Laser recanalization versus endoscopic intubation in the palliation of malignant dysphagia: a randomized prospective study

The endoscopic management of oesophageal strictures

An oesophageal stricture refers to a narrowing of the oesophageal lumen, which may be benign or malignant. The cardinal feature is dysphagia, and this may result from intrinsic oesophageal disease or extrinsic compression. Oesophageal strictures can be further classified as simple or complex depending on stricture length, location, diameter, and underlying aetiology. Many endoscopic options are now available for treating oesophageal strictures including dilatation, injectional therapy, stenting, stricturotomy, and ablation. Self-expanding metal stents have revolutionised the palliation of malignant dysphagia, but oesophageal dilatation with balloon or bougienage remains first-line therapy for most benign strictures. The increase in endoscopic and surgical interventions on the oesophagus has seen more benign refractory oesophageal strictures that are difficult to treat, and often require advanced endoscopic techniques. In this review, we provide a practical overview on the evidence-based management of both benign and malignant oesophageal strictures, including a practical algorithm for managing benign refractory strictures.

Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021

MALIGNANT DISEASE

1: ESGE recommends placement of partially or fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for palliation of malignant dysphagia over laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, and esophageal bypass.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 2 : ESGE recommends brachytherapy as a valid alternative, alone or in addition to stenting, in esophageal cancer patients with malignant dysphagia and expected longer life expectancy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends esophageal SEMS placement for sealing malignant tracheoesophageal or bronchoesophageal fistulas. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4 : ESGE does not recommend SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery or before preoperative chemoradiotherapy because it is associated with a high incidence of adverse events. Other options such as feeding tube placement are preferable. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

BENIGN DISEASE

5: ESGE recommends against the use of SEMSs as first-line therapy for the management of benign esophageal strictures because of the potential for adverse events, the availability of alternative therapies, and their cost. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE suggests consideration of temporary placement of self-expandable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures. Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE suggests that fully covered SEMSs be preferred over partially covered SEMSs for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures because of their very low risk of embedment and ease of removability. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends the stent-in-stent technique to remove partially covered SEMSs that are embedded in the esophageal wall. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends that temporary stent placement can be considered for the treatment of leaks, fistulas, and perforations. No specific type of stent can be recommended, and the duration of stenting should be individualized. Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 10 : ESGE recommends considering placement of a fully covered large-diameter SEMS for the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding refractory to medical, endoscopic, and/or radiological therapy, or as initial therapy for patients with massive bleeding. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for the Palliation of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal stents have been used to palliate patients with dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer. Early rigid plastic prostheses have been associated with a high risk of complications. However, with the development of self-expanding stents, it has developed into a widely accepted method for treating malignant esophageal strictures and esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs). The present review covers various aspects of self-expanding metallic stent placement for palliating esophageal cancer, including its types, placement procedures, indications, contraindications, complications, and some of innovations that will become available in the future.

