Surgical strategies in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis and infection

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in the Treatment of Abdominal Bleeding in Patients Being Treated with Open Abdomen Due to Duodenal Fistula

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in treatment of abdominal bleeding in patients being treated with open abdomen due to duodenal fistula.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study performed at our center. From January 2005 to November 2010, all patients with abdominal bleeding were treated with surgical hemostasis (SH) and included in SH group. From January 2012 to December 2018, all patients with a bleeding were treated with TAE and included in the TAE group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between the two groups. The effect of TAE in the management of abdominal bleeding was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were enrolled, and there were 64 in the SH group and 67 in the TAE group. The success rate of hemostasis was higher in the TAE group (89.55% vs. 73.44%, adjusted OR = 4.065, 95% CI 1.336-12.336, P = 0.013). Moreover, the recognition rate of hemorrhagic vessels in the TAE group was higher (91.04 vs. 51.56; P < 0.001). The re-bleeding occurred in 20 patients, 7(11.67%) in the TAE group and 13(27.66%) in the SH group. The re-bleeding rate in SH group was higher (adjusted HR = 2.564, 95% CI 1.023-6.428, P = 0.045) CONCLUSIONS: TAE is an effective method in treatment of abdominal bleeding in patients being treated with open abdomen due to duodenal fistula.

Safety and efficacy of early image-guided percutaneous interventions in acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis is managed conservatively in early phase of the disease. Even minimally invasive procedure is preferred after 21 days of onset and there is a paucity of data on decision and outcomes of early radiological interventions. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of early image-guided percutaneous interventions in management of acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was performed after obtaining Institutional review board approval for analyzing hospital records of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis from January 2012 to July 2017. Seventy-eight consecutive patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and acute necrotic collections (ANC) were managed with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) and catheter-directed necrosectomy, in early phase of the disease (< 21 days). Clinical data and laboratory parameters of the included patients were evaluated until discharge from hospital, or mortality.

RESULTS

Overall survival rate was 73.1%. Forty-two (53.8%) patients survived with PCD alone, while the remaining 15 (19.2%) survivors needed additional necrosectomy. The timing of intervention from the start of the hospitalization to drainage was 14.3 ± 2.4 days. Significant risk factors for mortality were the presence of organ system failure, need for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score. An APACHE II score cutoff value of 15 was a significant discriminant for predicting survival with catheter-directed necrosectomy.

CONCLUSION

An early PCD of ANC in clinically deteriorating patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis, along with aggressive catheter-directed necrosectomy can avoid surgical interventions, and improve outcome in a significant proportion of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Intra-Abdominal Abscesses: Emphasis on Image-Guided Diagnosis and Therapy

Infection of the peritoneal cavity can be divided into acute peritonitis and chronic abscess formation. While acute peritonitis is easier to diagnose and treatment is often straightforward, the diagnosis of an intra-abdominal abscess can be subtle and treatment can involve multiple diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. The advent of high-quality computed tomography and ultrasonography has revolutionized the care of these patients, and has allowed for the definitive management of these infections without open operation. We review the current techniques for the diagnosis, localization, and treatment of these serious infections, discuss important factors influencing the decision between percutaneous and operative approaches, and examine several other controversies In this challenging area.

Laparoscopic pancreatic resections

PURPOSE

Pancreatic surgery is technically complex and requires considerable expertise. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery adds the need for considerable experience with advanced laparoscopic techniques. Despite the technical difficulties, an increasing number of centers propagate the use of laparoscopy in pancreatic surgery over the last decade.

METHODS

In this review, we provide an overview of the literature regarding the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Larger prospective randomized studies have emerged in the subset of laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic surgery for acute pancreatitis, considerable single center experience has been reported for laparoscopic pancreatic tail resection, and laparoscopic pancreatic head resection, however, is still restricted to a few experienced centers worldwide.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is becoming more and more established, in particular for the treatment of benign and premalignant lesions of the pancreatic body and tail. It has been shown to decrease postoperative pain, narcotic use, and length of hospital stay in larger single center experience. However, prospective trials are needed in laparoscopic resective pancreatic surgery to evaluate its advantages, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms and in particular in malignant pancreatic tumors.

Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy

BACKGROUND

A "step-up" approach is currently the treatment of choice for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy (MINE) and endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy (ETG) and to compare it to open necrosectomy (ONE).

METHODS

Patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our institution from 1998 to 2010 (n = 334) were identified. From these, patients who underwent either ONE, MINE, or ETG were selected for further analysis. Statistical analysis employed 2-sided Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2010, 32 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated by minimally invasive procedures including MINE (n = 14) and ETG (n = 18) or with the classic technique of ONE (n = 30). Time from onset of symptoms to intervention was less for ONE than for MINE or ETG (median, 11 vs 39 vs 54 days; P < .05). The rate of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock was greatest in ONE (93%) and MINE (71%) compared with ETG (17%; P < .05). Problems after ONE and MINE were ongoing sepsis (ONE 73% vs MINE 29% vs ETG 11%) and bleeding requiring intervention (ONE 26% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 17%). A specific complication of ETG was gastric perforation into the peritoneal cavity during the procedure (28%), requiring immediate open pseudocystogastrostomy. Laparotomy was necessary in 21% after MINE and 28% after ETG owing to specific complications or persistent infected necrosis. Overall mortality was greatest after ONE (ONE 63% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 6%; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality remains high in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Operative procedures should be delayed as long as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive procedures can avoid laparotomy, but also introduce specific complications requiring immediate or secondary open operative treatment. Minimally invasive procedures require unique expertise and therefore should only be performed at specialized centers.

