Incidence of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in a population-based study of 1137 consecutive cases of colorectal cancer

Low Incidence of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome in a Selected Area of the Lombardy Cancer Registry

Aims and background

Epidemiological investigations on the frequency of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome are few and have shown a variable worldwide incidence ranging from 1% to 7% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). In Italy, relevant differences have been observed: 2.8-3% of all CRCs in northern regions and less than 1% in southern regions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the HNPCC incidence in a selected area of northern Italy belonging to the Lombardy Cancer Registry.

Methods and study design

We analyzed 197 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CRCs, histologically verified, and resident in two areas of the Lombardy Cancer Registry. For each case, genetic counseling with at least three generations pedigree reconstruction, HNPCC classification according to Amsterdam criteria, molecular analysis for microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry for hMLH1 and hMSH2 were performed.

Results

A very low frequency (0.5%) of HNPCC fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria was found in comparison to the other Italian areas. Such an incidence seems to be due to actual population differences and reflects a genetic heterogeneity.

Conclusions

The data underline the importance of a precise knowledge of actual HNPCC incidence in different populations in order to optimize effectiveness and efficiency of screening programs for the disease.

GSTM1 polymorphism contribute to colorectal cancer in Asian populations: a prospective meta-analysis

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are enzymes which expressed in many tissues and play important roles in neutralization of toxic compounds, and protecting hosts against cancer. Among several GSTs, Glutathione S-transferases mu (GSTM) has been drawn attention upon the association with the genetic risk for many types of cancers. But whether the GSTM1 polymorphisms confer the susceptibility to colorectal cancer in Asians has not been well established. We searched the PubMed database with GSTM1, polymorphism and colorectal cancer, attempting to identify the eligible studies. In total, 33 case-control studies in Asian populations with 8502 colorectal cancer patients and 13699 controls were included in the current meta-analysis. The association between the polymorphism and susceptibility to colorectal cancer was evaluated by the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The pooled meta-analysis suggested that GSTM1 null variant was correlated to the colorectal cancer risk in Asians. There was a marginal heterogeneity among these eligible studies. Nevertheless, cumulative meta-analysis observed a trend of an obvious association between the GSTM1 null genotype and colorectal cancer risk in Asians. In summary, the meta-analysis suggested that GSTM1 null polymorphism confer the susceptibility to colorectal cancer in Asians, especially in Chinese populations.

Risk prediction model for colorectal cancer: National Health Insurance Corporation study, Korea

Purpose

Incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer have been rapidly increasing in Korea during last few decades. Development of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer in Korean men and women is urgently needed to enhance its prevention and early detection.

Methods

Gender specific five-year risk prediction models were developed for overall colorectal cancer, proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer, colon cancer and rectal cancer. The model was developed using data from a population of 846,559 men and 479,449 women who participated in health examinations by the National Health Insurance Corporation. Examinees were 30–80 years old and free of cancer in the baseline years of 1996 and 1997. An independent population of 547,874 men and 415,875 women who participated in 1998 and 1999 examinations was used to validate the model. Model validation was done by evaluating its performance in terms of discrimination and calibration ability using the C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow-type chi-square statistics.

Results

Age, body mass index, serum cholesterol, family history of cancer, and alcohol consumption were included in all models for men, whereas age, height, and meat intake frequency were included in all models for women. Models showed moderately good discrimination ability with C-statistics between 0.69 and 0.78. The C-statistics were generally higher in the models for men, whereas the calibration abilities were generally better in the models for women.

Conclusions

Colorectal cancer risk prediction models were developed from large-scale, population-based data. Those models can be used for identifying high risk groups and developing preventive intervention strategies for colorectal cancer.

Metachronous colorectal cancer risk in patients with a moderate family history

AIM

Lifetime risk of a metachronous colorectal cancer (mCRC) is 0.6-3% following sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) and 15-26% in Lynch syndrome. The lifetime incidence of CRC in individuals with moderate familial risk is 8-17%. Risk of mCRC is unknown.

METHOD

A retrospective longitudinal study of the Regional Familial CRC Registry was performed. Patients who had at least one CRC were categorized as follows: moderate risk (n = 383), Lynch syndrome (n = 528) and average (population) risk (n = 409). The Kaplan-Meier estimate (1-KM) and the cumulative incidence function were used to calculate the risk of mCRC. The 1-KM gives the risk for individuals remaining at risk (alive) at a given time point and thus is useful for counselling. The cumulative incidence function gives the risk for the whole population.

