Pathological appearance of the stomach after endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer

Prevalence and risk factors for lymph node metastasis after noncurative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Additional surgery for all patients with noncurative resection after endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC) may be excessive due to the relatively low rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in such patients. However, the prevalence and risk factors for LNM after noncurative ER have not been consistent across studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of electronic databases through August 10, 2018 to identify cohort studies with patients who underwent additional surgery after noncurative ER for EGC. The prevalence of LNM in such patients was extracted for all studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were combined using random-effects meta-analyses to assess the risk of LNM, when possible.

RESULTS

We identified 24 studies comprising 3877 patients with 311 having LNM (pooled prevalence, 8.1%). The risk of LNM was significantly increased in lymphatic invasion (OR [95% confidence interval] = 4.22 [2.88-6.19]), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (4.17 [2.90-5.99]), vascular invasion (2.38 [1.65-3.44]), positive vertical margin (2.16 [1.59-2.93]), submucosal invasion depth of ≥ 500 μm (2.14 [1.48-3.09]), and tumor size > 30 mm (1.77 [1.31-2.40]). In contrast, there was no significant association between undifferentiated-type or ulceration (scar) and LNM. When studies were restricted to those that evaluated the adjusted OR, the risk of vascular invasion for LNM did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Several pathological factors, most notably lymphatic invasion and LVI, were associated with LNM in patients with noncurative resection after ER for EGC. Lymphatic and vascular invasion should be assessed separately instead of LVI (PROSPERO CRD42018109996).

The optimal timing of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection to treat early gastric cancer: long-term follow-up study

Patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who undergo non-curative endoscopic resection (ER) require additional surgery. The aim of the study was to validate surgical and oncological outcomes according to the timing of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection. We retrospectively analyzed long-term follow-up data on the 302 patients enrolled between January 2007 and December 2014. We validated our earlier suggestion that the optimal time interval from non-curative ER to additional surgery was 29 days. All patients were divided into two groups by reference to time intervals from ER to additional surgery of ≤29days (n = 133; group A) and >29 days (n = 169; group B). The median follow-up duration was 41.98 ± 21.23 months. As in our previous study, group B exhibited better surgical outcomes. A total of 10 patients developed locoregional or distant recurrences during the follow-up period, but no significant difference was evident between the two groups. Interestingly, the survival rate was better in group B. Group B (>29 days) exhibited better surgical and oncological outcomes. Thus, additional gastrectomy after non-curative ER should be delayed for 1 month to ensure optimal surgical and oncological outcomes.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent additional gastrectomy after incomplete endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and factors that lead to residual tumors in patients who underwent additional gastrectomy for incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC).Between 2003 and 2013, the medical records of patients underwent additional gastrectomy after incomplete ER were retrospectively reviewed. Those diagnosed with the presence of histologic residual tumor in specimens obtained by gastrectomy were assigned to the residual tumor (RT) group (n = 47); those diagnosed with the absence of histologic residual tumor were assigned to the nonresidual tumor (NRT) group (n = 33).In the multivariate analysis, endoscopic piecemeal resection, Helicobacter pylori infection, large tumor size (>2 cm), and both (lateral and vertical) marginal involvement were independent factors of the presence of residual tumor in additional gastrectomy after incomplete resection ER for EGC and the rates of independent factors were significantly higher in the RT group than in the NRT group (P < 0.05).Before ER, preexamination to accurately determine the GC invasion depth and the presence of LN metastasis is very important. During ER, surgeons should attempt to perform en bloc resection and to resect the mucous membrane with adequate safety margins to prevent tumor invasion into the lateral and vertical margins.

Additional gastrectomy after endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to examine the clinicopathological characteristics of cases undergoing additional gastrectomy after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer (EGC) and the appropriate strategy for treating those after incomplete EMR. We studied 16 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy after EMR for EGC. The reasons for additional gastrectomy were positive horizontal margin (8 cases), indeterminate horizontal margin (2 cases), positive vertical margin (4 cases), submucosal invasion (7 cases), lymphatic invasion (4 cases), venous invasion (1 case), and local recurrence (2 cases, including overlapped cases). Residual cancer was found in 6 of the 13 cases (46%), while no lymph node metastasis was found in any case; there were cases in which local resection was possible depending on tumor location and cases in which additional gastrectomy was performed due to suspected residual cancer but the specimens were free of cancer; follow-up without intervention appears to be feasible in some of these cases. When performing additional gastrectomy after EMR, the most appropriate method should be chosen so as not to worsen the quality of life of the patient while taking radical cure into consideration.

