Gastric motility following oesophagectomy

The Esophagogastric Anastomosis: The Importance of Anchoring Sutures in Reducing Anastomotic Leak Rates

Background

The incidence of anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery is highest after esophagogastric anastomosis, with leakage rates of 10% to 38% still being reported, but little consensus as to cause or corrective. The role of anastomotic tension from a series of physiological forces acting on the anastomosis from the moment of recovery from anesthesia may be underestimated. It was hypothesized that anchoring the conduit in the mediastinum would provide the greatest protection during the vulnerable healing phase.

Patients and Methods

A prospectively maintained database was interrogated for anastomotic leakage following the introduction of an anastomotic technique employing anchoring sutures where the gastric conduit was secured to the mediastinal pleura with 3 obliquely inserted load-bearing sutures. A contrast study was performed between days 5 and 7 and all intrahospital mortalities underwent autopsy. Clinical, radiological, and autopsy leaks were recorded.

Results

Of 146 intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomoses in 144 patients, 81 (55%) of which were stapled, there was 1 clinical leak and 1 patient with an aortoenteric fistula, considered at autopsy to be possibly due to an anastomotic leak, to give an anastomotic leak rate of 2 in 146 (1.37%).

Conclusion

The low anastomotic leak rate in this series is potentially due to the protective effect of anchoring sutures, the chief difference from an otherwise standard anastomotic technique. These sutures protect the anastomosis from a series of distracting forces during the most vulnerable phase of healing. It is intuitive that the absence of tension would also reduce any risk posed by a minor impairment of blood supply or any imperfection of the technique.

The Optimal Pyloric Procedure: A Collective Review

Vagal damage and subsequent pyloric denervation inevitably occur during esophagectomy, potentially leading to delayed gastric emptying (DGE). The choice of an optimal pyloric procedure to overcome DGE is important, as such procedures can lead to prolonged surgery, shortening of the conduit, disruption of the blood supply, and gastric dumping/bile reflux. This study investigated various pyloric methods and analyzed comparative studies in order to determine the optimal pyloric procedure. Surgical procedures for the pylorus include pyloromyotomy, pyloroplasty, or digital fracture. Botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic balloon dilatation, and erythromycin are non-surgical procedures. The scope, technique, and effects of these procedures are changing due to advances in minimally invasive surgery and postoperative interventions. Some comparative studies have shown that pyloric procedures are helpful for DGE, while others have argued that it is difficult to reach an objective conclusion because of the variety of definitions of DGE and evaluation methods. In conclusion, recent advances in interventional technology and minimally invasive surgery have led to questions regarding the practice of pyloric procedures. However, many clinicians still perform them and they are at least somewhat effective. To provide guidance on the optimal pyloric procedure, DGE should first be defined clearly, and a large-scale study with an objective evaluation method will then be required.

Should we continue to drain the pylorus in patients undergoing an esophagectomy?

A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the necessity of a pyloric drainage procedure during an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Earlier data recommend performing a pyloric drainage procedure for all esophagectomies; however, recent studies have questioned this. A thorough literature search (January 2001-November 2011) was performed using the terms esophagectomy, pyloroplasty, pyloromyotomy, botulinum toxin, and pyloric drainage. Only studies that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure with those undergoing an esophagectomy without a pyloric drainage procedure were selected. Only four studies, comprising 668 patients in total, were identified that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with or without a pyloric drainage procedure, and two additional meta-analyses were identified and selected for discussion. All studies were retrospective, and because of the heterogeneity of studies, patient demographics, reporting, and statistical analysis of patient outcome, pooling of data and meta-analysis could not be performed. Careful analysis demonstrated that pyloric drainage procedure was associated with a non-significant trend for delayed gastric emptying and biliary reflux, while not affecting the incidence of dumping. No correlation was determined between a pyloric drainage procedure and anastomotic leaks, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, and overall perioperative morbidity. While there are risks associated with a pyloric drainage procedure and data exist supporting its omission during an esophagectomy, no good conclusion can be drawn from the current literature. Larger multi-institutional, prospective studies are required to definitively answer this question.