RESULTS

The 1-KM and the cumulative incidence function demonstrated that the risk of mCRC was significantly higher in moderate-risk patients compared with average (population)-risk patients (1-KM, P = 0.008; cumulative incidence function, P = 0.00097). However, the risk of mCRC was higher in patients with Lynch syndrome than in moderate-risk or average (population)-risk patients. The 1-KM in moderate-risk patients was 2.7%, 6.3% and 23.5% at 5, 10 and 20 years, respectively. In average (population)-risk patients, the 1-KM was 1.3%, 3.1% and 7.0% at 5, 10 and 20 years, and the cumulative incidence function was 0.3%, 0.6% and 2.4% at the same time points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the risk of mCRC is significantly higher in patients with a moderate family history of CRC than in those with an average (population) risk. This justifies proactive lifelong surveillance.

Clinical and molecular detection of inherited colorectal cancers in northeast Italy: a first prospective study of incidence of Lynch syndrome and MUTYH-related colorectal cancer in Italy

The reported incidence of hereditary colorectal cancers (CRCs) is widely variable. The principal aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of familial CRCs in a region of northern Italy using a standardized method. Consecutive CRC patients were prospectively enrolled from October 2002 to December 2003. Patients underwent a structured family history, the microsatellite instability (MSI) test and a screen for MUTYH mutations. Following family history patients were classified as belonging to high, moderate and mild risk families. Immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 proteins and investigation for MLH1/MSH2 mutations, for MLH1 promoter methylation and for the V600E hotspot BRAF mutation were performed in high MSI (MSI-H) cases. Of the 430 patients enrolled, 17 (4%) were high risk [4 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), 12 suspected HNPCC and 1 MUTYH-associated adenomatous polyposis coli (MAP)], 53 moderate risk and 360 mild risk cases. The MSI test was performed on 393 tumours, and 46 (12%) of them showed MSI-H. In these patients, one MLH1 pathogenetic mutations and two MSH2 pathogenetic mutations were found. Thirty-two (70%) MSI-H cases demonstrated MLH1 methylation and/or BRAF mutation: None of them showed MLH1/MSH2 mutation. Two biallelic germline MUTYH mutations were found, one with clinical features of MAP. A strong family history of CRC was present in 4% of the enrolled cases; incidence of MLH1/MSH2 or MUTHY mutations was 1.3% and of MSI-H phenotype was 12%. MLH1 methylation and BRAF mutation can exclude 70% of MSI-H cases from gene sequencing.

Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact

An increasing number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receive genetic counselling within 1 year after diagnosis. Little is known whether specific subgroups are more vulnerable for genetic testing related distress. A literature review was conducted to identify the psychological impact of CRC in the first year, and the additional impact of genetic testing. The electronic databases of PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify all reports published between January 1997 and October 2007 on the psychological impact of (1) CRC-diagnosis up to 1 year after treatment and of (2) genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in patients with CRC. Studies on the psychological impact of genetic testing in newly diagnosed patient with CRC were not available. Either CRC patients diagnosed several years ago were studied and the focus was also often on the psychological impact of genetic testing prior to DNA-test disclosure. They show that limitations in emotional and social functioning can persist up to 1 year after CRC treatment, especially in those with a stoma or diagnosed before age 60. Female patients and male patients diagnosed before age 50 appear to be more vulnerable to genetic test-related distress. It is well known that being treated for CRC has great impact on psychological functioning. Little is known about the psychological impact during the first year after diagnosis and very little is known about the additional psychological effect of genetic testing for hereditary cancer in this period. We found presumptive evidence that specific subgroups of patients with CRC are more vulnerable for genetic-testing-related distress.

