Extracorporeal shock wave treatment of common bile duct stones: experience with two different lithotriptors at a single institution

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult common bile duct stones: a comparison between 2 different lithotripters in a large cohort of patients

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones is a safe and effective treatment strategy allowing for bile duct clearance in approximately 90% of patients with a low incidence of mild adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the CBD clearance rates achieved after ESWL performed with 2 different lithotripters (Siemens Lithostar Plus and Storz Modulith SLX-F2) in a large cohort of patients with difficult CBD stones.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

All of the consecutive patients who underwent ESWL because of difficult CBD stones between 1990 and 2012 were considered suitable for inclusion.

INTERVENTIONS

ESWL with Lithostar Plus or with Modulith SLX-F2.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

CBD clearance.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-two patients with difficult CBD stones were treated; 199 patients were treated with the Lithostar Plus and 193 patients with the Modulith SLX-F2. CBD clearance was achieved in 349 patients (89.0%) with no significant difference between the patients treated with Lithostar Plus and those treated with Modulith SLX-F2 (90.5% vs 87.6%; P = .45). Patients treated with Modulith SLX-F2 underwent a significantly lower number of ESWL sessions (3 [range, 2 to 4] vs 3 [range, 2 to 4]; P = .0015), had a lower incidence of ESWL-related adverse events (5.2% vs 13.6%; P = .009), and never required opioid analgesia (P < .001).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

The Modulith SLX-F2 allows the same clearance rate as the Lithostar Plus but has a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and requires fewer ESWL sessions.

Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones

Endoscopy is widely accepted as the first treatment option in the management of bile duct stones. In this review we focus on the alternative endoscopic modalities for the management of difficult common bile duct stones. Most biliary stones can be removed with an extraction balloon, extraction basket or mechanical lithotripsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy or mechanical lithotripsy has been shown to be effective for management of difficult to remove bile duct stones in selected patients. Ductal clearance can be safely achieved with peroral cholangioscopy guided laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy in most cases where other endoscopic treatment modalities have failed. Biliary stenting may be an alternative treatment option for frail and elderly patients or those with serious co morbidities.

Italian consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis

This paper gives practical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Statements have been elaborated by working teams of experts, by searching for and analysing the literature, and submitted to a consensus process by using a Delphi modified procedure. The statements report recommendations on clinical and nutritional approach, assessment of pancreatic function, treatment of exocrine pancreatic failure and of secondary diabetes, treatment of pain and prevention of painful relapses. Moreover, the role of endoscopy in approaching pancreatic pain, pancreatic stones, duct narrowing and dilation, and complications was considered. Recommendations for most appropriate use of various imaging techniques and of ultrasound endoscopy are reported. Finally, a group of recommendations are addressed to the surgical treatment, with definition of right indications, timing, most appropriate procedures and techniques in different clinical conditions and targets, and clinical and functional outcomes following surgery.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large difficult common bile duct stones: efficacy and analysis of factors that favor stone fragmentation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Difficult common bile duct stones (CBD) are those not amenable to extraction by the standard technique of sphincterotomy followed by use of a Dormia basket or balloon. The role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in stone fragmentation and clearance of difficult CBD stones and the factors which favor fragmentation were prospectively evaluated in the present study.

METHODS

A total of 283 patients with large CBD stones were subjected to ESWL. A maximum of 5000 shocks was delivered per session until CBD stones were fragmented to less than 5 mm diameter. CBD was cleared by biliary endotherapy using a basket or balloon. Outcome was assessed by CBD clearance.

RESULTS

Total CBD clearance was achieved in 239 patients (84.4%) and partial CBD clearance in 35 patients (12.3%). Three or fewer sessions of ESWL were required in 74.6% of patients. Minor complications were seen in 45 patients (15.9%). There was no procedure-related mortality. Epidural anesthesia, shock frequency of 90/min, radiolucent calculi and presence of fluid around the calculus helped in better fragmentation.

CONCLUSION

A high success rate, negligible complications and non-invasive nature of the procedure make ESWL a useful tool for removing large CBD stones.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of common bile duct stones without preliminary endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is now a standard procedure for common bile duct stones. It is less invasive than surgical treatment and is well established, but complications such as bleeding and perforation occasionally occur. We have been investigating the safest and most useful method of preserving the papilla of Vater. In the present study we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for common bile duct stones without preliminary EST.

METHODS

From May 1992 to May 1995 ESWL was performed on 52 patients with common bile duct stones at our hospital. In all 52 patients a nasobiliary tube was inserted endoscopically, without preliminary EST, and ESWL was performed.