Functional disorders and quality of life after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer

Functional disorders such as delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome or duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux occur in half of the patients who undergo esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer. The potential role for pyloroplasty in the prevention of functional disorders is still debated. Antireflux fundoplication during esophagectomy can apparently reduce the reflux but at the cost of increasing the complexity of the operation; it is not widely used. The treatment of functional disorders arising after esophagectomy and gastroplasty for cancer is based mainly on dietary measures. Proton pump inhibitors have well documented efficiency and should be given routinely to prevent reflux complications. Erythromycin may prevent delayed gastric emptying, but it should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders. In the event of anastomotic stricture, endoscopic dilatation is usually efficient. Problems related to gastrointestinal functional disorders after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction do not significantly impair long-term quality of life, which is mainly influenced by tumor recurrence.

The esophageal remnant after gastric interposition

Gastric interposition is usually considered the reconstruction of choice following esophageal resection. However, a number of reports show that esophagectomy followed by a gastric transplant is associated with poor quality of life and significant reflux esophagitis in the esophageal remnant. The aim of this work is to review the factors affecting the mucosa of the esophageal remnant when using the stomach. A Medline was conducted. Additional references and search pathways were sourced from the references of reviewed articles. Reflux disease is considered an unavoidable consequence of esophageal resection followed by gastric interposition. Mucosal damage from acid and bile exposure in the esophageal remnant affects approximatively 50% of these patients. There is usually no correlation between symptoms and the presence of mucosal damage in the remaining esophagus. Endoscopy and endoscopic biopsies are the only reliable methods to document the status of the mucosa. When present, reflux esophagitis shows a progression from inflammation to erosions and to the development of columnar lined metaplasia. Esophageal and gastric function, gastric drainage operation, level of the anastomosis, route of reconstruction, and patients' position after the operation have all been shown to influence the severity and extent of damage in the esophageal remnant. Prevention and treatment of esophagitis in the remaining esophagus are discussed. When the stomach is used as a substitute to reconstruct the esophagus whether for malignant or benign conditions, an in vivo model of reflux diseases is created. Studies using this model may help clarify molecular and cellular events that lead to irreversible insult on the esophageal mucosa. Improvement to the reconstruction itself must be sought to favor better results with the gastric transplant.

Gastrointestinal motility after digestive surgery

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility dysfunction is a common complication of any abdominal surgical procedure. During fasting, the upper GI tract undergoes a cyclic change in motor activity, called the interdigestive migrating motor contraction (IMC). The IMC is divided into four phases, with phase III having the most characteristic activity. After digestive surgery, GI motility dysfunction shows a lack of a fed response, less phase II activity, more frequent phase III activity of the IMC, and some phase III activity migrating orally. Postoperative symptoms have been related to motor disturbances, such as interrupted or retrograde phase III or low postprandial activity. The causes of GI disorder are autonomic nervous dysfunction and GI hormone disruptions. The administration of a motilin agonist can induce earlier phase III contractions in the stomach after pancreatoduodenectomy. For nervous dysfunction, an inhibitory sympathetic reflux is likely to be important in postoperative motility disorders. Until recently, treatment for gut dysmotility has consisted of nasogastric suction, intravenous fluids, and observation; however, more effective treatment methods are being reported. Recent discoveries have the potential to decrease postoperative gut dysmotility remarkably after surgery.

Trans-cutaneous electrogastrographic study of gastric myoelectric activity in transposed intrathoracic stomach after esophagectomy

We examined the feasibility of trans-cutaneous electrogastrography (EGG) in recording myoelectric activity of the transposed thoracic stomach after esophagectomy. Nineteen patients who had Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were studied. The EGG signal was recorded using cutaneous electrodes placed over the lower sternum. Eleven patients who underwent total gastrectomy served as controls. Normal rhythm pattern (2.4-3.6 cpm > or = 70%) and power ratio (PR > or = 2) was observed in five and 12 patients, respectively, after esophagectomy. The observation of normal gastric rhythm was more frequent in the postprandial period in the esophagectomy group (median 42.6%vs. 7.4%, P = 0.01), and the PR was significantly higher (median 2.27 vs. 1.38, P = 0.013) than the gastrectomy group. Feeding further increased the prevalence of normal gastric slow wave in the esophagectomy group (median 14.8% to 42.6%, P = 0.002) and improved the stability of dominant frequency (median 78% to 67%, P = 0.015). We conclude that gastric myoelectric activities of thoracic transposed stomach can be detected from cutaneous sternal electrodes. This represented a preservation of gastric motility even when the stomach is pulled up to the thorax as a substitute for the esophagus.

Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Controversy still exists about the need for pyloric drainage procedures (pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy) after esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy and vagotomy. Although pyloric drainage may prevent postoperative delayed gastric emptying, it may also promote bile reflux into the oesophagus. We analysed pyloric drainage methods for their potential effect on gastric outlet obstruction and bile reflux in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and ninety-eight patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated by transthoracal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction either with pyloromyotomy (group II, n = 118), pyloroplasty (group III, n = 34) or without pyloric drainage (group I, n = 46) between January 2000 and December 2004. The postoperative gastrointestinal passage by radiological investigation, anastomotic leakage rate, mortality and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux by endoscopy within the first postoperative year were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and the types of surgical procedures did not differ between the three groups. There was no difference in hospital mortality, anastomotic leakage rate, gastrointestinal passage and postoperative hospital stay between the three groups. However, more patients with pyloric drainage showed bile reflux (I = 0% vs II+III=14.9%, p = 0.069) and reflux esophagitis (I = 10.3% vs II+III = 34.5%, p < 0.05) compared to patients without pyloric drainage. On the multivariate analysis, pyloric drainage and the anastomotic height were independent and were significant risk factors associated with postoperative reflux esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Pyloric drainage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction should be omitted because it does not improve gastric emptying and may favour biliary reflux esophagitis.

Synchronous electrogastrographic and manometric study of the stomach as an esophageal substitute

AIM: To investigate the electric and contractile mechanisms involved in the deranged function of the transposed stomach in relation to the course of the symptoms and the changes in contractile and electrical parameters over time.

METHODS: Twenty-one patients after subtotal esoph-agectomy and 18 healthy volunteers were studied. Complaints were compiled by using a questionnaire, and a symptom score was formed. Synchronous electrogas-trography and gastric manometry were performed in the fasting state and postprandially.

RESULTS: Eight of the operated patients were symptom-free and 13 had symptoms. The durations of the postoperative periods for the symptomatic (9.1±6.5 mo) and the asymptomatic (28.3±8.8 mo) patients were significantly different. The symptom score correlated negatively with the time that had elapsed since the operation. The percentages of the dominant frequency in the normogastric, bradygastric and tachygastric ranges differed significantly between the controls and the patients. A significant difference was detected between the power ratio of the controls and that of the patients. The occurrence of tachygastria in the symptomatic and the symptom-free patients correlated negatively both with the time that had elapsed and with the symptom score. There was a significant increase in motility index after feeding in the controls, but not in the patients. The contractile activity of the stomach increased both in the controls and in the symptom-free patients. In contrast, in the group of symptomatic patients, the contractile activity decreased postprandially as compared with the fasting state.

CONCLUSION: The patients’ post-operative complaints and symptoms change during the post-operative period and correlate with the parameters of the myoelectric and contractile activities of the stomach. Tachygastria seems to be the major pathogenetic factor involved in the contractile dysfunction.

Gastric myoelectrical activity post-chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy: a prospective study using subscapular surface recording

The aims of this study were to prospectively evaluate gastric function in esophageal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy and following surgery, using cutaneous electrogastrography (EGG). Twenty-three patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were recruited to the study. A subset of patients (n = 11) underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and were also studied at 14 days after treatment. All patients underwent EGG studies prior to and following surgery, at 3 months postoperatively. Ten of these patients were also studied at medians of 6 months and 12 months after surgery. Twenty normal volunteers were used as controls. Post-operative EGG studies were monitored with a modified technique; the electrodes being placed in the subscapular region in the area of the transposed stomach. Following neoadjuvant treatment there was a significant increase in abnormal gastric myoelectrical activity involving changes in tachygastrias and decreased motility as measured by power ratio. Post-operatively there was a significant increase in bradygastria which persisted at 6 months but not at 12 months. There was a corresponding decrease in normogastria which persisted at 6 months and to a lesser extent at 12 months. Dominant frequency remained significantly depressed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Gastric myoelectrical activity is normal in untreated esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy causes a disruption to normal myoelectrical activity involving reduced motility and tachygastrias. Surgery causes a depression in dominant frequency with a reduced incidence of normogastria at 3 months and 6 months but with a tendency towards normality at 12 months.

Reflux after oesophagectomy

Background

Reflux of gastric and duodenal content after oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction is a common problem and largely considered an inevitable consequence of surgery. Cervical burning and regurgitation, often more pronounced when supine, can be troublesome and even disabling, interfering substantially with quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to reflux after oesophagectomy and evaluate measures to prevent or control it.