Reduced mRNA expression in paraffin-embedded tissue identifies MLH1- and MSH2-deficient colorectal tumours and potential mutation carriers

Based on the principle of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, we sought to identify MLH1 or MSH2-deficient colorectal tumours through relative quantification of mRNA expression with real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis. MLH1 and MSH2 mRNAs were almost equally expressed as defined by MLH1 to MSH2 transcript ratio (mean 1.41) in microsatellite stable, mismatch repair (MMR) proficient tumours (n = 16). A close correlation between loss of protein expression and MMR-mRNA levels was found in highly microsatellite instable (MSI-H) tumours deficient of MLH1 or MSH2. MLH1/MSH2 ratio was low in 11 sporadic and nine hereditary MLH1-deficient carcinomas (mean 0.51), whereas the ratio was high in 17 MSH2-deficient hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) associated carcinomas (mean 6.8). Notably, in the normal tissues of HNPCC patients with MSH2 mutations, the MLH1/MSH2 transcript ratios were significantly elevated (ratio > 2.0) as compared to the ratios of normal mucosa in patients with MMR-proficient tumours (27 of 32 ratio < 2.0; p = 0.00113). Analysis of B-lymphocytes of HNPCC patients with proven MMR gene mutation confirmed these findings. In conclusion, RT-PCR allows relative quantification of MMR gene mRNA expression in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. Furthermore, this approach enables quantification of haploinsufficiency due to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in normal tissue and B-lymphocytes from patients carrying MSH2 germline mutations and may be useful for identification of asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic germline mutations.

Very high incidence of familial colorectal cancer in Newfoundland: a comparison with Ontario and 13 other population-based studies

Newfoundland has the highest rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) of any Canadian province. In order to investigate the factors, especially genetic components, responsible for CRC we established the Newfoundland Colorectal Cancer Registry. In a 5-year period we examined every case of CRC diagnosed under the age of 75 years and obtained consent from 730 cases. Careful analysis of family history was used to assign a familial cancer risk, based on established criteria. We observed that 3.7% of CRC cases came from families meeting the Amsterdam II criteria and a further 0.9% of cases involved familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). An additional 43% of cases met one or more of the revised Bethesda criteria and 31% of all cases had a first-degree relative affected with CRC. We compared the Newfoundland data with data from the province of Ontario, where the same recruitment and risk-assessment criteria were used. In all categories, the indicators of familial risk were significantly higher in Newfoundland. These data were also compared to results published from 13 other population-based studies worldwide. In every category the proportion of Newfoundland cases meeting the criteria was higher than in any other population. The mean differences were: 3.5-fold greater for FAP, 2.8-fold higher for Amsterdam criteria, 2.0-fold higher for Bethesda criteria and 1.9-fold higher for the number of affected first-degree relatives. We conclude that the high incidence of CRC in Newfoundland may be attributable to genetic, or at least familial, factors. In the high-risk families we provide evidence for the involvement of founder mutations in the APC and MSH2 genes.

Clinical and molecular analysis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Chinese colorectal cancer patients

AIM: To analyze the frequency of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and to discuss the value of microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MSH2/MLH1 protein analysis as pre-screening tests in China.

METHODS: The Amsterdam criteriaIandII(clinical diagnosis) and/or germline hMLH1/hMSH2 mutations (genetic diagnosis) were used to classify HNPCC families. Genetic tests, including microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry for MSH2/MLH1 proteins and hMSH2/hMLH1 genes, were performed in each proband.

RESULTS: From July 2000 to June 2004, 1988 patients with colorectal cancer were analysed and 114 CRC patients (5.7%) from 48 families were categorized as having HNPCC, including 76 from 26 families diagnosed clinically and 38 from the other 22 families diagnosed genetically. The sensitivity and specificity of high MSI and IHC for predicting mutations were 100% and 54%, and 79% and 77%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The frequency of HNPCC is approximately 10% among all Chinese CRC cases. The MSI and IHC detections for hMSH2/hMLH1 proteins are reliable pre-screening tests for hMLH1/hMSH2 germline mutations in families suspected of having HNPCC.

Prevalence of the mismatch-repair-deficient phenotype in colonic adenomas arising in HNPCC patients: results of a 5-year follow-up study

In hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome, more than 90% of the carcinomas show microsatellite instability (MSI) due to a loss of mismatch repair (MMR) function. Although adenomas are very common in HNPCC and demonstrate an accelerated adenoma-carcinoma sequence, data about the prevalence and development of MSI in these early neoplastic lesions are lacking. To determine whether MSI and loss of MMR-protein expression are already present in early stages of tumorigenesis and could therefore be used as a screening tool to identify HNPCC patients before they develop an invasive carcinoma, we analyzed 71 adenomas of 36 HNPCC patients during a 5-year follow-up study. These 36 patients were part of a cohort of 122 HNPCC patients who were investigated at the Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Kassel, as part of the multicentric German HNPCC Consortium, which currently serves more than 2,880 registered families. The diagnosis of HNPCC was based either on the detection of a pathogenic germline mutation in the MSH2, MLH1, or MSH6 genes or in cases where a pathogenic mutation was not found; diagnosis of HNPCC was made, because all patients fulfilled the Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria and revealed a high degree of MSI (MSI-H) as well as loss of one of the MMR proteins by IHC in the cancer tissue. We found that most adenomas (58/71) were MSI-H and had loss of MMR-protein expression. Of the 71 adenomas, 3 were MSI-H with expression of all MMR proteins, and 3 out of 71 displayed loss of a MMR protein with the microsatellites being classified as microsatellite stable (MSS). However, 7 of the 31 adenomas that were located more than 5 cm away from the carcinoma revealed an MSS status (n=6) or low in MSI (n=1) and expressed all MMR proteins. In summary, a significant percentage of HNPCC-associated adenomas (7/31, 22.6%) developing at a distance of more than 5 cm from the corresponding carcinoma did not show the MSI-H MMR-deficient phenotype and expressed all MMR genes. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows that in most HNPCC patients, the mutator pathway is already detectable in adenomas, but MMR-proficient adenomas can also be found. Therefore, screening for MMR deficiency should not be applied routinely in adenomas with the goal to identify HNPCC patients.

A novel MSH2 germline mutation in homozygous state in two brothers with colorectal cancers diagnosed at the age of 11 and 12 years

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome is caused by heterozygous germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes (MMR), (MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2) and it is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with high penetrance. Several patients have been reported carrying bi-allelic MMR gene mutations and whose phenotype resembled a syndrome with childhood malignancies including hematological malignancies, brain, and colorectal tumors. This phenotype is similar to the tumor spectrum of MMR knockout mice. Herein we describe two brothers of healthy consanguineous parents from Pakistan, who had developed two and three colorectal cancers at the ages of 11 and 12 years, respectively, and less than 30 polyps. Tumor specimens were microsatellite instable (MSI-H), and expression of MSH2 and MSH6 was lost. Mutation analyses of DNA samples from both patients revealed a novel homozygous c.2006-5T > A mutation in intron 12 of the MSH2 gene. This phenotype of the brothers is unusual as they neither develop hematological malignancies nor brain tumors at an older age of presentation than other patients with homozygous MSH2 mutations. The milder phenotype may be due to the expression of low amounts of MSH2 protein with reduced activity.

Estimated prevalence of hereditary cancers and the need for surveillance in a Norwegian county, Telemark

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of hereditary cancers and the need for surveillance in Telemark county, Norway.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All persons attending the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial in Telemark were interviewed about cases of cancer in the family. Diagnoses were verified, pedigrees constructed and families classified according to preset criteria aiming at identifying hereditary cancer. Mutation analyses were performed in kindreds at risk for breast cancers when possible. Immunohistochemistry of tumors in assumed inherited colorectal cancer families was undertaken.

RESULTS

The screening examination was attended by 7,224 persons among whom 2,866 had cancer in the family. Of these, 2,479 had no suspicion of any known inherited cancer syndrome. Family information questionnaires were mailed to 387 persons and returned by 191. Sixty-four of these 191 met the clinical criteria for familial cancer by family history after verification of diagnoses. Observed prevalences for being at risk for hereditary breast and breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) were 2.8 per thousand and 0.77 per thousand, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of colonoscopies and mammograms obtained per year serving those who needed them was limited and reduced by clinical genetic work-up from 2,866 with a family history of cancer to 64 proven cases. Continued surveillance of an unnecessarily high number leads to unjustified cancer worry, is costly and uses up health-care facilities. Genetic work-up is a one-time job that reduces input numbers to surveillance programs, provides a starting-point for mutation testing and is economically cost beneficial if inherited cancers are prevented or cured by the health-care programs offered.

Surveillance colonoscopy in individuals at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an evidence-based review

PURPOSE

Surveillance colonoscopy plays an important role in the management of asymptomatic patients known to carry and suspected of carrying hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations. Although the shortest interval between surveillance examinations may seem to offer the most benefit to patients, excessive use of this procedure may have unwanted consequences. This study was designed to evaluate the evidence and make recommendations regarding the optimal frequency of surveillance colonoscopy and the age at which to initiate surveillance based on the best available evidence.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for all articles assessing surveillance colonoscopy from 1966 to 2004 by using the MESH terms "hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer" and "screening." The evidence was systematically reviewed and a critical appraisal of the evidence was performed.

