A randomized controlled trial of adjuvant portal vein cytotoxic perfusion in colorectal cancer

Efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in preventing liver metastasis from potentially curative colorectal cancer: A systematic review network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

Various chemotherapy administration methods have been used to prevent liver metastasis (LM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of these different methods in preventing LM in CRC patients who underwent curative surgery.

METHOD

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery was conducted. The primary outcome was the LM rate.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 19 studies reporting on 12,588 participants, comparing portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVIC) versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) versus systematic chemotherapy (SC) versus surgery alone. The HAIC group had the lowest LM rate when compared to the other three groups (odds ratio [OR] of PVIC vs. HAIC: 1.86; OR of SC vs. HAIC: 1.98; and HAIC vs. surgery alone: 0.43). The LM rate did not differ significantly between PVIC, SC, and surgery alone. The recurrence rates were lower for PVIC and HAIC than for surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.58-0.92] and 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.77]). The mortality rates of patients undergoing PVIC and HAIC were lower than that of patients undergoing surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64-0.93] and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]). Anastomotic leakage, cardiopulmonary leakage, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, oral ulceration, wound infection, or ileus did not differ significantly between the four groups. PVIC showed the highest hepatic toxicity rate compared to those for SC, HAIC, and surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC might be a satisfactory method for preventing LM in patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.

Medical Management of Colorectal Carcinomas

Current information on the medical treatment of colorectal cancer was reviewed after a search of the literature through Medline. Publications from 1984 to present were surveyed. Appropriate adjuvant therapy increases overall survival and disease-free intervals. The treatment modalities of unresectable or metastatic tumors are disappointing, with at best 40% of patients experiencing short-lasting responses. Whenever possible, patients with advanced colorectal cancer should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Cancer of Gastrointestinal Tract: A Critical Review

Surgery is the only curative therapeutic approach for gastrointestinal tumors. If the tumor is deeply Infiltrating through serosa or invading regional lymph nodes, the 5-year patient's survival is about 60 % and < 40 %, respectively. The natural history and prognosis of neoplasms from colon, rectum and stomach are different. Despite the unsatisfactory results obtained with radical treatment of advanced disease, there are positive studies on adjuvant treatment of colon and rectal cancer, whereas the role of such an approach is still controversial for gastric cancer. The combination of fluorouracil containing chemotherapy with radiotherapy was suggested as the most effective adjuvant treatment for patients with Dukes’ B and C rectal cancer. However, the choice of chemotherapeutic regimen is still debated. A recent report, from the North Central Cancer Tumor Group, stated survival and disease-free survival advantages for patients with Dukes’ C colon cancer treated with FU + levamisole for 1 year after radical surgery. Since this regimen was not proven effective in advanced disease, ongoing adjuvant trials are comparing it with the combination of FU + biochemical modulator. The role of adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer is debated. The recent development of regimens active on advanced disease result in more promising future adjuvant trials.

Safety of intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection: a randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III IOCCRC trial (IOCCRC)

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of intraoperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer have not yet been extensively investigated. This randomized control trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of intraoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgical resection to those of traditional surgical resection alone.

METHODS

From January 2011 to January 2016, 696 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study: 341 patients were randomly assigned to the intraoperative chemotherapy, which consist of portal vein chemotherapy, intraluminal chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, plus surgery group, whereas 344 patients were randomized to the control group to undergo surgery alone. Eleven patients withdrew consent.

RESULTS

Intraoperative chemotherapy did not increase the rate of surgical complications, and no severe chemotherapy-associated side effects were observed. Four patients in each of the intraoperative chemotherapy and the control groups experienced anastomotic leakage and underwent a second operation (1.2 vs. 1.2%, P = 0.99). There were no deaths within 90 days after surgery in the chemotherapy group, whereas one patient died in the control group. Intraoperative chemotherapy did not decrease the rate of patients who received postoperative chemotherapy between the intraoperative group and control group (29.3 vs. 30.2%, P = 0.795).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative chemotherapy can be safely performed during colorectal surgery; however, follow-up is necessary for a better assessment of its efficacy. ClinicalTrial.gov Register Number: NCT01465451.

High-efficacy targeting of colon-cancer liver metastasis with Salmonella typhimurium A1-R via intra-portal-vein injection in orthotopic nude-mouse models

Liver metastasis is the main cause of colon cancer-related death and is a recalcitrant disease. We report here the efficacy and safety of intra-portal-vein (iPV) targeting of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on colon cancer liver metastasis in a nude-mouse orthotopic model. Nude mice with HT29 human colon cancer cells, expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) (HT29-RFP), growing in the liver were administered S. typhimurium A1-R by either iPV (1×10⁴ colony forming units (CFU)/100 μl) or, for comparison, intra-venous injection (iv; 5×10⁷ CFU/100 μl). Similar amounts of bacteria were delivered to the liver with the two doses, indicating that iPV delivery is 5×10³ times more efficient than iv delivery. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by tumor fluorescent area (mm²) and total fluorescence intensity. Tumor fluorescent area and fluorescence intensity highly correlated (p<0.0001). iPV treatment was more effective compared to both untreated control and iv treatment (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively with iPV treatment with S. typhimurium arresting metastatic growth). There were no significant differences in body weight between all groups. The results of this study suggest that S. typhimurium A1-R administered iPV has potential for peri-operative adjuvant treatment of colon cancer liver metastasis.

Tumor location as a novel high risk parameter for stage II colorectal cancers

Current studies do not accurately evaluate the influence of tumor location on survival of colorectal cancer patients. This study aimed to explore whether tumor location could be identified as another high-risk factor in stage II colorectal cancer by using data identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. All colorectal cancer patients between 2004 and 2008 were grouped into three according to tumor location. Of 33,789 patients diagnosed with stage II colorectal cancer, 46.8% were right colon cancer, 37.5% were left colon cancer and 15.7% were rectal cancer. The 5-year cancer specific survivals were examined. Right colon cancer was associated with the female sex, older age (> 50), and having over 12 lymph nodes resected. Conversely, rectal cancer was associated with the male sex, patients younger than 50 years of age and insufficient lymph node resection. The characteristics of left colon cancer were between them and associated with Asian or Pacific Islander populations, T4 stage, and Grade II patients. The prognostic differences between three groups were significant and retained after stratification by T stage, histological grade, number of regional nodes dissected, age at diagnose, race and sex. Furthermore, the significant difference of location was retained as an independent high-risk parameter. Thus, stage II colorectal cancers of different locations have different clinic-pathological features and cancer-specific survivals, and tumor location should be recognized as another high-risk parameter in stage II colorectal cancer.

