Continuous single-layer serosubmucosal anastomosis in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Efficacy of single layered intestinal anastomosis over double layered intestinal anastomosis-an open labelled, randomized controlled trial

AIMS & OBJECTIVES

The hand-sewn method of bowel anastomosis is the most common because of its affordability, familiarity and easy availability of materials. It can be done in single or double layers, with different surgeons preferring one technique over the other. Double layer intestinal anastomosis (DLIA) is time-consuming, challenging to perform, and carries possibly a higher risk of devascularisation, infection, and necrosis. Studies conducted so far do not show a significant difference between the two, but have concluded that more studies are required to determine this definitively. This study attempted to see whether the single layer intestinal anastomosis (SLIA) is non-inferior to DLIA in terms of incidence of anastomotic leak. It also compared mortality, morbidity, and length of hospitalization (LOH) between the two groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a parallel arm, open labelled, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial conducted in the department of surgery in a tertiary care centre between October 2016 and March 2018. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly allotted to two groups: Patients undergoing SLIA and patients undergoing DLIA. After the procedure, all patients were assessed for anastomotic leak, morbidity, mortality and LOH in the postoperative period. A 3-month follow-up period was observed for complications.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were randomised, 52 in SLIA and 54 in DLIA. Baseline demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The most common indication for intestinal anastomosis was ostomy closure in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leak, other complications, mortality and LOH.

CONCLUSION

SLIA was comparable to DLIA with respect to incidence of anastomotic leak, morbidity, mortality, and the length of hospitalization, and can be considered as a safe and feasible alternative, in elective and emergency settings.

Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis - PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study

Introduction

Various suture materials and suture techniques are used to perform gastrointestinal anastomosis after tumour resection, but the best combination is still a matter of debate.

Methods

This multi-centre, international, single-arm, prospective observational study aimed at demonstrating the non-inferiority of a mid-term absorbable monofilament in comparison to braided sutures in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Monosyn suture was used to create the gastrointestinal anastomosis and the frequency of anastomotic leakage until day of discharge was chosen as the primary parameter. The outcome was compared to the results published for braided sutures in the literature. Secondary parameters were the time to perform the anastomosis, length of hospital stay, costs, and postoperative complications.

Results

The anastomosis leakage rate was 2.91%, indicating that Monosyn suture was not inferior to braided sutures used in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Of the reported anastomotic suture techniques, the single layer continuous method was the fastest and most economical technique in the present observational study.

Conclusion

Monosyn suture is safe and effective in gastrointestinal anastomosis and represents a good alternative to other sutures used for gastrointestinal anastomosis. With regard to safety, time and cost-efficiency, the single-layer continuous technique should be considered a preferred method. The transfer of results from clinical studies into daily practice with regard to surgical techniques for gastrointestinal anastomosis should be further evaluated in larger studies or in nationwide registries.

•

Monosyn suture material is safe and efficient for anastomosis performed in the gastrointestinal tract in daily routine.

•

Monofilament mid-term absorbable suture (Monosyn) represents a good alternative to other sutures used for gastrointestinal anastomosis.

•

Regarding safety and cost-efficiency, the single layer continuous technique should be considered as a preferred method.

Novel technique for full-thickness resection of gastric malignancy: feasibility of nonexposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (news) in porcine models

Full-thickness resection for gastric malignancy carries a risk of peritoneal dissemination due to opening of the gastric lumen. We evaluated the feasibility and safety a novel method of full-thickness resection without transmural communication, called nonexposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery in ex vivo and in vivo porcine models. Six explanted porcine stomachs and 6 live pigs were used for this study. After marking and submucosal injection around 3 cm simulated lesions, the seromuscular layer was laparoscopically cut and sutured with the lesion inverted to the inside. Consecutively, a mucosubmucosal incision was made endoscopically. Three pigs used for the survival study were monitored for 7 days. All 12 lesions were successfully resected en bloc without perforation. The 3 pigs survived for 1 week without adverse events, and necropsy revealed neither leakage nor abscess formation related to the operation. We demonstrated nonexposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery to be technically feasible and safe in both ex vivo and in vivo porcine studies.

Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after single-layer continuous suture for ileocolonic anastomosis

AIM

The study was designed to determine the suitability of a single-layer continuous anastomosis for ileo-colonic anastomoses and to determine perioperative risk factors for morbidity and mortality in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Perioperative data of 463 patients undergoing colonic surgery with an ileocolonic anastomosis between 2000 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors for morbidity, including anastomotic leakage, and mortality.

RESULTS

The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 2.1%. In more than 50% right hemicolectomies were performed for colonic cancer. Univariate analysis showed a significant association of the underlying diagnosis with the leakage rate (ischemia 3.0% vs. carcinoma 1.3%). Multivariate analysis identified age, ASA score, diagnosis, and urgency as risk factors for morbidity; and an urgent operation setting (vital indications), a body mass index >25, diabetes mellitus, and a hypotensive circulation upon admission as predictors of anastomotic leakage. The mortality rate was 20% (2/10) among patients with anastomotic leakage and 2.9% (13/453) in those without anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

Single-layer continuous anastomoses for ileo-colonic surgery can be safely performed, even in a teaching setting. Four preoperative risk factors for morbidity and four different factors for anastomotic leakage could be identified in multivariate analysis. If feasible, these factors should have an impact on the preoperative decision-making progress.

Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the suitability of a single-layer continuous technique for intestinal anastomosis in a surgical training program.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Several recent reports have advocated the use of a continuous single-layer technique for intestinal anastomosis. Purported advantages include shorter time for construction, lower cost, and perhaps a lower rate of anastomotic leakage. The authors hypothesized that the single-layer continuous anastomosis could be safely introduced into a surgical training program and that it could be performed in less time and at a lower cost than the two-layer interrupted anastomosis.

METHODS

The study was conducted during a 3-year period ending September 1999. All adult patients requiring intestinal anastomosis were considered eligible. Patients who required anastomosis to the stomach, duodenum, and rectum were excluded. Patients were also excluded if the surgeon did not believe either technique could be used. Patients were randomly assigned to one- or two-layer techniques. Single-layer anastomoses were performed with a continuous 3-0 polypropylene suture. Two-layer anastomoses were constructed using interrupted 3-0 silk Lembert sutures for the outer layer and a continuous 3-0 polyglycolic acid suture for the inner layer. The time for anastomosis began with the placement of the first stitch and ended when the last stitch was cut. Anastomotic leak was defined as radiographic demonstration of a fistula or nonabsorbable material draining from a wound after oral administration, or visible disruption of the suture line during reexploration.

RESULTS

Sixty-five single-layer and 67 two-layer anastomoses were performed. The groups were evenly matched according to age, sex, diagnosis, and location of the anastomosis. Two leaks (3.1%) occurred in the single-layer group and one (1.5%) in the two-layer group. Two abscesses (3.0%) occurred in each group. A mean of 20.8 minutes was required to construct a single-layer anastomosis versus 30.7 minutes for the two-layer technique. Mean length of stay was 7.9 days for single-layer patients and 9.9 days for two-layer patients; this difference did not quite reach statistical significance. Cost of materials was $4.61 for the single-layer technique and $35.38 for the two-layer method.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-layer continuous anastomosis can be constructed in significantly less time and with a similar rate of complications compared with the two-layer technique. It also costs less than any other method and can be incorporated into a surgical training program without a significant increase in complications.

Single-layer continuous anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective audit

BACKGROUND

Single-layer intestinal anastomoses have been constructed conventionally using an interrupted suture technique. It is however, increasingly popular to perform such anastomosis using a continuous suture.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty consecutive patients with 254 continuous single-layer anastomoses performed over a 4 year period were included in the study. Sixty-one patients underwent oesophagectomy, oesophageal bypass or gastrectomy, 32 underwent biliary bypass, hepatic, biliary or pancreatic resection and 88 had colorectal operations. The median age was 67 years.

RESULTS

There were 254 anastomoses of which four leaked (1.6%). Fifteen patients (8.3%) died in hospital.

CONCLUSION

These results show that the single-layer continuous suture technique is safe in gastrointestinal anastomoses.