Extending the role of breast-conserving surgery by immediate volume replacement

Paving the way for changing perceptions in breast surgery: a systematic literature review focused on oncological and aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The emphasis on aesthetic outcomes and quality of life after breast cancer surgery has motivated breast surgeons to develop oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPS). Training programs are still rare in most countries, and there is little standardization, which challenges the scientific evaluation of these techniques. This systematic review aims to assess oncological and cosmetic outcomes of OPS.

METHODS

After a strict selection process with precise inclusion and exclusion criteria, oncologic and aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery were searched, using the MEDLINE database up to September 30th, 2017. Available published literature was classified in levels of evidence. After a thorough screening process, only studies with the best level of evidence were included on selection. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were not included for methodological reasons.

RESULTS

Titles and abstracts of 2.854 citations were identified and after screening 15 prospective studies including 1.391 patients were reviewed and scored in detail. Local relapse was found in 2.8% of cases with a wide range of follow-up (from 6 to 74 months). Close margins were retrieved in 11% of cases and positive margins in 9.4% of cases. Mastectomy was implemented in 6.9% of breast cancer patients to whom OPS was performed. Good cosmetic outcomes were detected in 90.2% of patients undergoing OPS, leaving open issues for who should perform cosmetic evaluation and which method should be used.

CONCLUSION

Tumor margins, mastectomy rates, and cosmetic outcomes of OPS have to be further improved by standardizing various aspects of OPS. Research efforts should focus on level I evidence assessing both oncological and aesthetic outcomes of OPS and survival rates.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Better after Oncoplastic Breast Conservation than after Mastectomy and Autologous Reconstruction

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) avoids mastectomy for larger tumors, but patient-reported outcomes are unknown.

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: Volume replacement vs. volume displacement

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (BCS) has emerged as a third option between conventional BCS and mastectomy. Oncoplastic BCS includes two fundamentally different approaches: volume replacement and volume displacement. The former involves partial mastectomy and immediate reconstruction of the breast with the transposition of autologous tissue from elsewhere, while the latter involves partial mastectomy and using the remaining breast tissue to fill the defect resulting from extirpation of the tumor. There are several benefits associated with oncoplastic BCS. First, it allows partial mastectomy without cosmetic penalties, and can achieve better cosmetic outcomes than total mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Second, it avoids the need for total mastectomy in an increasing number of patients without compromising local control. Third, partial breast reconstruction is less extensive and has fewer complications than conventional procedures. Partial mastectomy and partial breast reconstruction can be carried out either simultaneously as a one-stage procedure, or using a two-stage approach. Although patients prefer a one-stage procedure, it requires intraoperative confirmation of complete tumor excision using frozen-section analysis. Moreover, oncoplastic BCS requires combined skills, knowledge, and understanding of both oncological and plastic surgeries, which may be optimally achieved by an oncoplastic surgeon.

Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals

BACKGROUND

Achieving an aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy breast reconstruction is both an important goal for the patient and plastic surgeon. However, there is currently an absence of a widely accepted, standardized, and validated professional aesthetic assessment scale following postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all articles that provided professional assessment of the aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy, implant- or autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction. A modified version of the Scientific Advisory Committee's Medical Outcomes Trust (MOT) criteria was used to evaluate all professional aesthetic assessment scales identified by our systematic review. The criteria included conceptual framework formation, reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, burden, and correlation with patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 120 articles were identified: 52 described autologous breast reconstruction, 37 implant-based reconstruction, and 29 both. Of the 12 different professional aesthetic assessment scales that exist in the literature, the most commonly used scale was the four-point professional aesthetic assessment scale. The highest score on the modified MOT criteria was assigned to the ten-point professional aesthetic assessment scale. However, this scale has limited clinical usefulness due to its poor responsiveness to change, lack of interpretability, and wide range of intra- and inter-rater agreements (Veiga et al. in Ann Plast Surg 48(5):515-520, 2002).

CONCLUSIONS

A "gold standard" professional aesthetic assessment scale needs to be developed to enhance the comparability of breast reconstruction results across techniques, surgeons, and studies to aid with the selection of procedures that produce the best aesthetic results from both the perspectives of the surgeon and patients.

