Kerin MJ, Murray J, Mulligan E, Kent P, Ennis J, Dowling M, Dervan P, Fitzpatrick JM, Gorey TF. Prospective evaluation of a composite scoring system for mammographically detected cytologically assessed impalpable breast abnormalities.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 1995;
21:360-3. [PMID:
7664898 DOI:
10.1016/s0748-7983(95)92318-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The aim of all breast screening programmes is a reduction in deaths from the disease. It is hoped that this can be achieved with minimal intervention in the patient cohort who do not have cancer. In this study we have assessed the efficacy of a combination of mammographic and cytological scoring systems in the evaluation of 208 women with screen-detected non-palpable breast lesions. All mammograms were scored 1-5 and those with a score of 3 or more required needle localization. A cytology score of 1 to 5 was generated for each patient according to a similar system and an aggregate score for each patient was achieved by the addition of the mammographic and cytology score. Ninety-three of the 208 patients had malignancy--the positive predictive value for mammography alone in this series was 45%. All 58 patients who had an aggregate score of 8 or greater had cancer. The 60 patients who had an aggregate score of 4 had benign disease on excision biopsy. We suggest that a 'wait and repeat mammogram' approach is appropriate in patients with grade 3 mammography and benign (grade 1) cytology. Patients with an intermediate aggregate score of 5-7 should have an excision biopsy and those with an aggregate score of 8 could have definitive surgery rather than excision biopsy. Application of this aggregate scoring technique would enhance the delivery of more appropriate surgery to a majority of patients with screen-detected breast abnormalities.
Collapse