Risk stratification and predictive risk-scoring model for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We are increasingly experiencing difficulty in deciding whether to perform gastrectomy after noncurative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC) for patients at high risk for surgery. If the differences in risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) on the basis of noncurative status are understood, the decision becomes easier. The present study aimed to stratify the LNM risk and develop and validate a risk-scoring model for predicting LNM.

METHODS

By retrospectively reviewing 3131 patients with solitary EGC who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy at our institution between July 1997 and May 2013, LNM risk was stratified and a risk-scoring model was developed on the basis of the identified independent risk factors for LNM. The scoring was validated using 352 other surgically resected EGC cases. The discriminatory accuracy of the scoring was measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

LNM was detected in 386 of 3131 cases. LNM risk in each subgroup, stratified by the identified independent risk factors, such as tumor size, depth, histological type, ulcerative findings, and lymphovascular involvement, considerably varied from 0 % to >50 % even among the current guidelines' noncurative subgroups. An 11-point scoring model was built, and AUROCs were 0.84 (95 % confidence interval, 0.82-0.86) and 0.82 (0.75-0.88) in the development and validation sets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed detailed LNM risk stratification data, and developed and validated an 11-point scoring model.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes after Rx or R1 endoscopic resection of superficial gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic resection is a standard treatment for gastric superficial lesions. A positive or a nonevaluable margin is considered a noncurative criterion. We aimed to systematically review recurrence, residual disease, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and cancer-related death following Rx/R1 resection of gastric lesions in the absence of other noncurative criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE systematic review and meta-analysis by July 2014.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 31 manuscripts. Definitions and results differed significantly. However, nonevaluable (HMx) and positive horizontal margins (HM1) were associated with 10% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5-15%] and 36% (95% CI 24-48%) rates of recurrence/residual disease, respectively, with an odds ratio of 2.85 (95% CI 1.6-5.8, P<0.01) for HM1 compared with HMx. Nonevaluable (VMx) or positive (VM1) vertical margin was associated with a 43% (95% CI 17-68%) rate of recurrence/residual. VMx/VM1 was associated with a higher risk of recurrence/residual compared with HMx/HM1 (odds ratio 3.76, 95% CI 1.71-6.82, P<0.01). The most common strategy after HMx/HM1 was endoscopic surveillance and retreatment, whereas surgery was recommended after VMx/VM1. No cases of LNM or cancer-related death were noticeable if neither submucosal invasion more than 500 µm nor lymphovascular infiltration was also reported.

CONCLUSION

Rx/R1 resection in the absence of other noncurative criteria does not appear to be a significant risk factor for LNM or cancer-related death. The risk of recurrence/residual disease is higher after HM1 than HMx and higher after VMx/VM1 than HMx/HM1. However, considerable heterogeneity was found in studies. Standard definitions should be created and applied in future studies.

Optimal management for patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The necessity of additional gastrectomy for patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after endoscopic submu cosal dissection (ESD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and residual cancer (RC) in patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after ESD and to determine additional treatment strategies.

METHODS

Of 1443 gastric cancer patients who underwent ESD between 2004 and 2013, 167 patients diagnosed as having a lesion not meeting the inclusion criteria after ESD were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 167 cases, 100 cases underwent additional gastrectomy, and 67 cases were observed without surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.0 % (9/100) and 9.0 % (9/100) of patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after ESD presented with LNM and RC, respectively, but neither was observed in 83 patients (83.0 %). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphovascular involvement (LVI) (OR 38.38; 95 % CI 1.94-761.43, p = 0.017) and undifferentiated type (OR 45.58; 95 % CI 2.88-720.94, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for LNM, and positive horizontal margin was an independent risk factor for RC (OR 9.48; 95 % CI 1.72-52.13, p = 0.010). In differentiated types without LVI, no cases had LNM (0/38) in the additional gastrectomy group, and there was no lymph node or distant recurrence (0/39) in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional treatment is necessary for patients with LVI, undifferentiated type, and positive horizontal margin. Careful follow-up may be acceptable for patients with the differentiated type without LVI, especially for the elderly or patients with severe comorbidities.