Intraoperative Boost Radiotherapy during Targeted Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Overview and Single Center Experiences

Breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation is the standard local therapy for early breast cancer. The international discussion of reduced importance of wider tumor-free resection margins than "tumor not touching ink" leads to the development of five principles in targeted oncoplastic breast surgery. IORT improves local recurrence risk and diminishes toxicity since there is less irradiation of healthy tissue. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can be delivered in two settings: an IORT boost followed by a conventional regimen of external beam radiotherapy or a single IORT dose. The data from TARGIT-A and ELIOT reinforce the conviction that intraoperative radiotherapy during breast-conserving surgery is a reliable alternative to conventional postoperative fractionated irradiation, but only in a carefully selected population at low risk of local recurrence. We describe our experiences with IORT boost (50 kV energy X-rays; 20 Gy) in combination with targeted oncoplastic breast surgery in a routine clinical setting. Our experiences demonstrate the applicability and reliability of combining IORT boost with targeted oncoplastic breast surgery in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer.

The suitability of absorbable mesh insertion for oncoplastic breast surgery in patients with breast cancer scheduled to be irradiated

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of radiotherapy on the cosmetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using an absorbable mesh in breast cancer.

Methods

From July 2008 to July 2009, 35 breast cancer patients who received immediate breast reconstruction with absorbable mesh insertion at the time of breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy were retrospectively studied.

Results

In 91% of cases there was an excellent or good cosmetic outcome before the initiation of radiotherapy, and in 8.6% the outcome was fair at this point. However, 6 months after surgery and irradiation, the rate of excellent to good cosmetic outcomes had decreased to 60% and fair outcomes had increased to 25.7%. Contrary to the decreased rate of good cosmetic outcomes from 65.7% to 42.9% at 1 year after operation, the rate of fair to poor outcomes considerably increased from 8.6% to 57.1%. The significant factors affecting cosmetic outcomes were pathology, specimen volume, and the estimated percentage of breast volume excised (EPBVE). Chemotherapy affected the cosmetic outcome at borderline significance level. Age, breast volume tumor site, insertion of drain, radiation dose, and time elapsed between surgery and radiotherapy were not significantly associated with the cosmetic outcome.

Conclusion

Applying an absorbable mesh for the immediate reconstruction of the breast should be carefully considered in patients with an EPBVE of over 30% who are scheduled to be irradiated.

Clinical and pathologic evaluation of implanted free dermal fat grafts after breast cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

The efficacy of immediate breast reconstruction using a free dermal fat graft (FDFG) was evaluated clinically.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 22 breasts in 21 patients who underwent partial mastectomy for early breast cancer involving mainly the inner upper quadrant were enrolled in this study. The defect was reconstructed immediately by filling it with an autologous FDFG. At 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postoperatively, the width (horizontal length) and thickness (distance perpendicular to skin) of the FDFG on computed tomography (CT) scans were measured. Histologic samples from the implanted FDFG were collected by core needle biopsy (CNB). The correlations between clinical findings and volume of the FDFG on CT and the proportion of fatty tissue in the CNB were examined statistically. Cosmetic results were also evaluated.

RESULTS

On CT, the mean width of the FDFG was 95%, 81%, 79%, 73%, 68%, and 47% and the mean thickness were 125%, 121%, 120%, 115%, 104%, and 103% at 6 months, and 1-5 years postoperatively, respectively. In the CNB samples, the mean fatty tissue distribution was 76%, 63%, and 54% at 1 year, 1-4 years, and >4 years postoperatively, respectively. The percent change in the width of the FDFG at 6 months after the operation displayed a significant negative correlation with the postmenopausal period and a significant positive correlation with the maximum surgical margin. On CT, thickness was negatively correlated with the size of the resected breast tissue, and thickness of the implanted FDFG. No clinicopathologic factors or technical factors were related to FDFG outcome and the proportion of fat tissue in the CNB sample, except for axillary dissection. Nineteen of 21 patients had good to excellent cosmesis.

CONCLUSION

FDFG implanted into breast defects after partial mastectomy undergo mild resorption and degeneration to fibrous tissue, but most patients have good to excellent cosmesis.

