Role of sequential leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein measurements in acute appendicitis

[Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy]

The review is devoted to the role of laparoscopic appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. We analyzed reviews, prospective and retrospective studies in the PubMed, Google, the Springer Link online library, the Cochrane Systematic Review databases. The results of laparoscopic and traditional treatment of acute appendicitis in pregnant women were assessed. We analyzed clinical, epidemiological features in these patients, differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women, indications and contraindications for endoscopic treatment, features of laparoscopic procedures. Comparative assessment of laparoscopic and open surgeries for acute appendicitis in pregnant women was carried out. We also estimated the influence of surgical treatment of acute appendicitis on subsequent course of pregnancy.

Oral inflammatory load: Neutrophils as oral health biomarkers

Periodontal diseases present a significant challenge to our healthcare system in terms of morbidity from the disease itself as well as their putative and deleterious effects on systemic health. The current method of diagnosing periodontal disease utilizes clinical criteria solely. These are imprecise and are somewhat invasive. There is thus significant benefit to creating a non-invasive test as a method of screening for and monitoring of periodontal diseases, and, in particular, chronic periodontitis. Oral polymorphonuclear neutrophil (oPMN) counts have been found to correlate with extent of oral inflammation and the presence and severity of periodontal diseases. Potentially then, quantification of oPMNs might be used to identify and measure the severity of oral inflammation (oral inflammatory load; OIL) in subjects with healthy and inflamed periodontal tissues, demonstrating a positive correlation between higher oPMN counts and the extent/severity of OIL. These findings support the development and utilization of a non-invasive chair-side test enabling rapid, accurate, and objective screening of OIL based on measurement of oPMN numbers (similar to white blood cell levels in blood as used in medicine for assessment of infection). The use of such a test before, during, and after treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis could lead to improvements in timing of intervention (ie, when inflammation is active) thereby reducing long-term morbidity.

The Modified Heidelberg and the AI Appendicitis Score Are Superior to Current Scores in Predicting Appendicitis in Children: A Two-Center Cohort Study

Background: Acute appendicitis represents the most frequent reason for abdominal surgery in children. Since diagnosis can be challenging various scoring systems have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate (and improve) different appendicitis scores in a very large cohort of children with abdominal pain. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all children that have been hospitalized due to suspected appendicitis at the Pediatric Surgery Department of the Altonaer Children's Hospital and University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf from 01/2018 until 11/2019. Four different appendicitis scores (Heidelberg Appendicitis Score, Alvarado Score, Pediatric Appendicitis Score and Tzanakis Score) were applied to all data sets. Furthermore, the best score was improved and artificial intelligence (AI) was applied and compare the current scores. Results: In 23 months, 463 patients were included in the study. Of those 348 (75.2%) were operated for suspected appendicitis and in 336 (96.6%) patients the diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically. The best predictors of appendicitis (simple and perforated) were rebound tenderness, cough/hopping tenderness, ultrasound, and laboratory results. After modifying the HAS, it provided excellent results for simple (PPV 95.0%, NPV 70.0%) and very good for perforated appendicitis (PPV 34.4%, NPV 93.8%), outperforming all other appendicitis score. Discussion: The modified HAS and the AI score show excellent predictive capabilities and may be used to identify most cases of appendicitis and more important to rule out perforated appendicitis. The new scores outperform all other scores and are simple to apply. The modified HAS comprises five features that can all be assessed in the emergency department as opposed to current scores that are relatively complex to utilize in a clinical setting as they include of up to eight features with various weighting factors. In conclusion, the modified HAS and the AI score may be used to identify children with appendicitis, yet prospective studies to validate our findings in a large mutli-center cohorts are needed.