Postoperative prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Radical resection is the main treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), but metastasis or recurrence is common in which liver metastasis accounted for 83% of the cases. Therefore, the prognosis of patients with advanced CRC may be improved if liver metastasis is prevented. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on liver metastases of stage III CRC patients after curative resection.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2008, 287 stage III CRC patients who had undergone radical resection were included in this study. According to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy modality, these patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the combined therapy group received two cycles of HAIC plus four cycles of systemic chemotherapy, while patients in the monotherapy group received six cycles of systemic chemotherapy alone. The HAIC regimen consisted of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin (OXA, 85 mg/m²) on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 2,400 mg/m²) on days 2 and 3 followed by a vein infusion of folinic acid (FA, 200 mg/m²) as a 2-hour infusion on days 2 and 3. The systemic chemotherapy regimen consisted of a 2-hour infusion of OXA (85 mg/m²) on day 1 followed by FA (200 mg/m²) as a 2-hour infusion on days 2 and 3, and by 5-FU (2,400 mg/m²) as a 48-hour infusion. This was repeated every 4 weeks. All cases were followed up for 5 years or until death. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, liver metastases-free survival, and the overall liver metastases rates were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the 5-year overall survival (combined therapy, 70.71%; monotherapy, 57.14%; P=0.014), disease-free survival (combined therapy, 69.29%; monotherapy, 55.78%; P=0.021), and liver metastases-free survival rates (combined therapy, 70%; monotherapy, 56.46%; P=0.019).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic adjuvant HAIC can prevent metachronous liver metastases and improve the prognosis of patients with stage III CRC after curative resection.

Raltitrexed and the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Objective. Colorectal cancer is the second largest cause of death from malignant disease in Western countries. Although surgical resection is the preferred treatment in early disease, chemotherapy has an important role to play both as an adjunct to surgery and in the palliation of advanced disease. For many years 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the only cyto toxic drug with significant activity in this condition and, recently, considerable effort has been directed toward enhancing its activity and finding better, alternative agents. Recently, raltitrexed (Tomudex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals), the first of a new class of cytotoxic drugs, the selective, direct, thymidylate synthase inhibitors, received its first regulatory ap proval for the first-line treatment of advanced colo rectal cancer. The purpose of this review is to con sider the efficacy, toxicity, and resource implications of using this new antineoplastic agent, alongside developments that have been made in the more effective use of fluoropyrimidines, and the place of drug treatment in the management of colorectal cancer.

Data Sources. A variety of sources were used, including manual and on-line (Medline and Pharm- line) literature searching. Approved and other drug names were used as primary search terms, linked with colorectal cancer where limitation was required. The medical information department of Zeneca Pharma ceuticals also was used where appropriate.

Study Selection. Particular attention was di rected to randomized clinical trials, but nonrandom ized and preclinical studies were considered where appropriate.

Conclusions. Although colorectal cancer is in herently resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, such treatment now has an established role as an adjunct to surgery and in the palliation of advanced disease. The optimum 5-FU- based regimen has yet to be estab lished with certainty, although in advanced disease a four-times-weekly, 5-day regimen of 5-FU and low- dose folinic acid is probably the best of those fully evaluated to date. Raltitrexed seems to be as effective as this combination while having definite advantages in terms of toxicity and the resources required for its preparation and administration, although it remains to be seen to what extent these and other resource benefits will be offset by its higher cost and how its efficacy and tolerability will compare with other 5-FU- based regimens in ongoing clinical trials.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intraportal Chemotherapy Combined With Adjuvant Chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6) for Stage II and III Colon Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery in patients with colon cancer is not clear. We investigated the benefit of combined intraportal chemotherapy administered during radical surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy for treating stage II and III colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to OCTREE arm (intraportal chemotherapy plus mFOLFOX6) or a standard adjuvant chemotherapy arm (mFOLFOX6). The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints included metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population comprised 237 patients. With a median follow-up of 44 months, the hazard ratio (OCTREE vs mFOLFOX6) was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.90), a 34% risk reduction in favor of OCTREE (P = 0.016). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 85.2% for OCTREE and 75.6% for mFOLFOX6 alone (P = 0.030). The 3-year metastasis-free survival rates were 87.6% for OCTREE and 78.0% for mFOLFOX6 (P = 0.035). Patients had lower distant metastatic rate in the OCTREE arm (12.7% vs 22.7%; P = 0.044), when compared with the mFOLFOX6 arm. The 3-year overall survival was no significant difference between 2 arms (P = 0.178). Neutropenia occurred in 12.7% of the patients receiving OCTREE and in 2.5% of the patients receiving mFOLFOX6 (P = 0.003) within 2 weeks of surgery, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity event was no difference between 2 regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of intraoperative intraportal chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 reduced the occurrence of distant metastases and improved disease-free survival in patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer.

Albumin-drug conjugates in the treatment of hepatic disorders

INTRODUCTION

This review deals with the use of serum albumin (SA) as a carrier for the selective delivery of drugs to liver cells.

AREAS COVERED

The synthesis and properties of the SA conjugates prepared to enhance the performance of the drugs used in the treatment of viral hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver micrometastases and hepatic fibrosis are reported.

EXPERT OPINION

Studies in humans and laboratory animals demonstrated the capacity of SA conjugates to accomplish a liver targeting of the drugs, but at the same time underscored their limits and drawbacks, which can explain why to date these complexes did not reach a practical application. The major drawback is the need of administration by intravenous route, which prevents long-term daily treatments as required by some liver pathologies, such as chronic virus hepatitis and fibrosis. At present, only a conjugate carrying doxorubicin and addressed to the treatment of HCC showed in laboratory animals a solid potentiality to improve the value of the coupled drug. In the future, conjugation to SA could remain a successful strategy to permit the administration of drugs with rapid resolutive effects inside liver cells without causing severe extrahepatic adverse reactions.