Oncological and cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing "moving window" operation

An inappropriate skin incision on the breast reduces the cosmetic benefit of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). To improve the cosmetic outcome, we have performed "moving window" operation in which BCS can be performed via a periareolar incision (periareolar approach) and/or axillary incision (axillary approach) under direct visualization. Axillary lymph node dissection is also performed via an axillary incision. The periareolar and axillary approaches were used in 65 and 43 patients, respectively. Average operation time was 130 min in periareolar approach and 131 min in axillary approach. Average blood loss was 37 and 50 ml, respectively. Postoperatively, the surgical margin of breast tissue was histologically confirmed to be negative in 107 (99%) of 108 patients, one patients underwent subsequently reoperation because of positive surgical margin. Fifty-two patients (85%) in periareolar approach and 37 patients (86%) in axillary approach had excellent or good cosmetic results. With a mean follow-up of 36 months, four patients developed in-breast recurrence, but three of them had neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. The moving window operation can improve cosmetic outcome of BCS without compromising oncological safety. Moreover, it can reduce operation time and blood loss in comparison to endoscope-assisted BCS.

Safety of partial breast reconstruction in extended indications for conservative surgery in breast cancer

Breast conservation surgery after large volume excisions for women with relatively larger or multicentric operable breast cancer (OBC) and in some locally advanced breast cancers (LABC) post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), is known to be a feasible option using a latissimus dorsi flap. However, the oncological safety of such a procedure is not well reported in literature. Two hundred and twenty one women with breast cancer (148-OBC, 73-LABC) underwent BCT plus LD during March 1998 to August 2009. One hundred and forty six women (72-LABC, 66-OBC) received prior NACT for downstaging, followed by completion of adjuvant therapy in all, including postoperative radiotherapy and hormone therapy where indicated. Women aged 20-62 years, with tumors 1.5-15 cm (median 5.0 cm), underwent volume replacement surgery with LD flap. All positive cut margins (total-4.9%, gross positive-1.3%) were re-excised to ensure negative margins. The mean surgical time for excision of primary with axillary clearance followed by volume replacement by LD was 5 h and mean hospital stay 6 days. Donor site morbidity was seen in 11 patients and 3 had minor recipient site infection. At a median follow up of 36 months, ten of 221 patients (4.5%) had failed locally (7-OBC, 3-LABC). The determinants of local recurrence were presence of lymphatic vascular invasion (p = 0.016) and axillary metastasis (p = 0.003). BCT plus LD flap is an oncologically safe, technically quick procedure with minimal morbidity, and should be offered to all eligible women as an extended breast conservation procedure.

Oncological and aesthetic considerations of conservational surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer

Conventional indications for mastectomy (MX) reflect circumstances where breast conserving therapy (BCT) could compromise oncological or cosmetic outcome. MX continues to be recommended for the majority of women with multiple lesions within the same breast. In this article, we review the oncological safety and aesthetic considerations of BCT in the context of multifocal (MF) or multicentric (MC) breast cancer. Literature review facilitated by Medline and PubMed databases. Published studies have reported divergent results regarding the oncological adequacy of BCT in the management of MF or MC disease. Earlier studies demonstrated high rates of local recurrence (LR) for BCT. More recent series have found BCT to be comparable to MX in terms of LR, distant failure, disease free and overall survival. Few studies have adequately evaluated cosmetic outcomes following BCT for MF or MC breast cancer. Contemporary oncoplastic techniques have extended the clinical utility of BCT and are of particular relevance to breast conservation in the context of MF or MC lesions. Appropriate case selection, preoperative oncological and aesthetic planning, satisfactory clearance of the surgical margins and adjuvant radiotherapy are of paramount importance. In the absence of level-1 guidance concerning the management of women with MF or MC disease, each case requires discussion with regard to tumor and patient related factors in the context of the multidisciplinary team. In selected patients with MF or MC disease, BCT is oncologically safe and cosmetically acceptable. Uniformity of practice and the establishment of a standard of care will require an evidence-base from prospective studies.

[Oncoplastic approach in breast cancer surgery--a new challenge for the future breast surgeon?]

The future challenge of breast surgery, the so-called oncoplastic approach is reviewed in this article. The authors discuss the most frequently applied surgical techniques as well as their indications. Medline and pubmed search was carried out using the following keywords and cross-references: "oncoplastic breast surgery", "breast reconstruction", "breast conserving surgery" and "reduction mammoplasty". Original and review papers published in English language and their references were included. In the literature surprisingly, a large variety of breast oncoplastic surgical procedures has been described. Although reconstructions with local flaps are relatively easy procedures, proper indications for these are critical in order to improve cosmesis after breast conservation. Applications of pedicled flaps are technically more demanding, and only properly trained oncoplastic breast or plastic surgeons are able to provide the possibly best aesthetic outcome after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery. Finally, carrying out free flap reconstructions after mastectomy should be assigned exclusively to plastic surgeons qualified in microsurgical techniques, and not to surgical oncologists. As conclusions oncoplastic approach will be an integral element of the surgical treatment of breast cancer in the future. Breast oncoplastic training is an interdisciplinary task, which combines surgical oncological management of breast cancers with aesthetic/reconstructive breast surgery.