RESULTS

Fragmentation and subsequent complete clearance of stones was achieved in 35 patients (67.3%), and no additional treatment was necessary. In 17 patients (25.0%) fragmentation was not achieved, so EST and endoscopic extraction were performed, and the stones were cleared completely. None of the patients had major complications with clinical sequelae. We compared the completely cleared group and the failed group, to assess the influence of various factors. Our findings indicated that smaller, 'floating' stones responded more favorably to ESWL. When the largest stone was < 15 mm in diameter and the stone index (diameter of common bile duct/diameter of stone) was > 1.0, the success rate was very high 25 of 27 = 92.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This treatment offers several advantages because it is less invasive, has few complications, and can preserve the papilla of Vater. This method is especially suitable for patients with smaller, floating stones.

Current role of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in surgery

In urology the introduction of extracorporeal shockwave therapy brought a revolutionary change to the management of urinary calculi. This inspired the introduction of shockwave therapy in several fields of surgery; it has been applied as a potential alternative to several operative procedures but is still experimental. So far, the major application of shockwave therapy has been lithotripsy of stones in the gallbladder, common bile duct, pancreatic duct and salivary gland ducts. Other applications are in the non-operative management of bone healing disturbances and in the inhibition of tumour growth. Steps towards selective thrombus ablation and pretreatment of heavily calcified arteries have also been made. In this review, the applications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in several areas of surgery are discussed. It is concluded that, for selected patients, shockwave treatment may serve as a useful addition to the surgical armamentarium.

Role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery

Since the early 1980s extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has partially replaced major operative procedures in various fields of surgery. In the interest of the patient, it is important to determine the exact role of ESWL in surgery. Comparing our own prospectively followed patients with other patient series, we have tried to assess this role. We treated 133 patients with cholecystolithiasis, 80 patients with choledocholithiasis, and 17 patients with pancreatic stones using a second-generation lithotriptor, the Siemens Lithostar (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The results suggest a limited role of ESWL for cholecystolithiasis, in which it is reserved for patients with high operative risk and patients who reject an operation. For choledocholithiasis ESWL seems to become an integral part of the treatment in the elderly patient in whom endoscopic stone removal proved impossible. Finally, ESWL could become a first option for the treatment of intractable pain in patients with chronic calcifying pancreatitis.

Lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary stones

Noninvasive or minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of biliary stones have been significantly advanced in the past two decades. The least invasive, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, continues to be used successfully, not only at its earliest reported site of use in Munich, Germany, but also in numerous other centers in the world. Lithotriptors that utilize a spark gap electrode or other sources of energy to generate sound waves and imaging by radiographic and ultrasonographic targeting of stones have proved to be effective in fragmenting biliary stones (90% to 95%) that are too large or otherwise inaccessible to removal by endoscopic papillotomy. Stone clearance (53% to 90%) may require successive treatments and the removal of debris by transendoscopic or surgical means. The mortality is low (0.5%), and the post-treatment course is relatively uncomplicated in an elderly, high-risk group of patients.

Non-surgical management of bile duct stones refractory to routine endoscopic measures

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and percutaneous approaches to the biliary tract have revolutionized the treatment of bile duct stones. Both the endoscopic and transhepatic approaches are less invasive than open surgery. This is an advantage for the mostly elderly and frail patients with common bile duct stones. Other patients with intrahepatic stones, e.g. young patients with oriental lithiasis, may also profit from the non-surgical approach. In this latter group it is often difficult for the surgeon to obtain access to the stone-bearing bile ducts. Due to the anatomical situation, size or impaction of stones the non-surgical approach, including mechanical disintegration, may primarily fail. Several techniques such as intracorporeal lithotripsy using electrohydraulic probes or laser light, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or direct contact dissolution are now available and often allow complete clearance of the bile ducts. If a kidney lithotripter with radiographic devices is available, it should be used after an attempt at mechanical lithotripsy has failed (Figure 1). According to the literature, experience with this method is greater than with any other 'third-step approach'. The procedure is simple, relatively safe and successful in approximately 80% of patients. However, in at least one third of patients, several sessions have to be performed and further endoscopy is frequently required for extraction of fragments. Intracorporeal techniques may become the procedure of choice in the future, at least in patients with common bile duct stones. At the moment, however, the different devices are still not fully developed and too susceptible to damage. A further major drawback, especially with high-energy electrohydraulic intracorporeal lithotripsy, is the danger of bile duct injury or even perforation, so that most procedures must be performed under optical control. The use of contact dissolution cannot generally be recommended. Treatment with mono-octanoin or modified mono-octanoin solvents takes too long, is often not successful and has a high rate of side-effects. MTBE may shorten the procedure considerably, but is suitable only for cholesterol stones, and the danger of spill-over into the intestine with absorption and systemic side-effects has to be weighed against the probability of success.