Role of Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Biomedical Marker for the Pre-Operative Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Background: Recently, the possible use of laboratory parameters such as full blood count, neutrophil count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), thrombocyte count (PLT), and mean thrombocyte volume (MPV) have been investigated in diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the prediction of complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) value as a biomedical marker in the prediction of acute appendicitis and perforated appendix. Patients and Methods: The data were retrieved from the hospital records related to age, gender, length of stay in hospital, MPV, leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and thrombocyte counts measured in the peripheral venous blood sample on presentation, NLR and PLR values, and the pathology results. The patients were grouped according to the pathology results as follows: group 1 (normal appendix, n = 86); group 2 (acute appendicitis, n = 458); group 3 (perforated appendicitis, n = 14). Results: The study included a total of 558 patients (308 males; 250 females) with a mean age of 34.24 ± 14.27 years. The mean length of stay in hospital was 2.12 days. The leukocyte and neutrophil count values of group 1 were lower than group 2 and group 3 values (p < 0.001). The lymphocyte count values of group 1 were higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.001). The NLR and PLR values of group 1 were lower than group 2 and group 3 values (p < 0.001). The length of stay in hospital was shorter in group 1 than in group 2 and group 3 (p = 0.42). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve test results showed that PLR and NLR values were sensitive and specific to differentiate normal appendix, acute appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that PLR value, such as NLR, could be evaluated as a new biomarker that could be valuable in the differentiation of normal appendix from acute appendicitis and in the differentiation of acute appendicitis from perforated appendicitis.

Can CRP velocity in right iliac fossa pain identify patients for intervention? A prospective observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown single CRP measurements at time of presentation to have limited predictive benefit for appendicitis. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic utility of serial CRP measurements (to determine CRP velocity [CRPv]) in patients with right iliac fossa (RIF) pain.

METHODS

A single-centre prospective observational study was conducted on adult patients admitted with RIF pain. CRP was measured on admission, at midnight, and the following morning. Appendicitis was diagnosed on histopathology, or diagnostic imaging in non-operatively managed patients. Therapeutic interventions included all appropriate operative procedures and effective non-operative treatment with antibiotics. Logistic regression was used to generate predictors of therapeutic intervention, and then used to create a new risk score incorporating CRPv.

RESULTS

98 of 112 (87.5%) participants had complete CRP data. 58 patients met the criteria for appendicitis (59.2%). Most patients presented with intermediate Modified Alvarado Scores (MAS) 5-6 (40.8%) or Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Scores (AIRS) 5-8 (49%). Our risk score had an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.96) in predicting therapeutic intervention. This score was superior to MAS, AIRS, and single admission biomarker measurements. Patients with an increasing CRPv had 14 times the odds (OR 14.07, 95% CI 0.63-315.2) of complicated appendicitis, and no cases of complicated appendicitis were observed in patients with a flat CRPv.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP velocity is superior to single CRP at predicting intervention. Our v-Score shows promise as a decision making-aide by predicting the need for surgical intervention in RIF pain. A flat CRPv identifies a group of patients with a very low risk of complicated appendicitis.

Ischemia-modified albumin as a predictor of the severity of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

The early prediction of gangrenous/perforated appendicitis is of great importance for the surgical planning, further treatments, and predicting the course of disease. Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) was previously reported as a biomarker of various ischemia-based diseases. Our aim is to determine the predictive value of serum IMA in the severity of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients who underwent urgent appendectomy were included in the study. Plasma level of IMA was measured after diagnosis and before treatment. All patients were classified as noncomplicated (acute) appendicitis and complicated (gangrenous/perforated) appendicitis according to histopathological findings, and comparisons were made between the groups.

RESULTS

The data of 62 patients with a mean age of 30.1 years were statistically evaluated. The pathological diagnoses were acute appendicitis in 33 (53.2%), and gangrenous/perforated appendicitis in 29 (46.8%) patients. There were significant differences in computed tomography (CT) findings (P = .031) and IMA (P = .012) levels between the groups. A strong positive correlation between IMA levels and CT findings was also found (Spearman ρ = +0.688, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The IMA can be considered as a novel and useful marker to distinguish gangrenous/perforated appendicitis from noncomplicated appendicitis. The correlation of IMA with CT findings also enhances the predictive value of IMA.

Acute appendicitis in pregnancy: literature review

INTRODUCTION

suspected appendicitis is the most common indication for surgery in non-obstetric conditions during pregnancy and occurs in about one in 500 to one in 635 pregnancies per year. This occurs more often in the second trimester of pregnancy. Acute appendicitis is the most common general surgical problem encountered during pregnancy.