[Minimally invasive breast surgery. Breast reconstruction using pure muscular latissimus dorsi flap]

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have extended to all the fields of surgery. Breast surgery can also benefit from these concepts because of their special characteristics, reduction of aggressiveness, avoiding or hiding scars. The aim of our work is to introduce a new surgical approach for the resection of a large volume of breast parenchyma, including complete subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction using a pure muscular latissimus dorsi flap, with or without prosthetic material, through a minimal cutaneous incision.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Retrospective analysis of our series of 5 cases using our surgical technique which allows us to establish proper indications. We analyse the technical details, complications and results.

RESULTS

Five patients were operated using this technique (1 giant hamartoma, 1 multicentred in situ carcinoma with Paget's disease, 1 multicentred infiltrating carcinoma and 2 malignant tumours arising in the external part of the breast). We performed oncological resections (2 partial resections and 3 complete subcutaneous mastectomies) including sentinel lymph node biopsy or total axillary lymphadenectomy. After a mean follow-up of 10 months no local relapses were found and the cosmetic results were excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgical techniques through a posterior axillary line vertical incision enable total or partial subcutaneous mastectomy and a breast reconstruction, using muscular flaps or prosthetic material, to be performed.

Breast conserving surgery for breast cancer involving the nipple

We present two cases of invasive breast carcinoma with involvement of the dermis and epidermis of the nipple areolar complex (NAC), which were treated with an immediate breast reconstruction. Oncoplastic techniques were utilised in both cases: Latissimus Dorsi Mini Flap in the first and therapeutic reduction mammaplasty in the second. Both methods were used to fill the defect and also to recreate the NAC. We believe these techniques have an expanding role in the repertoire of surgical options for treating breast carcinoma.

UK survey of partial mastectomy and reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Partial mastectomy and reconstruction can extend the role of breast-conserving surgery, but the frequency of this type of surgery is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A UK survey was performed to determine the frequency, indications, techniques and outcomes of partial mastectomy and reconstruction.

RESULTS

Seventy-one of 180 (39%) respondents offered partial mastectomy and reconstruction. Reasons for not offering partial mastectomy and reconstruction included lack of experience (61%), uncertain indications (33%), uncertain benefits (45%) and concerns about oncological safety (22%). Immediate reconstruction was performed by 50% of respondents and perioperative margin analysis was uncommon. Respondents performed volume displacement or volume replacement or both approaches (23%, 18% and 59%). Complications included fat necrosis (68%), haematoma formation (55%), positive margins (46%), infection (41%) and flap loss or poor cosmetic outcome (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial mastectomy and reconstruction is becoming popular in the UK as an alternative to full mastectomy. Safe introduction of this approach in clinical practice will require a clearer understanding of technique selection, safety and clinical outcomes.

Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: Analysis of Quadrantectomy and Immediate Reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery satisfies oncologic principles and improves cosmetic outcomes, even when an important breast volume excision is required.

METHODS

We reviewed 28 patients suffering from breast cancer treated with quadrantectomy and immediate myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. We evaluated the status of the surgical margins, early complications, and cosmetic outcome. Cosmetic assessment was carried out by a panel made up of three women and one man: a female member of an association against breast cancer, a female general practitioner, a female gynecologic resident, and a male breast-specialized surgeon.

RESULTS

Free margins were obtained in all cases. There were 11 postoperative complications: 9 seromas at the donor site, 1 dehiscence of the back wound, and 1 minor partial flap skin necrosis. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy adjuvant treatment was not compromised. The cosmesis outcome was deemed to be good in 43.75% of the cases and satisfactory in 56.25%. The score for overall cosmesis outcome was 6.92 out of 10. Symmetry and the scar of the reconstructed breast were the most influential criteria in the quantitative assessment of overall cosmetic results.