Alimentary tract fistula associated with severe acute pancreatitis: an analysis of 16 cases

AIM: To investigate the risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of alimentary tract fistulas after severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to improve the cure rate of SAP and reduce the morbidity and mortality of alimentary tract fistula.

METHODS: A retrospective study was made on 16 SAP cases complicated with alimentary tract fistula, which were treated at our hospital from January 2006 to August 2011, to analyze its risk factors, location, time, influence on the body, and clinical diagnosis and treatment.

RESULTS: Colonic fistulas occurred in 37.5% (6/16) of patients, duodenal fistulas in 31.25% (5/16), gastric fistulas in 18.75% (3/16), duodenal fistula + colonic fistula in 6.25% (1/16), and duodenal fistula + intestinal fistula in 6.25% (1/16). Alimentary tract fistulas were mostly found 3-9 weeks postoperatively. All patients had peripancreatic infection and were diagnosed accurately by X-ray. Early surgery was performed in 2 cases (<2 wk) and late operation in 14 patients (>2 wk). Intraoperative placement of drainage tubes (2-11) and postoperative drainage for >2 wk were performed in all patients. Fifteen cases underwent intraoperative prophylactic gastrostomy/jejunostomy and early enteral nutrition. Fourteen cases were cured, and the cure rate was 87.5% (14/16). One patient developed duodenal fistula and abandoned therapy because of abdominal cavity hemorrhage, and one patient who developed colonic fistula died of serious systematic infection and multiple organ failure.

CONCLUSION: Alimentary tract fistula after SAP is related to pancreatic juice corrosion, infection, operation timing and mode, and quantity, position, and placement time of drainage tubes. X-ray is a reliable and safe method for diagnosis of alimentary tract fistulas.

Surgical intervention in the management of severe acute pancreatitis in cats: 8 cases (2003-2007)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of cats undergoing surgical intervention in the course of treatment for severe acute pancreatitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study from 2003 to 2007 with a median follow-up period of 2.2 years (range 11 d-5.4 y) postoperatively.

SETTING

Private referral veterinary center.

ANIMALS

Eight cats.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Quantitative data included preoperative physical and clinicopathologic values. Qualitative parameters included preoperative ultrasonographic interpretation, perioperative and intraoperative feeding tube placement, presence of free abdominal fluid, intraoperative closed suction abdominal drain placement, postoperative complications, microbiological culture, and histopathology. Common presenting clinical signs included lethargy, anorexia, and vomiting. Leukocytosis and hyponatremia were present in 5 of 8 cats. Hypokalemia, increased total bilirubin, and hyperglycemia were present in 6 of 8 cats. Elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transferase were present in all cats. Surgery for extrahepatic biliary obstruction was performed in 6 cats, pancreatic abscess in 3 cats, and pancreatic necrosis in 1 cat. Six of the 8 cats survived. Five of the 6 cats that underwent surgery for extrahepatic biliary obstruction and 1 cat that underwent pancreatic necrosectomy survived. All 5 of the cats with extrahepatic biliary obstruction secondary to pancreatitis survived. The 2 nonsurvivors included a cat with a pancreatic abscess and a cat with severe pancreatitis and extrahepatic biliary obstruction secondary to a mass at the gastroduodenal junction. Postoperative complications included progression of diabetes mellitus, septic peritonitis, local gastrostomy tube stoma inflammation, local gastrostomy tube stoma infection, and mild dermal suture reaction.

CONCLUSION

Cats with severe acute pancreatitis and concomitant extrahepatic biliary obstruction, pancreatic necrosis, or pancreatic abscesses may benefit from surgical intervention. Cats with extrahepatic biliary obstruction secondary to severe acute pancreatitis may have a good prognosis.

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), formerly known as pancreatic abscess is a late complication of acute pancreatitis. It can be lethal, even though it is rare. This critical review provides an overview of the continually expanding knowledge about WOPN, by review of current data from references identified in Medline and PubMed, to September 2009, using key words, such as WOPN, infected pseudocyst, severe pancreatitis, pancreatic abscess, acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), pancreas, inflammation and alcoholism. WOPN comprises a later and local complication of ANP, occurring more than 4 wk after the initial attack, usually following development of pseudocysts and other pancreatic fluid collections. The mortality rate associated with WOPN is generally less than that of infected pancreatic necrosis. Surgical intervention had been the mainstay of treatment for infected peripancreatic fluid collection and abscesses for decades. Increasingly, percutaneous catheter drainage and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have been used, and encouraging results have recently been reported in the medical literature, rendering these techniques invaluable in the treatment of WOPN. Applying the recommended therapeutic strategy, which comprises early treatment with antibiotics combined with restricted surgical intervention, fewer patients with ANP undergo surgery and interventions are ideally performed later in the course of the disease, when necrosis has become well demarcated.

Characteristics and outcomes in surgical management of severe acute pancreatitis: 37 dogs (2001-2007)

OBJECTIVE

Describe clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with canine patients undergoing surgical intervention for treatment of acute pancreatitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective outcome study from 2001 to 2007.