Chinese herbal medicine for oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine is sometimes used as an adjunct to radiotherapy or chemotherapy for this type of cancer. This review was first published in 2007 and updated in 2009; this 2016 update is the latest version of the review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the addition of Chinese herbal medicine to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy for oesophageal cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP database, Wanfang database and the Chinese Cochrane Centre Controlled Trials Register up to 1 October, 2015. We also searched databases of ongoing trials, the Internet and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy with and without the addition of Chinese herbal medicine.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We tried to contact the 142 study authors by telephone, and finally included nine studies with 490 participants. All included studies were conducted in China, and allocated advanced oesophageal cancer patients to radiotherapy or chemotherapy groups, with and without additional Chinese herbal medicine. Quality of life, short-term therapeutic effects, TCM symptoms and adverse events caused by radiotherapy or chemotherapy were reported in these studies. Overall, we considered the trials to be at unclear or high risk of bias.The quality of life measure was conducted before and after the intervention; our analysis showed a beneficial effect, both in number of participants experiencing an improvement (risk ratio (RR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42 to 3.39; 5 RCTs, 233 participants, change of performance status score ≥ 10) and number of participants experiencing a deterioration (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.62; 6 RCTs, 287 participants, change of performance status score ≤ 10). We judged this to have low quality evidence, downgrading quality of evidence for risk of bias and imprecision, and upgrading quality of evidence for the large effect.For short-term therapeutic effects, the results suggest that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has a positive impact on improvement (complete response + partial response) (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.35; 8 RCTs, 450 participants), moderate quality evidence and downgrading for risk of bias. There was no significant difference for progressive disease (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.01; 8 RCTs, 450 participants), low quality evidence and downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision. Three studies assessed this outcome after four weeks or three months' follow-up, the remaining studies gave no detailed information for this outcome. TCM symptoms, which was similar to short-term therapeutic effects evaluated with TCM clinical criteria, was diagnosed in two studies of 88 people at the end of the intervention. The results suggest that TCM has a positive impact on both total effectiveness (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.81) and ineffectiveness (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.93); we judged the studies to have very low quality evidence, downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision.Nine studies reported a series of adverse events caused by radiotherapy or chemotherapy at the end of the intervention, including mucositis, radiation oesophagitis, arrest of bone marrow, gastrointestinal reactions, renal and hepatic impairment, white blood cell descent, neurotoxicity, cardiac toxicity and anaemia. For those containing multiple studies, we conducted a pooled analysis. As a result, TCM showed a significant effect on radiation oesophagitis (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; 2 RCTs, 90 participants), gastrointestinal reactions (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.81; 4 RCTs, 268 participants) and white blood cell descent (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.83; 4 RCTs, 224 participants). The quality of evidence was low or very low, downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We currently find no evidence to determine whether TCM is an effective treatment for oesophageal cancer. The effect of TCM on short-term therapeutic effects is uncertain. TCM probably has positive effects on quality of life and on some adverse events caused by radiotherapy or chemotherapy in advanced oesophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The results of the review need to be interpreted cautiously owing to overall low quality evidence. Future trials should be large and correctly designed to detect important clinical effects and minimise risk of bias.

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Most patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal carcinoma are diagnosed at an advanced stage and require palliative intervention. Although there are many kinds of interventions, the optimal one for the palliation of dysphagia remains unclear. This review updates the previous version published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

To find new studies for this updated review, in January 2014 we searched, according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL; and major conference proceedings (up to January 2014).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in which patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer underwent palliative treatment. Different interventions like rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination, were included. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis were performed in accordance with the methods of the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 3684 patients from 53 studies. SEMS insertion was safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provided comparable dysphagia palliation but had an increased requirement for re-interventions and for adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provided comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might have reduced gastro-oesophageal reflux and complications. Newly-designed double-layered nitinol (Niti-S) stents were preferable due to longer survival time and fewer complications compared to simple Niti-S stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life, and might provide better results when combined with argon plasma coagulation or external beam radiation therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Some anti-reflux stents and newly-designed stents lead to longer survival and fewer complications compared to conventional stents. Combinations of brachytherapy with self-expanding metal stent insertion or radiotherapy are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, and chemotherapy alone are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

How are palliative care cancer populations characterized in randomized controlled trials? A literature review

CONTEXT

The difficulties in defining a palliative care patient accentuate the need to provide stringent descriptions of the patient population in palliative care research.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic literature review with the aim of identifying which key variables have been used to describe adult palliative care cancer populations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The data sources used were MEDLINE (1950 to January 25, 2010) and Embase (1980 to January 25, 2010), limited to RCTs in adult cancer patients with incurable disease. Forty-three variables were systematically extracted from the eligible articles.

RESULTS

The review includes 336 articles reporting RCTs in palliative care cancer patients. Age (98%), gender (90%), cancer diagnosis (89%), performance status (45%), and survival (45%) were the most frequently reported variables. A large number of other variables were much less frequently reported.

CONCLUSION

A substantial variation exists in how palliative care cancer populations are described in RCTs. Few variables are consistently registered and reported. There is a clear need to standardize the reporting. The results from this work will serve as the basis for an international Delphi process with the aim of reaching consensus on a minimum set of descriptors to characterize a palliative care cancer population.

