Salvage treatment for inoperable neck nodes in head and neck cancer using combined iridium-192 brachytherapy and surgical reconstruction

Function Preservation in Head and Neck Cancers

The treatment of head and neck cancers can have a significant impact on function and appearance, which results in impairment of quality of life. Various long-term sequelae of treatment include speech and swallowing difficulty, oral incompetence, trismus, xerostomia, dental caries and osteoradionecrosis. Management has evolved from single modality treatment of either surgery or radiation to multimodality treatment to attain acceptable functional outcomes. Brachytherapy, also known as interventional radiotherapy, with its ability to deliver high doses centrally to the target, has been shown to improve local control rates. Due to the rapid fall-off of the dose of brachytherapy there is better organ at risk sparing as compared with that of external beam radiotherapy. In the head and neck region, brachytherapy has been practiced in various sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, nasal vestibule and paranasal sinuses. Additionally, brachytherapy has also been considered for reirradiation as a salvage. Brachytherapy can also be considered as a perioperative technique together with surgery. Close multidisciplinary cooperation is required for a successful brachytherapy programme. In oral cavity cancers, depending on the location of the tumour, brachytherapy has been shown to preserve oral competence, maintain tongue mobility, maintain speech, swallowing and the hard palate. Brachytherapy in oropharyngeal cancers has been shown to reduce xerostomia and also reduce dysphagia and aspiration post-radiation therapy. For the nasopharynx, paranasal sinus and nasal vestibule, brachytherapy preserves the respiratory function of the mucosa. Despite such an incomparable impact on function and organ preservation, brachytherapy is an underutilised technique for head and neck cancers. There is a strong need to improve brachytherapy utilisation in head and neck cancers.

Is Brachytherapy Feasible After Head and Neck Cancer Reconstructive Surgery? Preliminary Report

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of interstitial postoperative brachytherapy for the vitality and quality of flaps used for reconstruction of tissue defects after head and neck cancer salvage resection. We aimed at presenting six consecutive patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma in head and neck region who underwent salvage surgery and tissue reconstruction with a regional or free flap followed by brachytherapy. Reconstruction was performed with a free radial forearm flap in 2 cases, with a free thigh flap in 2 cases, and with a myocutaneous lateral upper arm flap in the next 2 cases. In all patients, pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy was used with a median value of 0.7 Gy (range 0.6–0.8 Gy) per pulse and a median total dose of 20 Gy (range 20–40 Gy). In the analyzed group, there were no serious wound and flap complications after brachytherapy. In one case, peripheral skin necrosis was noticed. No revision surgery was needed but only surgical debridement of the necrotic margins. All wounds healed within 14 days after surgery as well as donor sites which healed within 4 weeks. Based upon our data, pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy seems to be a safe option that can be performed at the site of reconstruction in immediate postoperative period with minimal wound complications and with no impact on flap survival. Further clinical study based on larger patient series is needed to present statistically proven results.

Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction

The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.

A curative-intent endoscopic surgery for postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) is a severe complication after radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which can severely affect the quality of life and threaten the patient’s life. Only 13.4%–28.6% of patients can be cured by traditional repeated endoscopic debridement. Here, we introduced an innovative curative-intent endoscopic surgery for PRNN patients and evaluated its clinical efficacy.

Methods

Clinical data of 72 PRNN patients who underwent radical endoscopic necrectomy, followed by reconstruction using a posterior pedicle nasal septum and floor mucoperiosteum flap were analyzed to determine the efficacy of this surgery. The endpoints were complete re-epithelialization of the nasopharyngeal defect, relief of headache, and overall survival (OS).