ANIMALS

Thirty-seven dogs.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The following data were collected for dogs who underwent surgical intervention in the course of treatment for severe acute pancreatitis: preoperative clinicopathologic and physical data, ultrasonographic findings, surgical procedure detail, histopathologic findings, and transfusion requirements. The survival rate was 80.8% in dogs with extrahepatic biliary obstruction, 64.3% in dogs undergoing necrosectomy, and 40.6% with pancreatic abscess. Overall survival was 63.6%. Surgical complications included intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage in 12 dogs, postoperative development of diabetes mellitus in 3 dogs, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in 1 dog, and bacterial peritonitis in 2 dogs.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention and aggressive postoperative care may be pursued in select dogs with severe acute pancreatitis. In dogs with extrahepatic biliary obstruction secondary to acute pancreatitis, surgical intervention may be associated with a good prognosis whereas dogs with pancreatic abscess formation may have a more guarded prognosis.

In situ high-volume modified continuous closed and/or open lavage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical significance of high-volume modified continuous closed and/or open lavage for the treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

METHODS

From August 1997 to December 2006, 53 patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis who underwent in situ high-volume (>20 L/d) continuous closed lavage using a single-lumen rubber catheter and/or open lavage were retrospectively studied in our hospital, and the advantages of this new technique were analyzed.

RESULTS

Modified continuous closed lavage was the initial treatment for all patients; in 6 patients with secondary retroperitoneal sepsis or abscess, continuous open lavage was performed. Impaired tube patency and lavage fluid retention did not occur in any of these patients. The overall mortality was 17.0% (9/53). Twelve patients underwent early surgery, and 5 (41.7%) died; 41 patients underwent delayed surgery, and 4 (9.8%) died. Significant local complications occurred in 14 patients (26.4%); the incidence of bleeding, abscess, and fistula was 13.2% (7/53), 9.4% (5/53), and 9.4% (5/53), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our technique of in situ high-volume modified continuous closed and/or open lavage has produced a better control of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

BACKGROUND

Infected pancreatic necrosis is a late infective complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in which infection tends to spread from the pancreas to the peripancreatic tissues, retroperitoneum, and, more rarely, the peritoneal cavity. Severe and rapid deterioration of the clinical condition may lead to septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. CAUSATIVE ORGANISMS: The microorganisms most frequently isolated in cases of acute bacterial pancreatitis have been historically gram-negative bacteria of enteric origin. However, gram-positive cocci are isolated with increasing frequency. Enterococci are the single most commonly isolated species.

TREATMENT

Aggressive multimodal therapy in the early stage of severe necrotizing pancreatitis improves survival; patients with infective complications tend to die later from multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Initially, the treatment consists of fluids, analgesics, and oxygen supplementation. Surgical debridement should be limited to proved infections and delayed as long as possible to allow necrotic tissue to become demarcated. When surgery is necessary, blunt debridement of necrotic tissues is the procedure largely utilized and usually is not accompanied by excessive bleeding. Pancreatic resection should be reserved for massive necrosis of the gland substance. In many situations, the abdominal incision can be closed primarily. Treatment by the "open abdomen" technique should be reserved for those patients in whom further laparotomies are planned, mainly because of incomplete unsatisfactory debridement or uncontrolled bleeding that necessitates packing of the lesser sac.

CONCLUSION

Modern management techniques have reduced the mortality of infected pancreatic necrosis to 15-20% from historical rates that were twice as high. Aggressive resuscitation and surveillance of infection are crucial for successful outcomes, although fewer patients are undergoing surgical debridement.

JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: surgical management

Acute pancreatitis represents a spectrum of disease ranging from a mild, self-limited course to a rapidly progressive, severe illness. The mortality rate of severe acute pancreatitis exceeds 20%, and some patients diagnosed as mild to moderate acute pancreatitis at the onset of the disease may progress to a severe, life-threatening illness within 2–3 days. The Japanese (JPN) guidelines were designed to provide recommendations regarding the management of acute pancreatitis in patients having a diversity of clinical characteristics. This article sets forth the JPN guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis, excluding gallstone pancreatitis, by incorporating the latest evidence for the surgical management of severe pancreatitis in the Japanese-language version of the evidence-based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis published in 2003. Ten guidelines are proposed: (1) computed tomography-guided or ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for bacteriology should be performed in patients suspected of having infected pancreatic necrosis; (2) infected pancreatic necrosis accompanied by signs of sepsis is an indication for surgical intervention; (3) patients with sterile pancreatic necrosis should be managed conservatively, and surgical intervention should be performed only in selected cases, such as those with persistent organ complications or severe clinical deterioration despite maximum intensive care; (4) early surgical intervention is not recommended for necrotizing pancreatitis; (5) necrosectomy is recommended as the surgical procedure for infected pancreatic necrosis; (6) simple drainage should be avoided after necrosectomy, and either continuous closed lavage or open drainage should be performed; (7) surgical or percutaneous drainage should be performed for pancreatic abscess; (8) pancreatic abscesses for which clinical findings are not improved by percutaneous drainage should be subjected to surgical drainage immediately; (9) pancreatic pseudocysts that produce symptoms and complications or the diameter of which increases should be drained percutaneously or endoscopically; and (10) pancreatic pseudocysts that do not tend to improve in response to percutaneous drainage or endoscopic drainage should be managed surgically.

