Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland: trends and current practice

Is there carotid artery aneurysm formation following saphenous vein patch endarterectomy?

The use of saphenous vein patching following carotid endarterectomy is reported to produce aneurysmal dilatation with the risk of thrombosis and possible rupture. The authors have studied patients who have had saphenous vein patch angioplasty following carotid endarterectomy to assess whether there is any progressive arterial dilatation. Thirty-five patients who had undergone saphenous vein patch carotid endarterectomy were age- and sex-matched with 31 subjects that had direct closure endarterectomy. All participants underwent carotid duplex scanning. The external diameters of the mid common carotid artery, the bulb and the proximal internal carotid artery were measured bilaterally. The diameters of the endarterectomized carotid were compared with the contralateral side using a paired t-test. Using an unpaired t-test, the saphenous vein angioplasty group was compared with the directly closed group. A graph was plotted of the ratio of internal carotid artery diameter of the saphenous vein angioplasty group (endarterectomized artery to the contralateral artery) against the length of follow-up, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated. When the saphenous vein angioplasty group was compared with the directly closed group there was a significant difference between the carotid bulb (11.6 versus 9.7mm, P < 0.001) and internal carotid artery diameters (9.0 versus 7.0mm, P < 0.001). Longitudinal analysis of the saphenous vein angioplasty group showed that the increased diameter of the endarterectomized internal carotid artery progressed with time after surgery (r = 0.51, P < 0.005, and r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Vein patching increases the diameter of the internal carotid artery, and this may further increase with time possibly predisposing to aneurysm formation. Further longitudinal studies of paired data are required.

Relationship between the regional and national incidence of transient ischaemic attack and stroke and performance of carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between the incidence of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and stroke on a national and regional level and the rate of carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

SUBJECTS

Patients entered onto a national primary care computerised database with a new diagnostic code of stroke or TIA between 1992 and 1995.

METHODS

Analysis of data from the primary care database and routine data sources. Main outcome measures were incidence of TIA and stroke and rates of CEA.

RESULTS

The mean incidence per 100,000 of the population was 292 (TIA) and 356 (stroke) in England, 391 and 497 in Scotland and 349 and 448 in Northern Ireland. There was a variation in the incidence of TIA and stroke between both the regions and the regions and countries which was significant. There was a national increase in the rate of CEA between 1990 and 1995 which showed a marked variation across the regions. The inter-regional variation in rate of CEA correlated with the inter-regional difference in incidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of TIA and stroke may be higher than previously recognised, and varies significantly between the regions. This is generally associated with the variation in performance of CEA.

Carotid endarterectomy in the U.K. and Ireland: audit of 30-day outcome. The Audit Committee for the Vascular Surgical Society

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN

A prospective study of 709 patients undergoing carotid surgery in the U.K. and Ireland was performed to evaluate the performance of vascular surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine surgeons (range 2-39 cases each) were sampled and all patients undergoing surgery over a 6-month period (1 March 1994-31 August 1994) were included in the study. Indications for surgery were TIA (35.9%), AF (23.3%), CVA (21.4%) and "others" (19.6%).

RESULTS

Mean ipsilateral stenosis was 82% (30%-99%). Thirty-one percent of patients had preoperative neurological consults. Shunts were used in 67.6%, tacking sutures in 40.1%, drains in 71.9% and patches in 54.4% of cases. At 30 days there were nine (1.3%) deaths (four cardiac, three neurological). There were 15 ipsilateral postoperative CVAs (2.1%); 19% of patients had one or more complication, usually minor. Statistical analysis showed no independent risk factor for CVA other than seniority of the surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined stroke/death rate of 3% for the series was obtained at 30 days for all cases. This large, validated study suggests that members of the Vascular Society of G.B. and Ireland currently have a very low morbidity/mortality rate for performing carotid surgery. Continued audit is required to ensure that this quality of service does not deteriorate.

