1
|
Kitagawa Y, Matsuda S, Gotoda T, Kato K, Wijnhoven B, Lordick F, Bhandari P, Kawakubo H, Kodera Y, Terashima M, Muro K, Takeuchi H, Mansfield PF, Kurokawa Y, So J, Mönig SP, Shitara K, Rha SY, Janjigian Y, Takahari D, Chau I, Sharma P, Ji J, de Manzoni G, Nilsson M, Kassab P, Hofstetter WL, Smyth EC, Lorenzen S, Doki Y, Law S, Oh DY, Ho KY, Koike T, Shen L, van Hillegersberg R, Kawakami H, Xu RH, Wainberg Z, Yahagi N, Lee YY, Singh R, Ryu MH, Ishihara R, Xiao Z, Kusano C, Grabsch HI, Hara H, Mukaisho KI, Makino T, Kanda M, Booka E, Suzuki S, Hatta W, Kato M, Maekawa A, Kawazoe A, Yamamoto S, Nakayama I, Narita Y, Yang HK, Yoshida M, Sano T. Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:401-425. [PMID: 38386238 PMCID: PMC11016517 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01457-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Satoru Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Kato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Oncology and University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central, Leipzig, Jena, Germany
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Hirofumi Kawakubo
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Paul F Mansfield
- Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Jimmy So
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stefan Paul Mönig
- Upper-GI-Surgery University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kohei Shitara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Sun Young Rha
- Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yelena Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Solid Tumor Gastrointestinal Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daisuke Takahari
- Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ian Chau
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, University of Kansas, Kansas, USA
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Maternity and Infant, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paulo Kassab
- Gastroesophageal Surgery, Santa Casa of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Khek Yu Ho
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tomoyuki Koike
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Higashiosaka, Japan
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun YAT-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zev Wainberg
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Australia
| | - Min-Hee Ryu
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Zili Xiao
- Digestive Endoscopic Unit, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chika Kusano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Heike Irmgard Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Mukaisho
- Education Center for Medicine and Nursing, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Tomoki Makino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Mitsuro Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Eisuke Booka
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Sho Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan
| | - Waku Hatta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Motohiko Kato
- Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Maekawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihito Kawazoe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shun Yamamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Izuma Nakayama
- Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukiya Narita
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bondzi-Simpson A, Ribeiro T, Grant A, Ko M, Coburn N, Hallet J, Kulkarni GS, Kidane B. Patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: A Markov decision analysis of esophagectomy versus active surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024:S0022-5223(24)00364-7. [PMID: 38649112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy is a standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, and recent evidence suggests select patients may benefit from omitting or delaying surgery. This study aims to compare surgery versus active surveillance for LAEC patients with complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS Decision analysis with Markov modeling was used. The base case was a 60-year-old man with T3N0M0 esophageal cancer with cCR after nCRT. The decision was modeled for a 5-year time horizon. Primary outcomes were life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Probabilities and utilities were derived through the literature. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed using ranges from the literature with consideration for clinical plausibility. RESULTS Surgery was favored for survival with an expected life-years of 2.89 versus 2.64. After incorporating quality of life, active surveillance was favored, with an expected QALY of 1.70 versus 1.56. The model was sensitive to probability of recurrence on active surveillance (threshold value 0.598), probability of recurrence being resectable (0.318), and disutility of previous esophagectomy (-0.091). The model was not sensitive to perioperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS Our study finds that surgery increases life expectancy but decreases QALY. Although the incremental change in QALY for either modality is insufficient to make broad clinical recommendations, our study demonstrates that either approach is acceptable. As probabilities of key factors are further defined in the literature, treatment decisions for patients with LAEC and a cCR after nCRT should consider histology, patient values, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adom Bondzi-Simpson
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tiago Ribeiro
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo Grant
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Ko