MAKING A VIRTUE OF NECESSITY: MANAGING THE OPEN ABDOMEN

BACKGROUND

The open abdomen, or laparostomy, is becoming increasingly used in the management of critically ill surgical patients.

METHODS

The published work on laparostomy is reviewed, in the light of personal experience, with particular attention to the history and pathophysiology associated with laparostomy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The combination of an inert plastic sheet in contact with the viscera, and the application of subatmospheric pressure on the wound, is an effective combination to maximize the prospects of delayed primary wound closure while minimizing the chance of fistula and ventral hernia.

Radical Subtotal Pancreatic Resection, Including Splenectomy, Is an Effective One-off Treatment for Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic resection for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis has been associated with prohibitive mortality rates and has been hence replaced by piecemeal debridement, either by the open or the laparoscopic technique. We report the results of deliberate subtotal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six-year prospective audit of patients treated by a single surgeon, with an interest in pancreatic disease, within a Low Volume Hospital (LVH) setting. Results are presented as median (IQR).

RESULTS

During the study period 18 patients (9 males) with complicated severe acute pancreatitis underwent radical pancreatic resection. The median age was 61 years (range 36-69). The median time to operation after presentation was 27 days (range 2-74). Microbiological culture confirmed infection in 14 (78%) patients. Three patients (17%) died within 30 days of operation. Twelve of the 15 survivors (80%) underwent a single operative procedure. Three patients required a further laparotomy, of whom 2 required colectomy for ischemia. Median hospital and ICU stays were 43 (range 30-57) and 5 (range 4-6) days respectively. Six patients (40% of survivors) developed an infection of the left half of the chevron incision; however, all wounds were fully healed within 3 months. Long-term follow-up of survivors (n=14) revealed 8 (57%) to need at least occasional pancreatic enzyme supplementation and 5 (36%) to have diabetes mellitus. Two patients (14%) developed an incisional hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical resection of pancreas and spleen, combined with postoperative irrigation, was associated with comparatively low rates of morbidity and mortality for patients with infected pancreatic necrosis in a LVH setting.

Clinical laboratory assessment of acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Several biochemical markers in blood and urine have been investigated to establish their clinical application in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The relevant studies are reviewed and critically appraised.

METHODS

Medline and the World Wide Web were searched and the relevant literature was classified under the following categories: (1) diagnosis of AP and (2) prediction of: a) disease severity, b) pancreatic necrosis and its secondary infection, c) organ failure and death, and d) disease etiology.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Serum lipase is a more reliable diagnostic marker of AP than serum amylase. Urinary strip tests for trypsinogen activation peptide (TAP) and trypsinogen-2 provide a reliable early diagnosis of AP. Useful predictors of severity may include serum procalcitonin and urinary TAP and trypsinogen-2 on admission, serum interleukins-6 and -8 and polymorphonuclear elastase at 24 h, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) at 48 h. Other markers such as amyloid A and carboxypeptidase B activation peptide (CAPAP) need further investigation. Biochemical prediction of pancreatic necrosis requires 72 h to reach reliability and is impractical. However, the daily monitoring of serum procalcitonin provides a non-invasive detection of infected necrosis; the promising role of phospholipase A(2) in this regard requires further investigation. Early transient hypertransaminasemia reliably predicts biliary etiology, while serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin and trypsin may predict an alcoholic etiology.

Severe acute pancreatitis: case-oriented discussion of interdisciplinary management

The clinical course of an episode of acute pancreatitis varies from a mild, transitory illness to a severe often necrotizing form with distant organ failure and a mortality rate of 20-40%. Patients with severe pancreatitis, representing about 15-20% of all patients with acute pancreatitis, need to be identified as early as possible after onset of symptoms allowing starting intensive care treatment early in the disease process. An episode of severe acute pancreatitis progresses in two phases. The first 10-14 days are characterized by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome maintained by the release of various inflammatory mediators. The second phase, beginning about 10-14 days after the onset of the disease is dominated by sepsis-related morbidity due to infected peripancreatic and pancreatic necrosis. This state is associated with septic multiple organ systemic failure. The importance of infection on the outcome of necrotizing pancreatitis has been clearly delineated and the pre-emptive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics that achieve effective tissue concentrations is considered standard management of patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis, especially if associated with organ failure or extended necrosis. Patients with infected necrosis should undergo a surgical intervention. The standard open technique consisting of an organ preserving necrosectomy followed by a postoperative concept of lavage and/or drainage to evacuate necrotic debris occurring during the further course has recently been challenged by various minimally invasive approaches.

Percutaneous video-assisted necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis

AIMS OF THE STUDY

Percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis is not always efficient and morbidity is high with open necrosectomy techniques. Minimally-invasive procedures have been developed to reduce this morbidity. We report our early experience with percutaneous video-assisted necrosectomy.

METHODS

Among 61 patients with acute pancreatitis treated between January 2001 and February 2003, seven developed infected pancreatic necrosis. Six of these seven patients underwent percutaneous video-assisted necrosectomy after failure of radio-guided percutaneous drainage.