Endoscopic papillectomy for benign ampullary neoplasms: how can treatment outcome be predicted?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic papillectomy is increasingly performed with curative intent for benign papillary tumors. This study was performed to identify factors that predict the presence of malignancy and affect endoscopic success.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who received an endoscopic papillectomy for papillary adenoma from 2006 to 2009.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients received endoscopic papillectomy. The pathologic results after papillectomy revealed adenocarcinoma in five patients (12%), and the risk of malignancy was high in cases of large lesions, preprocedural pathology of high-grade dysplasia or high serum alkaline phosphatase. Endoscopic success was observed in 37 patients (86%) at the end of follow-up (mean duration, 10.4±9.6 months). The factor significantly affecting success was a complete resection at the initial papillectomy (p=0.007). Two patients experienced recurrence 10 and 32 months after the complete resection, but both achieved endoscopic success with repeated endoscopic treatment. Six patients with endoscopic failure received surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic papillectomy is a safe and effective method for the curative resection of benign papillary tumors, especially when complete resection is achieved at the initial papillectomy. Follow-up with surveillance should be performed for at least 3 years because of the possible recurrence of tumors during these periods.

Predictive value of the pathological extent of tumor invasion in endoscopic resection margins positive for residual tumor cells in surgically resected specimens of early gastric cancer

Although endoscopic resection (ER) is considered to be the optimal treatment for early gastric cancer, indications for radical gastrectomy in patients undergoing incomplete ER for early gastric cancer remain unclear. We evaluated the pathological extent of tumor invasion in the ER margins positive for residual tumor cells in the surgically resected specimens. We measured the vertical and/or horizontal length of the exposed tumor in the ER specimens of 23 patients with margins positive for tumor cells. We compared the clinicopathological data to distinguish between the presence and absence of residual tumor cells in the surgically resected specimens. Of 17 lesions with exposed tumor cells in the vertical margins of the ER specimens, only 3 (17.6%) had residual tumor cells in the corresponding site of the surgically resected specimens. By contrast, of 10 lesions with exposed tumor cells in the horizontal margins of the ER specimens, 8 (80.0%) had residual tumor cells in the corresponding site of the surgically resected specimens. The length of the exposed tumor in the vertical margins of the ER specimens was significantly associated with the incidence of residual tumor cells in the vertical margins of the surgically resected specimens. When the cut-off value for the length of the exposed tumor in the vertical ER margins was set to >3 mm, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.67 and 0.95, respectively. In conclusion, measurement of the length of the exposed tumor in the ER margins for early gastric cancer is a simple procedure that is able to determine whether additional surgical intervention is necessary.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric neoplasia with a water jet-assisted knife: a Western, single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric neoplasia has not yet been established in Western countries because of a lack of data and the difficult, time-consuming, and hazardous nature of the method. Some of the technical limitations may be overcome by use of a water jet-assisted knife, which allows a combination of a high-pressure water jet and electrosurgical interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of water jet-assisted ESD (WESD) with a water jet-assisted knife in selected patients with early gastric neoplasia.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective study.

PATIENTS

This study involved 29 consecutive patients (13 female; median age 61 years; age range 35-93 years) with early gastric neoplasia that met the expanded criteria of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Histology of biopsies had shown gastric adenocarcinoma in 21 cases, adenoma in 8 case, and suspicion of a GI stromal tumor in 1 case. The median maximal diameter of the lesions was 20 mm (range 10-40 mm).

INTERVENTION

All procedures were done with patients under sedation with propofol. The water jet-assisted knife was used for setting coagulation markers around the neoplastic lesions, then for circumferential incision and dissection in combination with repeated submucosal injection of saline solution with a water jet system. Bleeding was treated with diathermia by use of the water jet-assisted knife or hemostatic forceps in case of failure or larger vessels. Clips were used for closure of perforations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complete resection of neoplasia, procedure time, complication and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

According to endoscopic criteria, complete resection of the targeted area could be achieved in all cases, with an en bloc resection rate of 90%. The median procedure duration was 74 minutes (range 15-402 minutes). Exchange of the device was needed in only 10 cases because of severe bleeding from larger vessels, which could be managed by use of hemostatic forceps. The 30-day morbidity rate was 4 of 30 (13.8%) because of postprocedure pain in 3 cases and delayed bleeding in 1 case. A 93-year-old patient died the night after WESD without evidence of a procedure-related complication. Histology of the resected specimens showed adenocarcinoma in 20 cases, adenoma in 7, no neoplasia in 2, and a plasmacytoma in 1. Complete resection (R0) was histologically confirmed in 18 of 28 patients (64.3%) with resected neoplastic specimens. A horizontal or vertical neoplasia-free margin could not be confirmed in 9 cases and 1 case, respectively. Complete local remission of neoplasia was achieved in 25 of 28 patients (89.3%) who were followed over a median period of 22 months (range 6-44 months). In 1 patient, a metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma was identified 54 weeks after initial WESD.

LIMITATIONS

Noncontrolled study with a limited number of patients.

CONCLUSION

The use of a water jet-assisted knife simplifies ESD because exchange of devices is rarely needed. WESD promises to be effective and safe. The study demonstrates that the high rates of en bloc resection of early gastric neoplasia reported in Asia can be reproduced in Western referral centers. However, histology may not always confirm complete resection of horizontal tumor margins. In spite of the unfavorable histology results, the high rate of complete local remission of neoplasia promises that surgical treatment of early gastric neoplasia can be avoided in the majority of cases.

Clinical Outcomes of Gastrectomy after Incomplete EMR/ESD

Purpose

Endoscopic resection is widely accepted as standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. The procedure is minimally invasive, safe, and convenient. However, surgery is sometimes needed after endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) due to perforation, bleeding, or incomplete resection. We evaluated the role of surgery after incomplete resection.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively studied 29 patients with gastric cancer who underwent a gastrectomy after incomplete EMR/ESD from 2006 to 2010 at Korea University Hospital.

Results

There were 13 incomplete resection cases, seven bleeding cases, three metachronous lesion cases, three recurrence cases, two perforation cases, and one lymphatic invasion case. Among the incomplete resection cases, a positive vertical margin was found in 10, a positive lateral margin in two, and a positive vertical and lateral margin in one case. Most cases (9/13) were diagnosed as mucosal tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography, but only three cases were confirmed as mucosal tumors on final pathology. The positive residual tumor rate was two of 13. The lymph node metastasis rate was three of 13. All lymph node metastasis cases were submucosal tumors with positive lymphatic invasion and no residual tumor in the gastrectomy specimen. No cases of recurrence were observed after curative resection.

Conclusions

A gastrectomy is required for patients with incomplete resection following EMR/ESD due to the risk of residual tumor and lymph node metastasis.

Clinical impact of a strategy involving endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: determining the optimal pathway

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique developed to enable the endoscopic resection (ER) of large and ulcerative neoplastic lesions that were previously unresectable using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). We investigated the clinical outcomes of ER of early gastric cancer (EGC) before and after the introduction of ESD, with particular attention to surgery and its potential consequences.

METHODS

We reviewed 2,785 consecutive surgical patients with EGC and 2,469 consecutive lesions treated by ER with curative intent between 1990 and 2005. The study was divided into an EMR period (1990-1999) and an ESD period (2000-2005). We analyzed the clinical outcomes of endoscopic and surgical resections and defined 'potentially avoidable surgery' as cases of surgery performed for lesions curable by ER.

RESULTS

The rate of potentially avoidable surgery was 3.8% (52/1,369) in the EMR period and 0.2% (3/1,416) in the ESD period (P < 0.001). For ER patients, the rate of overall non-curative ER was 36.9% (154/417) in the EMR group and 17.0% (348/2,052) in the ESD group (P < 0.001). The rate of non-curative ER for lesions defined as having 'positive or difficult to estimate horizontal margins only' decreased significantly, from 26.1% (109/417) in the EMR group to 1.4% (29/2,052) in the ESD group (P < 0.001). Conversely, the rate of non-curative ER for lesions defined as having 'possible lymph node metastasis' significantly increased in the ESD group (15.5%; 319/2,052) compared to that in the EMR group (10.8%; 45/417) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a pathway involving ESD resulted in a significant decrease in the rate of potentially avoidable surgery, highlighting the advantages associated with performing ESD.

Is Surgical Treatment Necessary after Non-curative Endoscopic Resection for Early Gastric Cancer?

Purpose

Additional surgery is commonly recommended in gastric cancer patients who have a high risk of lymph node metastasis or a positive resection margin after endoscopic resection. We conducted this study to determine factors related to residual cancer and to determine the appropriate treatment strategy.

Materials and Methods

A total of 28 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy due to non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer between January 2006 and June 2009 were enrolled in this study. Their clinicopathological findings were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed for residual cancer.