CONCLUSION

Partial mastectomy (quadrantectomy) and immediate reconstruction with a myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap allows extensive resection, which fits oncologic requirements, without serious morbidity and a good cosmetic outcome.

Immediate reconstruction using inframammary adipofascial flap of the anterior rectus sheath after partial mastectomy

Treatment of early breast cancer using breast conservative therapy (BCT) usually ensures local control and acceptable cosmetic results. To repair defects caused by partial mastectomy in the lower region of the breast, some reconstruction should be used. We developed a procedure involving the cranial based adipofascial (anterior rectus sheath) flap from immediately below the inframammary area for the reconstruction of defect due to partial mastectomy for patients with early breast cancer. In this procedure, a skin incision is made at the inframammary line, and the inframammary skin area is undermined. A tongue shaped flap composed of the subcutaneous fat and the anterior sheath of rectus abdominis muscle is pulled up and a C-shaped flap is rotated, gathered, and inserted to reconstruct the breast defect.

Early experience of immediate reconstruction using autologous free dermal fat graft after breast conservational surgery

Breast conservational therapy (BCT) has become a standard strategy for breast cancer, and ensures that local control with acceptable cosmetic results [Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1456-61] and immediate reconstruction after BCT has become increasingly popular even for early-stage breast cancer [Berrino P, Campora E, Santi P. Post-quadrantectomy breast deformities: classification and techniques of surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;79(4):567-72; Cooperman AM, Dinner M. The rhomboid flap and partial mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am 1978;58:869-73]. The breasts of Japanese women are sometimes too small to maintain symmetry, even after partial resection, and an insufficient resection margin may increase local recurrence if too much attention is paid to cosmesis. Use of an autologous free dermal fat graft (FDFG) for defect reconstruction has proven popular for some areas of the body [Lexer E. Free transplantation. Ann Surg 1914;60:166-94; Peer LA. The neglected free fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1956;18:233-50]. Immediate reconstruction of the surgical defect was performed in seven Japanese women using autologous free dermal fat graft (FDFG) from the lower abdomen after breast-conserving surgeries for six malignant lesions and two benign masses located in the medial or central area of the breasts. The mean amount of resected tissue was 56.4 g (range, 28-108 g), while mean FDFG weight was 78.3g (range, 35-148 g). We obtained symmetry in the size of the whole breast, the position and level of the nipple, and shape. Autologous FDFG was useful for reconstruction, with a good cosmetic effect. This technique achieves better cosmetic results than the transposition of residual breast tissue, is more convenient than muscle flap grafting, and safer than implantation of foreign materials. This report documents our early experiences with seven patients who underwent BCT and immediate breast reconstruction using autologous FDFG.

President’s Address

In breast cancer surgery, there has been a major shift toward less invasive local treatment: from extended or radical mastectomy to modified radical mastectomy, from modified radical mastectomy to breast conserving therapy, and from routine axillary lymph node dissection to sentinel lymph node biopsy. Many breast surgeons have experienced an evolutionary progression of surgical management of breast cancer. However, there is an increasing demand for minimally invasive and non-surgical treatment methods for patients with small breast cancer. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is the most promising among non-surgical ablation techniques in the treatment of breast cancer, although it is still in the investigative stage. Nevertheless, surgery still plays an integral role in the treatment of breast cancer, because local therapy is important for enhancing survival in the presence of systemic therapy. In clinical practice, surgical oncologists must individualize treatments, selecting a surgical or non-surgical procedure that provides the best local control, does not compromise the chances of cure, and achieves the best cosmetic results.

The Use of Latissimus Dorsi Miniflap for Reconstruction Following Breast-conserving Surgery: Experience of a Small Breast Unit in a District Hospital

BACKGROUND

Immediate reconstruction with autogenous tissue is one of the options for reconstruction following breast-conservation surgery for breast cancers in major centres with ready availability of appropriate skills. Immediate correction of volume deficit by latissimus dorsi miniflap (LDMF) in addition has cosmetic appeal by filling the defect without extra skin incision.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from clinical records of 51 patients who underwent LDMF procedures in a district general hospital between June 2000 and December 2004, and the results were analysed. Postal questionnaire survey was done to assess the level of subjective satisfaction of the cosmetic outcome.