RESULTS

One to four sessions of percutaneous video-assisted necrosectomy were required. There was no death. Sepsis control was achieved in all patients. One patient developed postoperative peritonitis due to intraoperative contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Eighteen months after the last necrosectomy, one patient developed a pseudocyst which was successfully cured by percutaneous drainage. One patient developed diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Early experience in six patients has shown that percutaneous video-assisted necrosectomy is feasible, safe and efficient, in accordance with reports in the literature. Further evaluation is necessary.

Infectious complications of acute pancreatitis

Disease severity in patients with acute pancreatitis varies from mild disease with minimal morbidity, to severe disease in which a whole spectrum of local and systemic complications may occur. Infectious complications frequently arise, and especially infection of pancreatic necrosis is an important risk factor for mortality. Several strategies have been devised to reduce this risk, and the use of prophylactic therapy, e.g. selective digestive decontamination, can be considered in patients with documented necrosis fo the pancreas. Pancreatic abscesses and infected pseudocysts arise later in the course of disease, and should be considered as separate entities, due to differences in therapy and outcome of these patients. When infection occurs, source control using either surgical or percutaneous drainage techniques, is essential to avoid systemic complications.

Inflammatory cytokines, C reactive protein, and procalcitonin as early predictors of necrosis infection in acute necrotizing pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Infection of necrosis is a major risk factor in patients with acute pancreatitis. Systematic use of broad spectrum antibiotics has been recommended in these patients but may induce serious side effects. To better target patients in whom antibiotic prophylaxis could be beneficial, we evaluated whether early serum profiles of interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha, C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) help to discriminate between patients who eventually develop infection of necrosis and those who do not.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with acute pancreatitis and a computed tomography (CT) severity index score of more than 3 were prospectively screened. They were then separated into infected and non-infected groups according to the occurrence of infected pancreatic necrosis. The severity of illness was assessed with Ranson's classification and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II. Serum levels of IL-6, TNF-alpha, CRP, and PCT were measured during the first 3 days after admission. CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic necrosis was performed to prove infection when sepsis of abdominal origin was suspected. Using the methodology of receiver operating curves, we determined the presence of a threshold for markers that would be predictive of the development of infected necrosis.

RESULTS

PCT and IL-6 were higher in the serum of patients who eventually developed infection of necrosis (P < 0.003 and < 0.04, respectively). No difference was noted between the 2 groups for TNF- alpha and CRP. The combination of IL-6 < 400 pg/l and PCT < 2 ng/L best identified patients who were not at risk for necrosis infection. The negative predictive value for these thresholds was 91%, whereas sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

PCT and IL-6 serum levels were elevated very early in patients who eventually developed necrosis infection. A combination of PCT and IL-6 thresholds could be helpful in identifying a subgroup of patients in whom antibiotic prophylaxis is likely to be ineffective.

[Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitic with infected necrosis by necrosectomy-pancreatostomy]

Technical modalities of surgical treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the results of necrosectomy associated by pancreatostomy using active drainage according Mikulicz, which is currently an unusual technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1985 to 1997, 18 consecutive patients (median age = 63; range = 35-88 years) were operated on through laparotomy for infected necrosis and treated by necrosectomy combined with Mikulicz drainage. Fourteen patients were referred from another center, including 9 who had previous surgery. Necrosectomy was performed after a median delay of 22 days (1-45) after onset of pancreatitis, in all patients because of severe sepsis (including 12 patients with persisting shock) and presence at CT scan of necrotic collections containing gas bubbles (n = 15) and/or infection proven by percutaneous aspiration (n = 3).

RESULTS

After the first procedure, patients underwent between 2 and 25 (median: 5) additional necrosectomies through the pancreatostomy tract. Thirteen surgical complications were observed in 8 patients: digestive fistula (n = 7), intraabdominal bleeding (n = 3), gastrointestinal haemorrhage (n = 1), colic stenosis with colectasy (n = 1). Five patients, all referred from another center, died (28%) between the 47th and the 140th day from multiorgan failure (n = 4) or gastrointestinal haemorrhage (n = 1). The median hospital stay was 109 days (26-265) including 51 in intensive care unit (1-134). The 13 surviving patients were followed during an average of 2 years (4 months-7 years). All developed an incisional hernia of the pancreatostomy tract, which was surgically treated in 6 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Necrosectomy-pancreatostomy is an appropriate treatment of acute pancreatitis with infected necrosis, despite the usual need of additional but easy necrosectomies, and the frequent occurrence of incisional hernia. Results observed in patients referred to our center suggest that earlier diagnosis of necrosis infection using percutaneous aspiration could improve the prognosis.

Pancreatic debridement in a district general hospital--viable or vulnerable?

Little is known about the outcome after pancreatic debridement in the district general hospital (DGH) setting and the debate about centralisation of pancreatic surgical services continues. We retrospectively reviewed our experience over 2 years, looking particularly at mortality, morbidity and cost. Of 12 cases treated during this period, 8 were women and 7 were gallstone induced. The mean pre-operative age was 56.5 years and pre-operative Apache II score was 15. The rates for postoperative morbidity and mortality were 67% and 25%, respectively In half, digital necrosectomy was performed and in half a regional pancreatic resection. These figures are similar to others found in the literature (comparison with 15 contemporary series). The median cost per patient was 21,487 pounds, mainly due to ITU accommodation (57.4% of total costs). This is similar to other previously published rates and the rate from our local tertiary centre. It is concluded that acceptable results for pancreatic debridement are producible in the DGH at economically viable levels.

Outcome and quality of life of patients with acute pancreatitis requiring intensive care

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe acute pancreatitis often require intensive care unit (ICU) admission, have multiple complications, spend weeks to months in the hospital, and consume a large amount of resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ICU course, costs, mortality, and quality of life of patients who require ICU admission for acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Patients with acute pancreatitis requiring ICU admission were identified retrospectively. Data regarding in-hospital morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs were obtained. Long-term quality of life was assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were identified. There were 31 men and 21 women: the mean age was 53 years (range, 22-89). The most common causes of acute pancreatitis were gallstones (44%) and alcoholism (17%). Pulmonary failure (52% required mechanical ventilation) and renal failure (21% required dialysis) were common. There were 39 (75%) hospital survivors and 13 (25%) nonsurvivors. In the first 24 h, the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores were 10 +/- 6 in survivors and 16 +/- 4 in the nonsurvivors (<0.01). Mean length of ICU (15 +/- 18 and 28 +/- 31 days) and hospital (40 +/- 34 and 38 +/- 34 days) stays were similar in survivors and nonsurvivors, respectively (NS). The mean hospital cost for survivors was $83,611 +/- 88,434 and that for nonsurvivors was $136,730 +/- 95,045 (P = 0. 09). The estimated cost to obtain one hospital survivor was $129,188. Of the 39 hospital survivors, 5 died later, 21 completed the SF-36, and 13 were lost to follow-up. Long-term quality of life (SF-36) was similar to that of an age-matched population. Twenty of twenty-one felt their general health was at least as good as it had been 1 year previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe acute pancreatitis need prolonged ICU and hospital stays. APACHE II may be a good predictor of outcome; further, prospective evaluation is needed. Although resource utilization is high, most patients survive and have good long-term quality of life.

Antibiotic selection for patients with septic shock

Early recognition of the sepsis syndrome, prompt administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, surgical intervention when indicated, and aggressive supportive care in intensive care units remain the therapeutic strategies for patients with sepsis. Antibiotic selection is based on many factors including the most probable source of infection, the most likely pathogens, and knowledge of antibiotic susceptibility patterns for community- and hospital-acquired infections. Unfortunately, with this approach, mortality remains unacceptably high. Adjuvant therapies such as antiendotoxin antibodies, cytokine antagonists, and anti-inflammatory agents aimed at blunting the host immune response to bacterial infection have provided little clinical benefit to date. As our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis progresses, perhaps newer modalities will improve clinical outcome. At this time, preventive strategies, including optimal vaccine use, effective infection control practices, judicious use and care of intravascular lines and indwelling urinary catheters, and appropriate use of anti-infective agents to prevent microbial resistance should be used to decrease the incidence of infection and subsequent sepsis.

Reliable screening for acute pancreatitis with rapid urine trypsinogen-2 test strip

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the validity of a new rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip (Actim Pancreatitis) for detection of acute pancreatitis in patients with acute abdominal pain.

METHODS

A total of 525 consecutive patients presenting with abdominal pain at two emergency units was included prospectively and tested with the Actim Pancreatitis test strip. Urine trypsinogen-2 concentrations were also determined by a quantitative method. The diagnosis and assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis was based on raised serum and urinary amylase levels, clinical features and findings on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

RESULTS

In 45 patients the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis could be established. The Actim Pancreatitis test strip result was positive in 43 of them resulting in a sensitivity of 96 per cent. Thirty-seven false-positive Actim Pancreatitis test strips were obtained in patients with non-pancreatic abdominal pain resulting in a specificity of 92 per cent. Nine patients with severe acute pancreatitis were all detected by the dipstick.

CONCLUSION

A negative Actim Pancreatitis strip result excludes acute pancreatitis with high probability. Positive results indicate the need for further evaluation, i.e. other enzyme measurements and/or radiological examinations. The test is easy and rapid to perform, unequivocal in its interpretation and can be used in healthcare units lacking laboratory facilities.

Surgical management of severe secondary peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in diagnosis, surgery, antimicrobial therapy and intensive care support, the mortality rate associated with severe secondary peritonitis remains unacceptably high. This article presents various surgical treatment strategies for severe secondary peritonitis, emphasizing the role of open management of the abdomen and planned relaparotomies.

METHODS

Material was identified from previous review articles, references cited in original papers and a Medline search of the literature.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of severe secondary peritonitis is highly demanding and very complex. The combination of improved surgical techniques, antimicrobial therapy and intensive care support has improved the outcome of such peritonitis following perforation or anastomotic disruption of the digestive tract, or infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, aggressive surgical treatment strategies, such as open management of the abdomen and planned relaparotomies, may have reached their limits.

Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis, early assessment, and management of severe acute pancreatitis remain difficult clinical problems. This article presents the consensus obtained at a meeting convened to consider the evidence in these areas. The aim of the article is to provide outcome statements to guide clinical practice, with an assessment of the supporting evidence for each statement.

METHOD

Working groups considered the published evidence in the areas of diagnosis, assessment of severity, nonoperative treatment, and surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Outcome statements were defined to summarize the conclusions on each point considered. The findings were discussed and agreed on by all participants. A careful assessment was made of the strength of the available evidence (proven, probable, possible, unproven, or inappropriate).

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

There is reliable evidence to support much current practice. Clear guidance can be given in most areas examined, and several areas were identified where further investigation would be helpful. Diagnosis using plasma concentrations of pancreatic enzymes is reliable. Rapid advances are taking place in the assessment of severity. Several new therapeutic strategies show real promise for the reduction of morbidity and mortality rates. Surgical debridement is required for infected pancreatic necrosis, but is less often necessary for sterile necrosis.

[Percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis: an alternative to surgery]

AIM OF THE STUDY

To describe a technique of percutaneous CT guided catheter drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis and to report the results of this technique compared with those of the conventional surgical treatment and of other percutaneous drainage series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 1997, the series included 32 patients who had a severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis with a mean Ranson score of 4.6, scored into grade D (n = 10), and grade E (n = 22), according to the Balthazar radiological staging. Modified Van Sonnenberg 24 F double lumen catheters were used for continuous irrigation and aspiration.

RESULTS

Forty-nine drains were inserted for 41 infected necroses and eight abscesses. Among the 32 patients, the proof of infected necrosis was obtained in 26 patients by fine needle aspiration and culture (enterococcus, staphylococcus, pseudomonas). The average delay of catheter insertion was 23 days after onset of pancreatitis; the mean duration of drainage was 43 days, and an average of three catheters per patient was required. Five patients (15%) died, and among the survivors, 16 (59%) presented 21 complications including 14 enterocutaneous or pancreatic fistulas. A subsequent surgical procedure including two necrosectomies was necessary in six patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis with a 15% mortality and 70% success rate, represents an interesting alternative to conventional surgery.

Fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis: results of open management of the abdomen and "planned" reoperations

BACKGROUND

Controversy still surrounds the management of fulminant acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Because mortality rates continue to be high, especially in patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis, aggressive surgical techniques, such as open management of the abdomen and "planned" reoperations, seem to be justified.

STUDY DESIGN

From 1988 through 1995, 28 patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis were treated with open management of the abdomen followed by planned reoperations at our surgical intensive care unit.

RESULTS

All patients had infected necrosis with severe clinical deterioration: 12 patients had an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score > or = 20 and 16 patients had a Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) > or = 15. Nineteen patients suffered from severe multiorgan failure; the remaining 9 patients needed only ventilatory and inotropic support. The mean number of reoperations was 17. In 14 patients, major bleeding occurred; fistula developed in 7. Later, 9 abscesses were drained percutaneously. The hospital mortality rate was 39%. Longterm morbidity in survivors was substantial, especially concerning abdominal-wall defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Open management of the abdomen followed by planned reoperations is an aggressive but reasonably successful surgical treatment strategy for patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis. Morbidity and mortality rates were high, but in these critically ill patients, such high rates could be expected. Because management and clinical surveillance require specific expertise, management of these patients is best undertaken in specialized centers.

Percutaneous aspiration for bacteriological studies in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided aspiration of abdominal collections is performed in necrotizing pancreatitis to detect infection of necrosis, which is an adverse prognostic factor and requires surgical drainage. However, in the case of sterile aspirates, the outcome and the optimum management are subject to debate. This study examined the clinical and bacteriological outcome of patients with severe acute pancreatitis with initially sterile necrosis and assessed the efficiency of percutaneous drainage in this setting.

METHODS

Seventeen patients hospitalized for necrotizing pancreatitis with a septic course underwent a preliminary sterile CT-guided aspiration. Eight patients underwent simultaneous percutaneous drainage of the punctured collection. Supportive therapy was continued unless severe clinical deterioration or proven secondary infection of necrosis indicated the need for necrosectomy and drainage.

RESULTS

Secondary infection of necrosis was observed in two patients of nine who had only fine-needle aspiration cytology of the collection, and in seven of eight it was drained percutaneously (P = 0.01). Only one patient drained percutaneously recovered without surgery. Surgical drainage was required in 12 patients. The hospital mortality rate was 29 per cent and was not significantly affected by the bacteriological status of necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous drainage of sterile collections predisposed to secondary infection of the necrosis and did not cure the patients. A first sterile percutaneous aspiration did not predict a favourable course and surgery frequently remains necessary.

Role of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis

BACKGROUND

Early detection of infected pancreatic necrosis has a major impact on further management and outcome in acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis over an 8-year period.

METHODS

From January 1988 to September 1996 193 (mean 2.0 (range 1-9) aspirations per patient) prospectively assessed FNACs guided ultrasonographically were performed in 98 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis proven by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Aspirates were considered infected if either Gram stain and/or culture revealed micro-organisms.