Preoperative testing before carotid endarterectomy: a survey of vascular surgeons' attitudes

Traditional surgical practice and published consensus statements from major vascular surgery specialty societies have considered contrast arteriography to be a routine part of the diagnostic evaluation prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, some surgeons now omit routine preoperative arteriography if a technically adequate carotid duplex scan is performed and indications for CEA are clear. To better establish current practice patterns and to characterize vascular surgeons' opinions about the role of preoperative arteriography, the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society membership was surveyed by mail. Eighty-six percent of the members responded (430 of 502). Ninety-three percent of all patients considered for CEA are evaluated with duplex scanning; 82% with arteriography. While the majority of surgeons typically obtain both a duplex scan and an arteriogram, 70% have performed CEA without a preoperative arteriogram. Brain imaging studies (CT or MRI) are obtained in 26% and MR angiograms in 10% of cases. Seventy-five percent of the surgeons agreed with the statement that CEA without preoperative arteriography is an acceptable practice if appropriate indications for surgery are present. Furthermore, one third believed that CEA without a preoperative arteriogram is generally acceptable (acceptable more than half the time). Respondents were stratified by surgical experience time in practice and practice type. No significant differences in responses were found, suggesting the acceptance of CEA without preoperative arteriography is broad-based. This survey demonstrates changing attitudes among practicing vascular surgeons regarding the necessity for routine arteriography prior to CEA. Carotid endarterectomy on the basis of duplex scanning and clinical assessment should be considered an accepted alternative.

A systematic review of the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of carotid territory ischemic stroke ipsilateral to a recently symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. However, the benefit is limited by the risks of stroke and death associated with the operation. Although reported surgical risks vary enormously, there has been no systematic review of the published literature.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of mortality and the risk of stroke and/or death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in studies published since 1980.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies fulfilled our criteria. Overall mortality was 1.62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 1.9), and the risk of stroke and/or death was 5.64% (95% CI, 4.4 to 6.9). However, there was significant heterogeneity of risk of stroke and/or death (P < .001). The risk varied systematically with the methods and the authorship of the study. The risk of stroke and/or death was highest in studies in which patients were assessed by a neurologist after surgery (7.7%; 95% CI, 5.0 to 10.2) and lowest in studies with a single author affiliated with a department of surgery (2.3%; 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.7). After correcting for study methodology, there was no temporal trend in the risk of stroke and/or death between 1980 and 1995.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported risks of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis show significantly greater variability than would be expected by chance. However, much of this variability can be accounted for by differences in methodology and authorship. The 5.6% overall risk of stroke and/or death is consistent with present guidelines.

Extracranial arterial reconstruction for atheromatous stenotic disease

Risk factors for stroke and for carotid stenosis in the Japanese population are reviewed and the variations between rates of carotid endarterectomy in different populations discussed. The evolution of carotid plaques and the involvement of intraplaque hemorrhage in embolism and hemodynamic inadequacy in causing focal cerebral ischemic events are described. The indications for operation are presented together with an assessment of fitness for operation, with particular emphasis on the influence of heart disease on perioperative morbidity and late survival. Combined carotid and coronary reconstruction is carried out when severe disease of both systems is present (138 patients). The technique of carotid endarterectomy involves minimal dissection posterior to the common and internal carotid arteries to avoid vagal nerve injury. The pathology and symptoms of disease of the proximal great vessel together with techniques for revascularization are also presented.

Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland: practice between 1984 and 1992

Of 356 questionnaires on carotid endarterectomy sent to all vascular surgeons in Great Britain and Ireland likely to undertake this procedure, 326 (92 per cent) were returned. Of those who replied 131 (40 per cent) performed at least one carotid endarterectomy in 1992; 57 (44 per cent) of these carried out ten or fewer operations and 74 (56 per cent) more than ten. The 131 surgeons were collectively responsible for 2628 operations in 1992, twice as many as were undertaken in either 1984 or 1989, years for which similar survey data are available. This sharp rise in the number of operations was accounted for by increased activity on the part of experienced operators, rather than any rise in the number of 'occasional' carotid surgeons. In 1992, although the neurologist remained a major source of patient referral, general practitioners (and others) were also referring patients in large numbers direct to the vascular surgeon; this represents a change in practice compared with previous years. Many of the technical aspects surrounding carotid endarterectomy remained unchanged over the years surveyed (1984, 1989, 1992) but by 1992 duplex scanning, intra-arterial (but not intravenous) digital subtraction angiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography had become established as clinically useful techniques.