RESULTS

There are no randomized, controlled, clinical trials examining the frequency of surveillance colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Three cohort studies were identified for review. There is one cohort study of good quality that provides evidence that surveillance colonoscopy every three years in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer reduces the risk of developing colorectal cancer and the risk of death. The two remaining cohort studies provide poor evidence on which to make a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

The best available evidence supports surveillance with complete colonoscopy to the cecum every three years in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (B recommendation). There is no evidence to support or refute more frequent screening. Further research is required to examine the potential harms and benefits of more frequent screening. However, given the potential for rapid progression from adenoma to carcinoma and missing lesions at colonoscopy, there is consensus that screening more frequently than every three years is required.

Glutathione S -transferase T1 polymorphisms are associated with outcome in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of mortality accounting for approximately 10% of all deaths from malignancy in the western world. Polymorphism in the glutathione S-transferase GSTT1 gene has been associated with CRC risk in some but not all studies. In this study, we examined associations between GSTT1 genotypes and CRC risk, and prognosis in 361 cases and 881 unrelated controls. GSTT1 null was associated with a small but significant increase in risk (P = 0.0006, odds ratio (OR) = 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.22-2.24). GSTT1 null was also associated with a significantly younger age at diagnosis (mean 65.2 years) compared with GSTT1 A (mean 67.6 years, P = 0.031). There were no significant associations between GSTT1 genotypes and clinical factors (e.g. Dukes stage, differentiation and tumour node metastasis classification) in the total case group. However, following stratification by age (<70 versus > or =70 years at diagnosis), in the patients diagnosed <70 years of age, GSTT1 null was more common in Dukes grade A/B tumours (P = 0.046), stage T1/T2 tumours (P = 0.053) and those with a pushing margin (P = 0.066). We also identified associations between GSTT1 null and increased prevalence of host lymphocyte response, particularly in the younger patients (P = 0.036). Furthermore, GSTT1 null was associated with improved survival in younger patients (P = 0.017, hazards ratio (HR) = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.31-0.89) but poorer survival in older patients (P = 0.017, HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.12-3.20). We proposed a model based on the dual functionality of GSTT1 to explain these contrasting results. We suggest that the null genotype is associated with improved immune response in younger patients, but poorer detoxification in older patients. These findings may also provide an explanation for the contrasting finding of other studies on the role of this gene in CRC.

Endoscopic management of familial colonic neoplasia

Heredity plays an important causative role in a large percentage of colorectal cancers. Clinical recognition of the hereditary polyposis syndromes, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, and common familial colorectal cancer is essential because screening, surveillance, and treatment among affected individuals and their family members differs from that recommended for the general population. More intensive cancer screening and surveillance is required if premature death is to be avoided. Genetic testing is commercially available for most of the hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes and can greatly facilitate the management of patients if properly undertaken.

Cancer genetics in primary care

The cloning of two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, in 1994 and 1995 and the subsequent development of commercial genetic testing has brought hereditary cancer genetics into the public eye. In addition to DNA-based genetic testing, new strategies and treatments have been developed to provide accurate assessment of cancer risk and to reduce the chances of cancer developing in the future. This increasing scientific and public attention has prompted some cancer patients and their families to find out whether they "have the cancer gene" and has placed more responsibility on primary care clinicians to identify people who should be referred for specialized services of hereditary cancer genetics.

Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, is a common autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by early age at onset, neoplastic lesions, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Because cancers with MSI account for approximately 15% of all colorectal cancers and because of the need for a better understanding of the clinical and histologic manifestations of HNPCC, the National Cancer Institute hosted an international workshop on HNPCC in 1996, which led to the development of the Bethesda Guidelines for the identification of individuals with HNPCC who should be tested for MSI. To consider revision and improvement of the Bethesda Guidelines, another HNPCC workshop was held at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MD, in 2002. In this commentary, we summarize the Workshop presentations on HNPCC and MSI testing; present the issues relating to the performance, sensitivity, and specificity of the Bethesda Guidelines; outline the revised Bethesda Guidelines for identifying individuals at risk for HNPCC; and recommend criteria for MSI testing.