WITHDRAWN: Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and palliative treatment is the realistic management option for most patients. The optimal intervention for the palliation of dysphagia in these patients has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook a search according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and major conference proceedings up to August 2005. The literature search was re-run in August 2006 and March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer who underwent palliative treatment. We included rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 2542 patients from 40 studies. SEMS insertion is safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provide comparable dysphagia palliation but have an increased requirement for re-interventions and adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provide comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux compared to conventional metal stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Self-expanding metal stent insertion and brachytherapy provide comparable palliation to endoscopic ablative therapy but are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, chemotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy and bypass surgery are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: a 5 year experience

BACKGROUND/AIM

To assess the prognostic indicators preoperatively presenting and influencing the mortality rate following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study, conducted at the Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from 1 January 2003 till 31 December 2008. Group 1 included patients who had undergone sub-total esophagectomy and were alive at completion of 12 months; whereas Group 2 included those patients who died by the completion of 12 months. Data were recollected from the Data Bank. A list of variables common to all patients from both groups was categorized and subsequently all data related to each individual patient were placed and analyzed on the version 13.0 of SPSS R for Windows.

RESULTS

Significant findings of a lower mean level of serum albumin from Group 2 were observed, whereas serum transferrin levels, also found lower in Group 2, were not statistically significant. Findings of serum pre-albumin, with a mean value of 16.12 mg/dl (P < 0.05) and Geansler's index for the evaluation of the presence of obstructive pulmonary disease prior to surgery showed a lower reading of mean ratio in Group 2. Anastamotic leak was not a common finding in the entire study. In most cases, the choice of conduit was the remodeled stomach. Nine patients from Group 2 were observed with evident leak on the fifth to seventh post-operative day following contrast swallow studies. This was statistically insignificant (P = 0.051) on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative variables including weight loss, low serum albumin and pre-albumin, Geansler's index, postoperative chylothorax, pleural effusion, and hospital stay, are predictive of mortality in patients who undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and palliative treatment is the realistic management option for most patients. The optimal intervention for the palliation of dysphagia in these patients has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook a search according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and major conference proceedings up to August 2005. The literature search was re-run in August 2006 and March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer who underwent palliative treatment. We included rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 2542 patients from 40 studies. SEMS insertion is safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provide comparable dysphagia palliation but have an increased requirement for re-interventions and adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provide comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux compared to conventional metal stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Self-expanding metal stent insertion and brachytherapy provide comparable palliation to endoscopic ablative therapy but are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, chemotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy and bypass surgery are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

Chinese herbal medicines for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Traditional Chinese herbal medicines are sometimes used as an adjunct to radiotherapy or chemotherapy for this type of cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the addition of Chinese herbal medicines to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), CBM (Chinese Biomedical Database), China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Cochrane Centre Controlled Trials Register and CISCOM (The Research Council for Complementary Medicine) (up to 10 July, 2008). Databases of ongoing trials, the Internet and reference lists were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy with and without the addition of Chinese herbal medicines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 43 trials which claimed to use random allocation. The first authors of all the RCTs we initially identified were contacted by telephone and we discovered that the authors had misunderstood the randomisation procedure. Using this new information, we reassigned all the identified RCTs as non-randomised trials. Because we identified no authentic randomised controlled trials, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to find any evidence from RCTs on the effectiveness of TCM in the treatment of esophageal cancer. New trials should be carried out and we recommend that they are large scaled, correctly randomised and that the assessors of the results are blinded to the conditions of allocation.

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and palliative treatment is the realistic management option for most patients. The optimal intervention for the palliation of dysphagia in these patients has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook a search according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and major conference proceedings up to August 2005. The literature search was re-run in August 2006 and March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer who underwent palliative treatment. We included rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 2542 patients from 40 studies. SEMS insertion is safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provide comparable dysphagia palliation but have an increased requirement for re-interventions and adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provide comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux compared to conventional metal stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Self-expanding metal stent insertion and brachytherapy provide comparable palliation to endoscopic ablative therapy but are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, chemotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy and bypass surgery are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

WITHDRAWN: Medicinal herbs for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs are sometimes used as an adjunct to radiotherapy or chemotherapy for this type of cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the addition of Chinese medicinal herbs to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), CBM (Chinese Biomedical Database), China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Cochrane Centre Controlled Trials Register and CISCOM (The Research Council for Complementary Medicine) (up to June 2004). Databases of ongoing trials, the internet and reference lists were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy with and without the addition of Chinese medicinal herbs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 43 trials which claimed to use random allocation. Sixteen study authors were contacted by telephone and we discovered that they misunderstood the randomisation procedure and the trials were identified as non-RCTs. The situation of lack of authentic randomised controlled trial leads us cannot draw a conclusion to recommend or against the use of TCM as a treatment for esophageal cancer.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of effect of TCM in the treatment of esophageal cancer due to no any authentic RCT in this field yet. New trials should be large scaled, correctly randomised and results assessor blinded in the future.

