Effective administration of heparin and antibiotic prophylaxis

A Simple Way to Improve DVT Protocol Compliance

Objective:

To assess the impact on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) protocol violations of the introduction of a label attached to the patient's drug chart, which specifically allows low-dose subcutaneous heparin or thromboembolic deterrent stockings (TEDS) to be prescribed as appropriate.

Design:

An audit study.

Setting:

Department of General Surgery of a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom.

Method:

All adult general surgical inpatients on a Weekday were studied. Staff were not forewarned of the studies. Patient details and risk factors for DVT were noted. Details of administered DVT prophylaxis were recorded. In total four separate studies were undertaken, namely: with original protocols (I), with refined protocol 1 and 3 years later (II, III) and finally after introduction of the label (IV).

Results:

Protocol violations were defined as being ‘acceptable’ or ‘unacceptable’. Raising awareness between studies I and II reduced acceptable violations to zero. There was no statistically significant reduction in unacceptable violations (24 in 80 patients, 1; 17 in 75, II; 13 in 60, III). In study IV, following introduction of the label, there were only 6 violations in 51 patients ( p<0.02).

Conclusion:

Combining increased awareness with the attachment of a label to the drug chart reduced unacceptable violations by 63%.

Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that using thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for VTE is safe, effective and cost-effective. Despite this, prophylactic therapies for VTE are underutilized. System-wide interventions may be more effective to improve the use of VTE prophylaxis than relying on individual providers' prescribing behaviors.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions designed to increase the implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized adult medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), assessed in terms of: 1. Increase in the proportion of patients who receive prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis 2. Reduction in risk of symptomatic VTE3. Reduction in risk of asymptomatic VTE4. Safety of the intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC) searched the Group's Specialised Register (last searched July 2010) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) 2010, Issue 3. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (19 April 2010) as well as the reference lists of relevant review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all studies whose interventions aimed to increase the use of prophylaxis and/or appropriate prophylaxis, decrease the proportion of symptomatic VTE, or decrease the proportion of asymptomatic VTE in hospitalized adult patients. We excluded studies that simply distributed published guidelines and studies whose interventions were not clearly described.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected the following outcomes: the proportion of patients who received prophylaxis (RP), the proportion of patients who received appropriate prophylaxis (RAP) (primary outcomes), and the occurrence of symptomatic VTE, asymptomatic VTE, and safety outcomes such as bleeding. We categorized interventions into education, alerts, and multifaceted interventions. We meta-analyzed RCTs and non-randomized studies (NRS) separately by random effects meta-analysis, and assessed heterogeneity using the I(2)statistic and subgroup analyses. Before analysis, we decided that results would be pooled if three or more studies were available for a particular intervention. We assessed publication bias using funnel plots and cumulative meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 55 studies. One of these reported data in patient-days and could not be quantitatively analyzed with the others. The 54 remaining studies (8 RCTs and 46 NRS) eligible for inclusion in our quantitative synthesis enrolled a total of 78,343 participants. Among RCTs, there were sufficient data to pool results for one primary outcome (received prophylaxis) for the 'alert' intervention. Alerts, such as computerized reminders or stickers on patients' charts, were associated with a risk difference (RD) of 13%, signifying an increase in the proportion of patients who received prophylaxis (95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 25%). Among NRS, there were sufficient data to pool both primary outcomes for each intervention type. Pooled risk differences for received prophylaxis ranged from 8% to 17%, and for received appropriate prophylaxis ranged from 11% to 19%. Education and alerts were associated with statistically significant increases in prescription of appropriate prophylaxis, and multifaceted interventions were associated with statistically significant increases in prescription of any prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis. Multifaceted interventions had the largest pooled effects. I(2) results showed substantial statistical heterogeneity which was in part explained by patient types and type of hospital. A subgroup analysis showed that multifaceted interventions which included an alert may be more effective at improving rates of prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis than those without an alert. Results for VTE and safety outcomes did not show substantial benefits or harms, although most studies were underpowered to assess these outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We reviewed a large number of studies which implemented a variety of system-wide strategies aimed to improve thromboprophylaxis rates in many settings and patient populations. We found statistically significant improvements in prescription of prophylaxis associated with alerts (RCTs) and multifaceted interventions (RCTs and NRS), and improvements in prescription of appropriate prophylaxis in NRS with the use of education, alerts and multifaceted interventions. Multifaceted interventions with an alert component may be the most effective. Demonstrated sources of heterogeneity included patient types and type of hospital. The results of our review will help physicians, nurses, pharmacists, hospital administrators and policy makers make practical decisions about local adoption of specific system-wide measures to improve prevention of VTE, an important public health issue. We did not find a significant benefit for VTE outcomes; however, earlier RCTs assessing the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis which were powered to address these outcomes have demonstrated the benefit of prophylactic therapies and a favourable balance of benefits versus the increased risk of bleeding events.

Impact of inadequate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis on perioperative outcome and length of stay on ICU in general and trauma surgery. Analysis using automated data collection

Within surgical departments, a large amount of antibiotics is used for perioperative prophylaxis. Despite the existence of several guidelines and recommendations for administering antibiotic prophylaxis, mistakes still do occur and have an unknown impact on outcome severity. Based on the electronic anaesthesia records of 4304 patients undergoing defined surgical procedures requiring perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, a matched pairs approach was used to evaluate the impact of inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis on hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay on intensive care. Stepwise regression models were developed to predict the impact of inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis on outcome measures. An inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis was found for a total of 877 cases. 77.9% of cases were successfully matched, leading to 683 cases and controls each. The crude mortality ratio of cases to controls was 1.5 (cases = 21 versus controls = 14; P = 0.19). The case group had a significantly (P < 0.01) prolonged stay on ICU when analysed as a metric variable. Using logistic regression analysis, we could determine that inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis had no impact on either hospital mortality or prolonged length of stay on ICU (>1 day; yes or no).

Prescribing practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 commonly performed surgeries in a teaching hospital in Brazil

BACKGROUND

The contribution of antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce surgical wound infection for some procedures is well known. In spite of extensive knowledge about the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis, its administrative regimens are often inappropriate.

METHODS

Antibiotic prophylaxis was evaluated in a university-affiliated community teaching hospital. Data were collected from medical records of patients undergoing cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and herniorrhaphy during a 9-month observation period. A total of 598 procedures were observed. Data were collected about the patient, the surgery, and the antibiotic prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Based on the existing guidelines, the choice to use the prophylactic antibiotic was correct in 75% of the cases. Of these cases, only 3% of the patients received the recommended regimen according to the proposed procedure. It was verified that antibiotic prophylaxis was performed more frequently in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy than laparoscopic cholecystectomy (P =.004). In 46% of the cholecystectomies, more than 4 doses were administered. In hysterectomy, a single dose was used in 54% of the patients, and the antibiotic was administered preoperatively in 80% of the cases. Prophylactic antibiotics were used in 47% of herniorrhaphies.

CONCLUSION

The surgeons infrequently met the hospital guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis, and compliance varied by type of procedure.