Is it acceptable to approach colorectal cancer patients at diagnosis to discuss genetic testing? A pilot study

In this pilot study, the acceptability of approaching 111 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients with the offer of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was assessed. A total of 78% of participants found it highly acceptable to have the information about HNPCC brought to their attention at that time.

Familial relative risk of colorectal cancer: a population-based study

This study aimed to assess the familial relative risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its variation according to age and gender. A population-based family study was carried out in France, from 1993 to 1998, including 761 families. Familial CRC risks were estimated from a cohort analysis of the relatives. No obvious decrease in CRC risk was found with increasing age, except when either the proband, or the relative, were in the youngest age class. The effect of the relatives' and probands' ages on the CRC risk differed according to their gender. The cumulative risk of CRC increased at an earlier age in male relatives of probands younger than 60 years of age, than in female relatives. This result suggests that mechanisms specific to females, possibly interacting with genetic factors, explain the difference in the cumulative risks between families with male and female probands.

Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Molecular testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) is becoming standard care and it is cost-effective compared with no genetic testing. However, the best strategy for detection of HNPCC gene carriers is unknown.

METHODS

We use a decision analytic model to evaluate the effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness of four commonly used testing strategies to detect HNPCC gene carriers. The model starts with a population of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients and measures costs, the number of gene carriers detected, and incremental costs per gene carrier detected.

RESULTS

We found that germline testing on only those CRC probands who meet the Amsterdam criteria detects the fewest gene carriers and has the lowest cost whereas tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of all CRC patients and families has the highest cost and detects the most gene carriers. When cost-effectiveness is considered, the mixed strategy (MSH2 and MLH1 testing on those who meet the Amsterdam criteria and germline testing for the remainder who meet less stringent modified criteria and are MSI-High) seems superior. The mixed strategy detects 59.6 mutation carriers per 1000 CRC cases and costs much less than the test all strategy, which has an incremental cost-effectiveness of $51,151. The mixed strategy often other strategies and when compared to the Amsterdam strategy, has a cost-effectiveness of only $6441 per gene carrier detected.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not very effective to limit genetic testing to only individuals who meet the Amsterdam criteria, as many gene carriers are missed. However, testing all CRC patients for tumor MSI-H, although effective, may be prohibitively expensive. A mixed strategy is the more cost-effective approach.

A population-based study of the extent of surgical resection of potentially curable colon cancer

BACKGROUND

We attempted to determine factors contributing to the extent of initial curative resection for colon cancer in a population-based cohort. Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TAC-IR) may be considered for young patients or those with a colorectal cancer family history to prevent metachronous lesions and facilitate surveillance.

METHODS

All Ontario patients newly diagnosed with colon cancer over 12 months beginning in July 1997 were staged at the time of surgery. The extent of resection was compared with variables, including familial risk obtained from the Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

Complete staging was possible for 86% of patients. A total of 1223 patients had a potentially curative resection: 17%, 46%, and 36% were stage I, II, and III, respectively. Patients were more likely to receive a TAC-IR if they were < or = 50 years old (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-6.6), if they had a synchronous lesion (OR, 28.37; 95% CI, 12.2-61.2), or if they were at a teaching hospital (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-4.7), but not if they had a family history (OR,.7; 95% CI,.3- 1.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Young age, teaching hospital, and multiple cancers but not family history were important factors for performing a TAC-IR.

The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas

A comprehensive analysis of somatic and germline mutations related to DNA mismatch-repair (MMR) genes can clarify the prevalence and mechanism of inactivation in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In the present study, 257 unselected patients referred for CRC resection were examined for evidence of defective DNA MMR. In particular, we sought to determine the frequency of hereditary defects in DNA MMR in this cohort of patients. MMR status was assessed by testing of tumors for the presence or absence of hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6 protein expression and for microsatellite instability (MSI). Of the 257 patients, 51 (20%) had evidence of defective MMR, demonstrating high levels of MSI (MSI-H) and an absence of either hMLH1 (n=48) or hMSH2 (n=3). All three patients lacking hMSH2, as well as one patient lacking hMLH1, also demonstrated an absence of hMSH6. DNA sequence analysis of the 51 patients with defective MMR revealed seven germline mutations-four in hMLH1 (two truncating and two missense) and three in hMSH2 (all truncating). A detailed family history was available for 225 of the 257 patients. Of the seven patients with germline mutations, only three had family histories consistent with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Of the remaining patients who had tumors with defective MMR, eight had somatic mutations in hMLH1. In addition, hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter was present in 37 (88%) of the 42 hMLH1-negative cases available for study and in all MSI-H tumors that showed loss of hMLH1 expression but no detectable hMLH1 mutations. Our results suggest that, although defective DNA MMR occurs in approximately 20% of unselected patients presenting for CRC resection, hereditary CRC due to mutations in the MMR pathway account for only a small proportion of patients. Of the 257 patients, only 5 (1.9%) appear to have unequivocal evidence of hereditary defects in MMR. The epigenetic (nonhereditary) mechanism of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation appears to be responsible for the majority of the remaining patients whose tumors are characterized by defective DNA MMR.