RESULTS

Wide local excision and axillary-node sampling/clearance along with immediate reconstruction with a LDMF (involving a musculo-subcutaneous flap without skin) were performed in all patients. Patients' median age was 50 years. Sixty-five percent of the tumours were in the upper-outer quadrant, median weight of the specimen was 217.5 g (31-510 g), median clearance margin was 5 mm (0-15 mm) and median pathological size of the tumour was 20 mm (8-60 mm). Four patients required mastectomy later, whereas 1 patient had flap necrosis. At a median follow-up of 33 months, there has been no recurrence. Eighty-six percent of the patients who responded to the postal survey were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome.

CONCLUSION

Immediate LDMF reconstruction is an acceptable way of correcting deformity after breast-conservation surgery. We demonstrate by our experience that it is a viable option for breast cancer in small district hospitals/ breast units.

Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale

INTRODUCTION

Multiple scales to evaluate breast cosmesis following breast conserving treatment (BCT) have been developed, however reliability is a problem. Panel scores, where scores from two or more individuals are combined, were assessed to examine their effect on reliability for two different cosmetic scales.

METHODS

Women, two or more years following BCT, were recruited from a single breast centre. Photographs of each participant were evaluated independently by six health care professionals on two separate occasions. A simple four-point scale and more involved multi-item scale were used to assess cosmetic outcome. Reliability was assessed with the weighted kappa statistic for increasing panel sizes.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine women were evaluated. Intra rater reliability increased from 0.73 to 0.83 for the four-point scale, for increasing panel sizes, however 95% confidence intervals generally overlapped. A smaller and more unpredictable effect was seen on the multi-item subscale, range 0.69 to 0.73. Inter rater reliability increased from 0.68 to 0.93 for the four-point scale, and 0.75 to 0.96 for the multi-item scale, for increasing panel sizes; 95% confidence intervals did not overlap. A panel of three for either scale provided almost perfect kappa values with only small improvements with larger panel sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

Care should be used in interpreting results where cosmetic outcomes have been obtained from a single evaluator. Panel scores can be used to significantly improve inter-rater, but not intra rater reliability, for the scales studied. Comparable reliability, in combination with simplicity of use and interpretation, would favour the four-point scale for breast cosmetic evaluation over the multi-item scale.

Therapeutic Mammaplasty for Centrally Located Breast Tumors

BACKGROUND

Central breast tumors are difficult to manage using breast-conserving treatment. Mastectomy has often been cited as the favored option for these tumors, because lumpectomies that remove the nipple-areola complex often result in poor cosmesis. This article describes the use of therapeutic mammaplasty (a term used to describe breast reduction techniques utilized to treat breast cancer) for centrally sited breast tumors.

METHODS

The techniques can be broadly divided into two categories: (1) wedge excision, involving wedge excision and a form of wedge closure, and (2) advancement flaps with nipple reconstruction.

RESULTS

These techniques were used in 11 patients. Excision margins were complete in all cases except one, due to extensive ductal carcinoma in situ. There have been no other complications and no cases of recurrence to date.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with mastectomy and total reconstruction, therapeutic mammaplasty has cosmetic, functional, and recovery time advantages. The techniques described need further evaluation and long-term follow-up. However, they can be added to the repertoire of techniques already established for breast-conserving surgery.

Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty--Nottingham approach

Therapeutic mammaplasty, the use of reduction mammaplasty and radiotherapy to surgically treat breast cancer, is an established technique for selected breast cancers and can extend the role of breast conserving surgery. Most frequently described is the use of a wise pattern reduction for tumours that lie within the expected mammaplasty excision. However, mammaplasty techniques can be safely adapted to treat patients with cancers in all areas of the breast. An approach to selection and planning surgery is presented which has evolved from the experience of other units and our first 50 clinical cases over a 3-year period. The outcomes of these 50 cases are found in the accompanying article. Technique will vary depending upon the tumour position. Breast cancers may lie within the normal excision site of a recognised mammaplasty method (scenario A) or outside of the expected excision sites (scenario B). In scenario A, a range of recognised techniques can be performed without adaptation to widely excise the tumour and re-shape the breasts. In scenario B the techniques need to be adapted. Three decisions are needed for planning in scenario B; the skin incision, the nipple-aereola complex (NAC) pedicle orientation and finally the method of filling the cancer defect. The latter can be achieved by either extending the nipple pedicle or by creating a secondary pedicle within the breast dissection. Either method will move tissue that is normally excised into the cancer defect. For central tumours an inferior pedicle is usually used to both fill the defect and re-create the nipple.

Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy is firmly established as a good and safe option for most women with early breast cancer. The important outcome measures of breast conservation are survival, local recurrence, cosmesis and patient satisfaction. Partial breast reconstructive techniques may improve cosmesis and patient satisfaction without compromising the oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A search of the Medline and Pubmed databases of studies on breast conserving surgery where partial breast reconstructive techniques were employed. The keywords used were breast conserving surgery, oncoplastic breast surgery, partial breast reconstruction and reduction mammoplasty. The oncological and cosmetic outcomes of these studies were analysed.

RESULTS

Studies on partial breast reconstructive techniques often lack oncological outcomes and long-term results are not available. On intermediate follow-up (up to 4.5 years) local recurrence rates vary from 0 to 1.8% per year. Cosmetic failure rates vary from 0 to 18%. To date, detailed studies are small and outcome measures vary.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast surgeons should be aware of the range of surgical techniques that may enhance the aesthetic results of breast-conserving surgery as well as expand the indications for its use. There is a need for routine assessment of oncological and cosmetic outcomes and long-term results of partial breast reconstructive techniques in relation to these outcomes are awaited.

Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer is a novel concept that combines a plastic surgical procedure with breast-conserving treatment to improve the final cosmetic results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological safety of oncoplastic procedures by studying the status of the surgical margins of the excised tumor specimen in comparison with standard quadrantectomies.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing oncoplastic surgery (group 1) and 30 patients undergoing standard quadrantectomy (group 2) were prospectively studied with regard to the stage of breast cancer, the surgical procedures performed, the volume of breast tissue excised, and the histopathology of the tumor specimen, with specific details on surgical margins.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery (group 1) were younger (mean age, 48.73 years) than patients who had a classic quadrantectomy (group 2; mean age, 55.76 years; P = .022). The mean volume of the excised specimen in group 1 was 200.18 cm(3), compared with 117.55 cm(3) in group 2 (P = .016). Surgical margins were negative in 25 cases out of 30 in group 1 and 17 out of 30 in group 2 (P = .05). The average length of the surgical margin was 8.5 mm in group 1 and 6.5 mm in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .074).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncoplastic surgery adds to the oncological safety of breast-conserving treatment because a larger volume of breast tissue can be excised and a wider negative margin can be obtained. It is especially indicated for large tumors, for which standard breast-conserving treatment has a high probability of leaving positive margins.

The impact of intra-operative specimen radiographs on specimen weights for wide local excision of breast cancer

The ultimate goal of breast conserving surgery (BCS) is to achieve survival and local control rates similar to those for mastectomy while providing improved cosmetic and functional results. The volume of breast tissue removed is the most significant determinant of the final cosmetic outcome of BCS. We hypothesised that intra-operative specimen radiograph (IOSR) during BCS may guide the surgeon to achieve clear radiographic and histological margins with minimum normal breast tissue excision, thus preserving cosmetic appearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing the policy of IOSR on the weight of specimens of wide local excision of palpable invasive breast cancer. All consecutive patients who underwent therapeutic wide local excision for palpable invasive breast cancer from 01/01/02 to 31/03/03 were included in this study. A policy of IOSR was introduced in October 2002, thus all BCS done after 01/10/2002 underwent IOSR. The mean (S.D.) specimen weight for the no intra-operative specimen radiograph (NIOSR) group was 74 grams compared to 46 g in the IOSR group, (P = 0.0241, unpaired t-test with Welch's correction) and the mean tumour size for the NIOSR was 23(13)mm and for IOSR was 21(8)mm (P = ns, unpaired t-test with Welch's correction). A histologically clear circumferential margin rate in the IOSR group was 96% compared to 82% in the NIOSR group. Five patients in the IOSR group and 11 in NIOSR group had positive anterior or posterior margin. For these patients no further surgical excision was possible as BCS was performed from skin to pectoral fascia. Therefore a radiation boost was given to the site of excision. Only one patient in the IOSR group needed further breast surgery (mastectomy) for a positive inferior (toward nipple) margin for a mammographically occult tumour, while 11 patients in the NIOSR group required further breast surgery. In conclusion, IOSR is a simple, effective and economical way of assessing adequacy of margins while minimising the breast tissue excised during wide local excision of palpable breast cancers.