Results

All surgeries were successfully performed without any severe postoperative complications or death. The median value of numeric rating scales of pain decreased from 8 before surgery to 0 after surgery (P < 0.001). Fifty-one patients (70.8%) achieved complete re-epithelialization of the nasopharyngeal defect. The number of cycles of radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 7.254; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.035–50.821; P = 0.046), postoperative pathological result (OR, 34.087; 95% CI 3.168–366.746; P = 0.004), and survival status of flap (OR, 261.179; 95% CI 17.176–3971.599; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of re-epithelialization of the nasopharyngeal defects. Postoperative pathological result (hazard ratio [HR], 5.018; 95% CI 1.970–12.782; P = 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. The 2-year OS rate of the entire cohort was 77.9%.

Conclusion

Curative-intent endoscopic necrectomy followed by construction using the posterior pedicle nasal septum and floor mucoperiosteum flap is a novel, safe, and effective treatment of PRNN in patients with NPC.

A systematic review of treating recurrent head and neck cancer: a reintroduction of brachytherapy with or without surgery

Purpose

To review brachytherapy use in recurrent head and neck carcinoma (RHNC) with focus on its efficacy and complication rates.

Material and methods

A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, and Scopus was conducted from 1990 to 2017. Publications describing treatment of RHNC with brachytherapy with or without surgery were included. The focus of this review is on oncologic outcomes and the safety of brachytherapy in the recurrent setting.

Results

Thirty studies involving RHNC treatment with brachytherapy were reviewed. Brachytherapy as adjunctive treatment to surgical resection appears to be associated with an improved local regional control and overall survival, when compared with the published rates for re-irradiation utilizing external beam radiotherapy (RT) or brachytherapy alone. Safety data remains variable with different isotopes and dose rates with implantable brachytherapy demonstrating a tolerable side effect profile.

Conclusions

Although surgery remains a mainstay treatment for RHNC, intraoperative interstitial brachytherapy delivery as adjunctive therapy may improve the treatment outcome and may be associated with fewer complication rates as compared to reirradiation using external beam radiotherapy. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role of brachytherapy for RHNC.

Perioperative HDR brachytherapy for reirradiation in head and neck recurrences: single-institution experience and systematic review

AIM

The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients reirradiated with high-dose-rate (HDR) intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for recurrent head and neck cancer and to perform a systematic review of the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with prior radiation doses >65 Gy were considered. After resection of macroscopic disease, catheters were fixed to the tumor bed. The total dose was 30 Gy in 12 fractions of 2.5 Gy twice daily for 5 days a week. A systematic literature search was conducted through several electronic databases including Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane library.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included; median overall survival was 19 months with a median local control interval of 15 months. Median follow-up was 36 months. Seven papers were considered for the review.

CONCLUSIONS

IMBT could play an important role in the retreatment of recurrent head and neck cancer.

Preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluation of Feasibility of Free Flaps in Difficult Reconstruction of Head and Neck

BACKGROUND

Free tissue transfer has been advocated for anatomic and functional reconstruction of soft tissue defects after surgical removal of an extensive recurrent tumor and/or arising from previous irradiation in the head and neck. We report a case series of difficult reconstruction in the head and neck in which preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiography was utilized to evaluate the feasibility of free flap reconstruction. The preoperative radiological evaluation was performed to determine the availability of reliable vessels for anastomosis in free flap reconstruction. If none was found, regional pedicle flap or palliative treatment was applied instead. The use of CT angiography allows the clinical surgeon to perform precise surgical planning with greater confidence. This may improve surgical results, thereby potentially reducing perioperative morbidity.

METHODS

Twenty CT angiograms were obtained from 20 patients. All patients were men with a mean age of 57.2 years (range, 42-72 years) and were scheduled to undergo difficult reconstruction in the head and neck. All patients (20/20 [100%]) suffered from oral squamous cell carcinoma. They had all received extensive operations and radiation therapy. Eighteen patients (18/20 [90%]) had completed a course of perioperative irradiation. The CT angiography reports were used to perform detailed preoperative surgical planning accordingly. The findings of CT angiography were classified into 3 groups: group I: normal CT angiography (patent recipient arteries) (Fig. 3); group II: abnormal CT angiography (recipient vessels were present but stenosis or atherosclerotic lesions were noted) (Fig. 4); group III: abnormal CT angiography with no patent recipient arteries in bilateral sides of the neck (Fig. 5); CT angiography results were correlated to the operative findings.

