The role of thrombolytic therapy in surgical practice

The safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics of low-dose alteplase compared with urokinase for catheter-directed thrombolysis of arterial and venous occlusions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, complications, and costs associated with low-dose (<2 mg/h) alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator [t-PA]) versus urokinase for the catheter-directed treatment of acute peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAO) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed during sequential time periods on two groups with involved extremities treated with either t-PA with subtherapeutic heparin (TPA group) or urokinase with full heparin (UK group) at a single center. Treatment group characteristics, success rates, complications, dosages, infusion time, and costs were compared.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients with 93 involved limbs underwent treatment (54 with DVT, 39 with PAO). The treatment groups were statistically identical (TPA: 45 limbs; 24 with DVT, 53.3%; 21 with PAO, 46.7%; UK: 48 limbs; 30 with DVT, 62.5%; 18 with PAO, 37.5%). The overall average hourly infused dose, total dose, infusion time, success rates, and cost of thrombolytic agent were as follows (+/- standard deviation): TPA, 0.86 +/- 0.50 mg/h, 21.2 +/- 15.1 mg, 24.6 +/- 11.2 hours, 89.4%, $466 +/- $331; and UK, 13.5 +/- 5.6 (10(4)) U/h, 4.485 +/- 2.394 million U, 33.3 +/- 13.3 hours, 85.7%, $6871 +/- $3667, respectively. Major and minor complication rates were: TPA, 2.2% and 8.9%; and UK, 2.1% and 10.4%, respectively. No statistical differences in success rates or complications were observed; however, t-PA was significantly (P <.05) less expensive and faster than urokinase.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose t-PA combined with subtherapeutic heparin is equally efficacious and safe compared with urokinase. Infusions with t-PA were significantly shorter and less expensive than those with urokinase.

Thrombolytic therapy with use of alteplase (rt-PA) in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: review of the clinical literature. The Advisory Panel

PURPOSE

The clinical literature describing the use of alteplase in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive (PAO) disease is reviewed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature database was acquired by a MEDLINE search using the Boolean keyword string: tissue plasminogen activator and/or rt-PA and peripheral not animal. A review was performed to identify the dose range of alteplase, technique of infusion, use of anticoagulation, clinical success rates, and risk of complications.

RESULTS

Forty-six clinical studies were identified. There are few prospective, randomized clinical trials and a lack of standardized protocols and endpoints. Use of catheter-directed infusions of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) may be beneficial versus surgery in the initial management of acute limb ischemia (< 14 days) and in reducing the magnitude of subsequent surgical or percutaneous revascularization. For patients with chronic limb ischemia (> 14 days), irreversible acute limb ischemia, or advanced diabetic arteriopathy, catheter-directed infusion of rt-PA or other plasminogen activators may be unsuitable. The risk of adverse bleeding appears related to the overall dose and duration of infusion. These risks appear similar to those of urokinase. The role of heparin in increasing adverse bleeding during rt-PA therapy is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no generally accepted dose or technique for administering catheter-directed thrombolysis using alteplase; however, several studies have demonstrated its clinical safety and efficacy. Formal studies will be required to determine the optimal dose, technique of infusion, the role of anticoagulation, and complication rates when alteplase is used for PAO disease.

Two Different Therapeutic Modalities in the Treatment of the Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Preliminary Investigation With 20 Case Reports

Primary or secondary axillary or/and subclavian vein thrombosis (ASVT) can produce long-term disability, mostly in young patients, while the final vein recanalization after various therapeutic modalities often fails. Our aim was to compare the results of two different therapeutic modalities: the thrombolytic vs anticoagulant therapy, in primary and secondary ASVT in a retrospective data analysis in terms of efficacy, negative side effects, long-term positive results. Eleven patients (Group A), with primary and secondary to central venous cannulation or cardiac pacing ASVT, were treated with anticoagulant therapy, while another 9 patients (Group B), were treated with thrombolytic therapy, that included urokinase or streptokinase for 24-48 hours. The phlebographic, duplex ultrasonographic findings and clinical improvement were compared between the two patient groups. In Group A patients, after a mean period of 81.7 months follow-up (range 58-106), one patient with open vein were noticed, while in Group B patients after a mean follow up period of 52.1 months (range 35-68) five patients presented with recanalized veins (P = 0.040). Complete clinical recovery and vein patency was achieved in one Group A patient, contrary to 5 Group B patients (P = 0.040). When the patients with complete clinical recovery were combined with those who presented some clinical improvement, four Group A patients and eight Group B had satisfactory outcome (P = 0.028). Thrombolytic therapy should be the treatment of choice in primary and secondary ASVT, in productive patients whose lifestyle depends on continued strenuous use of the involved limb with a reasonable medium-term life expectancy. The thrombolytic agents prevent the vein valves damage and malfunction, avoiding re-thrombosis related to venous reflux and stasis, preserving the valve functional integrity.

