Infrarenal abdominal aortic disease: a review of the retroperitoneal approach

Staged retroperitoneal mesenteric revascularisation and aortobifemoral bypass after endovascular rescue for acute mesenteric ischaemia

Visceral artery revascularisation through a retroperitoneal approach provides an infrequent yet viable, alternative means of managing mesenteric ischaemia in patients with previous abdominal operations. We present a unique case implementing this surgical approach in a 55-year-old man in which we performed a retroperitoneal aortobifemoral bypass with concomitant retrograde jump graft from the aortic prosthesis to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) for bilateral lower extremity rest pain and chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Three months previously, the patient had presented with acute mesenteric ischaemia and colonic perforation. He underwent emergent celiac artery stenting followed by an exploratory laparotomy with total abdominal colectomy and diverting loop ileostomy. Given the patient's hostile abdomen, a retroperitoneal approach to SMA revascularisation was elected over a transabdominal approach during concomitant lower extremity revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia. We achieved an excellent technical result with resolution of limb ischaemia and abdominal symptoms.

Retroperitoneal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms offers postoperative benefits to male patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System

BACKGROUND

Transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches have equal efficacy in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The effect of open operative approach on patient-specific outcomes after AAA repair was tested.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing open AAA repair at the Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System between January 2000 and August 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis was performed to examine the effects of demographic and clinical covariates on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were identified: 54 with TP approach and 52 with RP approach. Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were equivalent (p > or = 0.10), with the exception of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which was more prevalent in the TP group (61 vs. 40%). Operative times were longer in the TP group (4.6 vs. 3.5 hours; p < 0.01); however, significantly more TP patients had reconstruction with a bifurcated graft (72 vs. 2%; p < 0.01). Postoperative nasogastric tube decompression times were shorter in the RP group (1 vs. 3 days; p < 0.01), and RP approach led to a quicker return to preoperative diet (4 vs. 6 days; p = 0.05). Patients undergoing RP repair developed fewer incisional hernias (2 vs. 15%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

RP approach to AAA repair offers patients faster return of bowel function and is associated with fewer incisional hernias.

Retroperitoneal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Long-Term Follow-Up Regarding Wound Complications and Erectile Dysfunction

The long-term impact of retroperitoneal aortic exposure regarding wound complications in all patients and erectile dysfunction in men was studied in a consecutive group of 107 patients (81 males and 26 females). Postoperative wound complications were classified into the following groups: none, flank bulge, hernia, and chronic pain. Patient demographic features including body mass index (BMI) were statistically analyzed in relation to the incidence of long-term wound problems. Information regarding erectile dysfunction was obtained before surgery in all men and stratified into three groups after surgery: no change, inability to consistently obtain an erection, and retrograde ejaculation. Mean patient follow-up was 2.9 years (range 1-4.36, median 2.8). Flank bulge was the only long-term wound complication, and this was noted in nine patients (8%). The incidence of true hernia and chronic pain was 0%. BMI >28 was the only factor that positively impacted the incidence of wound complications (p < 0.0001). Erectile dysfunction prior to surgery was noted in 37 men (46%), while 44 (54%) reported normal erectile function. Erectile function improved after surgery in one patient but remained unchanged in the rest. Postoperative retrograde ejaculation occurred with a frequency of 9% (four of 45 patients). Retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) exposure with incision based on the twelfth rib tip and rectus abdominis muscle sparing results in an overall low incidence of long-term wound complications. Postoperative flank bulge is associated with patient BMI >28. In addition, erectile function is not worsened by infrarenal autonomic nerve sparing rAAA exposure. However, a small percentage of potent men will experience postoperative retrograde ejaculation.

