Oesophageal acid clearance in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis

Quantitative assessment of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH and its clinical implications

We sought to quantify the characteristics of acid reflux episodes in patients with extraesophageal GERD symptoms (EES), hiatal hernia (HH), and erosive esophagitis (EroE) using multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII‐pH) and investigate the correlation between impedance parameters and high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). This was a retrospective analysis of esophageal manometric and impedance data inpatients with typical GERD symptoms who underwent both HREM and 24 h MII‐pH tests. Within the three patient subgroups, we evaluated impedance metrics such as average height of reflux, total duration of reflux, maximum duration of reflux, average pH, and average area of reflux. We also introduce a novel composite reflux index (CRI) metric, which is a measure of reflux height, duration, and acidity. Patients with EES exhibited a 29.3% increase in average height of reflux, compared to non‐EES patients (p < 0.01); the average height of reflux was found to be an independent predictor of EES (p < 0.01). Patients with HH showed a 190% longer total reflux duration (p < 0.01, vs. non‐HH patients). Total reflux duration was twice as long in EroE patients compared to those without (p = 0.02). Average CRI was significantly different within all three subgroup comparisons (p < 0.01). Impedance metrics shared weak negative correlations with lower esophageal sphincter (LES) rest pressure and distal contractile integral (DCI), and weak positive correlations with % absent peristalsis (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01 for various parameters). Quantitative impedance metrics provide useful insight into the pathophysiology of reflux in patients with EES, HH, and EroE.

Normal acid exposure time in esophageal pH monitoring in Asian and Western populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small Asian studies have investigated the normal range of the AET; the range may be different from that in Western populations. We evaluated its normal range in healthy Asian compared to Western subjects.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed for studies that reported pH monitoring parameters in healthy subjects. Studies that reported the AET values of healthy subjects were eligible for the analyses. The upper limit of normal of the AET was obtained from the 95th percentile of the available raw data or calculated as the mean value +2 standard deviations.

KEY RESULTS

Nineteen Asian and 49 Western studies were assessed. The estimated AET values were analyzed using a bootstrapping technique, weighted according to the sample size. The mean AET was 1.1% and 2.9% in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The upper limit of the reference range was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.9%) and 8.2 (95% CI, 6.7-9.9) in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The normal AET differed between the Asian and Western populations because the CI of the two groups did not overlap.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The upper limit of normal of the AET in healthy Asian subjects was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7-3.9%), which was lower than that of healthy Western subjects.

Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Non-specific esophageal dysmotility with impaired clearance is often present in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially those with erosive disease; however the physio-mechanic basis of esophageal dysfunction is not well defined.

METHODS

Retrospective assessment of patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; n=20) and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD; n=20) with pathologic acid exposure on pH studies (>4.2% time/24 h) and also healthy controls (n=20) studied by high resolution manometry. Esophageal motility in response to liquid and solid bolus swallows and multiple water swallows (MWS) was analyzed. Peristaltic dysfunction was defined as failed peristalsis, spasm, weak or poorly coordinated esophageal contraction (>3cm break in 30 mmHg isocontour).

KEY RESULTS

Peristaltic dysfunction was present in 33% of water swallows in controls, 56% ENRD and 76% ERD respectively (P<0.023 vs controls, P=0.185 vs ENRD). The proportion of effective peristaltic contractions improved with solid compared to liquid bolus in controls (18%vs 33%, P=0.082) and ENRD (22%vs 54%, P=0.046) but not ERD (62%vs 76%, P=0.438). Similarly, MWS was followed by effective peristalsis in 83% of controls and 70% ENRD but only 30% ERD patients (P<0.017 vs controls and P<0.031 vs ENRD). The association between acid exposure and dysmotility was closer for solid than liquid swallows (r=0.52 vs 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Peristaltic dysfunction is common in GERD. ERD patients are characterized by a failure to respond to the physiologic challenge of solid bolus and MWS that is likely also to impair clearance following reflux events and increase exposure to gastric refluxate.

The role of delayed gastric emptying and impaired oesophageal body motility

Delayed gastric emptying in a variable proportion of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has been observed in most series, however a relationship between delayed gastric emptying and increased gastro-oesophageal reflux has not been convincingly demonstrated. Enhanced postprandial accommodation and delayed emptying of the proximal stomach have been described, but some controversy exists. Impaired primary peristalsis is often present especially in patients with oesophagitis and its prevalence increases with increasing severity of inflammatory mucosal lesions. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease often have defective triggering of secondary peristalsis independently of presence of oesophagitis. It is presently unclear if impaired oesophageal motility is a primary defect or an irreversible consequence of inflammation. Attempts at pharmacological improvement of impaired oesophageal motility have been so far disappointing. Patients with partially preserved neuromuscular structures need to be identified in order to select them for new prokinetic therapy.

The refluxate: The impact of its magnitude, composition and distribution

The pathogenesis of gastrointestinal reflux disease is multifactoral. Integral to the disease process is the refluxate itself. The characteristics and composition of the refluxate are dependent on several physiological variables. The refluxate may contain varying concentrations of acid, pepsin, gas, or contents of duodenal reflux (such as bile acid and pancreatic enzymes). Characteristics such as volume and proximal extent of the refluxate, and the chemical content of this refluxate can strongly influence the risk of symptom perception. Strong acid (pH<4) and duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux are also implicated in the development of mucosal damage in the form of oesophagitis, Barrett's metaplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The manifestation of disease, however, is not entirely reliant on the refluxate, which must be considered in the context of the genetic, environmental and psychological susceptibility of the individual.