Effect of portal vein chemotherapy on liver metastasis after surgical resection of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of portal vein chemotherapy on liver metastasis after surgical resection of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were assigned to receive either surgery plus 1-week continuous infusion of 5-FU (study group) or surgery alone (observational group). Patients in the study group received portal vein chemotherapy, whereby 5-FU (1000 mg/d) and heparin (5000 IU/d) infusion was initiated from the day of surgery and lasted for 7 consecutive days. Liver metastasis was monitored during five years follow-up postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty four patients were recruited and assigned to the study group (12 with colon and 20 with rectal cancer) or the control group (10 with colon and 22 with rectal cancer). Liver metastasis rate was 12.5% in study and 25.0% in observational group, the difference being significant (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Portal vein chemotherapy could be an effective treatment in preventing liver metastasis after surgical resection of colorectal cancer.

Unique patterns of metastases in common and rare types of malignancy

This review on the unique patterns of metastases by common and rare types of cancer addresses regional lymphatic metastases but also demonstrates general principles by consideration of vital organ metastases. These general features of successfully treated metastases are relationships to basic biological behavior as illustrated by disease-free interval, organ-specific behavior, oligo-metastatic presentation, genetic control of the metastatic pattern, careful selection of patients for surgical resection, and the necessity of complete resection of the few patients eligible for long-term survival after resection of vital organ metastasis. Lymph node metastases, while illustrating these general features, are not related to overall survival because lymph node metastases themselves do not destroy a vital organ function, and therefore have no causal relationship to overall survival. When a cancer cell spreads to a regional lymph node, does it also simultaneously spread to the systemic site or sites? Alternatively, does the cancer spread to the regional lymph node first and then it subsequently spreads to the distant site(s) after an incubation period of growth in the lymph node? Of course, if the cancer is in its incubation stage in the lymph node, then removal of the lymph node in the majority of cases with cancer cells may be curative. The data from the sentinel lymph node era, particularly in melanoma and breast cancer, is consistent with the spectrum theory of cancer progression to the sentinel lymph node in the majority of cases prior to distant metastasis. Perhaps, different subsets of cancer may be better defined with relevant biomarkers so that mechanisms of metastasis can be more accurately defined on a molecular and genomic level.

Regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver

The liver is the most common site of metastatic spread of colorectal cancer (CRC). Liver may be the only site of spread in as many as 30% to 40% of patients with advanced disease and can be treated with regional therapies directed toward their liver tumors. Surgery is currently the only potentially curative treatment, with a 5-year survival rate as high as 30% to 40% in selected patients. However, fewer than 25% of cases are candidates for curative resection. A number of other locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, cryotherapy, and chemotherapy, may be offered to patients with unresectable but isolated liver metastases. However, for most patients with metastatic spread beyond the liver, systemic chemotherapy rather than regional therapy is a more appropriate option. We review the status of various regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal metastases to the liver in the light of the available, published prospective, randomized trials; this discipline has not yet been properly applied to the burgeoning use of locally ablative techniques. The regional strategies reviewed include portal venous infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), intra-arterial chemotherapy (hepatic arterial infusion [HAI]), chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).

Lactosaminated human albumin, a hepatotropic carrier of drugs

A selective delivery of drugs to liver can be obtained by conjugation with galactosyl terminating macromolecules. The conjugates selectively enter hepatocytes after interaction of the carrier galactose residues with the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R) present only on these cells. Within hepatocytes the conjugates are transported to lysosomes where the drug is set free from the carrier, becoming concentrated in liver cells. The present article reviews the liver targeting of drugs obtained with lactosaminated albumin (L-SA), a neoglycoprotein exposing galactosyl residues. We report: (1) experiments which demonstrate the antiviral efficacy of the L-H(human)SA-ara-AMP conjugate in laboratory animals and in humans with viral hepatitis; (2) the property of a L-HSA conjugate with fluorodeoxyuridine to produce concentrations of the drug higher in hepatic sinusoids than in systemic circulation, with the potential of accomplishing a loco-regional, noninvasive treatment of liver micrometastases; (3) the increased anticancer activity of doxorubicin (DOXO) when coupled to L-HSA on all the forms of chemically induced rat hepatocellular carcinomas including those which do not express the ASGP-R.

Does adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy provide a benefit for patients with resected rectal cancer who have already received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy? A systematic review of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

The results of the recently published large European randomised study in rectal cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 22921 trial) do not support current guidelines recommending postoperative chemotherapy for patients who have previously undergone preoperative radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy [radio(chemo)therapy]. To evaluate this discrepancy further, a systematic review of relevant randomised trials was undertaken.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in order to identify randomised studies exploring adjuvant chemotherapy against observation in patients with rectal cancer previously treated with preoperative radio(chemo)therapy.

RESULTS

A statistically significant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was not found in any of the four relevant randomised trials. Non-protocolised subgroup analysis of one study indicated a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for high rectal tumours and for patients downstaged to ypT0-2N0 but no effect for low-lying rectal tumours. However, the body of evidence indicates that patients downstaged after radio(chemo)therapy to ypT0-2N0 disease are not candidates for testing adjuvant chemotherapy in future trials due to the considerable over-treatment anticipated by this manoeuvre.

CONCLUSIONS

To resolve the issue in question, a meta-analysis of relevant studies is required, and new trials should be launched to explore new drug combinations against observation. Currently, delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is not evidence based.

Effect of lymph node retrieval rates on the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Failing to meet the benchmark of 12 lymph nodes in resection specimens is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

Among consecutive eligible patients with pathologic stage II colon cancer treated at eight NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers between September 1, 2005 and February 19, 2008, we analyzed receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, with less than 12 versus 12+ lymph nodes removed and examined the primary explanatory variable of interest.

RESULTS

Among 258 patients, 46% received adjuvant chemotherapy. An oxaliplatin-containing regimen was used 67% of the time. Younger age (<50 years, P < 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.007), and higher T stage (P = 0.007) were independently associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use. There was significant inter-institutional variability in practice with the proportion receiving treatment ranging from 17% to 64% (P < 0.05). Notably, presence of less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen was a strong predictor of treatment (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy use after resection of stage II colon cancer is common, but by no means standard practice at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) institutions. More attention to achieving the recommended benchmark for lymph node dissection has the potential to decrease exposure to the toxicity of adjuvant treatment.

Targeting the extracellular signature of metastatic colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of tumor death, a consequence primarily of the spreading of malignant cells to liver and lung. Despite a range of interventions for liver metastases, the present knowledge of few specific molecular targets may contribute to late diagnosis and poorly effective therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review the most innovative methodology employed to profile the signature(s) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and to address diagnostic/therapeutic agents.

METHODS

A broad range Medline search was conducted, with particular attention to the search terms 'liver metastasis signature', in combination with 'targeting' and 'nanotechnology'.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Studies aimed at the discovery of molecular signatures of cancers and metastasis are ongoing; the future of cancer/metastasis targeting is nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery.

Adjuvant perioperative portal vein or peripheral intravenous chemotherapy for potentially curative colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The perioperative use of a single course adjuvant portal vein infusion chemotherapy in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer has been shown to significantly improve overall survival but did not reduce the occurrence of liver metastases (SAKK 40/81) [Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Lancet 345(8946):349-353, 1995]. The objective of the present prospective, three-arm randomized multicenter trial was to assess whether peripheral venous administration of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C decreases the occurrence of liver metastases as well as prolongs disease-free and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stages I-III colorectal cancer patients (n = 753) were randomized to receive either surgery alone (control arm), surgery plus postoperative portal venous infusion of 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) plus heparin given for 24 hours for seven consecutive days plus mitomycin C 10 mg/m(2) given on the first day (arm 2), or surgery and the same chemotherapy regimen administered by peripheral venous route (arm 3).

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival for the three treatment groups were 65% (control group), 60% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.18, p = 0.23), and 64% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.76); the 5-year overall survival was 72% (control group), 69% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.21, p = 0.2), and 74% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.03, p = 0.86), respectively. A significant accumulation of early deaths were observed in the portal vein infusion group (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The present prospective randomized multicenter trial provides compelling evidence that short-term perioperative chemotherapy does not improve disease-free and overall survival in patients with potentially curative colorectal cancer. In contrary, the chemotherapy regimen administered in the present investigation seems to have potentially harmful effects, a finding which should be carefully considered in the planning of future trials. Postoperative short-term administration of 5-FU plus mitomycin C either through portal infusion or a central venous catheter is not recommended for routine use in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery. Although adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with stage III disease, there is uncertainty of such benefit in stage II colon cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to better define the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy for patients with stage II colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of adjuvant therapy on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Ovid MEDLINE (1986-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( to 2007) were searched using the medical headings "colonic neoplasms", "colorectal neoplasms", "adjuvant chemotherapy", "adjuvant radiotherapy" and "immunotherapy", and the text words "colon cancer" and "colonic neoplasms". In addition, proceedings from the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology (1996 to 2004) as well as personal files were searched for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials or meta-analyses containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

:Three reviewers summarized the results of selected studies. The main outcomes of interest were overall and disease-free survival, however, data on toxicity and treatment delivery were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

With regards to the effect of adjuvant therapy on stage II colon cancer, the pooled relative risk ratio for overall survival was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.88, 1.05). With regards to disease-free survival, the pooled relative risk ratio was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.75, 0.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no improvement in overall survival in the pooled analysis, we did find that disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer was significantly better with the use of adjuvant therapy. It seems reasonable to discuss the benefits of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with those stage II patients who have high risk features, including obstruction, perforation, inadequate lymph node sampling or T4 disease. The co-morbidities and likelihood of tolerating adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should be considered as well. There exists a need to further define which high-risk features in stage II colon cancer patients should be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy. Also, researchers must continue to search for other therapies which might be more effective, shorter in duration and less toxic than those available today.

Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common noncutaneous malignancy in the United States and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death. Over the past 12 years, significant progress has been made in the systemic treatment of this malignant condition. Six new chemotherapeutic agents have been introduced, increasing median overall survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from less than 9 months with no treatment to approximately 24 months. For patients with stage III (lymph node positive) colon cancer, an overall survival benefit for fluorouracil-based chemotherapy has been firmly established, and recent data have shown further efficacy for the inclusion of oxaliplatin in such adjuvant treatment programs. For patients with stage II colon cancer, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial, but may be appropriate in a subset of individuals at higher risk for disease recurrence. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are evaluating how best to combine currently available therapies, while smaller studies are evaluating new agents, with the goal of continued progress in prolonging life among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and increasing cure rates among those with resectable disease.

Preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy in the prevention of liver metastasis after colorectal cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy is able to prevent liver metastasis and improve overall survival in patients receiving curative colorectal cancer resection.

METHODS

Patients with stage II or stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) were randomly assigned to receive preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy (PHRAC group, n = 110) or surgery alone (control group, n = 112). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, whereas the secondary endpoints included liver metastasis-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in overall morbidity between PHRAC and Control groups. During the follow-up period (median, 36 months), the median liver metastasis time for patients with stage III CRC was significantly longer in the PHRAC group (16 +/- 3 months vs. 8 +/- 1 months, P = 0.01). In stage III patients, there was also significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the incidence of liver metastasis (20.6% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.03), 3-year disease-free survival (74.6% vs. 58.1%, P = 0.0096), 3-year overall survival (87.7% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.020), and the median survival time (40.1 +/- 4.6 months vs. 36.3 +/- 3.2 months, P = 0.03). In the PHRAC arm, the risk ratio of recurrence was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.51-0.79, P = 0.0002), of death was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P = 0.009), and of liver metastasis was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.52-0.86; P = 0.02). In contrast, PHRAC seemed to be no benefit for stage II patients. Toxicities, such as hepatic toxicity and leukocyte decreasing, were mild and could be cured with medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy, in combination with surgical resection, could be able to reduce and delay the occurrence of liver metastasis and therefore improve survival rate in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Attempts to improve locoregional chemotherapy for the prevention of colonic cancer liver metastasis in the rat

AIM OF THE STUDY

To improve prophylactic local treatment of hepatic metastasis from colonic cancer cells in the rat.

METHODS

The in vitro anticancer activity of 30 mn exposure to different drugs was first evaluated by dimethyl-thiazol-diphenyl-tetrazolium-bromide assay on confluent DHD/K12/PROb rat and HT29 human colonic cancer cells. Hepatic metastasis was induced by portal vein infusion of 12 x 106 PROb colonic cancer cells in syngenic BDIX rats. Hepatic and general tolerance to epirubicin was studied. Rats were treated with epirubicin delivered by either intravenous (IV), intraperitoneal (IP) or intraportal (Ipo) administration to compare their antitumoral effects. Hepatic distribution of epirubicin was assessed by fluorescence microscopy after IV, IP, Ipo, and combined administration. High pressure liquid chromatography was used to measure hepatic concentrations of epirubicin.

RESULTS

Only pirarubicin was fully cytotoxic in vitro against the two types of tumor cells. No general or hepatic toxicity was observed. The preventive effect on hepatic metastasis was similar for IV, IP, and Ipo pirarubicin treatments. Hepatic pirarubicin concentrations obtained by Ipo administration were 4.1-fold higher than those obtained after IV administration (P=0.013). Three hours after IP and Ipo administration, hepatic remnants of pirarubicin were similar and significantly higher that those obtained after IV administration (P=0.074). Clamping the hepatic vein doubled hepatic pirarubicin concentrations after Ipo administration (P=0.048). Combined hepatic and intraportal administration was necessary to achieve diffuse, intense and homogeneous fluorescence throughout the entire liver.

CONCLUSION

Homogeneous hepatic diffusion of pirarubicin was successfully achieved with combined hepatic vein and intraportal administration but systemic, intraperitoneal or intraportal administration had no preventive effect on hepatic metastasis. Other drugs could be tested using this approach to evaluate their efficacy and toxicity.

Effect of 5-Fluorouracil plus Interferon on the Integrity of Colonic Anastomoses Covering with Fibrin Glue

BACKGROUND

It has been well established that the immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) after curative colon resection for colon cancer destroys disseminated cancer cells and inhibits micrometastases but also inhibits anastomotic healing. On the other hand, the application of fibrin glue constitutes a physical barrier around the anastomosis and may prevent anastomotic leakage. The purpose of this experimental study was to determine the effect of 5-FU plus interferon (IFN)-alpha-2a on the integrity of colonic anastomoses covered with fibrin glue when injected intraperitoneally immediately after colon resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty rats were randomized to one of four groups. After resection of a 1-cm segment of the transverse colon, an end-to-end sutured anastomosis was performed. Rats of the control and the fibrin glue groups were injected with 6 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution intraperitoneally. Rats in the 5-FU + IFN and the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue groups received 5-FU plus IFN intraperitoneally. The colonic anastomoses of the rats in the fibrin glue and in the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue groups were covered with fibrin glue. All rats were sacrificed on the 8th postoperative day, and the anastomoses were examined macroscopically. The bursting pressure measurements were recorded, and the anastomoses were graded histologically.

RESULTS

Only the 5-FU + IFN group had anastomoses rupture, and the rupture rate (33%) in this group was significantly greater than in the other groups, where there were no ruptures (P = 0.015). The adhesion formations score was, on average, significantly higher in rats of the 5-FU + IFN group compared with the control group (P = 0.006) and the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue group (P = 0.010). Bursting pressures were significantly lower in the control group when compared to the fibrin glue and 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue group (P < 0.001). Rats in the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue group developed significantly more marked neoangiogenesis than rats in the other groups. Inflammatory cell infiltration, collagen deposition, and fibroblast activity did not differ significantly among the four groups (P = 0.856, P = 0.192 and P = 0.243, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU plus IFN impairs colonic healing. However, when the colonic anastomoses were covered with fibrin glue, the injection of 5-FU plus IFN had no adverse effects on the integrity of the anastomoses.

Postresectional adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The postresectional tumor recurrence rate is high in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor portal venous invasion is the most important factor related to recurrence. Adjuvant intraportal infusion chemotherapy (IPIC) was used in HCC patients to improve the outcomes.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and May 1999, 28 HCC patients (IPIC group) underwent postresectional IPIC daily for 2 days with 5-fluorouracil (650 mg/m(2)), leucovorin (45 mg/m(2)), doxorubicin (10 mg/m(2)), and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 66 matched HCC patients (control group) who underwent hepatectomy without adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The IPIC group received an average of 5.2 cycles of chemotherapy, starting 5 to 24 days after surgery. The most frequent IPIC-related adverse events were upper abdominal pain, vomiting, and myelosuppression. Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates for the IPIC group were 44.6% and 60.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis of patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I and II disease identified significantly lower recurrence rates for the IPIC group (33.3%) than the control group (65.0%; P = .025). For patients with stage I and II disease, 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates for the IPIC group (70.6% and 83.3%, respectively) were significantly higher than those of the control group (33.4% and 46.9%, respectively; P < .05). Patients with stage III disease do not benefit from IPIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative IPIC benefits HCC patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I and II disease. The survival advantages demonstrated justify a selection of patients for future trials.

Parametric mapping of the hepatic perfusion index with gadolinium-enhanced volumetric MRI

The purpose of this study was to adapt the hepatic perfusion index (HPI) methodology previously developed for MRI to derive 3D parametric maps of HPI, and to investigate apparent differences in HPI maps between a group of colorectal cancer patients and controls. To achieve this, a new and simpler approach to HPI calculation which does not require measurements from the aorta or portal vein is introduced, and assessed with large liver regions of interest (ROIs) in patients and controls. Several example HPI maps showing localized variation are then presented. The subject group consisted of 12 patients with known colorectal metastases, and 13 control subjects referred for routine contrast-enhanced spine imaging with no history of neoplastic disease. HPI was evaluated from serial T1 volume acquisitions acquired over the course of a Gd-DTPA bolus injection. Regions of abnormal perfusion were visible on the HPI maps derived for the patient group, manifested as areas of locally increased HPI extending around the visible margins of known metastases evident on the conventional contrast-enhanced images. This method for MR voxel-based parametric mapping of HPI has the potential to demonstrate regional variations in perfusion at the segmental and subsegmental level.

Adjuvant regional chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy can improve overall survival and reduce the incidence of distant metastases for patients with advanced colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether regional chemotherapy (given by intraperitoneal or intraportal methods) combined with systemic chemotherapy was more effective than was systemic chemotherapy alone in terms of survival and recurrence for patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer. The study also compared systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid with that of fluorouracil and levamisole.

METHODS

During surgery, 753 patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to systemic chemotherapy alone (379 with fluorouracil and folinic acid, and 374 with fluorouracil and levamisole), and 748 to postoperative regional chemotherapy with fluorouracil followed by systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (n=368) or with fluorouracil and levamisole (n=380). Regional chemotherapy was given intraperitoneally (n=415) or intraportally (n=235) according to institution. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints were 5-year disease-free survival and toxic effects. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range 0.0-10.1). 5-year overall survival was 72.3% (95% CI 69.0-75.6) for patients assigned regional and systemic chemotherapy, compared with 72.0% (68.7-75.3) for those assigned systemic chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97 [0.81-1.15], p=0.69). 5-year overall survival for all patients assigned fluorouracil and levamisole was 72.0% (68.7-75.2) compared with 72.3% (69.0-75.6) for all those assigned fluorouracil and folinic acid (HR 0.98 [0.82-1.17], p=0.81). The hazard ratios for 5-year disease-free survival were 0.94 (0.80-1.10) for regional versus non-regional treatment, and 0.92 (0.79-1.08) for all fluorouracil and levamisole versus fluorouracil and folinic acid. Grade 3-4 toxic effects were low in all groups.

INTERPRETATION

Fluorouracil-based regional chemotherapy adds no further benefit to that obtained with systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer--an overview of current management for surgeons

BACKGROUND

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer has been re-evaluated with the advent of newer agents. The results of published trials are reviewed in this article and the protocols of some of the major ongoing trials outlined.

METHODS

A medline based literature search was performed for articles relating to clinical trials using systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer in the advanced and adjuvant setting. Additional original papers were obtained from citations in those identified by the initial search.

RESULTS

The combination of irinotecan or oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy regimens for advanced cancer demonstrates better response rates when compared with 5-FU and folinic acid (FA). Although this translates into a modest survival benefit, it may increase resectability rates in patients with hepatic metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III cancer has been established to improve long-term survival although it is benefit for patients with stage II disease remains less clear.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the various combinations of chemotherapeutic agents that are most effective and the clinical situations for which they are best suited is ongoing and will improve the current outlook for those with colorectal cancer.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer

Purpose

To address whether all medically fit patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy as part of routine clinical practice, to identify patients with poor prognosis characteristics, and to describe strategies for oncologists to use to discuss adjuvant chemotherapy in practice.

Methods

An American Society of Clinical Oncology Panel, in collaboration with the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline Initiative, reviewed pertinent information from the literature through May 2003.

Results

A literature-based meta-analysis found no evidence of a statistically significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients.

Recommendations

The routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for medically fit patients with stage II colon cancer is not recommended. However, there are populations of patients with stage II disease that could be considered for adjuvant therapy, including patients with inadequately sampled nodes, T4 lesions, perforation, or poorly differentiated histology.

Conclusion

Direct evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer. Patients and oncologists who accept the relative benefit in stage III disease as adequate indirect evidence of benefit for stage II disease are justified in considering the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, particularly for those patients with high-risk stage II disease. The ultimate clinical decision should be based on discussions with the patient about the nature of the evidence supporting treatment, the anticipated morbidity of treatment, the presence of high-risk prognostic features on individual prognosis, and patient preferences. Patients with stage II disease should be encouraged to participate in randomized trials.

Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in evidence-based care's gastrointestinal cancer disease site group

PURPOSE

To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy?

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P =.07).

CONCLUSION

There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.

Randomized Trial of Intraportal and/or Systemic Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colon Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of colon cancer is standard treatment. However, the choice of best delivery route--that is, systemic (i.e., intravenous or oral) or regional (i.e., intraportal, intraperitoneal, or hepatic arterial infusion)--has been controversial. In a randomized clinical trial of patients with colon cancer, we compared the benefits of chemotherapy delivered by these routes individually or in combination.

METHODS

From April 2, 1992, through April 30, 1998, 1084 eligible patients with Dukes' stage B or C colon carcinoma were randomly assigned: 369 patients to the IP regimen (continuous portal vein infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 500 mg/m2 of body surface daily and heparin at 5000 IU daily for 7 consecutive days, beginning on the day of surgery), 358 patients to the SY regimen (six 28-day courses of systemic leucovorin at 100 mg/m2 daily on days 1 through 5 followed by systemic bolus 5-fluorouracil at 370 mg/m2 daily on days 1 through 5, with treatment initiated 15-35 days after surgery), and 357 patients to the IP+SY regimen (the IP regimen followed by the SY regimen, with the same scheduling). Primary survival was analyzed with the log-rank statistic and a Cox multivariable regression model. All statistical tests were two sided.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 99 months, 389 events (recurrences, second malignancies, or deaths) had occurred, and 361 patients died. Sites of first recurrences were similar among the three arms. At 5 years, overall and event-free survival rates were similar among those on the IP (74% and 68%, respectively), SY (78% and 71%), and IP+SY (73% and 67%) regimens. When compared with the group on the SY regimen, the risk for death associated with the IP regimen (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 1.36) was similar to that associated with the IP+SY regimen (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.45) (P =.69), as were the risks for first event (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.37 and HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.41, respectively) (P=.74).

CONCLUSION

Overall and event-free survival rates were similar in all three arms. The combined regimen was no better than either single regimen alone.

Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil

PURPOSE

The aim of this experimental study was to investigate whether covering the colonic anastomoses with fibrin glue can protect the colonic healing from the adverse effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), when it is injected intraperitoneally immediately after colon resection.

METHODS

Sixty-four rats were randomized to one of four groups. After resection of a 1-cm segment of the transverse colon, an end-to-end sutured anastomosis was performed. Rats of the control group and the fibrin glue group were injected with 6 ml of solution 0.9 percent NaCl intraperitoneally. Rats in the 5-FU and the 5-FU + fibrin glue groups received 5-FU intraperitoneally. The colonic anastomoses of the rats in the fibrin glue group and in the 5-FU + fibrin glue group were covered with fibrin glue. All rats were killed on the 8th postoperative day and the anastomoses were examined macroscopically. The bursting pressure measurements were recorded and the anastomoses were graded histologically.

RESULTS

The leakage rate of the anastomoses was significantly higher in the rats of the 5-FU group than in those of the fibrin glue group and those of the 5-FU + fibrin glue group (37.5 percent vs. 0 percent, P = 0.020). The adhesion formation score was significantly higher in rats of the 5-FU group than in the other groups. Bursting pressures were also significantly lower in the 5-FUgroup than in the other groups ( P < 0.001). Rats in the 5-FU + fibrin glue group developed significantly more marked neoagiogenesis than rats in the other groups. Rats in the 5-FU + fibrin glue group also presented significantly more fibroblast activity than those in the 5-FU group. ( P = 0.004)

CONCLUSIONS

The immediate postoperative, intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU inhibited wound healing. However, when the colonic anastomoses were covered with fibrin glue, the injection of 5-FU had no adverse effects on the healing of the anastomoses.

Regional chemotherapeutic techniques for liver tumors: current knowledge and future directions

After a rather long period of stagnation, intra-arterial therapeutic approaches for treating liver tumors are currently progressing rapidly. These new modalities will increase the resectability of initially unresectable liver tumors after dramatic responses. At the same time, resectability rates are increasing with the assistance of local ablative physical treatments such as radiofrequency, resulting in an improvement of patients' median survival rates and quality of life.

A Comparative Pharmacology Study Between the Intracolonic and Oral Routes of 5-FU Administration in a Colon Cancer-Bearing Yoshida Sarcoma Rat Model

We prepared a colon cancer-bearing Yoshida sarcoma rat model to examine the dose-response relationship of antitumor activity of intracolonically or orally administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 45, 30, 20, 13, and 8 mg/kg). At doses of > or =20 mg/kg and > or =30 mg/kg, the 5-FU intracolonic and oral administration groups each showed a statistically significant difference in antitumor activity against the control group (P<0.05, Williams' test). A statistically significant dose-response relationship was noted in the two routes of administration, with an ED(50) value of 29 mg/kg. White blood cell count tended to decrease at high doses when 5-FU was administered intracolonically and showed a statistically significant decrease at doses of > or =30 mg/kg when 5-FU was administered orally. Regarding the time-course of body weight, even the 5-FU highest dose (45 mg/kg) intracolonic administration group showed no inhibited body weight increase compared to the control group. However, the 5-FU (> or =20 mg/kg) oral administration groups showed a statistically significant difference in body weight increase against the control group. These facts suggested that the intracolonic administration of 5-FU, while exhibiting more potent antitumor activity than that observed in oral administration, allows an extensive reduction in its toxicities compared to oral administration.

Prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for the prevention of liver metastasis in patients with colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most frequent site of recurrence after curative resection in patients with colon carcinoma. For liver metastasis, a high response rate can be achieved with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy. In the current study, the authors administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as adjuvant chemotherapy by HAI to patients with colon carcinoma without liver metastases and studied its effects on recurrence in the liver and survival.

METHODS

A total of 316 patients with preoperative Stage II or Stage III colon carcinoma (according to the 1997 revision of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system) were randomly assigned to receive surgery plus 3-week continuous HAI of 5-FU or surgery alone. There were 305 eligible patients, of whom the 119 patients assigned to the HAI arm actually received 5-FU. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, whereas the secondary endpoints were overall survival and liver metastasis-free survival. Analysis was by intent to treat.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences noted in morbidity between the two treatment arms. During the follow-up period (median, 59.0 months), the incidence of liver metastasis was significantly decreased in the HAI arm whereas there were no significant differences reported between the 2 arms with regard to the frequency of metastasis at other sites. In the HAI arm, the risk ratio for recurrence was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.24-0.64; P=0.0002), the risk ratio for death was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.21-0.67; P=0.0009), and the risk ratio for liver metastasis was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.66; P=0.0005). These differences were found to be significant only for patients with Stage III disease. Toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

A schedule of 3-week HAI of 5-FU given as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with Stage III colon carcinoma appeared to contribute to a significant decrease in the frequency of liver metastases and was associated with an improved survival rate.

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil infusion in colorectal cancer (AXIS)

Background

Postoperative portal vein infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a well tolerated and widely applicable treatment for colorectal cancer that might have an enormous public health impact, even if it produced survival benefits of just a few per cent. Very large trials are required to detect such differences, and the Adjuvant X-ray and 5-FU Infusion Study (AXIS) is the largest such trial yet reported.

Methods

Consenting patients with presumed colorectal cancer were randomized to surgery with or without 7 days of PVI (1 g 5-FU plus 5000 units heparin in 1 litre 5 per cent dextrose infused over each 24-h period). In addition, patients with rectal cancer could be randomized to radiotherapy or no radiotherapy to be given either before or after surgery.

Results

Between November 1989 and December 1997, 3583 patients were randomized with respect to PVI. The survival hazard ratios (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.)) in all patients randomized and in the curatively resected subgroup (71·2 per cent of patients) were 1·00 (0·92 to 1·11) and 0·94 (0·83 to 1·06) respectively. Tests for heterogeneity suggested a greater treatment benefit for patients with colonic cancer than for patients with rectal cancer with respect to disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·79 versus 1·03; P = 0·07), and there was a non-significant trend with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio 0·87 versus 1·03; P = 0·17). No survival benefit was seen in the 761 patients randomized with respect to radiotherapy; although not statistically significant, the impact on local recurrence rates was similar to that reported in the literature.

Conclusion

No overall benefit of PVI was established in AXIS when colonic and rectal cancers were considered together, but the evidence suggesting a differential treatment effect according to site of cancer in AXIS was strongly supported by a meta-analysis incorporating the previous trials. Combining the data gave hazard ratios of 0·82 and 1·00 for colonic and rectal tumours respectively (test for interaction, P = 0·024), equating to an absolute survival benefit for patients with colonic cancer of 5·8 (95 per cent c.i. 2·8 to 8·5) per cent, a level close to that seen for prolonged systemic therapy.