Preoperative and Intraoperative Determinants of Incisional Bulge following Retroperitoneal Aortic Repair

Although the left flank retroperitoneal incision is a useful approach for many patients undergoing major aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal and occlusive disease, it has been associated with weakening of the flank muscles, resulting in bulges varying from slight asymmetry to huge hernias. The purpose of this study was to determine if the incidence of this complication correlated with identifiable preoperative or intraoperative factors. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing aortic reconstruction via the retroperitoneal approach were followed for 1 year postoperatively for evidence of disfiguring bulges. Bulges were scored as follows: normal/mild, <1-inch protrusion; moderate, protrusion 1-2 inches; severe, protrusion >2 inches and/or pain or true herniation. Preoperatively, patients were administered a questionnaire to elicit demographic and comorbidity data. Fifty-six percent of patients developed a bulge at 1 year. In 43% of these, the bulge was deemed mild and in 54% moderate. One patient developed a severe bulge. Among preoperative comorbidities, no statistically significant correlations were found on bivariate analysis. However, likelihood ratios for bulge development of 5.5 for renal disease and 3.1 for cancer were demonstrated. Conversely, peripheral vascular disease had a likelihood ratio of 0.21 for bulge formation and emphysema, 0.28. On logistic analysis, incision >15 cm and body mass index (BMI) >23 mg/kg(2) were found to correlate strongly with bulge formation (p=0.003, odds ratio=9.1, and p=0.018, odds ratio=16.9, respectively). Together, these yielded a pseudo r (2) of 0.32. BMI >23 mg/kg(2 )was found to yield the greatest explanatory power. These same two variables were found to correlate with severity of bulge: p=0.02 for incision>5 cm and p=0.006 for BMI >23. Of note, gender, age, and extension of the incision into the interspace were not significant on logistic analysis. Preoperatively, surgeons should warn obese patients and those requiring large incisions for extensive disease of their increased risk for poor healing. Intraoperatively, surgeons should aim to minimize incision length.

Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate changes in quality of life and to compare conventional outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular and open retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and May 2003, 129 patients underwent elective AAA repair, endovascular repair in 22 patients and open retroperitoneal repair in 107 patients. The Short-Form Health Survey, 12 items (SF-12) was administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year after discharge. Quality of life, hospital and intensive care unit stay, perioperative complications, discharge disposition, readmission, and hospital cost were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

For the total group, significant differences were observed for both Physical Component Summary scores (P<.001) and Mental Component Summary scores (P=.001) between time points. There were no significant differences for either Component Summary score between open and endovascular procedures for any time period. Number of weeks required to return to baseline functional status was similar after either open or endovascular repair (7.22 vs 5.47 weeks, respectively; P=.09). Mean hospital and intensive care unit stay was 4.4 and 1 days, respectively, for open repair versus 1.9 and 0 days, respectively, for endovascular repair (P<.0001). No significant difference between groups was observed in terms of perioperative complications, discharge disposition, or hospital readmission (P> or =.54). Mean total hospital cost for endovascular repair was 1.60 times that for open repair (mean difference, $11,662; P<.0001; 95% confidence interval, $17,799-$5525).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital stay is significantly shorter after endovascular AAA repair. However, hospital cost is almost twice that for open retroperitoneal repair. Perioperative complications, discharge disposition, and hospital readmission are not statistically different between the two groups. Effect on health-related quality of life is similar after either open retroperitoneal or endovascular AAA repair.

Results of 256 consecutive abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs using extraperitoneal approach

Two hundred and fifty-six consecutive abdominal aortic aneurysms were repaired using three approaches for extraperitoneal exposure of the aorta and iliac vessels from February 1990 through September 1998. The perioperative mortality rate was 3.1% in 228 elective repairs and 14.3% in 28 ruptured cases. The initial 23 cases were repaired using Sicard's method. The duration of endotracheal intubation was 1.0+/-2.8 h, alimentation initiation was 2.7+/-1.6 days, and narcotic requirements were 1.2+/-1.1 times. Following these initial cases, we employed Williams' method for 192 abdominal aneurysms, however; repeated incisional pain and three cases of deforming bulge led us to avoid dividing muscles. In the last 13 cases, our approach was performed without muscle dividing. The narcotic requirements decreased to 0.3+/-0.7 times. As for postoperative complications, the larger skin incision approach had no shower embolism. However, the shorter skin incision had four cases of shower embolisms, one lymphorrhea and one vascular trauma by the aortic clamp. The extraperitoneal approach offers certain physiologic advantages with minimal disturbance of gastrointestinal and respiratory function. We believe that this method is useful for rapid approach to the proximal aorta in case of emergency. Postoperative wound complications could be prevented via an oblique incision without muscle dividing.