METHODS

a literature review on research of scientific articles, under the terms "acute appendicitis" and "pregnancy", in PubMed, Lilacs/SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Uptodate databases.

RESULTS

the clinical manifestations of appendicitis are similar to non-pregnant women, however, without a classic presentation, which often occurs, diagnosis is difficult and must be supported by imaging.

DISCUSSION

clinical diagnosis should be strongly suspected in pregnant women with classic findings such as abdominal pain that migrates to the right lower quadrant. The main purpose of imaging is to reduce delays in surgical intervention due to diagnostic uncertainty. A secondary objective is to reduce, but not eliminate, the negative appendectomy rate. Differential diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis usually includes pathologies considered in non-pregnant people.

CONCLUSION

the imaging study of choice is ultrasound, MRI may be used when the former is not conclusive and, as a last resort, a CT scan can be performed. The treatment remains appendectomy by laparotomy, since the feasibility of video- assisted surgery in these cases remains controversial.

Diagnostic role of procalcitonin in patients with suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected appendicitis.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out in the emergency department of a university hospital between July 2007 and June 2008. Adult patients who presented to the ED with clinically suspected appendicitis were enrolled. Each patient underwent serum PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Alvarado score evaluation on admission. The results of these three measurements were analyzed in relation to the final diagnosis determined by histopathological findings or compatible computed tomography findings.

RESULTS

Of the 214 study patients, 113 (52.8 %) had a confirmed diagnosis of appendicitis and 58 had complicated appendicitis (phlegmon, perforation, or gangrene). For the diagnosis of appendicitis, the area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.74 for Alvarado score, 0.69 for PCT, and 0.61 for CRP. Overall, the Alvarado score has the best discriminative capability among the three tested markers. We adopted two cutoff point approaches to harness both ends of the diagnostic value of a biomarker. PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with complicated appendicitis. For diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, a cutoff value of 0.5 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 29 % and a specificity of 95 %, while a cutoff value of 0.05 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 85 % and a specificity of 30 % in diagnosing complicated appendicitis. For those with a PCT value in the gray zone, clinical findings may play a more important role.

CONCLUSION

The study does not support the hypothesis that the PCT test may be useful for screening ED patients for appendicitis. However, determination of the PCT level may be useful for risk assessment of ED patients with suspected complicated appendicitis.

APPENDICITIS IN PREGNANCY

Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric indication for surgical intervention in pregnancy, complicating 1/500 to 1/2000 deliveries. Due to the anatomical and physiological changes associated with pregnancy, appendicitis may present a diagnostic dilemma, leading to management delays and thus increasing the risk of appendiceal perforation. Many of the common presenting symptoms of appendicitis are common features of normal pregnancy including lower abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and leukocytosis. Furthermore, the enlarging gravid uterus may displace the appendix to varying degrees thus altering the classic symptom pattern of appendicitis. The often nonspecific presentation in pregnancy may necessitate the utilization of diagnostic imaging to aid in accurate diagnosis. However, the perforated appendix is the most common surgical cause of fetal loss and the time required for any diagnostic aid must be weighed against the increasing risk of perforation caused by delay in surgical intervention.

Sequential cytokine levels in the diagnosis of appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic value of sequential white blood cell count (WBC), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with abdominal pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Tests were determined at hospital admission and 6 h later in 105 children. Patients who were non-operatively followed and had a normal histopathology were classified as the non-appendicitis (NA) group. Patients with symptoms consistent with appendicitis were classified as the appendicitis group (A). Data were analyzed as positive/negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate (AR). The global power of the variables in discriminating the patients between the two groups and advanced/simple appendicitis was assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

RESULTS

Initial measurements showed WBC to be a valuable diagnostic tool in acute appendicitis (AR = 74 %), whereas IL-6 and TNF-alpha were found not to be valuable. The second measurements revealed higher values, and IL-6 reached its highest AR (89 %). When initial values were evaluated in combination, the highest AR of 73 % was observed with TNF-alpha + WBC. The highest AR (90 %) was seen with IL-6 + TNF-alpha in the second measurements. ROC analysis showed WBC to be the most valuable parameter of the three. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.750 for the initial measurement and 0.779 for the repeat measurement of WBC (p = 0.001). The most useful diagnostic parameter in discriminating between the simple and the advanced cases was IL-6 as assessed with the ROC curve (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

WBC elevation in patients with suspected acute appendicitis is an important parameter supporting the diagnosis at initial admission, whereas IL-6 is a more valuable tool in diagnosing advanced appendicitis.

CRP in acute appendicitis--is it a necessary investigation?

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is one of the commonest procedures in surgery. In spite of various investigations used to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, the rate of normal appendices removed is still about 15-30%. Many studies have investigated the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in acute appendicitis, but with conflicting results.

METHODS

In a prospective, double blind study, blood for the measurement of serum C-reactive protein was collected pre-operatively from 192 children before going to the operating theatre for appendectomy. The histopathology was grouped into positive (acute appendicitis) and negative (normal appendix) and this was correlated with CRP values.

RESULTS

CRP was normal in 14 out of 33 negative explorations (normal appendix on histopathology). The specificity and sensitivity of serum CRP was 42% and 91% respectively. The predictive value of a positive (raised CRP) and negative (normal CRP) test is 88% and 48% respectively.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that neither raised nor normal CRP value is helpful in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. CRP is not a good tool for helping the surgeon make the diagnosis of appendicitis and it should not be measured in suspected appendicitis.

The role of serum inflammatory markers in acute appendicitis and their success in preventing negative laparotomy

Improving the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in order to prevent unnecessary surgery is crucial. This study was intended to identify the role of serum inflammatory markers in patients with preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis with a retrospective design. Eighty-five patients with the preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis were recruited in this study within the period of November-December 2003. The average age was 31.8 years (ranged from 15 to 85). There were 62 males (72.9%) and 23 females (27.1%). In addition to performing routine tests, preoperative serum samples were obtained from the patients to measure C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10. All the patients were operated on for a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis. Depending on the macroscopic evidence during the operation and the histopathological examination of the specimen, the patients were separated into two groups: the ones who did not have acute appendicitis as the cause for acute abdomen (group I; n = 14) and the ones who had acute appendicitis (group II; n = 71). The ones who had acute appendicitis (group II) were further grouped as noncomplicated appendicitis (group IIA; n = 44) and complicated appendicitis (group IIB; n = 27). Being a male with elevated levels of leukocytes (white blood cells, WBC); C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6); and interleukin-10 increased the probability of having acute appendicitis in patients with evidences of acute abdomen. The risk of complication of acute appendicitis significantly increased when patients had increased levels of C-reactive protein, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and increased interleukin-6 levels, had symptoms for more than 24 h, and were female. Interleukin-10 levels within normal range might be helpful in eliminating the possibility of acute appendicitis. Thus, elevated levels of WBC, IL-6 and CRP might be helpful in confirming a potential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In addition, normal levels of IL-10 might be of additional help to possibly rule out the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Laboratory measurements such as leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration are commonly used as diagnostic aids in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The present study aimed to clarify the role of these laboratory tests in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

METHODS

The medical records of 897 patients who underwent appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis during a 30-month period were retrospectively reviewed. The laboratory findings were correlated with the histopathology of the excised appendices. Data were analysed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the individual tests, as well as the test combinations.

RESULTS

Histologically verified appendicitis was found in 740 of the 897 patients (82.5%). The rise in leucocyte count and neutrophil percentage correlated with the degree of appendiceal inflammation. The median CRP level was much higher in the patients with ruptured appendicitis compared with that in patients with a normal appendix (96.8 vs 39.6 mg/L, P < 0.001). However, patients with uncomplicated appendicitis had a lower median CRP concentration than those with a normal appendix, although the difference was not statistically significant (24.1 vs 39.6 mg/L, P = 0.079). The sensitivity of leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and CRP in diagnosing acute appendicitis was 85.8, 87.2 and 76.5%, respectively, whereas the specificity was 31.9, 33.1 and 26.1%, respectively. Of the 740 patients with acute appendicitis, only six had all three tests simultaneously within the reference interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal laboratory findings cannot reliably deliver a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, acute appendicitis is very unlikely when leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and CRP level are simultaneously normal.