RESULTS

The patients were classified into 3 groups based on the angiographic findings. Six patients (6/20 [30%]) were assigned to group I, 8 patients (8/20 [40%]) to group II, and 6 patients (6/20 [30%]) to group III. In groups I and III, all patients (12/12 [100%]) underwent the treatment according to the original preoperative detailed planning. No flap failure was noted in these 2 groups. In group II, 4 patients' recipient vessels (4/8 [50%]) possessed adequate blood flow intraoperatively; hence, microvascular free flaps were transplanted. Venous congestion in 1 case (1/4 [25%]) was noted. The remaining patients in this group (4/8 [50%]) underwent reconstruction with pedicle flaps rather than free flaps because of the lack of suitable target vessels intraoperatively. All flaps (4/4 [100%]) survived. Among the patients who were treated surgically, intraoperative findings were in accordance with those predicted by CT angiography. The total abnormality rate of CT angiography was 70%. Vascular abnormalities detected as a result of preoperative CT angiography led to changes in the operative plan in 50% (10/20) of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CT angiography should be considered for difficult microsurgical reconstructions in the head and neck. When an abnormality in vascular anatomy is detected by CT angiography, the surgeon is advised to consider altering the operative plan accordingly. This allows precise operation, thereby maximizing the possibility of an optimal outcome. Changing the operative plan based on results of CT angiography may also help to avoid the difficult situation in which the surgeon finds that there are no suitable recipient vessels for free flap reconstruction during the operation. In addition, CT angiography enables surgeons to conduct the preoperative surgical planning with greater confidence, thereby potentially enhancing the success rate of difficult reconstructions in the head and neck, which in turn would tend to improve the perioperative course for the patient and consequently to improve results by decreasing vascular complication rates.

Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy

Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is a modern development of classical interventional radiation therapy (brachytherapy), which allows the application of a high radiation dose sparing severe adverse events, thereby further improving the treatment outcome. Classical indications in head and neck (H&N) cancers are the face, the oral cavity, the naso- and oropharynx, the paranasal sinuses including base of skull, incomplete resections on important structures, and palliation. The application type can be curative, adjuvant or perioperative, as a boost to external beam radiation as well as without external beam radiation and with palliative intention. Due to the frequently used perioperative application method (intraoperative implantation of inactive applicators and postoperative performance of radiation), close interdisciplinary cooperation between surgical specialists (ENT-, dento-maxillary-facial-, neuro- and orbital surgeons), as well interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) experts are obligatory. Published results encourage the integration of IMBT into H&N therapy, thereby improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Reirradiation after salvage surgery and microvascular free flap reconstruction for recurrent head and neck carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome and complications of reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancer after salvage surgery and microvascular reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients underwent salvage surgery with microvascular reconstruction for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer in a previously irradiated field. Median prior radiation therapy dose was 63.0 Gy. Patients then underwent postoperative reirradiation, and received a median total cumulative radiation dose of 115.0 Gy.

RESULTS

Three (25%) patients experienced acute complications (<3 months) during reirradiation. Four (33%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 late reirradiation complications (>3 months). There were no incidences of free flap failure, brain necrosis, spinal cord injury, or carotid rupture. The incidence of soft tissue necrosis and osteoradionecrosis was 8%. Six (50%) patients are alive without evidence of recurrent disease a median of 40 months after reirradiation.

CONCLUSION

Microvascular free flaps allow for maximal resection and reliable reconstruction of previously irradiated cancers before high dose reirradiation and may reduce the incidence of severe late complications and treatment related mortality.

