Acute limb ischaemia: the place of intravenous streptokinase

Thrombolysis in acute lower limb ischaemia

For the past three decades balloon embolectomy has been the treatment of choice for acute lower limb occlusion. However, although usually successful in emboli, results are often disappointing in thrombotic atherosclerotic vessels. Attempted dissolution of the clot is accordingly attractive, and has theoretically been possible since the introduction of streptokinase in 1933. This was initially used intravenously, with variable success rates, although intraarterial administration is currently the method of choice. Later thrombolytic drugs such as tissue plasminogen activator, urokinase and anistreplase have been introduced. Lysis time has also been increased by using pharmaco-mechanical methods of administration such as pulsed spray catheters, which could increase the usefulness of thrombolysis in patients with rapidly progressive neurological signs where currently surgical embolectomy would be advocated. Several newer drugs with theoretical advantages over older drugs such as single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator or K1K2PU are currently undergoing trials. The role of thrombolysis as an adjunct to surgical embolectomy is also promising, though again requires further trials. There is still no consensus as to which patients are best suited to thrombolysis, nor an optimum drug or method of administration. However, there seems no doubt that thrombolysis will be increasingly used in the management of peripheral limb ischaemia, though requiring a team approach between surgeons, radiologists and haematologists.

Choice of agent for peripheral thrombolysis

Evidence has been accumulating that tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is a more rapid and effective agent than streptokinase for peripheral thrombolysis. Twenty-three patients with acute limb-threatening ischaemia treated with tPA (0.5 mg h-1) over 15 months were compared with 20 consecutive patients previously receiving streptokinase (5000-10,000 units h-1). There were no major differences between the rates of complete and partial lysis (61 per cent for tPA versus 65 per cent for streptokinase) or limb salvage (65 versus 55 per cent respectively). Complication rates were also similar. It was not possible to show that tPA, an agent ten times more expensive than streptokinase, was superior for peripheral thrombolysis.

Thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute limb ischaemia

Acute limb ischaemia poses a threat to both the limb and life of a patient. Until recently, attempted revascularization by thromboembolectomy or vascular reconstruction held the best chance of limb salvage. Thrombolytic techniques afford an alternative method of management for this condition and are effective in selected patients. Low-dose intra-arterial streptokinase is the most established method of thrombolysis, although the recently developed tissue plasminogen activator offers a promising alternative. Intra-arterial thrombolysis is not an easy option, being labour intensive and requiring close co-operation between surgeon and radiologist. Thrombolytic and surgical techniques are not mutually exclusive but are best used to complement each other. Ideally patients with acute limb ischaemia should be managed by surgeons with knowledge of, and access to, optimal current surgical and non-surgical techniques.