Predictive value of C-reactive protein at different cutoff levels in acute appendicitis

Determining the different cutoff values of C-reactive protein (CRP) on the basis of how long the patient's symptoms were present can be used to early predict acute appendicitis. We analyzed retrospectively from 2001 to 2004 the hospital records of 568 patients who underwent appendectomies for suspected appendicitis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis has shown that CRP measurement can increase the diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis. The cutoff values of CRP concentration taken as the first, second, and third days after onset of symptoms that distinguish acute appendicitis from other acute abdominal diseases were 1.5, 4.0, and 10.5 mg/dL, respectively; the values that distinguish perforated appendicitis from other acute abdominal diseases were 3.3 mg/dL (first day), 8.5 mg/dL (second day), and 12.0 mg/dL (third day). The different cutoff values of CRP concentration may serve as a useful predictive parameter in the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis on the first 3 days after the onset of symptoms.

Serum amyloid A protein levels as a possible aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children

Hematological and biochemical tests, including white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and other acute-phase reactants, have been used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, there is controversy among physicians about the value of this practice in children. The objective of our study was to evaluate serum amyloid A protein (SAA) levels in children with confirmed acute appendicitis and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of this marker of inflammation with those for WBC and CRP. A prospective cohort study of 60 children admitted with abdominal pain to rule out appendicitis was used in the study. Of these, 42 underwent surgery, while 18 children who had spontaneous amelioration within 24 h of admission were not operated on and served as controls. WBC and serum SAA and CRP levels were obtained preoperatively. Serum concentrations of the analytes were determined with particle-enhanced immunonephelometric methods. Patients with acute appendicitis had WBC, SAA and CRP levels higher than those of the control group (p<0.001). There was no appendicitis patient with a normal SAA value, while 21.4% of the patients had CRP values within the normal range. The performance of each test was measured by receiver-operating characteristic curves. Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.849 for WBC, 0.868 for CRP and 0.964 for SAA. The sensitivity and specificity of these methods were 76% and 75% for WBC>10.0 x 10(9) /L, 62% and 94% for CRP>10 mg/L and 86% and 83% for SAA >45.0 mg/L, respectively. Circulating SAA levels have better discriminatory value than WBC or CRP in the assessment of acute appendicitis in children. Thus, this test appears to be of higher value than the current standards of care in the diagnosis of this condition.

Role of Leukocyte Count, Neutrophil Percentage, and C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly

Leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been shown to give valuable information in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, whether these laboratory tests have the same clinical applicability in the elderly as in young patients remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the role of these tests in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients aged 60 years or over. Eighty-five consecutive elderly patients underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis during a 30-month period. Histologically verified appendicitis was found in 77 of the 85 patients (90.6%). There was no significant difference in leukocyte counts or CRP values between patients with acute appendicitis and those with a normal appendix. The sensitivities of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and CRP in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 71.4 per cent, 88.3 per cent, and 90 per cent, respectively, while the specificities were 37.5 per cent, 25 per cent, and 37.5 per cent, respectively. Of 77 patients with acute appendicitis, only two had all three tests simultaneously normal. In conclusion, patients with normal results in all three tests are highly unlikely to have acute appendicitis and should be evaluated with extra caution before surgery.

Can ruptured appendicitis be detected preoperatively in the ED?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine which clinical symptoms/signs and computed tomography (CT) signs can help in distinguishing ruptured from simple appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records and CT findings of 202 consecutive patients with surgically proven acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed and compared between 2 groups with and without appendiceal rupture.

RESULTS

Longer duration of symptoms ( P < .001), peritoneal sign ( P = .004), and higher C-reactive protein ( P < .001) are significant clinical factors for predicting appendiceal rupture in acute appendicitis. Abscess, extraluminal air, wall defect, peritoneal enhancement, extraluminal appendolith, phlegmon, localized fluid, fascial thickening, ascites, stool impaction, and 4 patterns of bowel wall thickening ( P < .001 to P = .047) are significant CT signs for predicting appendiceal rupture. The appendiceal diameter is larger in patients with ruptured appendicitis than in those with simple appendicitis (13.2 +/- 3.2 vs 11.3 +/- 2.4 mm, P < .001). The appendolith size is larger in patients with ruptured appendicitis than in those with simple appendicitis (7.1 +/- 4.4 vs 5.1 +/- 2.8 mm, P = .018).