[Brachytherapy in combination with function-preserving surgery. An interdisciplinary challenge]

A multimodal, interdisciplinary approach known as intensity-modified brachytherapy is a promising alternative for patients with advanced head and neck cancer infiltrating the orbita and skull base. An 87-year-old man presented with a recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the medial corner of the left eye that had been locally resected and irradiated by external beam radiotherapy multiple times. The cancer was resected with preservation of the eye with close margins, implantation of afterloading catheters, and reconstruction of the defect with a median forehead flap. The patient was irradiated with a total radiation dose of 30 Gy IMBT. After 1 year, there was no evidence of locoregional recurrence. The background of this therapeutic process and analysis of the current literature regarding this interdisciplinary treatment of head and neck cancer infiltrating the orbita and skull base are discussed based on this case report.

Re-irradiation in the management of isolated neck recurrences: Current status and recommendations

Recent times have witnessed significant improvements in outcome for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nevertheless, the major pattern of failure continues to remain loco-regional. Isolated neck recurrence, although uncommon, occurs in 5-7% of patients after radical treatment. The options for this subgroup are somewhat limited and are often guided by empiricism rather than evidence. This review attempts to systematically analyze the therapeutic options for patients with isolated neck recurrence following radical treatment for the primary and draining cervical lymph nodes, with a special emphasis on re-irradiation. Salvage neck dissection offers the best chance of cure to patients with resectable neck recurrences. The perceived increased risk of complications of re-irradiation following previous curative dose irradiation has precluded optimal evaluation of its potential in this setting. Post-operative adjuvant re-irradiation should be based on histo-pathological findings of the salvage surgery. Re-irradiation with or without chemotherapy may be considered for unresectable neck recurrences. The role of chemotherapy continues to evolve and is presently not optimally defined. There is lack of high-quality evidence pertinent to salvage therapy leading to vast variations in practice. More patients with recurrent disease should be enrolled onto prospective clinical trials with relevant and meaningful endpoints.

Manually after-loaded 192Ir low-dose rate brachytherapy after subtotal excision and flap reconstruction of recurrent cervical lymphadenopathy from head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of extensive recurrent cervical lymph node metastases from previously irradiated head and neck cancer represents a difficult clinical challenge. We report the results of an approach of maximal surgical debulking and manually after-loaded intra-operative brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-four procedures were carried out at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1979 and 2003. All patients had previously been treated with radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Patients underwent maximal surgical debulking, followed by brachytherapy to the tumour bed with low-dose rate (192)Ir to a dose of 60 Gy to the reference isodose using the Paris system.

RESULTS

Overall and disease specific survival rates were 31% and 28% at two years and 23% and 17% at five years. Corresponding Loco-regional control rates were 37% and 23%, respectively. Fifty per cent of patients developed metastatic disease within 5 years of treatment. Best results were obtained with surgical excision, brachytherapy and reconstruction of the skin defect using a vascularised myo-cutaneous flap with in-field control rates of 72% at two years and 66% at 5 years. Nine per cent of patients developed fistulae, 4% had haemorrhage and 8% wound breakdown/infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal surgical debulking, including removal of overlying skin, and brachytherapy to the surgical tumour bed provides high levels of local control, and can be achieved with acceptable morbidity. Only a minority of patients achieve long-term survival because of the high risk of systemic relapse.

Perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) in previously irradiated head and neck cancer: Initial results of a Phase I/II reirradiation study

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of salvage surgery and perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) at the dose/fractionation schedule proposed in patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head and neck cancer or second primary tumors arising in a previously irradiated field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five patients were treated with surgical resection and PHDRB. The PHDRB dose was 4 Gy b.i.d. x 8 (32 Gy) for R0 resections and 4 Gy b.i.d. x 10 (40 Gy) for R1 resections. Further external beam radiotherapy or chemotherapy was not given.