The colon cancer burden of genetically defined hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Estimates of the frequency of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) based on clinical criteria have varied widely. Recent studies of germline mismatch repair gene mutations have suggested that HNPCC accounts for close to 3% of all colon cancer, but this estimate may have been inflated by inclusion of founder effects peculiar to Finland. We therefore determined by genetic criteria the colon cancer burden associated with HNPCC in a population-based study of 1066 individuals from Utah and California.

METHODS

The coding regions of mismatch repair genes hMSH2 and hMLH1 were sequenced from the germline of those individuals whose tumors exhibited microsatellite instability.

RESULTS

Microsatellite instability was present in 16% (171/1066) of tumors. Pathogenic germline mismatch repair gene mutations were identified in 7 individuals, and missense amino acid changes of uncertain significance were identified in another 6 individuals. After adjusting for the availability of sufficient germline DNA for sequencing, the 7 clearly pathogenic mutations accounted for 0.86% of colon cancer at the population level. Individuals with these mutations were significantly younger, more likely to have a family history of colon and endometrial cancer, and more likely to have first-degree relatives with a young-age onset of colon cancer than individuals with unstable tumors but without germline mutations (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that genetically defined HNPCC accounts for a very small percentage of colon cancer at the population level, a percentage less than that estimated by most previous clinical studies.

Screening of patients at high risk of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the present state of colonoscopic screening practice for patients at a high risk of developing colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We assessed colonoscopic screening practice in nine colorectal surgery or gastroenterology units referring patients to the regional genetics centre in the North-west of England. The validity of the pedigree was confirmed by inspection of Hospital records, use of cancer registries and records of general practitioners across the United Kingdom. The screening activity at the participating centres was investigated by means of a questionnaire, site visit and study of case notes.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight high risk families were identified. Outside the genetics unit, family history was not taken in a structured manner and family pedigree was not confirmed. In four units screening was offered directly by the consultant surgeon. Differing protocols for screening were in place in six units, but were frequently not adhered to. Colonoscopy completion rates were known in only four units (range 83-97%). Frequency of screening varied from 2 to 5 years. Recording of information was minimal outside the patients' records and there were no dedicated databases. Facilities for families to be screened together existed in three units and the psychological effect of screening was not determined outside the genetics centre.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening practice should be standardized and specific criteria met before regular screening is initiated. A dedicated database should be established to record information from units screening patients at high risk of colorectal cancer.

Common hereditary cancers and implications for primary care

The identification of genes that place individuals at high risk of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer has greatly advanced our understanding of cancer predisposition over the past decade. This knowledge has received much attention from the media, and referrals to geneticists and surgeons, and requests for genetic testing, have risen. We review the published evidence for the management of people at increased risk of hereditary cancers, to draw attention to areas of uncertainty and to discuss implications for primary care. We focus on common inherited cancers, since they will have the greatest effect on clinical practice over the next decade. Cancer genetics offers a model of how information on the genetics of other common diseases could affect primary care in the future. Strategies to support the integration of genetic medicine in primary care are needed to enable primary-care practitioners to identify individuals at raised genetic risk and to reassure patients for whom genetic testing and increased surveillance offer little benefit.

