplastic surgery has been increasingly used in breast cancer treatment and allows the performance of breast-conserving surgery in cases of larger tumors with unfavorable location or tumor-breast disproportion. Purpose: To compare surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Methods: Retrospective cohort study with convenience sampling of 866 patients who consecutively underwent breast-conserving surgery from 2011 to 2015. Results: The mean follow-up was 50.4 months. Nononcoplastic breast conservation surgery was performed on 768 (88.7%) patients and oncoplastic surgery on 98 (11.3%) patients. Patients in the oncoplastic group were younger (p<0.0001) and most were premenopausal (p<0.0001). Comorbidities such as diabetes (p=0.003) and hypertension (p=0.0001) were less frequent in this population. Invasive carcinoma >2 cm (p<0.0001), multifocality (p=0.004), ductal in situ carcinoma (p=0.0007), clinically positive axilla (p=0.004), and greater weight of surgical specimens (p<0.0001) were more frequent in the oncoplastic group. A second surgery for margin re-excision was more frequently performed in the nononcoplastic group (p=0.027). There was more scar dehiscence in the oncoplastic group (p<0.001), but there was no difference in early major complications (p=0.854), conversion to mastectomy (p=0.92), or local recurrence (p=0.889). Conclusion: Although used for the treatment of larger and multifocal tumors, surgical re-excisions were performed less often in the oncoplastic group, and there was no increase in conversion to mastectomy or local recurrence. In spite of the higher rate of overall complications in the oncoplastic group, major complications were similar in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie R Almeida
- Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Breast Surgery Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabrício P Brenelli
- Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Breast Surgery Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cesar C Dos Santos
- Associated Professor Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renato Z Torresan
- Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Júlia Y Shinzato
- Assistant Professor Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cassio Cardoso-Filho
- Assistant Professor Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Giuliano M Duarte
- Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nicoli S de Azevedo
- Division of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, Woman's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz Carlos Zeferino
- Full Professor of Gynecology Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Davies C, Holcombe C, Skillman J, Whisker L, Hollingworth W, Conefrey C, Mills N, White P, Comins C, Macmillan D, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study). BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046622. [PMID: 33863715 PMCID: PMC8055121 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 40% of the 55 000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy because they are considered unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (BCS) due to tumour size or multiple tumour foci. Mastectomy can significantly impact women's quality of life, and only one in four women currently undergo immediate breast reconstruction (IBR).Level 2 oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) combines removing the cancer with a range of plastic surgical volume replacement (eg, local perforator flaps) and volume displacement techniques (eg, therapeutic mammaplasty) that can extend the role of BCS and may allow some women not suitable for standard BCS to avoid mastectomy. High-quality research to determine whether OPBCS offers a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy±IBR is currently lacking. Preliminary work is needed to ensure a future large-scale study is feasible and well designed and addresses questions important to patients and the National Health Service. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Mixed methods will be used to inform feasibility and design of a future large-scale study comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of OPBCS and mastectomy±IBR. It will have four parts: (1) a National Practice Questionnaire to determine current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast and reconstructive surgery in the UK; (2) a pilot multicentre prospective cohort study to explore the proportion of patients choosing OPBCS versus mastectomy, the proportion in OPBCS is successful and clinical and patient-reported outcomes of different techniques at 3 and 12 months postsurgery; (3) a qualitative interview study to explore patients' attitudes to different procedures, rationale for decision-making and perceptions of outcomes; and (4) design of the future study.All centres offering OPBCS and mastectomy in the UK will be invited to participate. Recruitment is planned to commence winter 2020 and continue for 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 National Research Ethics Service (REC Ref 20/WA/0225). Results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will work with patients to develop lay summaries and share these through patient groups and breast cancer charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN18238549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Davies
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Christopher Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Breast Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanna Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Lisa Whisker
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- Health Economics at Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Carmel Conefrey
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul White
- Applied Statistics Group, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Charles Comins
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Douglas Macmillan
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Shelley Potter
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pujji OJS, Blackhall V, Romics L, Vidya R. Systematic review of partial breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator artery flaps: Clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1883-1890. [PMID: 33895022 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) following breast conservation surgery for breast cancer has become a useful tool in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon, however robust evidence for the technique is lacking. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review appraising the current evidence for the use of CWPFs, evaluating clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review, with PROSPERO published protocol a priori and search of all relevant database and trial registries between 1990 to July 2020. Eleven studies amounting to 432 cases were reviewed and considered to be at high risk of bias due to small sample size, selective outcome reporting and selection bias. Heterogeneity due to lack of consensus of outcome measures prevented meaningful analysis. Fifty-two (12.3%) clinical complications were recorded: seroma (n = 9; 2.1%), fat necrosis (n = 9; 2.4%), haematoma (n = 8; 1.9%), infection (n = 9; 2.1%), and flap necrosis (n = 9; 2.1%). Thirty-four (10.8%) patients had an involved positive margin, 29 patients underwent re-excision (9.3%) and four underwent completion mastectomy (1.3%). One local recurrence and six distant recurrences were observed during a mean follow up of 21 months (1-49). A pooled patient cosmetic satisfaction descriptor of good or excellent was described in 93% of cases. CWPFs are a safe method of partial breast reconstruction following BCS. They are associated with a low complication rate, acceptable short-term oncological outcomes and satisfactory cosmetic outcome. There is a relative paucity in quality of data in this field and larger prospective studies are needed to investigate outcomes further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O J S Pujji
- Academic Foundation Trainee, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, England, UK.
| | - V Blackhall
- General and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Registrar, Gartnavel General Hospital, Greater Glasgow and Clyde, NHS Scotland, UK
| | - L Romics
- Consultant Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon, New Victoria Hospital, Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, UK
| | - R Vidya
- Honorary Senior Lecturer, Birmingham University, Consultant Oncoplastic Surgeon, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
"Medial Hemi-Mastopexy": An Innovation to Avoid Medial Pole Emptiness in Reduction Mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85:363-368. [PMID: 32897663 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Therapeutic mammaplasty is a well-established advanced oncoplastic technique for larger tumors in large breasts. However, the larger the breasts are, the greater is the lower outer parenchymal displacement due to weight resulting in relative emptiness in the medial/cleavage part. Therefore, the default practice of excising the medial wing parenchymal component of Wise pattern (WP) incision may either maintain or worsen such anatomy. METHODS We present a technical innovation to improve the standard WP technique: instead of excision, the medial wing of the WP incision is deepithelized, and parenchyma is preserved to retain or augment bulk. RESULTS Between July 2015 and December 2018, a total of 16 patients (26 breasts) underwent a medial hemi-mastopexy. This technique seems to be safe, with minimal complications even after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Although its use is limited in lower inner quadrant tumors, "medial hemi-mastopexy" can be safely applied to cancers located in all the other quadrants and potentially in the cosmetic setting as well. This case series is limited by the small numbers and short follow-up; however, the data show promising results.
Collapse
|
19
|
MacInnes EG, Piper J, Tait C, Waterworth A, Achuthan R, Hogan B, McKenzie S, Turton P, Kim B, Horgan K. Breast Cancer Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic Peak in the UK: Operative Outcomes. Cureus 2020; 12:e9280. [PMID: 32821623 PMCID: PMC7431302 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread changes in delivery of breast cancer care, aiming to protect vulnerable patients whilst minimising compromise to oncological outcomes. This multicentre observational study aimed to establish early surgical outcomes from breast cancer surgery performed during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods Data were collected on consecutive patients that underwent breast surgery in four units between 16 March and 24 April 2020. Outcome data at 30 days post-operation were collected, including documented COVID-19 cases in patients and reported cases in healthcare workers directly involved in their care. Recommended modifications to practice to reduce COVID-19 transmission risk, both to patients and healthcare workers in each centre, are described. Results A total of 202 patients underwent surgery in four hospitals delivering breast services in the West Yorkshire region over the six-week period at the peak of the pandemic. The age ranged from 28 to 91 years (median 57, interquartile range, 48-65) with 22% having co-morbidities linked to COVID-19, e.g. diabetes or respiratory disease. No patients presented post-operatively with COVID-19 symptoms and at 30 days there had not been any identified COVID-19 cases. There were no unexpected critical care admissions or deaths. One healthcare worker involved in the delivery of breast surgery was diagnosed with COVID-19 during this time and made an uneventful recovery. Conclusion Breast cancer surgery, in selected groups and with meticulous adherence to measures designed to reduce COVID-19 transmission, does not appear to be associated with elevated risk to patients or healthcare workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma G MacInnes
- Breast Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR
| | - Jenny Piper
- Breast Surgery, York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, GBR
| | - Catherine Tait
- Breast Surgery, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, GBR
| | - Alison Waterworth
- Breast Surgery, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, GBR
| | - Raj Achuthan
- Breast Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR
| | - Brian Hogan
- Breast Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR
| | | | - Philip Turton
- Breast Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR
| | - Baek Kim
- Breast Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR
| | - Kieran Horgan
- Breast Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Discussion: Immediate Contralateral Mastopexy/Breast Reduction for Symmetry Can Be Performed Safely in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145:1143-1144. [PMID: 32332526 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Potter S, Trickey A, Rattay T, O'Connell RL, Dave R, Baker E, Whisker L, Skillman J, Gardiner MD, Macmillan RD, Holcombe C. Therapeutic mammaplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2020; 107:832-844. [PMID: 32073654 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) may be an alternative to mastectomy, but few well designed studies have evaluated the success of this approach or compared the short-term outcomes of TM with mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Data from the national iBRA-2 and TeaM studies were combined to compare the safety and short-term outcomes of TM and mastectomy with or without IBR. METHODS The subgroup of patients in the TeaM study who underwent TM to avoid mastectomy were identified, and data on demographics, complications, oncology and adjuvant treatment were compared with those of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR in the iBRA-2 study. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful breast-conserving procedures in the TM group. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and time to adjuvant therapy. RESULTS A total of 2916 patients (TM 376; mastectomy 1532; mastectomy and IBR 1008) were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TM were more likely to be obese and to have undergone bilateral surgery than those having IBR. However, patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR were more likely to experience complications than the TM group (TM: 79, 21·0 per cent; mastectomy: 570, 37·2 per cent; mastectomy and IBR: 359, 35·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Breast conservation was possible in 87·0 per cent of patients who had TM, and TM did not delay adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION TM may allow high-risk patients who would not be candidates for IBR to avoid mastectomy safely. Further work is needed to explore the comparative patient-reported and cosmetic outcomes of the different approaches, and to establish long-term oncological safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Potter
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Breast Care Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - A Trickey
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - T Rattay
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | | | - R Dave
- Nightingale Breast Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Baker
- Department of Breast Surgery, Airedale General Hospital, Keighley, UK
| | - L Whisker
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - J Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - M D Gardiner
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - R D Macmillan
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - C Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Extreme oncoplastic conservation is a safe new alternative to mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:71-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
23
|
Multicentre prospective observational study evaluating recommendations for mastectomy by multidisciplinary teams. Br J Surg 2019; 107:227-237. [PMID: 31691270 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations for mastectomy by multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) may contribute to variation in mastectomy rates. The primary aim of this multicentre prospective observational study was to describe current practice in MDT decision-making for recommending mastectomy. A secondary aim was to determine factors contributing to variation in mastectomy rates. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy between 1 June 2015 and 29 February 2016 at participating units across the UK were recruited. Details of neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST), operative and oncological data, and rationale for recommending mastectomy by MDTs were collected. RESULTS Overall, 1776 women with breast cancer underwent 1823 mastectomies at 68 units. Mastectomy was advised by MDTs for 1402 (76·9 per cent) of these lesions. The most common reasons for advising mastectomy were large tumour to breast size ratio (530 women, 29·1 per cent) and multicentric disease (372, 20·4 per cent). In total, 202 postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) unifocal tumours were advised mastectomy and not offered NST, owing to large tumour to breast size ratio in 173 women (85·6 per cent). Seventy-five women aged less than 70 years with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) tumours were advised mastectomy and not offered NST, owing to large tumour to breast size ratio in 45 women (60 per cent). CONCLUSION Most mastectomies are advised for large tumour to breast size ratio, but there is an inconsistency in the use of NST to downsize tumours in patients with large ER+ or HER2+ cancers. The application of standardized recommendations for NST could reduce the number of mastectomies advised by MDTs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Oncoplastic breast conservation occupies a niche between standard breast conservation and mastectomy – A population-based prospective audit in Scotland. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1806-1811. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