Surgical management of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are increasingly common in the aging population. While the etiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms is unknown, there is growing evidence that suggests an immune response. The majority of AAA are asymptomatic and when treated are standard open surgical procedures. The overall mortality rate is 5% or less. The current recommendations for the treatment of aneurysms are based on diameter: diameters exceeding 5 cm in good-risk younger patients should be treated. Aortic aneurysms tend to enlarge over time with a growth-rate between 0.2 and 0.4 mm per year. Once rupture occurs mortality is estimated to exceed 75%, with half of the patients dying prior to arriving at the hospital and the remaining one-half following surgical correction. Recently, minimally invasive techniques have been developed to treat AAA in high-risk patients. These techniques involve the use of covered stented grafts. Current clinical investigations are underway both in this country and in Europe, which have yielded promising results. However, long-term complications are unknown. Currently, aortic aneurysms are best treated with open surgical management.

Cost-effective aortic exposure: a retroperitoneal experience

In this study we investigated whether the surgical approach to infrarenal aortic aneurysm (IAA) repair significantly affects in-hospital morbidity and cost. The study comprised a consecutive series of 96 patients with elective repair of an IAA by two vascular surgeons using an established protocol from March 1995 to March 1999. The outcomes and costs for 50 patients with transperitoneal (TP) exposure were compared with those for 46 patients with retroperitoneal (RP) exposure, all of whom were in a tertiary care center, in a university hospital. Hospital and ICU days, perioperative complications, and cost were measured. All patients followed the same protocol except for intraoperative aortic exposure. There was no significant difference between TP and RP groups with regard to demographic features (all p-values > 0.12), mean IAA size (p = 0.41) or mean operative blood loss (p = 0.89). Incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the groups (11 in TP and 6 in RP; p = 0.29). However, a trend without statistical significance was noted in the incidence of pulmonary complications (7 in TP and 2 in RP; p = 0.11). Mean ICU days (4 vs. 2; p = 0.004) and hospital days (11 vs. 6; p = 0.002) were significantly longer after TP aortic exposure than after the RP approach. Mean total hospital cost was significantly reduced for patients having RP IAA repair compared to TP IAA repair (mean cost difference = $5,527; p = 0.016). Retroperitoneal exposure for IAA repair is associated with decreased pulmonary complications, significantly shorter ICU and hospital days, and significantly decreased hospital cost compared to transperitoneal aortic exposure. In the future, RP exposure for IAA repair should be the benchmark for comparison of any new techniques.

Retroperitoneal approach used exclusively with epidural anesthesia for infrarenal aortic disease

BACKGROUND

The retroperitoneal approach for elective infrarenal aortic procedures is an attractive alternative to the standard transperitoneal approach. In an effort to limit the number of extraneous influences on patient outcome, this approach was performed using epidural anesthesia without the use of endotracheal intubation or general anesthesia.