Rectal cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) accounts for approximately 2% to 5% of all colorectal cancers. Rectal cancer in HNPCC is not well characterized.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review of HNPCC patients with colorectal cancer diagnosis from December 1948 to December 1999 was performed in an attempt to elucidate the natural history of rectal cancer in HNPCC. Group A consisted of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer as the index colorectal cancer. Group B consisted of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer as a metachronous colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 104 patients developed rectal cancer in our HNPCC registry. There were 18 patients in group A with a median age at diagnosis of rectal cancer of 48 years (range 24 to 79) and 7 patients in group B diagnosed at a median age of 58 years (range 45 to 68). Three of 18 patients (17%) in group A developed metachronous colon cancers at a median of 203 months (range 27 to 373) from the index rectal cancer. Rectal cancer in group B was diagnosed at a median 245 months (range 51 to 564) from the index colorectal cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal cancer in HNPCC is not uncommon. The presentation of rectal carcinoma should not obviate the evaluation for HNPCC in suspected cases.

Efficient detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene carriers by screening for tumor microsatellite instability before germline genetic testing

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal strategy for the detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) gene carriers remains uncertain. We evaluated whether microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis or MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining of tumors will screen individuals efficiently for germline MSH2 and MLH1 testing.

METHODS

We performed a case-series study of 114 eligible families enrolled in our high-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) registry. Medical history data were collected on probands and relatives. MSI analysis was performed on proband tumors, and MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining was assessed. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis was used to identify germline MSH2 or MLH1 mutations in probands found to have tumors with high-frequency MSI.

RESULTS

Tumor tissue and adequate clinical data were available in 109 of the 114 families. Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines were met by 23% and 70% of the families, respectively. High-frequency MSI was identified in the proband tumors in 47 of the 109 families (43%). Germline MSH2 and MLH1 gene testing was carried out in the probands of 32 of 47 families with MSI-H tumors. Mutations were detected in 16 families (9 in MSH2 and 7 in MLH1) and sequence variants of uncertain significance in 5 families (1 in MSH2 and 4 in MLH1). Germline mutations or sequence variants of uncertain significance were detected in 15 of 19 (79%) of our Amsterdam families and in 6 of 13 (46%) of our non-Amsterdam families with MSI-H tumors. MSH2 and MLH1 protein immunostaining was assessed in 38 of the 47 MSI-H tumors. Unequivocal loss of hMLH1 expression was found in 20 tumors and loss of MSH2 expression in 9 tumors. Corresponding loss of protein expression was seen in 17 of 18 (94%) of tumors from probands with germline mutations or variants.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of high-frequency MSI or the loss of MSH2 or MLH1 immunostaining in CRCs are both useful criteria for selecting high-risk patients who should be tested for germline mutations in MSH2 or MLH1.

Broadsheet number 52: Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer

The molecular genetics of colorectal cancer is presented in an order that ascends from the basic to the applied: molecular mechanisms, morphogenesis, classification and diagnosis. Major consideration is given to the nature of genetic instability and the role of this mechanism in driving neoplastic progression. It is shown how the fundamental principle of genetic instability cuts across applied research, tissue diagnosis and clinical management with respect to both sporadic and inherited forms of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer: molecules and populations

The epidemiology and molecular biology of colorectal cancer are reviewed with a view to understanding their interrelationship. Risk factors for colorectal neoplasia include a positive family history, meat consumption, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Important inverse associations exist with vegetables, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), hormone replacement therapy, and physical activity. There are several molecular pathways to colorectal cancer, especially the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli)-beta-catenin-Tcf (T-cell factor; a transcriptional activator) pathway and the pathway involving abnormalities of DNA mismatch repair. These are important, both in inherited syndromes (familial adenomatous polyposis [FAP] and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer [HNPCC], respectively) and in sporadic cancers. Other less well defined pathways exist. Expression of key genes in any of these pathways may be lost by inherited or acquired mutation or by hypermethylation. The roles of several of the environmental exposures in the molecular pathways either are established (e.g., inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by NSAIDs) or are suggested (e.g., meat and tobacco smoke as sources of specific blood-borne carcinogens; vegetables as a source of folate, antioxidants, and inducers of detoxifying enzymes). The roles of other factors (e.g., physical activity) remain obscure even when the epidemiology is quite consistent. There is also evidence that some metabolic pathways, e.g., those involving folate and heterocyclic amines, may be modified by polymorphisms in relevant genes, e.g., MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) and NAT1 (N-acetyltransferase 1) and NAT2. There is at least some evidence that the general host metabolic state can provide a milieu that enhances or reduces the likelihood of cancer progression. Understanding the roles of environmental exposures and host susceptibilities in molecular pathways has implications for screening, treatment, surveillance, and prevention.