Management of colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic metastases occur in 60% of patients following resection for colorectal cancer. Liver resection is the only curative option, with one third of resected patients alive at five years. In those developing recurrence in the liver following resection, further liver surgery may be curative, with similar 5 years survival rates of about 30%. Until recently surgery was feasible in only 15-25% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. New strategies, such as downstaging chemotherapy, portal vein embolization and two-stage hepatectomy, may increase the resectability rate by 15%. Earlier detection of liver metastases would increase resectability, although good follow-up trials are lacking. Once suspected, colorectal liver metastases are staged by spiral CT, CT portography and MRI, which have similar overall accuracies. Mortality following liver resection is less than 5% in major centres, with a morbidity rate of 20% to 50%. Prognostic scoring systems can be used to predict the likely cure rate with resection. Pulmonary metastases occur in 10-25% of patients with resected colorectal cancer, but are limited to the lung in only 2% of cases. In these selected cases surgery provides long-term survival in 20-40%, and repeat lung resection has shown similar rates. For patients with unresectable disease, chemotherapy and ablation techniques have been demonstrated to prolong survival, although chemotherapy alone has been shown to improve quality of life.

Adjuvant therapy of cancers of the colon and rectum

Important advances have been made in our understanding of the role of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. Current standard 5FU-based regimens have been convincingly shown to reduce the incidence of recurrences and to prolong overall survival in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Colon cancer patients with stage II disease have a better-overall prognosis than those with stage III; however, the relative merits of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. Combined chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is currently the standard adjuvant approach for stage II and III rectal cancer patients. Despite the advances that have been made, far too many patients with resectable colorectal cancer ultimately relapse and die of their disease. There remains a pressing need for continued development of improved adjuvant treatments. Participation of eligible patients in clinical trials must continue to be actively encouraged. Only in this way will we be able to continue to build and expand on the progress that has been made thus far.

Unique methodological issues facing randomized controlled trials of endourologic procedures

Randomized controlled trials provide the optimal design for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment but have not been widely accepted by surgical investigators. Although there are several methodological and ethical difficulties, none is insurmountable. In the United Kingdom, a regulatory agency has been established to supervise the introduction of new medical procedures, and something similar might be seen in the United States, particularly given the pressure from the government and third-party payors for proof of efficacy and cost effectiveness. Endourologists have responded to similar challenges in the past and must continue to do so.

Floxuridine coupling with lactosaminated human albumin to increase drug efficacy on liver micrometastases

BACKGROUND

Conjugates of nucleoside analogues with galactosyl terminating peptides selectively enter hepatocytes through the asialoglycoprotein receptor. After intracellular release from the carrier, the drugs partly exit from hepatic cells into hepatic blood.

AIMS

To establish whether administration of a conjugate of floxuridine with lactosaminated human albumin selectively enhances drug concentrations in hepatic blood. Floxuridine is a fluoropyrimidine active on human colorectal cancer, a tumour which metastasises first to the liver.

METHODS

In rats injected with free or conjugated floxuridine, plasma levels of the drug were determined in hepatic veins and in inferior vena cava, in order to measure drug concentrations in hepatic blood and in the systemic circulation, respectively.

RESULTS

Ratios between floxuridine levels in hepatic veins and those in systemic circulation were found to be seven times higher in rats injected with the conjugate (p=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that coupling to lactosaminated albumin might improve the effect of floxuridine in adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer by exposing the cells of liver micrometastases (nourished by hepatic sinusoids) to enhanced drug concentrations.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world, especially in occidental countries. The primary curative therapy is surgical resection of the tumour. Within the last 15 years, appropriately powered prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy should be the standard treatment for stage III cancers (node-positive disease). 5-Fluorouracil(5FU)/levamisole was used in the early 1990s but has now been replaced by 5FU/leucovorin. The recommended duration of treatment is 6 months. Combining levamisole with 5FU/leucovorin does not improve efficacy. In patients with stage II colon cancer it is still unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy is effective. In an attempt to define groups of stage II cases that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, considerable efforts have been made to determine molecular genetic factors (tumour-ploidy and mutations or alterations in oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes). Regional therapy (particularly portal vein infusion) is one of the other therapeutic strategies still considered to be investigational. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of non-fluorinated pyrimidine agents in an adjuvant setting.

Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer: a review

Colon cancer is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. Complete surgical resection of the primary tumor and/or select metastatic lesions can be curative in many patients. The risk of recurrence after resection can be predicted by pathologic staging. Large prospective randomized trials over the past 2 decades have clearly shown an increased overall survival for patients with resected stage III colon cancer who are treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II disease remains controversial. There is indirect evidence to support adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of metastatic disease. Locoregional approaches such as radiation, hepatic arterial infusion, or portal vein chemotherapy remain investigational. Adjuvant immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies is emerging as a therapeutic option that might complement chemotherapy. Future challenges include improving adjuvant chemotherapy with the addition and/or substitution of new agents, resolving which subset of patients with stage II and resected stage IV colon cancer might benefit from therapy, validating the benefit of immunotherapy, and investigating locoregional therapies compared with systemic therapy.

Correlation between tumour blood flow and fluorouracil distribution in a hypovascular liver metastasis model

The poor response of colorectal liver metastases to fluorinated pyrimidine chemotherapy may be due to poor drug penetration into the tumour. Chemotherapy delivered by the blood to well perfused areas of tumour must reach less well perfused areas by diffusion. This study examined the relationship between intratumoural blood flow and drug uptake in a hypovascular liver metastasis animal model. We used a double isotope technique to examine the microdistribution of the blood flow tracer [125I]-iodoantipyrine (IAP) and fluorinated pyrimidine 5-[6-3H]-fluorouracil (5-FU) within intrahepatic, hypovascular HSN tumours. There was a significant fall (P < 10(-6)) in both IAP and 5-FU uptake between the liver/tumour edge and tumour centre which resulted in a significant covariation (P < 10(-5)) in tracer uptake with distance. The finding of a close covariation between blood flow and drug uptake in liver metastases suggested that 5-FU diffusion did not compensate for low 5-FU delivery in areas of poor tumour blood flow. The lower 5-FU levels in low compared with high areas of tumour blood flow could reduce the cytotoxic effect and increase the potential for development of drug resistance.