RESULTS

Ultrasonographically guided FNAC correctly diagnosed infection in 29 of 33 patients with infected necrosis a median of 13 days after onset of symptoms. Of 61 patients with sterile necrosis 55 were identified correctly as sterile by FNAC. There were six false-positive and four false-negative aspirates of which nine occurred during the first week of the disease. In four patients who did not undergo operation FNAC revealed Gram-negative organisms; however, in the absence of repeated aspirations, the positive results remained unconfirmed. An overall sensitivity of 88 per cent and a specificity of 90 per cent was obtained. No difference was found in biochemical and clinical parameters indicating systemic inflammatory response syndrome before each FNAC between patients with proven sterile or infected necrosis. All patients tolerated the procedure well and no major complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonographically guided FNAC is a fast and reliable technique for the diagnosis of infected necrosis. As complication rates are very low, the procedure can be repeated at short intervals to improve the diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasonographically guided FNAC is recommended for all patients with necrotizing pancreatitis in whom systemic inflammatory response syndrome persists beyond the first week after onset of symptoms.

Surgical treatment of infected necrosis

Over the years, experience has shown that the cornerstone for improved survival in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis is an early, precise diagnosis followed by adequate drainage combined with modern intensive care management. In experienced hands, this goal can be achieved with different surgical approaches, provided that all septic collections are thoroughly removed and that reexploration is performed promptly if there is evidence of ongoing sepsis. If there is any concept preferable, and under what conditions, future large-scale randomized trials with precise and comparable patient stratification will have to demonstrate it.

Surgical strategy and management of infected pancreatic necrosis

Infected pancreatic necrosis and sepsis are the leading causes of death in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Between 1986 and 1993, 123 patients with infected pancreatic necrosis were treated; in all cases the infected necrosis extended to the retroperitoneal area. Surgical treatment was performed a mean of 18.5 days after the onset of acute pancreatitis. Operative management consisted of wide-ranging necrosectomy through all the affected area, combined with continuous widespread lavage and suction drainage applied for a mean of 39.5 days, with a median of 6.5 litres of normal saline per day. In 56 cases (46 per cent), another surgical intervention (distal pancreatic resection, splenectomy, cholecystectomy, sphincteroplasty or colonic resection) was also performed. Bacteriological findings revealed mainly enteric bacteria, but Candida infection was detected in 21 per cent of patients. The overall hospital mortality rate was 7 per cent (nine patients died). Infected pancreatic necrosis responds well to aggressive surgical treatment, continuous, long-standing lavage and suction drainage, together with supportive therapy combined with adequate antibiotic and antifungal medication.

Early antibiotic treatment in acute necrotising pancreatitis

Despite improvements in surgical treatment and intensive care, mortality from severe acute pancreatitis remains high. We have carried out a randomised study of 60 consecutive patients with alcohol-induced necrotising pancreatitis to find out whether early antibiotic treatment can improve outcome. 30 patients were assigned cefuroxime (4.5 g/day intravenously) from admission. In the second group, no antibiotic treatment was given until clinical or microbiologically verified infection or after a secondary rise in C-reactive protein. The inclusion criteria were C-reactive protein concentration above 120 mg/L within 48 h of admission and low enhancement (< 30 Hounsfield units) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. There were more infectious complications in the non-antibiotic than in the antibiotic group (mean per patient 1.8 vs 1.0, p = 0.01). The most common cause of sepsis was Staphylococcus epidermidis; positive cultures were obtained from pancreatic necrosis or the central venous line in 14 of 18 patients with suspected but blood-culture-negative sepsis. Mortality was higher in the non-antibiotic group (seven vs one in the antibiotic group; p = 0.03). Four of the eight patients who died had cultures from pancreatic necrosis positive for Staph epidermidis. We conclude that cefuroxime given early in necrotising pancreatitis is beneficial and may reduce mortality, probably by decreasing the frequency of sepsis.

Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial was undertaken in 102 patients with objective evidence of severe acute pancreatitis to evaluate whether selective decontamination reduces mortality.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Secondary pancreatic infection is the major cause of death in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Controlled clinical trials to study the effect of selective decontamination in such patients are not available.

METHODS

Between April 22, 1990 and April 19, 1993, 102 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were admitted to 16 participating hospitals. Patients were entered into the study if severe acute pancreatitis was indicated, on admission, by multiple laboratory criteria (Imrie score > or = 3) and/or computed tomography criteria (Balthazar grade D or E). Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard treatment (control group) or standard treatment plus selective decontamination (norfloxacin, colistin, amphotericin; selective decontamination group). All patients received full supportive treatment, and surveillance cultures were taken in both groups.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were assigned to the selective decontamination group and 52 were assigned to the control group. There were 18 deaths in the control group (35%), compared with 11 deaths (22%) in the selective decontamination group (adjusted for Imrie score and Balthazar grade: p = 0.048). This difference was mainly caused by a reduction of late mortality (> 2 weeks) due to significant reduction of gram-negative pancreatic infection (p = 0.003). The average number of laparotomies per patient was reduced in patients treated with selective decontamination (p < 0.05). Failure of selective decontamination to prevent secondary gram-negative pancreatic infection with subsequent death was seen in only three patients (6%) and transient gram-negative pancreatic infection was seen in one (2%). In both groups of patients, all gram-negative aerobic pancreatic infection was preceded by colonization of the digestive tract by the same bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of gram-negative colonization of the digestive tract, preventing subsequent pancreatic infection by means of selective decontamination, significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Necrotizing acute pancreatitis induced by Salmonella infection

A case of salmonellosis complicated by hemorrhagic pancreatitis is presented. It is emphasized that removal of the gallbladder when stones are present is mandatory in sepsis induced by salmonellosis in the bile-pancreatic region, in spite of modem antibiotic treatment.