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Cancer Care Manitoba Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Physiology & Pathophysiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neuschütz KJ, Fourie L, Germann N, Pieters A, Däster S, Angehrn FV, Klasen JM, Müller-Stich BP, Steinemann DC, Bolli M. Long-term quality of life after hybrid robot-assisted and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single center: a comparative analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:118. [PMID: 38600407 PMCID: PMC11006740 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03310-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to improved survival of esophageal cancer patients, long-term quality of life (QoL) is increasingly gaining importance. The aim of this study is to compare QoL outcomes between open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (Open-E) and a hybrid approach including laparotomy and a robot-assisted thoracic phase (hRob-E). Additionally, a standard group of healthy individuals serves as reference. METHODS With a median follow-up of 36 months after hRob-E (n = 28) and 40 months after Open-E (n = 43), patients' QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the EORTC Esophagus specific QoL questionnaire 18 (QLQ-OES18). RESULTS Patients showed similar clinical-pathological characteristics, but hRob-E patients had significantly higher ASA scores at surgery (p < 0.001). Patients and healthy controls reported similar global health status and emotional and cognitive functions. However, physical functioning of Open-E patients was significantly reduced compared to healthy controls (p = 0.019). Operated patients reported reduced role and social functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, and diarrhea. A trend towards a better pain score after hRob-E compared to Open-E emerged (p = 0.063). Regarding QLQ-OES18, hRob-E- and Open-E-treated patients similarly reported eating problems, reflux, and troubles swallowing saliva. CONCLUSIONS The global health status is not impaired after esophagectomy. Despite higher ASA scores, QoL of hRob-E patients is similar to that of patients operated with Open-E. Moreover, patients after hRob-E appear to have a better score regarding physical functioning and a better pain profile than patients after Open-E, indicating a benefit of minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin J Neuschütz
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Lana Fourie
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Anouk Pieters
- University of Basel, Postfach 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Silvio Däster
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fiorenzo V Angehrn
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer M Klasen
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel C Steinemann
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Bolli
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis - University Digestive Health Care Center Basel, Postfach 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bîrlă R, Hoara P, Achim F, Dinca V, Ciuc D, Constantinoiu S, Constantin A. Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:1675-1690. [PMID: 37969407 PMCID: PMC10631441 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly indicated in the management of malignant disease. Although oesophagectomy is a difficult operation, with a long learning curve, there is actually a shift towards the laparoscopic/thoracoscopic/ robotic approach, due to the advantages of visualization, surgeon comfort (robotic surgery) and the possibility of the whole team to see the operation as well as and the operating surgeon. Although currently there are still many controversial topics, about the surgical treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma, such as the type of open or minimally invasive surgical approach, the type of oesophago-gastric resection, the type of lymph node dissection and others, the minimally invasive approach has proven to be a way to reduce postoperative complications of resection, especially by decreasing pulmonary complications. The implementation of new technologies allowed the widening of the range of indications for this type of surgical approach. The short-term and long-term results, as well as the benefits for the patient - reduced surgical trauma, quick and easy recovery - offer this type of surgical treatment the premises for future development. This article reviews the updates and perspectives on the minimally invasive approach for GOJ adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodica Bîrlă
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| | - Petre Hoara
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 020021, Romania
| | - Florin Achim
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| | - Valeriu Dinca
- Faculty of Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, Bucharest 031593, Romania
| | - Diana Ciuc
- Faculty of Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, Bucharest 031593, Romania
| | - Silviu Constantinoiu
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| | - Adrian Constantin
- Department of General Surgery, Carol Davila University, Bucharest 011172, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Slingerland M, Haj Mohammad N, van Rossum PSN, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. Long-term health-related quality of life in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer receiving first-line systemic therapy. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:520. [PMID: 37578590 PMCID: PMC10425291 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07963-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of systemic therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer in daily clinical practice. This study assessed the HRQoL of patients with esophagogastric cancer during first-line systemic therapy, at disease progression, and after progression in a real-world context. METHODS Patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (2014-2021) receiving first-line systemic therapy registered in the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Oesophageal-gastric cancer (POCOP) were included (n = 335). HRQoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25. Outcomes of mixed-effects models were presented as adjusted mean changes. RESULTS Results of the mixed-effect models showed the largest significant improvements during systemic therapy for odynophagia (- 18.9, p < 0.001), anxiety (- 18.7, p < 0.001), and dysphagia (- 13.8, p < 0.001) compared to baseline. After progression, global health status (- 6.3, p = 0.002) and cognitive (- 6.2, p = 0.001) and social functioning (- 9.7, p < 0.001) significantly worsened. At and after progression, physical (- 9.0, p < 0.001 and - 8.8, p < 0.001) and role functioning (- 15.2, p = 0.003 and - 14.7, p < 0.001) worsened, respectively. Trouble with taste worsened during systemic therapy (11.5, p < 0.001), at progression (12.0, p = 0.004), and after progression (15.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In general, HRQoL outcomes in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer improved during first-line therapy. Deterioration in outcomes was mainly observed at and after progression. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Identification of HRQoL aspects is important in shared decision-making and to inform patients on the impact of systemic therapy on their HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pape
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hauge T, Førland DT, Johannessen HO, Johnson E. Short- and long-term outcomes in patients operated with total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6365776. [PMID: 34491299 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
At our hospital, the main treatment for resectable esophageal cancer (EC) has since 2013 been total minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE). The aim of this study was to present the short- and long-term results in patients operated with TMIE. This cross-sectional study includes all patients scheduled for TMIE from June 2013 to January 2016 at Oslo University Hospital. Data on morbidity, mortality, and survival were retrospectively collected from the patient administration system and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Long-term postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQL) and level of dysphagia were assessed by patients completing the following questionaries: EORTC QLQ-OG25, QLQ-C30, and the Ogilvie grading scale. A total of 123 patients were included in this study with a median follow-up time of 58 months (1-88 months). 85% had adenocarcinoma, 15% squamous cell carcinoma. Seventeen patients (14%) had T1N0M0, 68 (55%) T2-T3N0M0, or T1-T2N1M0 and 38 (31%) had either T3N1M0 or T4anyNM0. Ninety-eight patients (80%) received neoadjuvant (radio)chemotherapy and 104 (85%) had R0 resection. Anastomotic leak rate and 90-days mortality were 14% and 2%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 53%. Patients with tumor free resection margins of >1 mm (R0) had a 5-year survival of 57%. Median 60 months (range 49-80) postoperatively the main symptoms reducing HRQL were anxiety, chough, insomnia, and reflux. Median Ogilvie score was 0 (0-1). In this study, we report relatively low mortality and good overall survival after TMIE for EC. Moreover, key symptoms reducing long-term HRQL were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Hauge
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal and Children Surgery, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dag T Førland
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hans-Olaf Johannessen
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Egil Johnson
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal and Children Surgery, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mehdorn AS, Möller T, Franke F, Richter F, Kersebaum JN, Becker T, Egberts JH. Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Procedures-A Propensity Score-Matched Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9113513. [PMID: 33142987 PMCID: PMC7693702 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophagectomies are among the most invasive surgical procedures that highly influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recent improvements have helped to achieve longer survival. Therefore, long-term postoperative HRQoL needs to be emphasized in addition to classic criterions like morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare short and long-term HRQoL after open transthoracic esophagectomies (OTEs) and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIEs) in patients suffering from esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prospectively collected HRQoL-data (from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)) were correlated with clinical courses. Only patients suffering from minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification of < 2) after R0 Ivor-Lewis-procedures were included. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status-score (ASA-score), tumor stage, and perioperative therapy were used for propensity score matching (PSM). Twelve RAMIE and 29 OTE patients met the inclusion criteria. RAMIE patients reported significantly better emotional and social function while suffering from significantly less pain and less physical impairment four months after surgery. The long-term follow up confirmed the results. Long-term postoperative HRQoL and self-perception partly exceeded the levels of the healthy reference population. Minor operative trauma by robotic approaches resulted in significantly reduced physical impairments while improving HRQoL and self-perception, especially in the long-term. However, further long-term results are warranted to confirm this positive trend.
Collapse
|