Prospective randomised comparative study of pulse spray and conventional local thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the time required to achieve lysis with the pulse spray technique and the conventional slow continuous infusion technique.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised open Study.

METHODS

Eighteen patients suitable for intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy with conventional and pulse spray technique were randomised 1:1 to receive either pulse spray thrombolysis with 0.33 mg/ml rt-PA injected as a bolus of 0.2 ml or conventional thrombolysis with 0.05 mg/ml rt-PA infused at a rate of 10 ml/h.

RESULTS

The age, duration of symptoms, length of occlusion and prethrombolysis ankle brachial pressure index were comparable in the two groups. The median duration of thrombolytic therapy in the pulse spray group was 195 min (range 90-1260) compared to 1390 min (range 300-2400) in the Conventional group. The difference between the two groups was significant, p < 0.002 (Mann-Whitney test).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly shorter time is required to achieve local thrombolysis with pulse spray compared to the conventional infusion method.

Immediate and early follow-up results of purse spray thrombolysis in patients with peripheral ischaemia

Pulse spray thrombolysis is a technique of accelerated peripheral thrombolysis which has been evaluated in 38 patients, 29 with threatened limb viability and nine with a viable but critically ischaemic limb. The median length of occlusion was 26.5 (range 3-65) cm. The lytic agent used was recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), injected manually via a pulse spray catheter at a concentration of 0.33 mg/ml and a bolus size of 0.2 ml. The median total dose of rtPA was 18 (range 5-35)mg. Patency and flow were completely restored in 34 of 38 patients and clinical success at 30 days was maintained in 27 of 38. The median lysis time was 120 (range 35-1125) min, compared with a median duration of 1545 (range 42-5760) min in 120 consecutive patients previously treated with conventional low-dose infusion thrombolysis using rtPA. This represents a 12-fold reduction in lysis time (P < 0.001). The overall estimated cumulative limb salvage rate for the 38 patients who entered the study was 84 per cent and the cumulative patency rate for the 34 patients in whom patency was restored was 74 per cent at 18 months follow-up. Pulse spray thrombolysis rapidly restores patency with good limb salvage at 30 days; the benefit is sustained even in patients with limbs at immediate risk of irreversible ischaemic injury who are not considered suitable for conventional thrombolysis.

Treatment of the critically ischaemic lower limb

Medical therapy of PAOD is only indicated in patients unsuitable for vascular reconstruction or angioplasty. The approach includes early detection of subjects at risk, avoidance of known risk factors, and appropriate management of diseases such as diabetes and hypertension. Vasodilators are of little use orally, though some drugs may have a part to play for short-term management and iloprost should be considered for patients unsuitable for revascularization. The ankle systolic or toe pressure should be used as a measure of disease and, if reduced, arteriography should be performed. This should not be limited to those thought fit for major surgery, as angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy may be appropriate, and aortoiliac disease may be treated by extra-anatomic bypass if not suitable for major surgery. Arterial reconstruction is associated with a reduction in both mortality and amputation, and should be attempted if a greater than 25% chance of limb salvage could be expected.

Thrombolysis in acute lower limb ischaemia

For the past three decades balloon embolectomy has been the treatment of choice for acute lower limb occlusion. However, although usually successful in emboli, results are often disappointing in thrombotic atherosclerotic vessels. Attempted dissolution of the clot is accordingly attractive, and has theoretically been possible since the introduction of streptokinase in 1933. This was initially used intravenously, with variable success rates, although intraarterial administration is currently the method of choice. Later thrombolytic drugs such as tissue plasminogen activator, urokinase and anistreplase have been introduced. Lysis time has also been increased by using pharmaco-mechanical methods of administration such as pulsed spray catheters, which could increase the usefulness of thrombolysis in patients with rapidly progressive neurological signs where currently surgical embolectomy would be advocated. Several newer drugs with theoretical advantages over older drugs such as single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator or K1K2PU are currently undergoing trials. The role of thrombolysis as an adjunct to surgical embolectomy is also promising, though again requires further trials. There is still no consensus as to which patients are best suited to thrombolysis, nor an optimum drug or method of administration. However, there seems no doubt that thrombolysis will be increasingly used in the management of peripheral limb ischaemia, though requiring a team approach between surgeons, radiologists and haematologists.