RESULTS

Resections were categorized as R0 (negative margins of at least 10 mm) in 3 patients (12.0%) and R1 (negative margins of less than 10 mm or microscopically positive margins) in 22 (88.0%). Twelve patients with R1 resections had microscopically positive margins (48%), and 10 patients had close margins (40%), with a median of 2.0 mm. Ten patients (40.0%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 or greater toxicity. Seven patients (28%) presented complications requiring a major surgical procedure. Four of these complications appeared in the immediate postoperative period and were surgical in nature (flap failure, n = 2; fistula, n = 2), and the other three were mainly related to the brachytherapy procedure (n = 2) or the radiation dose delivered (n = 1). One patient died on postoperative day 11 due to bleeding. After a median followup of 14 months, the 4-year local control rate and overall survival were 85.6% and 46.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical salvage and PHDRB at the dose/fractionation proposed are feasible in this high-risk population. Toxicity is high, but not substantially different from other reirradiation series. Four-year local control results are encouraging taking into account that 22 of 25 patients (88%) had either close or microscopically positive margins.

The role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze the value of interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (iBT) with regard to local control and the incidence of side effects in patients with head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated area.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From October 1997 to September 2001, 43 patients with head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated area (31 patients with recurrent cancer) were treated with iBT alone or in combination with external beam radiation. Thirty-four of 43 patients received interstitial PDR brachytherapy (DREF=20-60 Gy) as part of their curative treatment regimen alone or in combination with external radiation. Nine patients were implanted for palliative purposes. The pulses were delivered 24 h/day with a time interval of 1 h between two pulses. The dose per pulse (dp) ranged from 0.4-0.7 Gy. Sixteen of 43 (37%) patients also received cisplatin or carboplatin with 5-fluorouracil during the time of the iBT. Additionally 20/43 (47%) patients were treated with interstitial hyperthermia. Thirteen of 43 (30%) patients received external beam radiation in a dose range from 20-67 Gy. A follow-up of all patients was done to analyze local control and survival, and acute and delayed toxicity. This analysis was performed after a median follow-up of 24 months (6-48 months).

RESULTS

Local tumor control was achieved in 34 of a total of 43 patients (79%) and in 30/34 patients (88%) treated for curative intention. Distant metastases were observed in 5/43 (12%) patients. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rates, disease-free survival rates, and overall survival rates according to the Kaplan-Meier method for all patients were 68%, 62%, and 49%, respectively, and for patients treated with curative intention they were 80%, 77% and 66%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the probability of local recurrence in patients subgrouped by recurrent tumor vs. secondary primary, tumor size, grading and lymphangiosis. The application of chemotherapy or hyperthermia did not have significant influence on the therapy results. Soft tissue necrosis was the only serious side effect seen in 2/43 patients (4.7%). No other serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer is an effective therapy with minimal toxicity. The role of chemotherapy and hyperthermia in these patients remains unclear. Further randomized studies with larger patient numbers are necessary to draw a definite conclusion.

The use of a lymphatic bridge in the management of head and neck lymphoedema

Severe progressive lymphoedema of the whole of the head and neck is almost always due to the combined effects of surgery and radiotherapy, compounded by repeated infections or recurrent tumour. The condition is difficult to control, and manual lymphatic drainage is the mainstay of management. We present a case of progressive lymphoedema following treatment for an occult squamous carcinoma of the head and neck, and describe the use of a lymphatic bridge to drain the facial tissue.

Cervical lymph node relapses of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: is brachytherapy a therapeutic option?

PURPOSE

To report the results of interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) without salvage surgery for isolated cervical lymph node relapses.

PATIENT AND METHODS

From 1970 to 1989, 84 patients were treated; 76 patients had relapsed in sites of previous external beam radiation. In 72 patients, IBT was sole salvage treatment (mean, 56.5 Gy). In 12 patients IBT (mean, 38 Gy) was combined with further external beam radiotherapy (mean, 41 Gy).

