Total pelvic exenteration: a justified procedure

Pelvic exenteration for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal and bladder malignancies in the modern era

BACKGROUND

Although pelvic exenteration (PE) remains an important treatment for advanced pelvic malignancies, it has historically been associated with high morbidity and mortality with unclear long-term benefits. The objectives of this study were (1) estimate complication and mortality rates, (2) determine predictors of complications, and (3) estimate overall survival after PE for patients with locally advanced colorectal and bladder tumors.

METHODS

A total of 377 patients were retrospectively identified from the 2005-2010 NSQIP PUF and an additional 1,111 from the 2004-2010 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database with T4M0 colorectal or bladder cancers. A logistic regression model was fitted to estimate early morbidity and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival after PE compared to nonoperative management.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percent of patients had a complication, but 30-day mortality was only 2%. Patients with preoperative dyspnea and higher ASA class had the highest risk of morbidity. PE for the treatment of T4M0 rectal and bladder cancer was associated with significantly improved long-term survival compared to nonoperative therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PE is associated with a high complication rate but low 30-day mortality. The results of this study provide strong evidence to support PE as a viable treatment option for locally advanced rectal and bladder malignancies in appropriately selected patients.

Major complications following exenteration in cases of pelvic malignancy: A 10-year experience

AIM: To analyze the major complications after exenteration of gynecological and rectal malignancies.

METHODS: Twenty-two patients with gynecological malignancy and 6 with rectal malignancy underwent pelvic exenteration (PE) between 1996 and 2005. PE was performed for primary malignancy in 71.4% of cases (vulvar cancer in 13, cancer rectal in 5, cervical cancer in 1 and Bartholin’s gland cancer in 1 cases respectively and recurrent malignancy in 28.6% of cases (cervical cancer in 5, ovarian cancer in 1, uterine sarcoma in 1 and rectal cancer in 1 cases respectively). Posterior PE, total PE and anterior PE were most often performed.

RESULTS: Major complications in the operative field involving the urinary tract infection or the wound dehiscence occurred in 12 patients (42.9%). Early complications included massive bleeding from the sacral plexus, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), thrombophlebitis, acute renal failure, urinary bladder dysfunction, ureter damage, re-operation and pulmonary embolus. Urinary incontinence was observed in 2 women as a late complication. In 1 patient a nephrostomy was performed in 1 patient due to extensive hydronephrosis and 1 patient had complications connected with the gastrointestinal tract. The mortality rate was 7%, of which inter-operative mortality accounted for 3.5%. Major complications often occurred in advanced primary vulvar cancer affecting those with recurrent malignancies.

CONCLUSION: PE is more beneficial to patients with primary vulvar and rectal cancer than to those with recurrent cancer. Knowledge of the inherent complications and morbidity of PE is essential.

Exenterative pelvic surgery—eleven year experience of the Swansea Pelvic Oncology Group

AIMS

To review indications for surgery and outcomes of patients with complex locally advanced pelvic malignancies treated by a multidisciplinary Pelvic Oncology Group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1992 and March 2003, 130 patients were jointly assessed in a monthly clinic involving urological, gynaecological, colorectal and plastic surgeons, an oncologist and nurse specialists. Seventy-six patients proceeded to exenterative surgery.

RESULTS

Rectal carcinoma and gynaecological cancers were the two most common indications for surgery. Median follow-up was 14 months (range 1-120 months). There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery. The morbidity rate was 28%. Predicted 5 years survival was 53% in cases with clear histological margins and no lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

With careful patient selection and multi specialty care pelvic exenteration is a safe and effective option in the treatment of complex locally advanced pelvic malignancy.

Pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancy

Pelvic exenteration is a demanding, yet potentially curative operation, for patients with advanced pelvic cancer. The majority will present with recurrence after prior surgery and radiotherapy. After exenteration, 5-year survival is 40% to 60% in patients with gynecologic cancer as compared to 25% to 40% for patients with colorectal cancer. Physiologic age and absence of co-morbidities appear to be more important when selecting patients for exenteration than chronological age. Careful pre-operative staging, including either computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), usually will identify patients with distant metastases, extrapelvic nodal disease, or disease involving the pelvic sidewall (which generally precludes surgery). The recent application of intra-operative radiotherapy or postoperative high-dose brachytherapy for patients with more advanced pelvic disease, which may include sidewall involvement, may expand the standard indications for exenteration. However, the intent of this procedure, with or without radiotherapy, should be resection of all tumor with the aim of cure since the place of palliative exenteration is controversial at best. The operative details of exenteration are presented, as are two surgical approaches to composite resection of pelvic structures in continuity with sacrectomy. Filling the pelvis with large tissue flaps, usually a rectus abdominus flap, has decreased morbidity rates, particularly with small bowel complications. Peri-operative mortality is usually 5% to 10%, and significant morbidity occurs in over 50% of patients. Restorative techniques for both urinary and gastrointestinal tracts can diminish the need for stomas and, along with vaginal reconstruction, can significantly improve quality of life for many patients after exenteration. These advances in surgery and radiotherapy help make the procedure a viable option for patients with otherwise incurable pelvic malignancy.

Phase II trial of radical surgery for locally advanced pelvic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Reported operative mortality and survival rates following total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for recurrent pelvic neoplasia are now as good as those for many primary treatments. The currently accepted primary treatments for these tumours are, however, still either radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of TPE and secondarily to ascertain survival after TPE.

METHODS

This was a phase II study of 50 patients with locally advanced pelvic tumours who underwent TPE.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (64 per cent) underwent TPE for recurrent carcinoma of the cervix, seven (14 per cent) for rectal cancer, three (6 per cent) for vulval carcinoma, three (6 per cent) for vaginal carcinoma, two (4 per cent) for prostate cancer and three (6 per cent) for other tumours. The 30-day mortality rate was 8 per cent with an in-hospital mortality rate of 16 per cent. The crude morbidity rate was 62 per cent, with 23 patients (46 per cent) having grade III or IV toxicity. A complete response was achieved in 63 per cent and a partial response in 37 per cent of patients. The overall median survival time was 86 weeks; it was 111 weeks in patients in whom a complete response was achieved.

CONCLUSION

The survival and operative mortality rates that are now attainable with TPE are comparable to those achieved with chemoradiotherapy in advanced pelvic neoplasia. TPE should no longer be reserved for salvage therapy and should perhaps be compared with chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment in a phase III randomized trial in patients with these tumours.

Pelvic exenteration for advanced primary rectal cancer in male patients

Between November 1987 and January 1996 pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer was carried out in 11 male patients. Two underwent a primary resection with subtotal cystectomy. In the remaining nine patients, the treatment commenced with a staging laparotomy and the fashioning of an end colostomy of the descending colon, followed by preoperative radiotherapy (50-56 Gy in 5 weeks). Total exenteration with uretero-ileo-cutaneostomy was carried out 4-6 weeks later. In two patients, the exenteration was performed despite the detection of hepatic metastases during the second laparotomy. The pathological staging was T4 in six and T3 in five patients. The immediate postoperative course was uneventful in eight patients and their hospital stay averaged 20 days. Serious postoperative complications prolonged the hospital stay of three patients. Three died during the first 6 months. Recurrent disease caused the death of three of the eight remaining patients: one locoregional (7.5 years after surgery), one from pre-existing hepatic metastases (18 months after surgery) and one from the combination of locoregional and distant recurrence (15 months after surgery). Four patients are on follow-up without evidence of disease, 96, 43, 23 and 22 months after surgery. One patient is alive 20 months after exenteration, with two pulmonary metastases having been recently excised. We conclude that, notwithstanding the morbidity rate, total pelvic exenteration is an acceptable option for advanced primary rectal cancer in male patients. Preoperative radiotherapy should be administered for cancers seated in the lower two-thirds of the rectum and perioperative chemotherapy should be considered seriously.