Methods

A Medline search using the terms ‘gastro-oesophageal reflux’, ‘oesophagectomy’ and ‘antireflux surgery’ was conducted. Additional references and search pathways were sourced from the bibliographies of articles located.

Results and conclusion

Reflux after oesophagectomy is a significant problem, with both clinical and pathological consequences. Simple measures to facilitate gastric emptying, such as creating a gastric tube, performing a pyloric drainage procedure and using gastric motility agents, may produce a reduction in symptoms but do not alone control reflux itself. A variety of surgical reconstructions have been used, many of which are either difficult to fashion or not suitable when a radical resection has been performed. A modified fundoplication at the anastomosis seems to be the simplest technique and may be relatively effective in controlling symptoms. The impact of strategies to reduce reflux on quality of life and on pathological sequelae of reflux in the oesophageal remnant remains to be evaluated.

Prokinetic effect of cisapride on pedicled stomach, small bowel and colon grafts replacing the esophagus after esophageal resection

Cisapride is a potent third generation prokinetic agent acting on postganglionic receptors by increasing the release of acetylcholine. In a prospective, self-controlled study the prokinetic action of cisapride was tested on pedicled stomach, jejunum and colon grafts used for substitute after esophageal resection. Between 1995 and 1998 15 patients with gastric pull up, 10 patients with colon replacement or bypass and eight patients with free jejunum transplant or jejunum replacement were evaluated. Esophageal transit scintigraphy was performed before and after cisapride administration. From the time-activity curves, the half-life of radiolabeled bolus in the esophagus was calculated and preadministration and postadministration half-lives were compared. Cisapride significantly reduced the half-life of radiolabeled bolus in the substitute in the case of stomach and jejunum replacement, while for colon replacement the results were dispersed too widely to yield significant difference. Cisapride exerts prokinetic effect on pedicled stomach and jejunum substitutes after esophageal resection.

Decreased expression of stem cell factor in esophageal and gastric mucosa after esophagogastric anastomosis for cancer: potential relevance to motility

BACKGROUND

Esophageal replacement with gastric tube is a well-established reconstruction of the alimentary tract after esophagectomy in cancer patients. The resulting molecular events in the transposed gastric tube and residual esophagus have yet to be investigated. Stem cell factor (SCF) was recently shown to be critical for signaling in gastrointestinal motility. SCF expression is here correlated with changes in mucosal morphology, acid and biliary reflux, and motility in the residual esophagus and gastric tube.

METHODS

Thirteen patients surgically resected for squamous esophageal carcinoma with gastric tube replaced by esophagogastric anastomosis underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and bile reflux detection. Esophageal and gastric mucosa samples were examined for SCF expression by immunohistochemical and semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis and for SCF serum levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

All patients showed severe residual esophagus hypoperistalsis and no gastric tube motor activity. The 24-hour pH monitoring was positive in most; 24-hour bile detection was mostly negative. SCF levels in the residual esophageal and gastric tube mucosa were dramatically decreased compared with those of normal subjects. The correlation between SCF and slow-wave activity was positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypomotility of the residual esophagus and gastric tube seems closely associated with disruption of the SCF/c-kit signaling pathway. However, the absence of notable relations between mucosal changes after chronic exposure to acid, biliary gastric content, and SCF expression indicates that this analysis cannot be considered part of endoscopic follow-up.

Gastropyloric motor activity and the effects of erythromycin given orally after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The motor activity of the gastric tube as an esophageal replacement after esophagectomy is poorly understood. The aims of the present study were to examine the gastropyloric motility of the gastric tube and the effects of erythromycin given orally.

METHODS

Interdigestive gastropyloric motility was recorded by manometry with a sleeve sensor in 23 esophagectomized patients. The 23 patients were classified into 3-, 12-, and 24-month groups according to postoperative follow-up time. Radiopaque markers were used in 8 patients to assess gastric emptying. The effects of erythromycin were studied after the patients received 600 mg during fasting and 1 g postprandially.

RESULTS

Compared with the 3-month group, the 12-month group and the 24-month group showed significantly increased pyloric and antral motility, respectively. During a fast, erythromycin induced phase III in 44.4% of the patients with more than 12 months of follow-up. In contrast to the normal subjects, esophagectomized patients showed delayed gastric emptying at 3 and 4 hours. However, erythromycin significantly accelerated gastric emptying at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The motor activity of the gastric tube returns towards normal in a progression over time from the pylorus cephalad. Erythromycin given orally might be used as a prokinetic agent in patients after esophagectomy.

