Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer surgery

Simple laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer without omental patch

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the outcomes of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers using simple closure only.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 79 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers from January 2011 to February 2016. They were divided into two groups: repair with an omental patch and repair with simple closure only. All of them underwent peritoneal cavity lavage with several litres of warm normal saline. A closed suction drain system was placed for drainage of intra-abdominal abscess. Patients' age, sex, Boey score, perforation size, operation time, overall complications, and length of hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients diagnosed with perforated peptic ulcers who underwent emergency laparoscopic operations were enrolled in this study. Thirty patients underwent simple closure without an omental patch (group A), and 49 patients underwent simple closure with an omental patch (group B). Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in the patients' age, size of perforation, and Boey score. However, the operation time was significantly different (p < 0.05) between the groups, with the average time being 84.4 min in group A and 106.65 min in group B. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate or the average length of hospital stay. No patient underwent reoperation for complications.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer without an omental patch is a safe option and does not increase the morbidity and mortality rate.

Laparoscopic Finney pyloroplasty in the emergency setting: first case report in the literature and technical challenges

Pyloroplasty is currently reserved for emergencies (perforation, bleeding), but may occasionally be performed to treat benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Historically, two techniques are available: the Mikulicz pyloroplasty, by which the pylorus is incised longitudinally and sutured vertically, and the Finney pyloroplasty, by which a U-shaped inverted incision is made in the second part of duodenum (D1-D2), followed by a side-to-side gastroduodenostomy. We report our experience in this single case of laparoscopic Finney pyloroplasty (LFP) performed in the emergency setting for a woman with a perforated duodenal ulcer and severe loss of tissue in D1-D2. Due to the presence of severely inflamed perforation edges and the risk of duodenal narrowing with subsequent GOO, Finney technique was favored over direct ulcer repair. The patient achieved a full postoperative recovery free of complications, with a dynamic oral contrast study demonstrating good gastric evacuation. Review of the current literature revealed no similar cases, as LFP has only been performed in the canine model. Although LFP requires a specific surgical skill-set, we believe it can be effective and feasible in cases of duodenal perforation with significant loss of mural substance.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) has become an accepted way of management. Patch omentoplasty stayed for decades the main method of repair. The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic simple repair of PPU is as safe as patch omentoplasty.

METHODS

Since June 2005, 179 consecutive patients of PPU were treated by laparoscopic repair at our centers. We conducted a retrospective chart review in December 2012. Group I (patch group) included patients who were treated with standard patch omentoplasty. Group II (non-patch group) included patients who received simple repair without patch.

RESULTS

From June 2007 to Dec. 2012, 179 consecutive patients of PPU who were treated by laparoscopic repair at our centers were enrolled in this multi-center retrospective study. 108 patients belong to patch group. While 71 patients were treated with laparoscopic simple repair. Operative time was significantly shorter in group II (non patch) (p = 0.01). No patient was converted to laparotomy. There was no difference in age, gender, ASA score, surgical risk (Boey's) score, and incidence of co-morbidities. Both groups were comparable in terms of hospital stay, time to resume oral intake, postoperative complications and surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic simple repair of PPU is a safe procedure compared with the traditional patch omentoplasty in presence of certain selection criteria.

Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients with perforated peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H.P.) eradication has led to a significant decline in peptic ulcer prevalence; however, the number of patients requiring surgical intervention remains relatively unchanged. Laparoscopy suture repair is the most commonly used procedure for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). Whether omental patch adds any benefit than simple closure alone is not answered.

METHODS

From July 2007 to August 2010, patients received emergency surgeries for PPU in our department were enrolled in this study. The demographic data, disease pattern, surgical outcomes were retrospectively collected. Patients who had previous multiple operations, with profound shock, and complicated ulcers were excluded.

RESULTS

Totally 73 patients were enrolled. 26 of them received simple closure and the other 47 received simple closure plus an omental patch. There were no difference in age, gender, ASA, Boey risk score, and incidence of co-morbidities. The Mannheim Peritonitis index, median operation time and length of stay were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of leakage rate and surgical outcome, the maneuver to cover an omental patch on the repaired PPU did not show additional advantages compared to simple closure alone. Further prospective randomized study is required to clarify the safety and feasibility of simple closure alone without buttressing an omentum patch.

Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal "cross and twine" knotting

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used to treat various types of diseases requiring surgical intervention. We present the technique and the results of our simple "cross and twine" intracorporeal knotting approach for treatment of a perforated duodenal ulcer.