Imaging of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is a relatively uncommon gastrointestinal malignancy but carries a poor prognosis unless it is of early stage and can be surgically resected for cure. Resectability is determined by the stage of disease at diagnosis and therefore accurate staging is of importance in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Imaging studies that play a role in the evaluation of esophageal cancer include barium studies, computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography. Imaging provides important information regarding the local extent and any distant spread of disease, which in turn helps in determining optimal management for these patients. This review discusses the imaging findings that may be encountered with various imaging modalities in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer.

Surgical palliation of thoracic malignancies

Primary and metastatic thoracic malignancies are often incurable. Surgeons caring for these patients must be familiar with the options,indications, techniques, and limitations of interventions for palliative treatments in these patients. This article is an overview of the current practices for palliation of a broad spectrum of complaints relating to patients with carcinomas of the lung, esophagus,and mesothelium. The information can be used for treatment of patients with complaints secondary to less common malignancies and metastatic disease of the thorax.

Endoscopic palliative treatment for esophageal and gastric cancer: techniques, complications, and survival in a population-based cohort of 948 patients

BACKGROUND

Under the auspices of the Scottish Audit of Gastric and Esophageal Cancer, we investigated treatment techniques, complications, and survival in a population-based cohort of patients undergoing endoscopic palliative therapy for esophageal or gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 948 patients undergoing endoscopic palliative therapy were identified prospectively and followed for a minimum of 1 year.

RESULTS

Expandable metal stent placement (506 patients) and LASER (117 patients) were the most frequently used treatment options. Stent placement was more common for grade 3 or 4 dysphagia. Delivery of endoscopic palliative therapy varied by region of residence (from 18% to 38% of patients, p < 0.001) but not by deprivation category. Complications were recorded in 16% of patients (155 of 948). Overall survival was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36-43) at 6 months, 17% (95% CI, 14-19) at 12 months, and 10% (95% CI, 8-12%) at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These data define the reality of endoscopic palliative therapy for patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer and provide a baseline against which future improvements in care can be measured.

Diagnosis and therapy for advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The majority of esophageal cancers are advanced at presentation, rendering cure unlikely, especially by surgery alone. Consequently, much research effort has been directed towards studies of adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation, particularly in defining the best regimens from the standpoint of efficacy and minimal toxicity and in an attempt to predict response.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall results of adjuvant therapy have been conflicting, although a survival advantage has been documented in those demonstrating objective response to chemoradiation. In such circumstances, comparable survival has been demonstrated using chemoradiation alone, leading to the hypothesis that surgery may be best reserved for nonresponders. For those with stage IV disease or unfit for radical treatment, a variety of palliative modalities exist including stenting, laser photocoagulation, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy used singly or in combination, the latter providing encouraging improvement in survival over single-modality treatment.

SUMMARY

Current research is directed towards securing better results using newer chemotherapeutic agents such as taxanes and irinotecan and deploying molecular markers both to predict response to chemotherapy and to target its delivery to tumor sites.

Inoperable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: a comparative clinical study of laser coagulation versus self-expanding metallic stents with special reference to cost analysis

AIMS

Neither clinical nor financial comparisons yet exist between self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) and laser therapy, concentrating on the treatment of obstructive adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction. The aim of our study was to compare the relative lifetime costs and clinical results of the Nd:YAG laser to those of SEMS as alternative forms of primary palliation of dysphagia for adenocarcinoma near the oesophagogastric junction.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with distal oesophageal or oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas underwent palliative treatment for dysphagia: 32 treated with laser therapy and 20 with SEMS in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome and real cumulative costs as physical units and in financial terms were analysed for these study groups.