CONCLUSION

Besides some clinical findings, CT scan can accurately determine appendiceal rupture in acute appendicitis and can further demonstrate the presence of local inflammatory mass, facilitating management decision in the emergency department (ED).

Is the use of plain abdominal radiographs (PAR) a necessity for all patients with suspected acute appendicitis in emergency services?

PURPOSE

Almost all patients with suspected appendicitis have plain abdominal radiographies (PAR) at the emergency departments. The aims of this study are to evaluate the ability of PAR to diagnose suspected acute appendicitis in patients and to predict length of hospital stay (LOS).

METHODS

Three blinded radiologists retrospectively and separately reviewed the preoperative PARs of all patients with suspected appendicitis, who underwent surgery in our hospital for 1 year period based on 8 radiologic criteria. The patients were divided into 3 groups [acute appendicitis (group 1), perforated appendicitis (group 2), and negative appendectomy (group 3)] according to their perioperative and pathological findings. The relationship between the presence/absence of the PAR findings and the diagnosis and LOS were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 162 patients (103 men, 63.6%). There were 96 (60.5%), 45 (27.8%), and 19 (11.7%) patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Although there were more men in the study overall (p < 0.001), there were more women in groups 2 and 3 than group 1 (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, respectively). Group 2 had the longest LOS, and Group 3 had the shortest LOS (p < 0.001). The generalized air-fluid level was more commonly observed in group 2 patients (7 of 45) than in group 1 patients (2 of 98) (p < 0.05). The LOS was longer in group 3 when the sentinel loop was present on the PAR (n = 3) (p = 0.017), and in group 2 when the colon cutoff sign was positive (n = 3) on the PAR (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PAR is rarely beneficial in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and in the prediction of LOS. The PAR may not be a necessity for all patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Pediatric appendicitis score

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Morbidity in children treated with appendicitis results either from late diagnosis or negative appendectomy. A Prospective analysis of efficacy of Pediatric Appendicitis Score for early diagnosis of appendicitis in children was conducted.

METHODS

In the last 5 years, 1,170 children aged 4 to 15 years with abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis were evaluated prospectively. Group 1 (734) were patients with appendicitis and group 2 (436) nonappendicitis. Multiple linear logistic regression analysis of all clinical and investigative parameters was performed for a model comprising 8 variables to form a diagnostic score.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis yielded a model comprising 8 variables, all statistically significant, P <.001. These variables in order of their diagnostic index were (1) cough/percussion/hopping tenderness in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen (0.96), (2) anorexia (0.88), (3) pyrexia (0.87), (4) nausea/emesis (0.86), (5) tenderness over the right iliac fossa (0.84), (6) leukocytosis (0.81), (7) polymorphonuclear neutrophilia (0.80) and (8) migration of pain (0.80). Each of these variables was assigned a score of 1, except for physical signs (1 and 5), which were scored 2 to obtain a total of 10. The Pediatric Appendicitis Score had a sensitivity of 1, specificity of 0.92, positive predictive value of 0.96, and negative predictive value of 0.99.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric appendicitis score is a simple, relatively accurate diagnostic tool for accessing an acute abdomen and diagnosing appendicitis in children.

The C-reactive protein

C-reactive protein (CRP) was identified in 1930 and was subsequently considered to be an "acute phase protein," an early indicator of infectious or inflammatory conditions. Since its discovery, CRP has been studied as a screening device for inflammation, a marker for disease activity, and as a diagnostic adjunct. Improved methods of quantifying CRP have led to increased application to clinical medicine. In the emergency department (ED), CRP must be interpreted in the clinical context; no single value can be used to rule in or rule out a specific diagnosis. We conclude that CRP has limited utility in the ED. It may be a useful adjunct to serial examinations in equivocal presentations of appendicitis in those centers without ready access to computed tomography (CT) scan. It may be elevated with complications or treatment failures in patients with pneumonia, pancreatitis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and urinary tract infections. In patients with meningitis, neonatal sepsis, and occult bacteremia, CRP is usually elevated. However, CRP has no role in diagnosing these clinical entities, and a normal CRP level should never delay antibiotic coverage.