METHODS

From January 2009 to October 2009, 13 patients with perforated duodenal ulcers underwent single-port laparoscopic repair. The laparoscopic procedure included peritoneal lavage and suture of the perforation. The omentum above the repair site was then reinforced. After surgery, patients took an H2 receptor antagonist for 8 weeks and then underwent follow-up gastrofiberscopy.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed under the conditions described. The mean operative time was 90.2 ± 24.2 min, and the mean hospital stay was 6.1 ± 0.5 days. The mean number of times that opiates were used for pain was 0.5 ± 1.0, and wound length was 1.9 ± 0.1 cm. There was no operation-related morbidity. Follow-up gastrofiberscopy revealed good lesion healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port laparoscopic repair using the "cross and twine" knotting technique is a feasible and safe procedure, and it may be a less invasive laparoscopic surgical technique for scarless surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the simple "one-stitch" suture with omental patch technique

BACKGROUND

We present, here, the technique and results of our laparoscopic simple "one-stitch" suture with omental patch technique for treating 35 patients with perforated duodenal ulcer.

METHODS

The laparoscopic treatment included peritoneal lavage, suture of the perforation without knotting, and then tying the suture over the omentum. Follow-up gastroscopy was performed after an eight-week course of medication with proton-pump inhibitors.

RESULTS

Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for two patients, because of a large-sized perforation and the inadequate localization of the perforation site, respectively. The mean operative time was 64 minutes and the mean hospital stay was 6.8 days. Operation-related complications occurred in two patients, including one case of pneumonia and one case of gastric stasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple "one-stitch" suture with omental patch technique is a safe and easy procedure, and it has an acceptable morbidity rate and a low conversion rate.

Complications of peptic ulcer disease in children and adolescents: minimally invasive treatments offer feasible surgical options

PURPOSE

Surgery for complications of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) carries a significant morbidity and even mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety, and outcome of children and adolescents undergoing minimally invasive treatment of bleeding and perforation complicating PUD.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients aged 6 to 17 years managed endoscopically for bleeding and laparoscopically for perforation from January 1999 to February 2006 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty children had significant endoscopic stigma of recent hemorrhage. Primary endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in most cases except one requiring further endoscopic hemostasis. Seventeen patients with perforation underwent laparoscopic patch repair. Four patients were converted to open repair because of technical difficulty and the large size of the ulcer. All patients had a course of proton pump inhibitors postoperatively. Ninety percent of patients had Helicobacter pylori infestation. Triple therapy was given. Two patients defaulted triple therapy and presented later with recurrent ulcer bleeding. All others remained asymptomatic on follow-up (average, 32.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcer is effective and safe in children. With stringent criteria, laparoscopic patch repair of perforation can be applied safely to most pediatric patients. Eradication of H pylori and subsequent antiulcer medication are integral in the management of complicated PUD.

Surgical perspectives in peptic ulcer disease and gastritis

For much of the twentieth century, surgery was frequently the solution for peptic ulcer disease. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of ulcers paralleled the development of potent pharmaceutical therapy. As the surgical world developed parietal cell vagotomy which would minimize the complications of surgery, patients failing medical therapy became rare. Emergent surgery for complicated peptic ulcers has not declined however. The development of proton pump inhibitors and the full understanding of the impact of H pylori has led to a trend towards minimalism in surgical therapy for complicated peptic ulcer disease. In addition to the changes in patient care, these developments have had an impact on the training of surgeons. This article outlines these trends and developments.

Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer was reported in 1990 but has not gained wide acceptance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a prospective analysis of 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer between July 1997 and June 2003.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two patients of mean age 54 (range 14-93) years had perforated peptic ulcer diagnosed by laparoscopy. There were 172 duodenal ulcers, 22 prepyloric and 13 non-juxtapyloric gastric ulcers. One hundred and sixty-five patients underwent omental patch closure of perforations; there were six Pólya gastrectomies and one ulcerectomy. Thirty-seven patients (21.5 per cent) required conversion to laparotomy. The mean operating time was 64.8 (range 14-180) min. The median postoperative requirement for intramuscular pethidine was one dose. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 28 patients (16.3 per cent) resulting in three reoperations. Six patients with intra-abdominal collections were managed by percutaneous drainage. Two patients who underwent conversion developed a wound infection. Fourteen patients (8.1 per cent) died, 11 of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III and IV.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe emergency procedure in routine clinical practice for patients with perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer.