Meta-analysis of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients with previous lower abdominal surgery

Postoperative urinary leakage after bilateral totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy in a patient with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy: A case report

We report a case of postoperative urinary leakage after bilateral laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy. A man in his upper 80s with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy underwent bilateral TEP herniorrhaphy. Urinary leakage was noted by ultrasound examination 4 days after bilateral TEP. Cystography and computed tomography conclusively confirmed a 6-mm extraperitoneal fistula at the site of the previous cystostomy. The fistula involved the anterior bladder wall and was associated with an extended urinoma. The patient was treated by indwelling catheterization using a Foley catheter and repeated ultrasound-guided puncture and aspiration of the inguinal effusion at the bedside. The patient was completely healed 69 days after the operation with no mesh infection or bladder dysfunction. We believe that urinary leakage is possible after TEP herniorrhaphy in patients with a healed suprapubic cystostomy. Therefore, indwelling catheterization using a Foley catheter should be implemented before surgery, and the Foley catheter can be removed within 1 week after surgery if no postoperative urinary leakage is observed. A history of suprapubic cystotomy should not be regarded as a contraindication for TEP surgery. This is the first report of urinary leakage after bilateral TEP herniorrhaphy in a patient with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy.

Single-port versus multi-port totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The value of single-port totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (STEP) when compared to the conventional multi-port approach (TEP) is still a matter of controversy. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the feasibility and safety of the above-mentioned techniques.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcome STEP and TEP in patients with inguinal hernia was conducted. Data regarding postoperative outcomes were extracted and compared by meta-analysis. The Odds Ratio and Standardized Mean Differences with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were identified, involving a total of 636 cases (STEP: n = 328, TEP: n = 308). There was a statistically significant difference noted between the 2 groups regarding return to everyday activities favoring the STEP group (SMD = -0.23; 95% CI [-0.41, -0.06]; P = .01; 4 studies; I2 = 9). For the remaining primary and secondary endpoints, intra- and postoperative morbidity, conversion rate, peritoneal tears, major intraoperative bleeding, postoperative haematoseroma, operative time, postoperative pain, chronic pain, cosmetic satisfaction, hernia recurrence and in-hospital length of stay no statistically significant difference was noted between the 2 study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that patients who underwent STEP had similar outcomes to the traditional TEP technique with the exception of time to return to everyday activities, which was reported to be shorter in the STEP group.

Risk Factors for Conversion in Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernioplasty

BACKGROUND

Conversion is a surgical concern because the surgical technique can change during surgery. Surprisingly, there is no study in the literature on the causes and risk factors leading to conversion in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair (TEP). There is also no consensus on the prevention and causes of this condition in TEP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors underlying the development of conversion during TEP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited 962 consecutive patients who underwent TEP between May 2016 and May 2021. All data were collected retrospectively. The outcomes of patients who converted to open surgery were compared with those without conversion. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for conversion.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of conversion was 4.05% (n=39). The median age was 42 years (18 to 83) and body mass index was 25.2 kg/m2 (15.67 to 32.9). Significant clinical factors associated with conversion included old age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, large peritoneal tear (PT), Charlson comorbidity index, previous surgery, large hernial defects, presence of scrotal hernia, and the defect size of inguinal hernia. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for conversion: large hernial defect, large PT, previous lower abdominal surgery, previous hernia surgery, and scrotal hernia.

CONCLUSION

Conversion is a minor complication seen during TEP and its incidence varies depending on many factors. Previous lower abdominal surgery and a large PT carries a 6-fold increased risk for conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery during TEP.

New technique of inguinal hernia repair during prostatectomy

Background: Several benefits of inguinal hernia repair concurrent with simple prostatectomy have been proposed recently. For the first time we represent this surgery in the form of retroperitoneal mesh insertion without an additional surgical cut for the inguinal hernia repair. Methods: We selected 19 patients for this trial of a new surgery method. The simple prostatectomy was performed and from the same surgical cut the hernia sac recognized. Two methods of prostatectomy surgery were undertaken: Millin’s and Freyer’s prostatectomy. The retroperitoneal insertion of monofilament polypropylene was undertaken for hernia repair. Results: All patients were prospectively followed for three years for clinical outcomes and hernia recurrence. No complications after surgery, including wound infection, pelvic collections, sepsis and recurrence of the hernia were seen. Conclusions: Our new retroperitoneal mesh insertion technique is safe, effective and simultaneously practical with simple prostatectomy. This new method is strongly recommended to other surgeons, since it has beneficial results with no noteworthy raise in operative duration or further complications.