RESULTS

Although patients palliated with SEMS underwent fewer procedures (1.9+/-1.6 vs 3.4+/-4.0, P=0.0048) and spent less time in endoscopic theatre (38+/-25min vs 118+/-152min, P=0.0048), they spent as many days in hospital (12.9 vs 15.1, P=0.370) and required as high overall costs for therapy (5360 EUR vs 5450 EUR, P=0.679) as those treated with laser therapy. In addition, they had higher morbidity rates (30 vs 6.3%, P=0.043), hospital mortality (20 vs 3.1%, P=0.066), and 30-day mortality (40 vs 3.1%, P=0.0011) than did patients with laser therapy, with no evidence of SEMS being the more effective treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with adenocarcinoma at the distal oesophagus or at the oesophagogastric junction, laser therapy palliates dysphagia effectively with lower morbidity and mortality rates and without increased costs or hospital stays than does use of self-expanding metallic stents.

Endoluminal palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma

There are now a variety of treatment options available to palliate dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. The decision as to which therapy to recommend for a patient should be based on a though understanding of the therapies and must be individualized for each patient and on the experience of the endoscopist or surgeon. In addition, consideration should be given as to resource availability at a particular institution. External beam radiation currently has little role as primary treatment for dysphagia. Brachytherapy is labor intensive; requires 2 to 3 weekly treatments, highly specialized radiation equipment, and an experienced radiation oncologist; and is therefore limited to tertiary care centers. Endoluminal YAG-laser tumor ablation is feasible at many institutions and provides immediate dysphagia relief but has limited durability (weeks) if not followed by adjuvant therapy, and requires an endoscopist with significant laser experience. PDT is relatively easy to perform and has a lower perforation rate and longer durability than YAG laser therapy but it is relatively costly and less patient friendly due to the morbidity of its attendant 6 weeks of photosensitivity. Advances in stent technology have rendered this a safe, readily available treatment for the palliation of dysphagia. Palliation of dysphagia is an important but difficult goal that may require creative use of a variety of endoscopic interventions, either in combination or serially. Ideally, physicians who palliate dysphagia secondary to esophageal cancer should be facile in both endoscopic ablative and stenting techniques and have a close working relationship with both radiation and medical oncologists.

A randomized trial of thermal ablative therapy versus expandable metal stents in the palliative treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Expandable metal stent insertion and thermal tumor ablation (TTA) both improve dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, but no direct comparison study of their efficacy on health-related quality of life has been published. The aim of this study was to compare survival, relief of dysphagia, quality of life, and cost in patients treated by thermal ablation or stent insertion.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with histologically proven, inoperable esophageal and esophagogastric cancer were initially assessed by endoscopy, barium contrast radiography, and CT of the thorax and abdomen. Dysphagia and quality of life were serially assessed at monthly intervals. Patients were randomized to either repeated TTA or insertion of an expandable metal stent.

RESULTS

Median survival was significantly longer for patients who underwent TTA; 125 days (17-546) versus 68 days (8-602) for those in whom a stent was inserted (p < 0.05), although relief of dysphagia was disappointing in both groups. Several patients in both groups had serious treatment-related complications and required further therapy. Median length of hospital stay and cost were greater for patients treated by TTA. Health-related quality of life was globally impaired in both groups at randomization and deteriorated significantly in the stent group. Pain was reported more commonly by patients with stents.

CONCLUSIONS

The palliation of patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric cancer remains unsatisfactory. Health-related quality of life deteriorated in the stent group but not in the TTA group. Patients treated by TTA live longer than patients treated by stent insertion, but the cost of TTA is higher.

An update in the palliative management of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is generally associated with late presentation and poor prognosis. Therefore palliative surgery has been largely superseded by less invasive non-surgical techniques. Once palliation is indicated, the aims of the management should be: the maintenance of oral intake, minimizing hospital stay, relief of pain, elimination of reflux and regurgitation and the prevention of aspiration.