|
25
|
Manie TM, Youssef M, Taha SN, Rabea A, Farahat AM. Batwing mammoplasty: a safe oncoplastic technique for breast conservation in breast cancer patients with gigantomastia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2019; 102:115-119. [PMID: 31538808 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management of breast cancer with gigantomastia can be challenging when planning breast conservation, as major breast reduction is required. Complex oncoplastic procedures can carry an additional surgical risk in this situation. We suggest batwing mammoplasty as a simple and safe oncoplastic procedure for those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fourteen patients with gigantomastia diagnosed with breast cancer were included in this prospective cohort study. All underwent batwing mammoplasty and contralateral symmetrisation procedure between May 2016 and June 2018. Patient satisfaction assessed by the Breast-Q questionnaire. RESULTS All patients had a body mass index above 30kg/m2 with a mean of 36.7kg/m2 (range 31.6-44.9kg/m2). The mean distance from midclavicular point to nipple was 42cm (range 38-50cm). The mean operative time was 83 minutes for procedures done by a single surgeon. Mean specimen weight was 1.2kg (ranging from 1.035-1.63kg). Postoperative complications occurred in 14.2% of patients. Nipple-areola complex viability was not compromised nor sensation impaired. The mean Breast-Q score for patient satisfaction with breasts was 68.6 (range 61-74). The mean score for physiological wellbeing was 77.3 (range 64-84) and the mean score for physical wellbeing was 35 (range 31-40). CONCLUSION Batwing mammoplasty is a safe and simple oncoplastic procedure in patients who have breast cancer with gigantomastia. It has short operative time and low complications rate. In our cohort of patients, there was no delay in the delivery of adjuvant treatment. The cosmetic outcome was favourable with a high patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Manie
- Breast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mmg Youssef
- Breast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.,Breast Surgery Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - S N Taha
- Breast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - A Rabea
- Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - A M Farahat
- Breast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
De-escalation of complexity in oncoplastic breast surgery: Case series from a specialized breast center. Breast 2019; 46:12-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
27
|
O'Connell L, Walsh S, Evoy D, O'Doherty A, Quinn C, Rothwell J, Geraghty J, McDermott EW, Prichard R. The approach to an isolated close anterior margin in breast conserving surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2019; 101:268-272. [PMID: 30855173 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although close radial margins after breast-conserving surgery routinely undergo re-excision, appropriate management of patients with close anterior margins remains a topic of controversy. An increasing body of literature suggests that re-excision of close anterior margins yields low rates of residual malignancy and may only be necessary in selected patients. The aim of this study was to examine the management of close anterior margins after breast conserving surgery in a single institution and to analyse the rate of residual disease in re-excised anterior margins. METHODS All patients having breast conserving surgery at St Vincent's University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Data collected included patient demographics, tumour characteristics, margin positivity, re-excision rates and definitive histology of the re-excision specimens. A close margin was defined as les than 2 mm. RESULTS A total of 930 patients were included with an average age of 65 years (range 29-94 years). Of these, 121 (13%) had a close anterior margin. Further re-excison of the anterior margin was carried out in 37 patients (30.6%) and a further 16 (13.2%) proceeded to mastectomy. Residual disease was found in 18.5% (7/36) of those who underwent re-excision and 7/16 (43.75%) of those who underwent mastectomy. Overall, 11.57% (14/121) of patients with close anterior margins were subsequently found to have residual disease. CONCLUSION The low yield of residual disease in re-excised anterior margins specimens supports the concept that routine re-excision of close anterior margins is not necessary. Further research is required to definitively assess its influence on the risk of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L O'Connell
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - S Walsh
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - D Evoy
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - A O'Doherty
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - C Quinn
- Department of Pathology, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - J Rothwell
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - J Geraghty
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - E W McDermott
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - R Prichard
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| |
Collapse
|