A new surgical strategy for breast conservation in locally advanced breast cancer that achieves a good locoregional control rate: preliminary report

The scope of breast conserving surgery has recently expanded to include locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients who are downstaged following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, the efficacy of this approach in achieving adequate locoregional control of disease is in doubt. Some reports have attributed the failure to the association of NACT-induced tumour downstaging which can leave multifocal in situ and invasive lesions around the main tumour mass. In the present study, in order to eradicate all possible tumour satellites, a very wide local excision that included the whole original tumour-bearing area was performed regardless of the expected wide defect. This defect was then immediately reconstructed by an ipsilateral pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) flap. The study included 26 patients with LABC without evidence of primary tumour-multicentricity. Tumours were downstaged following NACT. The early cosmetic outcome was good in the majority of cases. Early complications were minimal. Twenty-two patients had a mean follow up period of 30.2 (range 7-50) months. In those evaluable cases, locoregional control of the disease was excellent (100%) but distant metastases occurred in seven cases (31.8%).

Size of invasive breast cancer and risk of local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy

Risk of local recurrence is one important factor that determines a woman's suitability for breast-conservation therapy. With the evolution of oncoplastic surgery, tumours of a size that traditionally require mastectomy may be treated by breast conservation and partial breast reconstruction. This article reviews the evidence relating to tumour size as a risk factor for local recurrence to assess whether this change in practice is appropriate. A literature review through Medline and Pubmed was performed. All pathological studies analysing tumour size as a predictor of multifocality and all randomised trials and large case series of breast conservation including tumours larger than 2 cm were reviewed and critically interpreted. Pathological studies report consistent evidence that tumour size is not predictive of multifocality. Randomised trials and clinical series of breast conservation report conflicting evidence relating to tumour size as a risk factor for local recurrence, although most studies report no association. Evidence relating to cancers over 3 cm is limited. There is little evidence to justify the use of tumour size alone as an exclusion criterion for breast-conservation therapy. A registration study of patients with cancers larger than 3 cm treated by breast conservation with or without partial breast reconstruction is proposed.

Breast-sparing reconstruction with latissimus dorsi miniflaps

Volume loss following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the key reason for major local deformity and a bad cosmetic outcome. Latissimus dorsi miniflaps can be used to reconstruct central and upper quadrant resection defects, replacing the volume excised with autogenous tissue. Partial mastectomy, axillary dissection, flap harvest and reconstruction of the resection defect is performed as a one-stage procedure through a single lateral incision. This oncoplastic approach allows extensive local excision during BCS without cosmetic penalties in a group of patients normally treated by mastectomy.

Latissimus dorsi mini-flap: a technique for extending breast conservation

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap was first used in patients for breast reconstruction in 1896. More recently it has been used to fill defects after quadrantectomy or very wide excision. We have developed a two stage procedure for excision of large breast cancers which would otherwise require mastectomy. The first stage is a wide excision of the cancer without removal of the overlying skin. Thirty patients with large localized operable breast cancer underwent wide local excision followed 5 to 10 days later in 25 patients who had clear histological margins by an axillary dissection with transfer of the LD muscle and overlying fat into the defect in the breast (mini-flap). The cosmetic outcome of these 25 patients who underwent mini-flap were compared with age matched patients having a standard wide local excision and axillary node clearance or mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. The volume of tissue excised in patients having their defects filled by LD mini-flap was significantly greater than those women undergoing standard wide excision, p<0.001. Compared with patients who had a mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction, patients who had mini-flaps reported a better treated breast shape, p=0.04, a greater resemblance to the opposite breast, less self consciousness and less change in attitude of their spouse, p=0.03 and they were more likely to choose the same operation in future compared with patients having immediate whole breast reconstruction, p=0.02. Results as rated by patients in the mini-flap group were similar to those women treated by standard wide local excision. Only one patient in the mini-flap group felt sexually inhibited. When wide local excision and LD mini-flap is performed as a two stage procedure, it is an oncologically safe technique and extends breast conservation to women with larger tumours. The cosmetic outcomes appear better than those following the alternative of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Single axillary incision for quadrantectomy, axillary clearance and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi

This paper describes a method of immediate breast reconstruction following conservative breast surgery. The technique is innovative in that axillary clearance, quadrantectomy and the harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle are carried out through a small transverse axillary incision with no incision in the breast.