RESULTS

Local control in the neck was 49% at 1 year, 31% at 2 years, and 0% at 5 years. Overall survival was 33% at 1 year, 13% at 2 years, and 1% at 5 years. Significant toxicity occurred in 35% (7% fatal). Multivariate analysis shows survival after salvage was better for patients who had achieved initial control for > or =18 months before relapse (0% vs. 13% at 3 years, p < 0.0002). Lymph node control was better for patients who received total salvage dose > or =60 Gy (0% vs. 56% at 3 years, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Given its poor efficiency and its toxicity, IBT must be considered only when surgery is contraindicated and if lymph node relapse occurs after a minimal interval of 18 months.

Interstitial iridium-192 implantation for recurrent and/or locally advanced head and neck cancer

We report our experience with the use of interstitial iridium-192 implantation in the management of patients with recurrent and locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Between June 1992 and July 1998 this technique was employed in the management of two groups of patients: (1) a primary group, comprising 42 patients who had presented for the first time with advanced head and neck disease, and had therefore not undergone any previous treatment; and (2) a salvage group of 16 patients with recurrent disease previously treated with external beam radiotherapy (four received therapy to the neck, one to the cheek, eight to the tongue and three to the floor of the mouth). The follow-up in each group was short, ranging from 3 to 56 months. The overall response in the primary group was 38/42 (90%). A complete response was achieved in 35/42 (83%). In the salvage group, the overall response was 13/16 (81%); 4/16 (25%) showed a complete response and 9/16 (56%) a partial response. The estimated percentage surviving at 1 year for patients with primary disease is 70% (95% confidence interval (CI) 54-86). For those receiving salvage therapy the estimated percentage surviving at 1 year is 45% (95% CI 19-71).

Early wound complications in advanced head and neck cancer treated with surgery and Ir 192 brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

Brachytherapy, either as primary or adjuvant therapy, is increasingly used to treat head and neck cancer. Reports of complications from the use of brachytherapy as adjuvant therapy to surgical excision have been limited and primarily follow Iodine 125 (I125) therapy. Early complications include wound breakdown, infection, flap failure, and sepsis, and late complications may include osteoradionecrosis, bone marrow suppression, or carotid injuries. The authors sought to identify the early wound complications that follow adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy with iridium 192 (IrS92).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of all patients receiving adjuvant brachytherapy at a tertiary medical center over a 4-year period.

METHODS

Nine patients receiving Ir192 brachytherapy via afterloading catheters placed during surgical resection for close or microscopically positive margin control were evaluated. It was used during primary therapy in six patients and at salvage surgery in three. Early complications were defined as those occurring within 6 weeks of surgical therapy.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 55% (5/9), and included significant wound breakdown in two patients, minor wound dehiscence in three, and wound infection, bacteremia, and local tissue erosion in one patient each. All complications occurred in patients receiving flap reconstruction and one patient required further surgery to manage the complication. Complication rates were not associated with patient age, site, prior radiotherapy, timing of therapy, number of catheters, or dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively high complication rate is acceptable, given the minor nature of most and the potential benefit of radiotherapy. Further study should be undertaken to identify those patients who will achieve maximum therapeutic benefit without prohibitive local complications.

Brachytherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer

The outlook for patients with recurrent HNC that is not amenable to treatment with curative surgery alone is grim. Reirradiation is often possible and can have a substantial effect on local tumor control. A dose of at least 60 Gy is needed, however, and should preferably be given using BT. Radiobiological considerations dictate the use of small fraction sizes. The role of hyperbaric oxygen in reducing the morbidity associated with reirradiation (by improving the vascularization status of irradiated normal tissue) deserves further investigation. Adequate imaging and recent developments in conformal radiotherapy (3D planning and intensity-modulated radiotherapy) and stereotactic radiotherapy should be utilized in order to apply high tumoricidal doses, while minimizing the incorporated volume of irradiated critical normal tissue.