Proximal oesophagus: the added value in understanding GORD symptoms

Over the past decade, the approach to the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms has changed, and growing evidence now supports the concept that visceral hyper-sensitivity to intra-oesophageal stimuli plays a major role. Among the recent advances, one of the more consistent findings is that the contact of the refluxate, either acidic or weakly acidic, with the proximal oesophageal mucosa, is a main determinant of GORD symptoms, particularly in the large majority of patients affected by non-erosive reflux disease. The data reported in the current issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility by Bredenoord et al., showing only a small proportion of proximal reflux in patients with Barrett's oesophagus, who are less sensitive to gastro-oesophageal reflux, further support the consistency of this finding in the pathogenesis of symptoms. In the light of these results, we shall look forward, in the management of patients, to approaches aimed at restoring the antireflux barrier, hopefully decreasing the amount of reflux and, in turn, its proximal extent.

Esophageal Acid clearance: more volume-dependent than motility-dependent in healthy piglets

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The present study investigates manometrically in healthy piglets whether esophageal clearance after distension with different volumes of acid is volume-dependent.

METHODS

Sedated, non-intubated piglets (n = 22) underwent stationary manometry of the esophagus with a 4-probe perfused assembly after successive injection of 1, 2, and 3 mL of saline and acid. Simultaneous pH metering allowed assessment of acid clearance. Wave features and clearance times after saline and acid were compared by paired non-parametric tests and Friedman analysis of variance. The linearity of the relationships between the clearance times and the volumes of acid infused were tested after square root transformations by one-way ANOVA repeated measures. The significance level was set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

The motor response was identical after distension with saline and acid except for the largest amount of acid used, which elicited more waves during the first 5 minutes after infusion. Time elapsed until regaining pH4 was longer after higher amounts of acid, but not significantly, whereas that necessary to regain baseline pH was significantly longer after such challenge. Esophageal motility was practically identical after 1 and 2 mL of acid, but it was slightly less effective in the first minute after the 3 mL challenge. There was a linear correlation between clearance times and volumes of acid infused.

CONCLUSIONS

Up to a certain volume, the motor responses of the healthy esophagus to distension with neutral or acid fluids were similar. Acid clearance was more a function of the amount of acid present than of the motor response elicited by its presence. Only when the amount of acid was large, esophageal motor response was worse than that elicited after equivalent volumes of neutral fluid. The present evidence suggests that long episodes of reflux in pH tracings might reflect large volumes of refluxate as well as disturbed motor function.

Early reoperation for acute dysphagia following laparoscopic fundoplication

BACKGROUND

A small number of patients develop acute severe dysphagia for which reoperation is necessary within 10 days of laparoscopic fundoplication. The aim of this study was to identify clinical variables that might predict the likelihood of this condition occurring, such that it could be avoided in the future.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study from three tertiary referral centres, using reoperation for acute dysphagia as the main outcome variable. Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale, and psychological well-being index questionnaires were undertaken before laparoscopic fundoplication, and dysphagia scores were determined before operation and 1 year later. Standard preoperative assessment included gastroscopy, oesophageal manometry and pH studies.

RESULTS

Twelve (1.9 per cent) of the 617 patients suffered acute dysphagia, which was predicted by older age and female sex, and resulted in a longer duration of hospital stay. This condition was not predicted by any other demographic, clinical, investigative or operative variables.

CONCLUSION

The study did not identify useful criteria by which severe acute dysphagia could be anticipated and thereby avoided following laparoscopic fundoplication.

Esophageal body motor response to reflux events: secondary peristalsis

The esophageal body is a major component of the antireflux mechanism. Disruption of esophageal peristalsis affects both volume clearance and delivery of swallowed saliva to the distal esophageal body. The esophageal body responds to reflux by an increase in primary peristalsis through stimulation of swallowing and secondary peristalsis through esophageal distension. Primary peristalsis is the most common motor event after reflux and accounts for up to 90% of initial and subsequent motor activity. Secondary peristalsis is uncommon but may be important during sleep when swallowing is relatively suppressed. Some patients with reflux disease, particularly those with severe esophagitis, exhibit impaired esophageal responses to reflux. It is likely that this impairment prolongs acid clearance and may also influence the proximal extent of the refluxate within the esophageal body.

Gastric secretion of acid and pepsin in patients with esophageal stricture and appropriate controls

Most cases of esophageal stricture are associated with acid/peptic reflux esophagitis. While patients with strictures commonly have disordered lower esophageal sphincters and poor clearance and neutralization mechanisms, it is not known whether they also have abnormal gastric secretion. This study examined fasting, basal, and stimulated acid and pepsin secretion. With an endoscopic diagnosis of esophagitis, patients with stricture (< 12.5 mm) were matched for age, sex, concurrent gastrointestinal disease (duodenal ulcer, N = 9), Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (N = 6), and postgastric surgery state (N = 5), as well as the absence of ulcer disease (non-DU, N = 37). Fasting, basal, and pentagastrin-stimulated acid and pepsin secretion were measured. Overall, the 57 stricture patients had the same acid and pepsin secretion as their matched controls with esophagitis; the same was true for each of the subgroups (ZES, DU, non-DU, and postsurgical). Stricture patients weighed less and had a lower body mass index (P < 0.01). Patients with esophageal peptic stricture have the same acid and pepsin output as control patients matched for sex, age, background gastrointestinal disease, and the presence of esophagitis.