Deep venous thrombosis in the surgical intensive care unit

The ICU patient population is at a high risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis leading to a potentially fatal pulmonary embolism. It is vital to appreciate this risk and apply appropriate prophylaxis. Constant vigilance is required, as deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli can develop and progress despite standard prophylactic measures. In unstable patients, more aggressive prophylaxis may be warranted, including the use of inferior vena cava filters. A high index of suspicion and a low threshold for screening and diagnostic testing will allow earlier recognition and treatment of this lifethreatening condition. Treatment decisions are based on clinical suspicion, diagnostic examination results, and the potential complications of difficult treatment modalities.

Results of a recently instituted programme of thrombolytic therapy in acute lower limb ischaemia

Twenty-eight patients with acute lower limb ischaemia received low dose intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy over a 2-year period. Eighteen patients received streptokinase and ten patients received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA). Indications included arterial thromboemboli and graft failures. Mean ischaemic times were similar in both groups. Treatment time to achieve lysis was significantly less with rTPA (P less than 0.01). Subsequent vascular procedures, including angioplasty or reconstruction, were undertaken in 36 per cent of patients. Arterial puncture site bleeding occurred in eight (29 per cent) patients. Three (11 per cent) patients suffered rethrombosis after initial successful lysis. All rethromboses were successfully lysed with rTPA. There were two major amputations. Five (18 per cent) patients died, all lytic failures in the streptokinase treatment group. There were no cerebral haemorrhagic events and no patient died as a result of thrombolytic therapy. Good clinical outcome was obtained in nine of 18 patients treated with streptokinase and in nine of ten patients treated with rTPA. Intra-arterial thrombolysis provides effective therapy with high rates of limb salvage and a low mortality rate. This study suggests that rTPA may be a more effective agent, causing less morbidity, than streptokinase.

Thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute limb ischaemia

Acute limb ischaemia poses a threat to both the limb and life of a patient. Until recently, attempted revascularization by thromboembolectomy or vascular reconstruction held the best chance of limb salvage. Thrombolytic techniques afford an alternative method of management for this condition and are effective in selected patients. Low-dose intra-arterial streptokinase is the most established method of thrombolysis, although the recently developed tissue plasminogen activator offers a promising alternative. Intra-arterial thrombolysis is not an easy option, being labour intensive and requiring close co-operation between surgeon and radiologist. Thrombolytic and surgical techniques are not mutually exclusive but are best used to complement each other. Ideally patients with acute limb ischaemia should be managed by surgeons with knowledge of, and access to, optimal current surgical and non-surgical techniques.

Survey of the use of thrombolysis for acute limb ischaemia in the UK and Ireland

A total of 156 vascular surgeons from the UK and Ireland responded to a postal questionnaire on the use of thrombolysis in acute limb ischaemia. Almost half had used thrombolysis in the previous 12 months. Low dose intra-arterial streptokinase (89 per cent) was the regimen most frequently used, but 33 per cent had used intravenous streptokinase. Detailed results for 103 patients (limb salvage rate 60 per cent, amputation rate 35 per cent, mortality rate 5 per cent) were similar to those of previously published reports. Complications in most series were infrequent, but in the entire survey there were six bleeding-related deaths and one death from anaphylaxis. A total of 67 per cent of surgeons with working experience indicated that selected patients with acute arterial thromboses were most suitable for thrombolysis, particularly if there was no neurological deficit and no run-off for surgical bypass. Distal or late emboli and graft occlusions were regarded as appropriate by some surgeons. This study demonstrated that many vascular surgeons currently use thrombolysis, although sparingly and in selected cases. Patients with acute limb ischaemia should be managed by experienced vascular surgeons who are aware of the new therapeutic alternatives, an ideal supported by almost three-quarters of respondents to this survey.