METHODS

From June 1991 through July 1993, 62 consecutive patients with aorto-occlusive or aorto-iliac disease underwent infrarenal aortic repair using the retroperitoneal approach. Epidural anesthesia was used exclusively in all cases. Patients were evaluated for age, sex, comorbid conditions, morbidity, operating time, blood loss, ileus, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

There were 29 aortobiiliac bypasses, 18 aortobifemoral bypasses, and 15 aortic tube grafts. Three patients had an associated renal artery procedure performed. There were 48 men and 14 women. The average age was 74.2 years (range 30 to 88). Comorbid conditions including smoking (69%), coronary artery disease (61%), hypertension (61%), prior myocardial infarction (43%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (35%), prior surgery (27%), diabetes mellitus (24%), and a history of cancer (8%) were identified. The average length of surgery was 2 hours and 10 minutes (range 1 hour 20 minutes to 3 hours 15 minutes). The average blood loss was 510 mL (range 200 to 4,000). A nasogastric tube was not used in any patient perioperatively, and oral feeding was started on average by postoperative day 2. The average intensive care unit stay was 1.3 days (range 1 to 7). A mortality rate of 1.6%, and major complication rate of 11% were found. None were of pulmonary nature, which may be ascribed to the absence of endotracheal intubation or general anesthesia. A minor complication rate of 19% was achieved under the presented method. The average hospital stay was 7.7 days (range 5 to 15).

CONCLUSION

No large series using the retroperitoneal approach exclusively under epidural anesthesia has been reported. Recent literature on the retroperitoneal approach makes use of general anesthesia with/without epidural anesthesia. This review supports our contention that the procedure of choice for elective infrarenal aortic surgery is the retroperitoneal approach utilizing epidural anesthesia in the absence of endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia. There is a decrease in the physiologic disturbances associated with general anesthesia, notably pulmonary and gastrointestinal, when only epidural anesthesia is used. This translated into a low complication rate, improved patient comfort, early hospital discharge, and subsequent lower costs.

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography versus computed tomography in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Results of preoperative investigation of 127 patients who underwent elective aortic aneurysm repair during a 3-year period were examined and compared with findings at operation. The accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in assessing proximal and distal aneurysm extent was compared. From a total of 118 CT scans, ten of 12 suprarenal aneurysms were correctly predicted, with 11 false positives (positive predictive value 48 per cent, sensitivity 83 per cent, specificity 90 per cent). After 103 DSA investigations, six of ten suprarenal aneurysms were correctly predicted with one false positive (positive predictive value 86 per cent, sensitivity 60 per cent, specificity 99 per cent). Using CT, 30 of 54 aneurysmal iliac arteries were correctly diagnosed with 20 false positives (positive predictive value 60 per cent, sensitivity 56 per cent, specificity 88 per cent). Thirty-six of 48 aneurysmal iliac arteries were diagnosed correctly using DSA, with 32 false positives (positive predictive value 53 per cent, sensitivity 75 per cent, specificity 79 per cent). Intravenous DSA also provided useful information about renal and peripheral occlusive disease. Both investigations have their own specific limitations; clinicians should be aware of these when ordering and interpreting them.

Risberg retroperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta

In a study of the best approach to the infrarenal abdominal aorta, 47 patients were compared retrospectively: 15 underwent a standard transperitoneal incision, 15 a retroperitoneal left flank incision and 17 a new modified lateral pararectus incision, the Risberg approach. Operating time, length of postoperative intubation and hospital stay, mortality rate, morbidity rate and cost were assessed. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in mean(s.d.) operating time (141(21) versus 198(41) min), intraoperative cross-clamping time (74(13) versus 104(46) min) and postoperative intubation time (6.5(8.0) versus 13.3(7.3) h) associated with the Risberg retroperitoneal incision compared with the left flank retroperitoneal route. There was also a significant decrease (P < 0.02) in mean(s.d.) postoperative intubation time (6.5(8.0) versus 17.5(12.0) h), time after operation to discharge (11.0(2.4) versus 17.3(7.6) days) and hospital cost (4885(670) pounds versus 7732(580)) pounds associated with the Risberg incision compared with the transperitoneal approach. The Risberg incision gives better access to the infrarenal abdominal aorta while maintaining the advantages of other retroperitoneal approaches. This technique is recommended as the incision of choice for the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta.