Flush aortic tie versus selective preservation of the ascending left colic artery in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma

Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic mid-low rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study from a single-center

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is the main surgical approach for treating rectal cancer, but there is still no clear consensus on the issue of low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during the procedure. Robotic surgery has been shown to have certain advantages over laparoscopic surgery in multiple studies, but further research is needed to better understand the outcomes of robotic surgery in the context of low ligation procedures. In this study, we included 1590 patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Among them, 942 patients underwent low ligation surgery (LL), divided into 138 in the robotic group and 804 in the laparoscopic group. The high ligation surgery (HL) group consisted of 648 patients. The results of LL vs HL showed that the LL group had faster bowel movement recovery (P = 0.003), lower anastomotic leak rate (P = 0.032), and lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). The results of Rob-LL vs Lap-LL showed that the Rob-LL group had longer operative time (P < 0.001), less blood loss (P = 0.001), more lymph nodes retrieved (P = 0.045), and lower Wexner score at 2 weeks postoperatively (P = 0.029). The concept of low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is a promising surgical approach that can accelerate the patient's functional recovery. When combined with robotic technology, it may offer more benefits than laparoscopic techniques.

Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Level in Rectal Cancer Surgery beyond Conventions: A Review

Within the intricate field of rectal cancer surgery, the contentious debate over the optimal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) persists as an ongoing discussion, influencing surgical approaches and patient outcomes. This narrative review incorporates historical perspectives, technical considerations, and functional as well as oncological outcomes, addressing key questions related to anastomotic leakage risks, genitourinary function, and oncological concerns, providing a more critical understanding of the well-known inconclusive evidence. Beyond the dichotomy of high versus low tie, it navigates the complexities of colorectal cancer surgery with a fresh perspective, posing a transformative question: "Is low tie ligation truly reproducible?" Considering a multidimensional approach that enhances patient outcomes by integrating the surgeon, patient, technique, and technology, instead of a rigid and categorical statement, we argued that a balanced response to this challenging question may require compromise.

Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the current scientific evidence regarding the impact of the level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation on post-operative and oncological outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to 06 September 2022. Included were RCTs that compared patients who underwent high (HL) vs. anterior (LL) IMA ligation for resection of rectal cancer. The literature search was performed on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science without any language restrictions. The primary endpoint was overall anastomotic leakage (AL). Secondary endpoints were oncological outcomes, intraoperative complications, urogenital functional outcomes, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (1331 patients) were included. The overall rate of AL was lower in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.96). The overall number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (MD 0.93, 95% CI - 2.21 to 0.34). The number of lymph nodes harvested was assessed in 256 patients, and all had a laparoscopic procedure. The number of lymph nodes was higher when LL was associated with lymphadenectomy of the vascular root than when IMA was ligated at its origin, but there the difference was not statistically significant (MD - 0.37, 95% CI - 1.00 to 0.26). Overall survival at 5 years was slightly better in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05). Disease-free survival at 5 years was higher in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.04).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support HL or LL according to results in terms of AL or oncologic outcome. Moreover, there is not enough evidence to determine the impact of the level of IMA ligation on functional outcomes. The level of IMA ligation should be chosen case by case based on expected functional and oncological outcomes.

Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA).

METHOD

We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies regarding high- or modified low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

RESULTS

Of 641 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies with 3050 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (WMD -2.63, 95% CI -5.69 to 0.43; P = .09), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD -0.35, 95% CI -1.60 to 0.20; P = .50), the number of apical lymph node yield (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.13; P = .24), the number of apical lymph node metastasis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.45; P = .40), rate of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09; P = .513), rate of urinary dysfunction (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.74; P = .34), rate of recurrence and metastasis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61; P = .64), 5-year survival rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18; P = .42). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (WMD -9.92, 95% CI -15.49 to -5.84; P = .0005), rate of diverting stom (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92; P = .02), rate of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.673, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.62; P < .00001), time to first flatus (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48; P = .002), time of hospitalization (WMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.15; P = .01) between the 2 surgical techniques.

COCLUSION

The available evidence suggests that preserving the left colic artery is a safe, effective technique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. nique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer.

High Versus Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of high ligation (HL) versus low ligation (LL) in colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (trial registries and ClinicalTrials.gov), other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, with no restrictions on the language or publication status, up until 10 March 2021. We included all parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and considered cluster RCTs for inclusion. The risk of bias domains were "low risk," "high risk," or "unclear risk." We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted the results according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used the GRADE guidelines to rate the certainty of evidence (CoE) of the randomized controlled trials. Results: We found 12 studies (24 articles) from our search. We were very uncertain about the effects of HL on overall mortality, disease recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, postoperative mortality, and anastomotic leakage (very low CoE). There may be little to no difference between HL and LL in postoperative complications (low CoE). For short-term follow-up (within 6 months), HL may reduce defecatory function (constipation; low CoE). While HL and LL may have similar effects on sexual function in men, HL may reduce female sexual function compared with LL (low CoE). For long-term follow-up (beyond 6 months), HL may reduce defecatory function (constipation; low CoE). There were discrepancies in the effects regarding urinary dysfunction according to which questionnaire was used in the studies. HL may reduce male and female sexual function (low CoE). Conclusions: We are very uncertain about the effects of HL on survival outcomes, and there is no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between HL and LL. More rigorous RCTs are necessary to evaluate the effect of HL and LL on functional outcomes.

Low Ligation Plus High Dissection Versus High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is superior in surgery for rectal and sigmoid colon cancers remains controversial. Although several meta-analyses have been conducted, the level of lymph node clearance was poorly defined. We performed a meta-analysis comparing high and low ligation of the IMA for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers, with emphasis on high dissection of the lymph node at the IMA root in all the included studies.

Methods

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify relevant articles published until 2020. The patient’s perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software RevMan version 5.4.

Results

A total of 17 studies, including four randomized controlled trials, published between 2011 and 2020 were selected. In total, 1,846 patients received low ligation of the IMA plus high dissection of lymph nodes (LL+HD), and 2,648 patients received high ligation of the IMA (HL). LL+HD was associated with low incidence of anastomotic leakage (p < 0.001), borderline long operative time (p = 0.06), and less yields of total lymph nodes (p = 0.03) but equivalent IMA root lymph nodes (p = 0.07); moreover, LL+HD exhibited non-inferior long-term oncological outcomes.

Conclusion

In comparison with HL, LL+HD was an effective and safe oncological procedure for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers. Therefore, to ligate the IMA below the level of the left colic artery with D3 high dissection for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers might be suggested once the surgeons are familiar with this technique.

Systematic Review Registration

INPLASY.com, identifier 202190029.

Technical considerations depending on the level of vascular ligation in laparoscopic rectal resection

AIM

In addition to ischemia there is also anastomotic ends tension proven to be a risk factor for anastomotic leak. HT vascular ligation is accepted as a rule, in attempt to achieve tension-free anastomosis. LT is a preferred option, based on the more accurate preservation of proximal intestinal segment microperfusion and lower risk of damage to the hypogastric plexus. The aim of this study is evaluation of comparative indicators in high tie (HT) and low tie (LT) laparoscopic rectal resections.

METHODS

A prospective nonrandomized comparative cohort study of patients in our department with cancer of the rectum in clinical stage I-III, operated on in laparoscopic approach over a 6-years period.

RESULTS

For the period 2015-2020, a number of 208 laparoscopic surgeries have been done for rectal cancer. Patients were divided into three groups-group A with HT vascular ligation 116 pts. (69%), group B-53 pts. (25%), underwent low ligation-LT and group C-39pts. (19%) low tie plus lymph node dissection of the apical LN group (LT-appic LND). The distribution was made without randomization, based on the operators' expertise. Anastomotic leaks were 3.8% in group A, 3.0% in group B and 2.9% in group C (p > 0.05) with no significance difference. There is no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes obtained in group A and group B, while in group C the number of the harvested lymph nodes was higher (p < 0.05). The indicators for intestinal / defecation dysfunction, as well as for urinary/sexual dysfunction, according to our data, are significantly more favorable in patients with LT, in contrast to the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

HT vascular ligation attempts to achieve tension-free anastomosis and more harvested lymph nodes. However, LT could be a preferred option, based on the lack of significant evidence for a difference in specific oncological survival and due to more accurate preservation of proximal intestinal segment microperfusion to prevent anastomosis dehiscence, also for its lower risk of damage to the hypogastric plexus. Splenic flexure mobilization provides elongation of the proximal intestinal segment, but has no proven effect on anastomotic leakage incidence. It increases surgical duration and is in fact necessary in up to 30% of the cases. At the present moment there is no precise data whether LT has an advantage in terms of prevention of autonomic nervous and urogenital dysfunction. New prospective randomized and highly probative studies are needed to standardize the procedures in specific clinical situations.

Clinical and oncological outcomes of the low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with robotic surgery in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background/aim

The aim of this study is to compare clinical and oncologic outcomes of the high and low ligation techniques of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in rectal cancer patients treated with robotic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, 77 patients with T3/T4-node negative rectal cancer with tumor penetration through the muscle wall (Stage 2) or node positive disease without distant metastases (Stage 3) who were treated electively with robotic surgical resection following nCRT at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2018 were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups (38 patients were included in the low ligation group and 39 patients in the high ligation group).

Results

There was no statistical difference between the high ligation group and low ligation group in univariate analysis for 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (OR = 1.146; 95% CI = 0.274 to 4.797; P = 0.950, and OR = 1.141; 95% CI = 0.564 to 2.308; P = 0.713, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the mean number of harvested lymph nodes and mean number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.980 and P = 0.124, respectively). Anastomosis stricture was observed significantly less frequently in the low ligation group versus the high ligation group (2.6% and 28.2%, respectively) (P = 0.002). Also, the difference for the median length of hospital stay for the high and low ligation groups was statistically significant in favor of the low ligation group (P = 0.011).

Conclusion

In robotic rectal surgery, the low ligation technique of the IMA can reduce the rate of anastomosis stricture and provide similar oncological results as the high ligation technique.

Preservation of the Arterial Arc Formed by Left Colic Artery, Proximal Inferior Mesenteric Artery, and the First Branch of Sigmoid Arteries in Anus Saving Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Low anterior, ultralow anterior, and intersphincteric resection are conventional, elective anus-sparing techniques for low rectal cancer, and good prognosis depends on a good blood supply and tension-free anastomosis.

AIM

The goal is to assess the effect of preserving the arc formed by the left colic and proximal inferior mesenteric arteries (IMAs), and first branch of the sigmoid arteries on the anastomotic blood supply, tension, and leakage rate in anus-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer.

METHOD

From 2011 to 2020, a patient with low rectal cancer resection was distributed into the ligation group (42 cases with inferior mesenteric artery ligation) and the preservation group (61 cases with preservation of the left colic and proximal IMAs and first branch of the sigmoid artery).

RESULTS

We evaluated patient characteristics, operative results, morbidity, and postoperative follow-up results. There were comparable outcomes between ligation and preservation groups in relations to the number of patients in each operative procedure, duration of surgery, operative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and the number of patients with protective stoma (P >.05). In postoperative morbidity, there were similar outcomes between ligation and preservation groups in terms of anastomotic subclinical dehiscence, bleeding and stricture, and urinary retention (P >.05). There were significant differences in anastomotic leakage and intra-abdominal abscess (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Preservation of the arterial arc formed by left colic artery, proximal IMA, and the first branch of sigmoid arteries with apical lymph node dissection could increase anastomotic blood supply, reduce anastomotic tension, and leakage rate in anus-saving treatment of low rectal cancer.

Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing High and Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite ongoing debates, there is still no consensus regarding where to divide the inferior mesenteric artery for oncological reasons in rectal cancer: at its origin from the aorta (high ligation) or distal to the origin of the left colic artery (low ligation).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ISRCTN Register were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

andomized controlled trials investigating outcomes of curative anterior resection in patients with cancer of the rectum were included.

INTERVENTIONS

High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery was compared with low ligation technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured the total number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to open surgery, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Analysis of 1102 patients from 8 trials suggested no difference between high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in terms of total number of lymph nodes harvested (mean difference = -0.87; p = 0.26), anastomotic leak (OR = 1.39; p = 0.15), postoperative complications (OR = 1.39; p = 0.78), postoperative mortality (risk difference = -0.00; p = 0.48), operative time (mean difference = -1.99; p = 0.79), intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = -2.28; p = 0.77), conversion to open surgery (risk difference = 0.01; p = 0.48), 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.76; p = 0.32), 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.88; p = 0.58), overall survival at maximum follow up (OR = 0.80; p = 0.43), and disease-free survival at maximum follow-up (OR = 0.83; p = 0.35).

LIMITATIONS

Limited data were available on functional and long-term survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference between high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in terms of oncological outcomes or postoperative morbidity and mortality. The available evidence is subject to potential confounding by the use of neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, disease stage, location of tumor, and use of protective stoma. Functional outcomes including postoperative bowel, urinary and sexual function, and long-term survival outcomes should be the outcome of study in future trials. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019148626.

Evaluation of characteristics of left-sided colorectal perfusion in elderly patients by angiography

BACKGROUND

Handling of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and maintaining anastomotic perfusion are important in radical resection of left-sided colorectal cancer. However, the branching of this artery and the drainage patterns of this vein vary among individuals, and the characteristics and perfusion region of this artery in elderly patients remain unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the characteristics and perfusion region of the IMA in elderly patients using angiography.

METHODS

We enrolled 154 patients (> 65 years old) who underwent digital subtraction angiography of the IMA. The characteristics, bifurcation, and distribution of the IMA and termination of the anastomotic perfusion of the left colon and rectum were examined using digital subtraction angiography. Collateral arterial arches and the IMA hemoperfusion region were also recorded. Perfusion regions were cross-referenced with clinical and anatomical features by the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 154 patients, 25 (16.2%) had IMA lesions. The left colic artery arose independently from the IMA in 44.2% of patients, shared a trunk with the sigmoid artery in 35.1%, shared an opening with the sigmoid and superior rectal arteries in 16.9%, and was absent in 5.1%. The IMA perfusion region stopped at the splenic flexure in 50 (32.5%) patients. The collateral circulation existed in the colonic perfusion region, including the marginal artery (Drummond’s artery), the ascending branch of the left colonic artery to supply the transverse colon, and the arc of Riolan with a frequency of 100%, 22.7%, and 1.9%, respectively. The IMA perfusion region was independently associated with the comorbidity of atherosclerosis, IMA atherosclerotic lesion, branching pattern, collateral circulation, and marginal artery integrity.

CONCLUSION

The IMA and its branches are prone to arteriosclerosis, and IMA perfusion may be interrupted at the splenic flexure in elderly patients. The applicability and precision of preoperative angiography for evaluating the IMA branching and perfusion patterns could facilitate geriatric laparoscopic left-sided colorectal cancer surgery with suspicion of poor IMA perfusion.

High versus low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Laparoscopic radical resection is standard treatment for resectable rectal cancer. However, whether high or low inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation should be performed remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study compared the advantages and disadvantages of low vs high IMA ligation in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Rectal cancer patients (n = 322) undergoing total mesorectal excision at our institution in 2010 to 17 were enrolled; 174 underwent high IMA ligation group and 148 low IMA ligation (LIMAL group). Baseline data on patients, operative indices, economic indices, pathology findings, perioperative complications, and survival in the 2 groups were analyzed retrospectively.The low IMA ligation group had significantly higher anus retention ratio (P = .022), shorter hospital stay (P = .025), lower medical expenses (P = .032), fewer cases of anastomotic leakage (P = .023) and anastomotic stricture (P < .001), and lower incidence of postoperative genitourinary dysfunction (P = .003). Cox regression analysis indicated that local recurrence, distant metastasis, tumor differentiation, and tumor-node-metastasis stage were independently associated with survival.Low ligation of the IMA during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer appears to be associated with a lower risks for anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and genitourinary dysfunction, a shorter hospital stay, and lower costs. In contrast, the rate of lymph node harvest, tumor recurrence rate, metastasis, or mortality was not found to be related with the level of IMA ligation.

Usefulness of blood flow evaluation by indocyanine green fluorescence system in laparoscopic anterior resection

BACKGROUND

One of the major cause of anastomotic leakage (AL) in anterior resection of the rectum is insufficient blood flow of the remnant colon. The indocyanine green fluorescence system (ICG-FS) can visualize the blood flow of organs intra-operatively. The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of ICG-FS for evaluating the blood flow of the remnant colon in laparoscopic anterior resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rectal cancer patients (n=24) who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection were included in this study. After resection of the rectum, 7.5mg of ICG was administered intravenously, and the blood flow of the oral stump was evaluated by the ICG-FS. The relationship between the fluorescence time (FT) of the oral stump and AL was investigated retrospectively.

RESULT

Two of twenty-four patients (8.3%) suffered AL. The FT of these two cases were over 60 seconds. In the case with the FT was over 80 seconds, we performed additional resection of the late fluorescence portion of the remnant colon and could avoid AL. In patients whose FT was under 60 seconds, no patients suffered AL.

CONCLUSION

ICG-FS may be useful for evaluating the blood flow of the remnant colon to avoid AL in laparoscopic anterior resection. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 65-69, February, 2019.

Operative safety and oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer based on the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation: a stratified analysis of a large Korean cohort

Purpose

To compare high and low inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation in a large number of patients, and investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study compared outcomes between high IMA ligation and low IMA ligation with dissection of lymph nodes (LNs) around the IMA origin. A total of 1,213 patients underwent elective low anterior resection with double-stapling anastomosis for stage I-III rectal cancer located ≥6 cm from the anal verge (835 patients underwent IMA ligation at the IMA origin; 378 patients underwent IMA ligation directly distal to the root of the left colic artery along with dissection of LNs around the IMA origin).

Results

There was no difference in anastomotic leakage rate between groups. The 2 groups did not significantly differ in intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, total number of harvested LNs, and metastatic IMA LNs. However, more metastatic LNs were harvested in the high-tie than in the low-tie group (1.3 ± 2.9 vs. 0.8 ± 1.9, P = 0.002), and the incidence of positive pathologic nodal status was higher in the high-tie group (37.9% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.001). The 5-year local recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival rates were similar between groups, as were the 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates.

Conclusion

Low IMA ligation with dissection of LNs around the IMA origin showed no differences in anastomotic leakage rate compared with high IMA ligation, without affecting oncologic outcomes. High IMA ligation did not seem to increase the number of total harvested LNs, whereas the ratio of metastatic apical LNs were similar between groups.

Lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare high inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation (HL) with low IMA ligation (LL) for the treatment of colorectal cancer and to evaluate the lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of these surgeries.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were systematically searched for relevant articles that compared HL and LL for sigmoid or rectal cancer. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and the weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 30 studies were included in this analysis. There were significantly higher odds of anastomotic leakage and urethral dysfunction in patients treated with HL compared to those treated with LL (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.55; OR = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.39 to 4.33, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the total number of harvested lymph nodes, the number of harvested lymph nodes around root of the IMA, local recurrence rate, and operation time. Further, no statistically significant group differences in 5-year overall survival rates and 5-year disease-free survival rates were detected among all patients nor among subgroups of stage II patients and stage III patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LL can achieve equivalent lymph node yield to HL, and both procedures have similar survival benefits. However, LL is associated with a lower incidence of leakage and urethral dysfunction. Thus, LL is recommended for colorectal cancer surgery.

Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in colorectal cancer surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether or not preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) for colorectal cancer surgery. The objective of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the current scientific evidence of LCA non-preservation versus LCA preservation in colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and reference without limits. Quality of studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. Effective sizes were pooled under a random- or fixed-effects model. The funnel plot was used to assess the publication bias. The outcomes of interest were oncologic consideration including the number of apical lymph nodes, overall recurrence, 5-years overall survival, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS); safety consideration including overall 30-day postoperative morbidity and overall 30-day postoperative mortality; anatomic consideration including anastomotic circulation, anastomotic leakage, urogenital, and defaecatory dysfunction.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies including 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 cohort studies with a total of 8456 patients (4058 patients underwent LCA non-preservation surgery vs 4398 patients underwent LCA preservation surgery) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The preservation of LCA was associated with significantly less anastomotic leakage (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.48, P = .03). In term of sexual dysfunction, urinary retention, the number of apical lymph nodes, and long-term oncologic outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LCA non-preservation and LCA preservation group. It was hard to draw definitive conclusions on other outcomes including operation time, blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, and perioperative morbidity and mortality for insufficient data and highly significant heterogeneity among studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled data provided evidence to support the LCA preservation preferred over LCA non-preservation in anastomotic leakage. Future more large-volume, well-designed RCTs with extensive follow-up are needed to draw a definitive conclusion on this dilemma.

The Oncologic Outcomes of Inferior Mesenteric Artery-Preserving Laparoscopic Lymph Node Dissection for Upper-Rectal or Sigmoid Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard procedure of lymph node (LN) dissection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer remains controversial. Many laparoscopic surgeons cut the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at the root; however, this may cause bowel ischemia around the site of anastomosis. We performed D3 or D2 LN dissection with the preservation of the IMA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of IMA-preserving LN dissection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 142 consecutive patients with upper-rectal or sigmoid colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic LN dissection with the preservation of the IMA. The number of LNs dissected and the overall and disease-free survival rates were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic D3 (n = 92) or D2 (n = 50) LN dissection were performed with the preservation of the IMA. The left colic artery was preserved in all cases, the superior rectal artery was also preserved in 30 cases. The mean number of LNs dissected was 19.6 in the D3 group and 12.9 in the D2 group. The median operative time was 230 minutes, and the median volume of blood loss was 17 mL. There was no treatment-related mortality. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rates of the stage I, II, and III patients were 93%, 83%, and 74%, respectively. No patients developed LN recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery with IMA-preserving LN dissection is an oncologically acceptable treatment strategy in patients with upper-rectal or sigmoid colon cancer.

High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The ideal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during curative resection of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of high ligation and low ligation of the IMA on anastomotic leakage, overall morbidity, postoperative mortality, and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and BioMed Central databases were searched to identify relevant articles published from May 1953 to March 2018. A total of 18 articles (14 non-randomized studies and 4 randomized clinical trials) were identified. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for analysis of data. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), with 95% CI, were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 5917 patients included in this meta-analysis, 3652 patients underwent low ligation of the IMA and 2265 patients underwent high ligation of the IMA. Anastomotic leakage rate was 9.8% in high ligation patients vs. 7.0% in low ligation patients; the risk of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in high ligation patients (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10-1.62; P = 0.004). What is more, overall morbidity was also significantly higher in high ligation patients (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.68; P = 0.05). Postoperative mortality, number of harvested lymph nodes, overall recurrence rate, and 5-year survival rate did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Low ligation of the IMA during curative resection of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer appears to be associated with lower risk of anastomotic leakage and overall morbidity. However, there was no significant advantage of low ligation over high ligation of IMA in terms of postoperative mortality, the number of harvested lymph nodes, overall recurrence rate, or 5-year survival rate.

Feasibility and oncologic safety of low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery with D3 dissection in cT3N0M0 sigmoid colon cancer

Purpose

There is no standard consensus for the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery during radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer. Especially, there is little research about low ligation combined with D3 dissection. The study was performed to compare feasibility and oncologic safety between low ligation with D3 dissection to high ligation in intermediately advanced sigmoid colon cancer.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2013, 134 patients who underwent radical surgery for cT3N0M0 sigmoid colon cancer were evaluated retrospectively. Clinicopathologic factors and oncologic outcomes of high ligation (HL, n = 51) and low ligation (LL, n = 83) groups were compared.

Results

The mean operative time was significantly shorter in LL, and there was no difference in complications, distal margin or number of retrieved lymph node. The tumor size was significantly larger in HL, but there was no difference in number of metastatic lymph node, pT or pN stage. There was no difference in overall survival, disease-free survival, or local and systemic recurrence.

Conclusion

In cT3N0M0 sigmoid colon cancers, we suggest that low ligation with D3 dissection can be performed with feasibility and oncological safety.

Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA).

METHOD

We searched Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and PubMed databases for relevant articles published between 1962 and 2017. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were identified and included in the study. End-points evaluated included 5-year mortality, number of patients with retrieved positive metastatic lymph nodes (LN) at the root of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), number of retrieved LNs, morbidity, mortality, recurrence, bowel obstruction, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leakage, operation time, surgical site infection and postoperative bleed. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to analyze dichotomous data.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies including 6247 patients were identified for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that preserving the LCA was associated with reduced anastomotic leakage rate (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the 5-year mortality, number of retrieved LNs, number of patients with retrieved positive metastatic LNs at the root of IMA, morbidity, mortality, recurrence, bowel obstruction, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, surgical site infection and postoperative bleed.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with ligating the left colic artery, preserving the left colic artery seems to achieve comparable success with acceptable safety outcomes and we suggest to preserve the LCA in the sigmoid and rectal cancer surgeries. However, more multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of preserving the left colic artery in surgeries.

Low-tie IMA and selective D3 lymph node sampling in laparoscopic rectal resection for carcinoma rectum: comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes with the open technique

Background

Level of proximal lymphovascular ligation remains controversial in carcinoma rectum. High-tie inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) claims better lymph node clearance; low-tie IMA minimizes autonomic nerve injury (ANI) and ensures vascularity to anastomosis. Objective of this study is to compare postsurgical complications and oncological clearance in laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) and open rectal resection (ORR) for carcinoma rectum, with low-tie IMA and selective D3 lymphadenectomy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was done comparing LRR and ORR done with low-tie IMA for carcinoma rectum/rectosigmoid for significant differences (P<0.05) regarding postsurgical complications and histopathology parameters.

Results

A total of 118 patients; 48 in LRR group and 70 in ORR group were studied. They were comparable in age, site of lesion and clinical TNM (cTNM) stage. Comorbidities and symptoms requiring upfront surgery were more among ORR. 75% LRR and 55.3% ORR had neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT). Duration of surgery was longer in LRR. Clavien-Dindo grade >3 was similar in two groups. Histopathology characteristics were also comparable; including specimen length, lymph node yield, length of distal margin and pathologic TNM (pTNM) stage. Selective D3 lymphadenectomy was done in 37.5% LRR and 37.14% ORR. And 4.16% in LRR and 4.28% in ORR were had positive IMA root lymph nodes.

Conclusions

The post-surgical complications and oncological clearance of LRR done with low-tie IMA and selective D3 lymphadenectomy were found equivalent to ORR. Low-tie IMA without routine splenic flexure mobilisation had no technical issues regarding the anastomosis.

Optimum level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation for the left-sided colorectal cancer. Systematic review for high and low ligation continuum

OBJECTIVES

To compares the effectiveness and impact of high inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) versus low IMA ligation on 5-year survival, lymph node yield rates, and peri-operative morbidity and mortality. 

METHODS

The databases of Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), the Web of Science, EBSCO and MEDLINE were searched using MeSH terms 'colorectal cancer', 'inferior mesenteric artery', 'high ligation', 'low ligation', 'mesenteric lymph nodes', 'prognosis', and 'survival'. Only clinical studies were selected and review articles and meta-analysis were excluded. In cases of duplicate cohorts, only the latest article was included. Irrelevant articles and the articles on both right and left sided CRC were excluded. The finally selected studies were analysed for the defined end-point outcomes. 

RESULTS

The published data has shown that high IMA ligation improves the yield of harvested lymph node that allows accurate tumor staging and a more reliable estimation of prognosis. High ligation was not found to be positively correlated with increased anastomotic leakage or impaired genito-urinary function. However, high ligation demands advanced surgical expertise and longer operating time. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rates for both techniques. Some studies have reported fatal complications of high ligation such as proximal bowel necrosis.  

CONCLUSION

Although there is no consensus, this research signals the routine use of high ligation for left-sided CRC. However, the published fatal complications following high ligation and no significant difference in 5-year survival rates demand more studies to establishing a unified protocol.

Oncological Outcomes following Rectal Cancer Surgery with High or Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery

BACKGROUND

The level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation for anterior resection of rectal cancer has several considerations concerning oncological outcomes. The primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess bowel function between high and low ligation. This study was intended to clarify oncological outcome as the secondary endpoint.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess in a prospective RCT whether the ligation level of the IMA in rectal cancer influences oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Between February 2008 and December 2011, 100 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were randomized to perform either high or low ligation of the IMA. Oncological outcomes was the secondary endpoint of this RCT, whereas assessing bowel function was the primary endpoint. This RCT was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00701012).

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups in terms of clinical data except for tumor stage. There were more advanced-stage patients in the high ligation group (p = 0.046). There were no lymph node (LN) metastases in the root of the IMA in the high ligation group. The average number of harvested LNs for the high and low ligation groups was 16.7 and 14.9, respectively. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS), site of first recurrence, and overall survival (OS). When patients were in stage III, there was also no difference in DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ligation level of the IMA in rectal cancer may not influence oncological outcomes. However, further large-scale RCTs are needed to conclude this issue.

Colonic Necrosis Following Laparoscopic High Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature

We report a patient who experienced colonic necrosis after laparoscopic high anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer, and review the literature to evaluate the clinical features of colonic necrosis following surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer. A 76-year-old man with sigmoid colon cancer underwent laparoscopic high anterior resection. The operation included high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and end-to-end anastomosis using circular staples. Pathology findings revealed a pT4N2M0 lesion. Beginning on postoperative day (POD) 1, the patient experienced a high, spiking fever, and gradually developed leukocytosis and high inflammatory condition. The patient complained of abdominal distention, but had no signs of peritonitis. Abdominal computed tomography on POD4 showed wall thickness of the proximal colon from the anastomosis site and ascites with free air. An anastomotic leakage was suspected. Emergency laparotomy revealed a disrupted anastomosis without feces in the abdomen and a gangrenous 15 cm segment of the colon proximal to the anastomosis. The affected area of the colon was excised and Hartmann's procedure was performed. His postoperative period was uneventful. Our review of the literature demonstrates that elderly male patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary complications undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery with high ligation have high risk of postoperative colonic necrosis. We experienced colonic necrosis following laparoscopic high anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer and required immediate resection. Elderly male patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary complications undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery with high ligation should be carefully monitored for postoperative colonic necrosis.

Technical difficulties of left colic artery preservation during left colectomy for colon cancer

PURPOSE

Low-tie ligation in colorectal cancer surgery is associated with technical difficulties in left colic artery preservation. We aimed to evaluate and classify the anatomical and technical difficulties of left colic artery (LCA) preservation at its origin and along its route at the inferior border of the pancreas.

METHODS

A vascular reconstruction computed tomography prospective series of 113 patients was analyzed. The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) branching pattern according to Latarjet's classification (Type I, separate LCA origin, Type II, fan-shaped branching pattern) and the distances between the IMA and the LCA origins and between the LCA and the Inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) at the inferior border of the pancreas were measured.

RESULTS

The IMA branching pattern was Type I in 80 (71 %) patients and Type II in 33 (29 %) patients. The IMA-LCA distance was 39.8 ± 12.2 mm. The LCA-IMV distance at the inferior border of the pancreas was 20.5 ± 21.7 mm. When classified based on this distance, 75 (66 %) patients were classified into the Near subgroup (<20 mm) (7.7 ± 4.1 mm) and 38 (34 %) into the Far subgroup (≥20 mm) (45.6 ± 20.4 mm, p < 0.001). A Type I subgroup F accounted for 27 % of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Left colic artery preservation is highly feasible at its origin in more than two-thirds of cases due to the separate origin. The addition of a high IMV ligation increases the risk of damage to the LCA at the inferior border of the pancreas because the distance to the IMV is less than 20 mm in two-thirds of cases.

Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

High morbidity rates related to anastomotic leakage and other factors restrict the application of laparoscopic rectal excision. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of left colonic artery (LCA) preservation on postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal excision.

METHODS

Data from 888 patients from 28 leading hospitals in Japan who underwent laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving resection of middle and low rectal cancers between 1994 and 2006 were analyzed. The effects of LCA preservation were analyzed among all anterior resection (AR) cases (n = 888) and among AR cases with radical lymph node excision (n = 411).

RESULTS

Among all AR cases, the tumor size, number of lymph nodes collected with evidence of metastasis, TNM factor, and TNM staging were smaller in the LCA preservation group. Regarding complications, the rate of anastomotic leak was significantly higher in the LCA non-preservation group among all AR cases, as well as among AR cases with radical lymph node excision. Nevertheless, there was no difference in survival rate between LCA preservation group and non-preservation group, as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the preservation of the LCA in laparoscopic AR for middle and low rectal cancer is associated with lower anastomotic leak rates.

Randomized clinical trial of defaecatory function after anterior resection for rectal cancer with high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery

Background

Defaecatory function is often poor after anterior resection. Denervation of the neorectum following high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is a possible cause of impaired defaecatory function. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to clarify whether the level of ligation of the IMA in patients with rectal cancer affects defaecatory function.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2011, patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were randomized to receive either high or low ligation of the IMA. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate the superiority of low ligation in terms of defaecatory function.

Results

One hundred patients were enrolled in the study; 51 were randomized to high ligation of the IMA and 49 to low ligation. There were no differences between the groups in terms of clinical data, except tumour stage, which was more advanced in the high-ligation group (P = 0·046). Nor were there any differences in defaecatory function, self-assessment of defaecation, Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale or continence score between groups at 3 months and 1 year. The number of harvested lymph nodes was similar. The rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage was 16 per cent in the high-ligation group and 10 per cent in the low-ligation group (P = 0·415).

Conclusion

The level of ligation of the IMA in patients with rectal cancer did not affect defaecatory function or the incidence of postoperative complications. Registration number: NCT00701012 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Marginal artery stump pressure in left colic artery-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the influence of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with apical lymph node dissection on the anastomotic blood supply, lymph node retrieval rate, operative time and anastomotic leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A total of 57 Chinese patients were randomly distributed into group A and group B and underwent radical resection of rectal cancer. Patients in group A underwent high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, and patients in group B underwent apical lymph node resection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery. The marginal artery stump pressure was measured after colon and artery reconstruction. Systemic pressure, distal colon length, operative time and lymph node retrieval rate were measured and recorded. The results were analysed and related to patient characteristics and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

The anastomotic blood supply negatively and linearly correlated with age and distal colon length and showed a positive linear correlation with systemic pressure. Patients who received low ligation with apical lymph node dissection had a better anastomotic blood supply than those who received high ligation. No differences were found in lymph node retrieval rate, operative time and anastomotic leakage rate. Anastomotic leakage was associated with a worse anastomotic blood supply.

CONCLUSIONS

Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection in rectal cancer treatment provides better anastomotic blood supply but is not associated with differences in node retrieval rate or operation time.

Anatomy of the inferior mesenteric artery evaluated using 3-dimensional CT angiography

BACKGROUND

The branching of the inferior mesenteric artery and vein varies among individuals. Three-dimensional CT angiography is a less invasive modality than traditional angiographic examination to assess the artery and vein.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to demonstrate the clinical applicability of CT angiography by evaluating bifurcations of the inferior mesenteric artery and the positional relationship between the inferior mesenteric artery and vein.

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study of patients undergoing preoperative CT angiography.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution in Japan.

PATIENTS

A total of 471 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative CT angiography from April 2012 to December 2013 were prospectively enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The branching pattern of the inferior mesenteric artery, the positional relationship between the inferior mesenteric artery and vein, and the associations between inferior mesenteric artery length and clinical features were evaluated.

RESULTS

The length of the inferior mesenteric artery varied widely, from 10.1 to 82.2 mm. In 41.2% patients, the left colic artery arose independently from the sigmoid artery, and in 44.7% of the patients, the left colic artery and sigmoid artery had a common trunk, whereas the left colic artery did not exist in 5.1%. The left colic artery was located lateral to the inferior mesenteric vein at the level of the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery in 73.0% of the patients. The incidence of a short inferior mesenteric artery was significantly increased in men with high BMIs (75.0%).

LIMITATIONS

Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed by the use of a single software, and angiographic examination was not performed. Therefore, accuracy and reliability of the 3-dimensional reconstruction could not be established for each modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3-dimensional CT angiography, preoperative understanding of the anatomic vascular variations can be easily obtained, which would help surgeons to safely perform laparoscopic surgery in the left-side colon and rectum.

Oncological impact of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with preservation of the left colic artery for advanced sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy around the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) with preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) remains a controversial approach. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This study analysed 211 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of advanced (≥T3) sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancers with D3 lymphadenectomy including 91 high ligations of the IMA (HL) and 120 low ligations with preservation of the LCA (LL) from January 1998 to December 2009.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in operative result between the groups. In stage II cancer, the overall survival rate (94.8% HL vs. 91.8% LL; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.8 to 0.68, p = 0.920) and disease-free survival (93.0% HL vs. 87.6% LL; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0.40, p = 0.540) did not differ significantly between the two groups. A similar tendency in overall survival was observed in patients with stage III cancer (88.3% HL vs. 86.9% LL; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.57, p = 0.989) and disease-free survival (71.4% HL vs. 69.8% LL; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.40, p = 0.637).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy around the IMA with preservation of the LCA resulted in acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with advanced sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer.

High Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Left Colonic and Rectal Cancers: Lymph Node Yield and Survival Benefit

During surgery for colorectal cancer, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) may be ligated either directly at the origin of the IMA from the aorta (high ligation) or at a point just below the origin of the left colic artery (low ligation). Sixty patients of left colonic and rectal cancer undergoing elective curative surgery in 2007 and 2008 were selected for this observational study. The resected lymph nodes were grouped into three levels: along the bowel wall (D1), along IMA below left colic (D2), and along the IMA and its root (D3). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 20.0. D2 level was involved pathologically in 20 (33.3 %) and D3 in six out of 44 (13.6 %) patients. The median nodal yield with high and low ligation were 33 and 25, respectively (p = 0.048). Median overall survival for high ligation was 62 months versus 42 months for low ligation (p = 0.190). High ligation of the IMA for rectal and left colonic cancers can improve lymph node yield, thus facilitating accurate tumor staging and thus better disease prognostication, but the survival benefit is not significant.

Risk factors and predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: reappraisal of the literature

Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication that can occur after colorectal surgery. Several risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been reported based on the findings of prospective and retrospective studies, including patient characteristics, the use of neoadjuvant therapy, the tumor location, intraoperative events, etc. However, as these risk factors affect each other, the statistical results have differed in each study. In addition, differences in surgical methods, including laparoscopy versus laparotomy or stapling anastomosis versus handsewn anastomosis, may influence the incidence of anastomotic leakage. This mini-review summarizes the results of reported papers to clarify the current evidence of risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic stricture or stenosis is a well-described complication of intestinal anastomosis. The incidence of stricture after colorectal anastomosis ranges from 0 to 30 %. The aim of this study was to identify possible factors related to postoperative colorectal anastomotic stricture and to indicate reoperative surgery outcomes.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, medical records were reviewed for patients who underwent surgery for colorectal anastomotic stricture at Cleveland Clinic Florida between January 2001 and December 2010. The main outcome measures were demographics, indications for initial surgery, body mass index, comorbidities, previous treatment, level of anastomosis, history of radiotherapy, and operative data for the reoperative surgery.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (15 males) were eligible for the study. Nine patients had a diagnosis of cancer, 7 of whom received radiotherapy. The initial surgeries were low anterior resection (n = 9; 47.4 %), high anterior resection (n = 9; 47.4 %), and sigmoidectomy (n = 1; 5.2 %). Six patients (31.6 %) had anastomotic leak after initial surgery. The majority of the patients (n = 17; 89.5 %) had an intact splenic flexure, inferior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric vein. In all patients, full mobilization of the splenic flexure and high ligation of the mesenteric vessels was performed. Seven patients (36 %) developed postoperative complications. Over a mean follow-up of 24.3 months, there was no recurrence of anastomotic stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

An intact splenic flexure and mesenteric vessels were the most prevalent in patients who underwent reoperation at our institution. Full mobilization of the splenic flexure, high ligation of the mesenteric vessels, anastomotic stricture resection, and re-anastomosis can be successfully performed with satisfactory outcomes.

High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery

In rectal cancer surgery, it is unclear whether the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) should be ligated as high as possible, at its origin, or low, below the origin of the left colic artery. We reviewed all relevant articles identified from MEDLINE databases and found that despite a trend of improved survival among patients who underwent high ligation, there is no conclusive evidence to support this. High ligation of the IMA is beneficial in that it allows for en bloc dissection of the node metastases at and around the origin of the IMA, while enabling anastomosis to be performed in the pelvis, without tension, at the time of low anterior resection. High ligation of the IMA does not represent a source of increased anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery and postoperative quality of life is improved by preserving the hypogastric nerve without compromising the radicality of the operation. More importantly, high ligation of the IMA improves node harvest, enabling accurate tumor staging. Although the prognosis of patients with node metastases at and around the origin of the IMA is poor, the survival rate of patients with rectal cancer may be improved by performing high ligation of the IMA combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed

Nowadays left colon and rectal cancer treatment has been well standardized in both open and laparoscopy. Nevertheless, the level of the ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), at the origin from the aorta (high tie) or below the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), is still debated. The objective of the systematic review is to evaluate the current scientific evidence of high versus low tie of the IMA in colorectal cancer surgery. The outcomes considered were overall 30-days postoperative morbidity, overall 30-days postoperative mortality, anastomotic leakage, 5-years survival rate, and overall recurrence rate. A total of 8.666 patients were included in our analysis, 4.281 forming the group undergoing high tie versus 4.385 patients undergoing low tie. Neither the high tie nor the low tie strategy showed an evidence based success, as no statistically significant differences were identified for all outcomes measured. Future high powered and well designed randomized clinical trials are needed to draw definitive conclusion on this dilemma.

Proximal bowel necrosis after high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery may jeopardize blood supply to the proximal bowel. We undertook this study to review the clinical features and outcomes of patients who developed proximal bowel necrosis after high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, and to assess the incidence and the risk factors for this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing high or low ligation for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer with a primary anastomosis between April 2004 and March 2009 was performed. Patient and tumor characteristics and the incidence of bowel necrosis were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and nine patients were included to the analysis. Six out of 302 patients (2.0%) with high ligation developed proximal bowel necrosis, while the remaining 107 patients with low ligation did not suffer from this complication. All patients who developed proximal bowel necrosis underwent secondary surgery with resection of necrotic bowel. The pathological examination of the resected specimen revealed mucosal to transmural ischemic necrosis without the evidence of vascular thrombosis or embolic occlusion. Univariate analysis revealed that advanced age, cerebrovascular disease, and hypertension were significantly associated with proximal bowel necrosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that cerebrovascular disease was an independent predictor of this complication. Of these six patients, two died from associated complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal bowel necrosis after high ligation is potentially fatal, and this report provides a warning in clinical settings where high ligation is indicated. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its distinct relationship with high ligation and to clarify whether low ligation would be a safeguard.

High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses

BACKGROUND

There is no demonstrated benefit of high-tie versus low-tie vascular transections in colorectal cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high-tie and low-tie vascular transections on colonic length after oncological sigmoidectomy, the theoretical feasibility of colorectal anastomosis at the sacral promontory, and straight or J-pouch coloanal anastomosis after rectal cancer surgery with total mesorectal excision.

DESIGN

This study is an anatomical study on surgical techniques.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a surgical anatomy research unit.

PATIENTS

Thirty fresh nonembalmed cadavers were randomly assigned to high-tie and low-tie groups (n = 15).

INTERVENTIONS

Oncological sigmoidectomy followed by total mesorectal excision was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The distances from the proximal colon limb to the lower edge of the pubis symphysis were recorded after each step of vascular division.

RESULTS

The successive mean gains in length in high-tie vs low-tie vascular transections were 2.9±1.2 cm vs 3.1 ± 1.8 cm (p = 0.83) after inferior mesenteric artery division, 8.1 ± 3.1 cm vs 2.5 ± 1.2 cm (p = 0.0016) after inferior mesenteric vein division at the lower part of the pancreas, 8.1 ± 3.8 cm vs 3.3 ± 1.7 cm (p = 0.0016) after sigmoidectomy. The mean cumulative gain in length was significantly higher in high-tie vs low-tie vascular transections (19.1 ± 3.8 vs 8.8 ± 2.9 cm, p = 0.00089). After secondary left colic artery division, the gain in length was similar to that of the high-tie group (17 ± 3.1 vs 19.1 ± 3.8 cm) (p = 0.089). Colorectal anastomosis at the promontory and straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomosis feasibility rates were 100% in the high-tie group, 87%, 53%, and 33% in the low-tie group, but 100%, 100%, and 87% after secondary left colic artery division.

LIMITATIONS

This anatomical study, based on cadavers rather than live patients, does not evaluate colon limb vascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

The gain in colonic length is 10 cm greater for high-tie vascular transections. With low-tie vascular transections, high inferior mesenteric vein division produced a small additional gain in length, and secondary left colic artery division produced the same length gain as high-tie vascular transections.

Distribution of lymph node metastases is an independent predictor of survival for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the prognostic significance of the distribution of lymph node metastases (LND) in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

The impact of the LND on survival in colorectal cancer is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 1205 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) from January 1997 to February 2008 were assigned to 4 groups based on LND: LND0, no lymph node metastases-615 patients (51.0%); LND1, metastases in the pericolic nodes-324 patients (26.9%); LND2, metastases in the intermediate nodes-172 patients (14.3%); and LND3, node metastases at the origin of the IMA-94 patients (7.8%).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with LND0, LND1, LND2, and LND3 were 83%, 63%, 52%, and 28%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with LND0, LND1, LND2, and LND3 were 83%, 54%, 43%, and 21%, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, LND was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival and disease-free survival. However, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was not inversely related to the LND. On a subset analysis that compared stage III disease with stage IV disease, the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 45% and 31% for the patients with stage IV disease compared with 40% and 32% for the patients with stage III, LND3 disease, respectively (P = 0.761 and 0.704). For the patients with pN1 tumors, the overall survival and disease-free survival did not differ significantly according to the LND (P = 0.471 and 0.347, respectively). However, for patients with pN2 tumors, the overall survival and disease-free survival curves among the LND groups significantly differed (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LND is an independent predictor of survival for colorectal cancer patients, but it does not predict local recurrence. The N categorization including LND may enhance the prognostic value of the TNM staging system for patients with node-positive sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.

Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery

AIM

Curative resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer includes "high tie" of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). However, IMA ligation compromises blood flow to the anastomosis, which may increase the leakage rate. Accordingly, some surgeons employ a technique of lymph node (LN) dissection around the IMA, preserving the IMA and left colic artery (LCA). The same technique was reported to need longer time in laparoscopic surgery due to technical difficulties. We present herein a simple and secure method of laparoscopic LN dissection around the IMA that allows preservation of the IMA and LCA, and report the operative results.

METHODS

Our method involves peeling off the vascular sheath from the IMA and dissection of the LN around the IMA together with the sheath. The feasibility of the technique was evaluated in 72 consecutive cases of laparoscopic resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer.

RESULTS

The IMA was ligated at its root in 27 cases (high tie, group A). Lymph nodes around the IMA were dissected with preservation of the IMA and LCA in 21 cases (group B). The root of the superior rectal artery was ligated in 24 cases of Tis and T1N0 ("low tie," group C). Mean operative time was 207.6, 221.2, and 198.5 min for group A, B, and C, respectively. Respective blood loss was 47.8, 44.0, and 58.5 g, and mean numbers of harvested LN were 17.3, 16.3, and 10.7. None of the operative results of groups A and B were different statistically. LN dissection was not associated with any morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Our method allows equivalent laparoscopic lymph node dissection to the high tie technique without excessive operative time or bleeding.

Apical lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal cancer: an analysis of the risk of tumor involvement and the impact of high ligation on anastomotic integrity

BACKGROUND

What level of arterial ligation is best in left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer remains controversial. This study aims to assess the necessity and risk of high ligation from an oncological and technical perspective.

METHODS

The lymph nodes at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) were separated as apical nodes in all patients operated for distal colorectal cancer in our department. The number and status of the nodes were prospectively assessed, and demographic and tumor-related variables were evaluated as risk factors for apical tumor invasion. Anastomotic leaks were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A hundred and three patients (52 [50.5%] males, 60.3+/-12.9 years old) were included. The number of non-apical lymph nodes harvested was 14.5+/-7.1 with an additional 4.4+/-3.2 apical nodes at the high ligation site. Tumor invasion of apical nodes was observed in 6 (5.8%) patients. Two of these (1.9%) had no other positive nodes (skip metastases). Although none of the variables evaluated was found significant for predicting apical node positivity, tumor invasion was detected in 8.5 and 22.2% of patients with pT3 and pN2 cancers, respectively. Among patients, who had an anastomosis (n = 84, 81.6%), anastomotic leak was observed in 7(8.3%) and 1 (1.2%) of these patients required emergency relaparotomy. There was no mortality related to high ligation.

CONCLUSIONS

High ligation of IMA may be routinely performed in patients with distal colorectal cancer, since tumor invasion of apical lymph nodes is neither rare (>5%) nor predictable, and skip metastases may also occur. This is especially true in case of an advanced disease for which apical node positivity peaks. The anastomotic leak rate is less than 10%, and mortality is low after high ligation of IMA.

The oncologic benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the surgical treatment of rectal or sigmoid colon cancer

PURPOSE

It remains controversial as to whether high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) should be performed during surgical treatment for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to attempt to clarify the extent of the oncologic benefit of high ligation of the IMA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1995 to July 2001, a total of 1,389 patients underwent high ligation of the IMA; 387 patients featured non-disseminated sigmoid colon cancer and 1,002 patients had rectal cancer. Pathology of the primary tumors, IMA nodes, and clinical outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (3.1%) revealed IMA node metastasis. Of these 43 patients, 29 (67.4%) featured tumor recurrences/metastases. After a minimum 5-year follow-up, 11 of these 43 patients (25.6%) were alive and disease free. Of these 43 patients, the 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients featuring sigmoid cancer was 50% and for patients with rectal cancer 13.8%. The beneficial rate of high ligation of the IMA for non-disseminated sigmoid colon cancer and rectal cancer was 0.8%, for non-disseminated sigmoid colon cancer 1.8%, and for non-disseminated rectal cancer, the rate was only 0.4%. The rates of IMA metastasis in patients with T stage tumors were 0% (pT1), 1.0% (pT2), 2.6% (pT3), and 4.3% (pT4).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients afflicted with IMA node metastasis revealed a rather high incidence of tumor recurrence/metastasis, 25.6% of these patients remained disease free following IMA node dissection after a minimum 5-year follow-up. We consider that IMA node dissection is more beneficial in patients with non-disseminated sigmoid pT4 tumor.

Does laparoscopic surgery offer adequate clearance in rectal cancer?--A discussion

Currently in the UK, the national institute of clinical excellence (NICE), only advocates laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer as part of commissioned clinical trials. Laparoscopic teaching, training and techniques have evolved greatly and offer many benefits to patients, whilst remaining technically demanding to surgeons still on the slope of the learning curve. Can such minimally invasive techniques be used with the same results as open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer? Are laparoscopic colorectal surgeons able to achieve the same clearance of tumours and so avoid recurrence at the same rate compared to conventional techniques? The discussion to follow, aims to shed some light on such questions and briefly review some of the literature. If laparoscopic anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections achieve the same results as open procedures, then should these techniques be more widely taught and practised? Surely the peri-operative cost of these laparoscopic procedures does not over shadow the potential outcome from much less traumatic surgery?

Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review

Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), and ligation at a level without any intraoperative definition of the inferior mesenteric or superior rectal arteries. Publications concerning the level of ligation in rectal cancer surgery were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three articles that evaluated oncologic outcome (n = 14), anastomotic circulation (n = 5), autonomous innervation (n = 5), and tension on the anastomosis/anastomotic leakage (n = 2) matched our selection criteria and were systematically reviewed. There is insufficient evidence to support high tie as the technique of choice. Furthermore, high tie has been proven to decrease perfusion and innervation of the proximal limb. It is concluded that neither the high tie strategy nor the low tie strategy is evidence based and that low tie is anatomically less invasive with respect to circulation and autonomous innervation of the proximal limb of anastomosis. As a consequence, in rectal cancer surgery low tie should be the preferred method.