C-reactive protein and leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and its possible advantage, if any, over leukocyte counts in acute appendicitis in children.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 124 children (72 males) with a mean age of 9.3 (range, 2-14) years operated on under a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis, confirmed by pathologic examination of the removed appendix, was then correlated with C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and a combination of both C-reactive protein and leukocyte count, with a logistic regression model. C-reactive protein serum measurements were performed by an immunoturbidimetric test. The patients were divided into two groups according to the pathologic features of the removed appendix: Group A (n = 104), patients with acute appendicitis, and Group B (n = 20), patients without acute appendicitis. To assess the accuracy of C-reactive protein, leukocyte counts, and a combination of both parameters, receiver operating characteristic curves were used. The areas under the curve were compared using the maximum likelihood estimation method.

RESULTS

There were 95 cases (76.6 percent) of nonperforated appendicitis, 9 cases (7.3 percent) of perforated appendicitis and 20 cases (16.1 percent) of normal appendix. Mean C-reactive protein in Group A was 4.3 (standard deviation, 6.6) and in Group B was 1.2 (standard deviation, 1.7; P = 0.03). The C-reactive protein and leukocyte count values were correlated with the pathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Mean C-reactive protein values increase as the pathologic inflammation type progresses (P = 0.007). The C-reactive protein receiver operating characteristic curve shows that the C-reactive protein value with highest accuracy was 1.7 mg/dl. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates calculated in the 1.7 cutoff were 58, 80, and 83.8 percent, respectively. A comparison of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrates that C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and the combination of both tests all have a good diagnostic value but without any significant difference (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In children, 1) serum C-reactive protein is increased in acute appendicitis; 2) such increase is related to the severity of the appendiceal inflammation; and 3) although serum C-reactive protein has an adequate diagnostic accuracy, neither individually nor in combination with the leukocyte count is it significantly better than the leukocyte count alone.

The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis--a meta-analysis

The aim of the study was to review the literature on the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP) in diagnosing acute appendicitis. All the relevant articles found by searching Medline and the Science Citation Index were reviewed. We used summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis to describe the central tendency of the studies and to assess potential sources of variability. We included 22 articles with a total number of 3436 patients. The sensitivity ranged from 0.40 to 0.99, and the specificity from 0.27 to 0.90. The cut-off values for a positive test varied from 5 to 25 mg l-1. SROC curve analysis showed that CRP performed significantly better in acute abdomen populations (11 studies) than in populations already selected for appendectomy (11 studies). The diagnostic accuracy of CRP tended to be a little inferior to that of total leukocyte count (13 studies). CRP is a test of medium accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The formerly distractingly wide range of sensitivity and specificity is at least partly due to variations in cut-off values and to differences in study populations. However, definitive conclusions on the clinical usefulness of the test could not be drawn.

Appendicitis

A complete understanding of the anatomy, pathophysiology, and presenting signs and symptoms of appendicitis, combined with a thorough history and physical examination, will be the most important factors in allowing the practicing emergency physician to make the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis. For patients in which the diagnosis is less clear or for patients in high-risk groups (extremes of age, pregnant women, and immunocompromised patients) additional diagnostic testing, usually US or CT, and early surgical consultation are recommended.

Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in children with perforated appendicitis

The diagnostic value of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in children with perforated appendicitis was prospectively studied in 78 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed appendicitis. The patients were divided into two groups: group A included 56 patients with perforated appendicitis and group B consisted of 22 patients with simple appendicitis. Serum CRP level and leucocyte count were assayed in all and abdominal ultrasonography was performed in 75. The mean age group A patient was significantly lower than that of group B patients (7.5 vs. 10.4 years, P < 0.001). Group A patients had a significantly higher mean serum CRP levels than group B patients (92 vs. 31 mg/l, P < 0.001), while the mean leucocyte count was comparable in the two groups. Of 75 examined patients, 73 (97%) had a pre-operative sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Perforation is a common complication in children with appendicitis, especially in those of young age and with prolonged pain duration. Greatly increased serum CRP levels (> or = 50 mg/l) and abdominal ultrasonography are important diagnostic aids in such patients.