Pyloroplasty in gastric replacement of the esophagus after esophagectomy: one-layer or two-layer technique?

Pyloroplasty is our routine drainage procedure performed when the stomach is used as the esophageal substitute after esophageal resection for cancer. The technique of pyloroplasty varies among surgeons and effectiveness has not been studied. Thirty-four patients with a gastric conduit whose pyloroplasty was constructed with a one-layer technique (group 1) were compared with a historical cohort of 31 patients treated with a two-layer method (group 2). Patients who had an abnormal pyloroduodenal region were excluded from the study. Perioperative morbidity and post-operative gastrointestinal symptoms within the first 6 months were evaluated. Patient demographics and the types of surgical procedures did not differ between the two groups. The median daily output from the nasogastric tube was 119 mL in group 1 and 115 mL in group 2 (p = 0.49). In 40 out of 65 patients (62%), the nasogastric tube was removed at a median of 3 days after the operation in both groups. There was no leakage from the pylorus or the esophagogastric anastomosis in this study. In both groups, the patients could resume a semisolid diet at a median of 8 days after surgery. One patient in group 1 and two patients in group 2 developed gastroparesis clinically. No patient, however, required reoperation. There was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary complications attributable to the technique of pyloroplasty. The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms within the first 6 months after surgery did not differ. Regurgitation was the most common symptom, affecting 10 patients in each group, 29% and 32% in group 1 and group 2 respectively (p = 1.0). Pyloroplasty was an effective gastric drainage procedure after esophagectomy whether the one or two-layer method was used. The authors prefer the one-layer method, which is safe and simple.

How important is the route of reconstruction after esophagectomy: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare retrosternal and posterior mediastinal gastric tube reconstruction with regard to postoperative function and quality of life.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were randomly allocated to either retrosternal (n = 14) or posterior mediastinal (n = 12) reconstruction after gastric tube formation. Radionuclide transit studies were applied to obtain objective functional data and a standardized quality-of-life assessment was performed.

RESULTS

Retrosternal reconstruction showed an increased morbidity (15 vs 13 major complications) and mortality (14.2 vs 8.3%). Radionuclide clearance in the supine position was delayed in the gastric tube in general, compared with normal controls (retention index > 40% vs < 10%). There was a significantly higher retention (p < 0.005) in the retrosternal group in the middle third of the tube and the whole tube after intake of the liquid tracer. The retention of the first solid tracer was also higher in the retrosternal group in the middle third of the tube (p = n.s.) and was significantly higher in the whole tube after 30 (p < 0.05) and 60 (p < 0.01) s. This had no significant impact on the patients' quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior mediastinal route of reconstruction is recommended but curative resection (R0) is mandatory to avoid possible complications due to local tumor relapse. After incomplete resection (R1 or R2) we recommend retrosternal reconstruction for better palliation.

Oral erythromycin improves gastrointestinal motility and transit after subtotal but not total gastrectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Erythromycin has been shown to be a powerful prokinetic of the gastrointestinal tract. Little is known about its value to improve motility and transit in gastrectomized patients.

METHODS

Thirteen disease-free patients subjected to subtotal gastrectomy and 11 subjected to total gastrectomy for gastric cancer entered the study. Gastrointestinal transit of a standard 99mTc-labelled meal and fasting motility were studied before and after oral erythromycin.

RESULTS

In patients who had subtotal gastrectomy mean(s.d.) gastric half-emptying time was 42(14) min before and 26(11) min after erythromycin (P = 0.011). Before erythromycin prolonged rhythmical contractions (3 per min) were recorded in eight patients, sporadic non-organized contractions in two and prolonged bursts of waves in one. After erythromycin, clustered waves resembling a migrating motor complex (MMC) appeared in eight patients, while rhythmic motor activity was unchanged in three. In patients who had total gastrectomy jejunal half-emptying time was 39(18) min before and 45(12) min after erythromycin. In eight patients, frequent MMCs were recorded, peristaltic in four, synchronous in one, antiperistaltic in two, with clusters of non-propagated waves in one. After erythromycin, longer peristaltic MMCs were recorded in three, antiperistaltic MMCs persisted in two, synchronous in one and clusters of non-propagated waves in two.

CONCLUSION

Oral erythromycin improves gastrointestinal transit and motility after subtotal gastrectomy. The findings after total gastrectomy are controversial.