METHODS

This study was a review of all published English language data on the palliation of malignant dysphagia between 1994-1999. The Medline and Bids databases were searched and other references were derived from the material perused.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Palliative treatment for oesophageal cancer should be individualized and relate to tumour stage, size and location, the patient's medical condition and his/her personal wishes. The palliative treatment largely includes self-expanding metal stents (SEMS), laser (including photodynamic therapy (PDT)) or a combination of the two to relieve symptoms, this may be employed with or without other treatments such as radiotherapy/chemotherapy (RT/CT) with the aim of reducing tumour bulk and possibly prolonging survival. A multi-disciplinary approach is vital in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer surgery: the value of controlled clinical trials

Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) in esophageal cancer were reviewed. Their value and significance in the areas of multimodality therapy, lymphadenectomy, surgical techniques, palliative treatments, and perioperative management were evaluated. Much has been gained through RCT in the management of esophageal cancer, and RCT is the most reliable scientific method in clinical investigations. Problems in the conduct of such trials include lack of expertise by surgeons, lack of patients, lack of funding, and methodologic and ethical problems. These obstacles could be overcome and more well-conducted RCTs encouraged.

Nd-YAG laser as a palliative treatment for malignant dysphagia

Two hundred and twenty-four patients with histologically-confirmed carcinoma of the oesophagus received palliative Nd-YAG laser therapy for malignant dysphagia between January 1986 and December 1994. The results are appraised in terms of the degree of relief obtained, its relation to the macroscopic type and the size of the tumour, peri-operative complications, duration of hospitalization and survival after treatment. Recannulation of the oesophageal lumen was obtained in 98.2% of the patients, after which 93.7% were able to ingest at least semi-solids. Although the lumen was permeable for a 9.8 mm endoscope, the remainder could only ingest liquids. The only complication was a perforation is six cases (2.7%). After treatment, 14.8% survived more than 1 year and 3.4% more than 2 years. After discussing the role of lasers in the palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia, the authors conclude that it can be considered effective in that it relieves the dysphagia and improves the patients' quality of life.

Comparison of different treatments for unresectable esophageal cancer

Many patient with esophageal cancer have advanced disease that in not amenable to curative treatment. For these individuals the relief of dysphagia is of utmost importance to the quality of their remaining survival time. This article reviews and compares the methods of palliation with focus on indications and contraindications, advantages as well as disadvantages of each technique, success rates, and complications. Tumor characteristics, the physician's experience, the institution's capabilities, cost, and patient preference will influence choice of palliation. Methods are often complementary rather than competitive.

A cost analysis of Nd:YAG laser ablation versus endoscopic intubation for the palliation of malignant dysphagia

Although endoscopic intubation is the mainstay of non-surgical palliation of malignant dysphagia, Nd:YAG laser ablation has been shown to provide good palliation with few complications. The study reported here incorporates data from published and unpublished sources into a cost model which estimates the lifetime cost of palliation with the two therapies. It is estimated that, depending on the assumptions used, laser palliation costs between 153 pounds and 710 pounds more per patient than endoscopic intubation. Sensitivity analysis is used to assess whether variation in clinical practice and in the unit costs of resources will change the conclusions of the study. This indicates that, under most alternative sets of assumptions, intubation retains its cost advantage. However, factors that might reduce, or even eliminate, this cost differential include undertaking more laser procedures as day-cases, using more expensive expanding metal stents for intubation and reducing the need for follow-up laser procedures with palliative radiotherapy.

Advanced esophageal carcinoma

From 1976 until 1990 a total of 212 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus were referred for surgical treatment. Resectability was 84.1% (161 of 191). Actuarial 5-year survival in patients with negative lymph nodes was 51.2% versus 12.4% in lymph node-positive patients. Therefore advanced carcinoma was defined to compromise all patients with involved regional (N1) or distal lymph nodes (M+Ly) as well as patients with T4 tumors or solid organ metastasis (M+org) irrespective of their lymph node status. Comparing complete (R0) versus incomplete (R1-R2) resections for stage III and IV carcinoma revealed 20% and 0% five-year survivals, respectively. There was no 5-year survival in the stage IV group. When excluding solid organ metastasis, the median survival shifted from 8.5 months after incomplete (R1-R2) to 20 months after complete (R0) resection. In 1991 three-field lymphadenectomy was initiated that included bilateral cervical lymphadenectomy. Thirty-seven patients have been treated so far (23 squamous cell carcinoma, 14 adenocarcinomas). Cervical lymph nodes were positive in 24.3% with an incidence up to 28.5% for distal-third carcinoma. Subsequently, 6 patients (16%) moved from M0 to M+Ly status. Our results confirm the key role of surgery not only in improving survival and locoregional tumor control but in refining the accuracy of staging advanced carcinomas provided complete resection is possible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)