Results

Of the 28 patients, surgical specimens showed residual cancers in eight cases (28.6%) and lymph node metastasis in one case (3.8%). Based on results of the endoscopic resection method, the rate of residual cancer was significantly different between the en-bloc resection group (17.4%) and the piecemeal resection group (80.0%). The rate of residual cancer was significantly different between the diffuse type group (100%) and the intestinal type group (20%). The rate of residual cancer in the positive lateral margin group (25.0%) was significantly lower than that in the positive vertical margin group (33.3%) or in the positive lateral and vertical margin group (66.7%).

Conclusions

We recommended that patients who were lateral and vertical margin positive, had a diffuse type, or underwent piecemeal endoscopic resection, should be treated by surgery. Minimal invasive procedures can be considered for patients who were lateral margin positive and intestinal type through histopathological examination after en-bloc endoscopic resection.

Surgical outcome after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer is a relatively new and attractive treatment, but occasionally fails to remove all cancer lesions completely. This study aimed to elucidate clinicopathological factors that could be helpful in predicting residual tumour in the surgical specimen after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy because of incomplete ESD between August 2004 and August 2008 were analysed. Clinicopathological characteristics were reviewed retrospectively from prospectively collected medical records. Patients were classified into groups with and without residual tumour. Pathology results following gastrectomy were compared with those of incomplete ESD.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included. The incidence of residual tumour in the surgical specimen was 24·6 per cent after incomplete ESD. Elevated/flat-type cancers, large tumours (at least 2 cm) and those limited to the mucosa had significantly higher incomplete ESD rates. Cancer limited to the mucosa and the presence of tumour in the lateral margin were associated with residual tumour in the surgical specimen (both P = 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Radical gastrectomy should be performed if pathological examination reveals a positive lateral resection margin after ESD.

The role of surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer

During the past decades, despite considerable improvements in the management of gastric cancer, surgery remains the main curative treatment. However, there is still debate about the extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy, multivisceral resection, the requirement for reoperation for specimens with positive margins, the selection of neoadjuvant treatment and the management strategy of early gastric cancer. This review is to evaluate the above issues based on the reported prospective and retrospective studies.

Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer treated by guideline and expanded National Cancer Centre criteria

BACKGROUND

Criteria for endoscopic resection in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) have been expanded recently by the National Cancer Centre (NCC). This study compared long-term outcomes in patients with EGC who underwent endoscopic treatment according to guideline criteria with those treated according to expanded criteria.

METHODS

Baseline and outcome data from patients undergoing curative endoscopic resection for EGC between January 1999 and December 2005 were collected from electronic medical records. Survival time hazard ratios and 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 1485 patients who had a curative resection, 635 (42.8 per cent) underwent resection according to traditional criteria and 625 (42.1 per cent) according to expanded criteria. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have treatment following the expanded criteria have similar long-term survival and outcomes to those treated according to guideline criteria.

Endoclipping for gastric perforation secondary to second session of EMRC in locally residual early gastric cancer: a case report

A 72-year-old woman underwent gastric endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted endoscope for an adenocarcinoma in situ. She was scheduled for endoscopic follow-up at 1 and 3 months after the procedure. By the third month of follow up, biopsies of a slightly depressed scar area showed an high grade epithelial dysplasia. For this reason a second endoscopic resection (ER) was performed using the oblique soft cap. A perforation in the site of endoscopic resection was immediately observed. The complication was treated successfully by the application of seven clips.

Randomized controlled study of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection with a water-jet hybrid-knife of esophageal lesions in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) seems to be more effective than EMR for curative resection of GI mucosal neoplasia. However, ESD is technically difficult, hazardous, and time consuming. New technologies may overcome these drawbacks.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare a new simplified ESD technique with conventional EMR.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, and controlled trial in anesthetized pigs.

METHODS

A total of 25 esophageal areas with a diameter of 20 mm were marked with coagulation points in 6 pigs under general anesthesia. These lesions were then randomized to either EMR by use of the cap technique or ESD. Submucosal injection of saline solution was used for both methods. ESD was performed with a hybrid-knife (ESDH), which allows cutting and coagulation as well as a needleless, tissue-selective hydrodissection through an axial water-jet channel with a preselected pressure by using a high-pressure water-jet system (ErbeJet 2). Intraoperative bleedings were treated with hemostatic forceps.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

A comparison of the rates of complete resection of the lesions, the number and the size of resected specimens, the complication rate, and the procedural duration.

RESULTS

Thirteen lesions were randomized to EMR and 12 to ESDH. ESDH achieved complete resection significantly more frequently than EMR (10/12 vs 6/13; P = .05). All ESDH resections were performed as a single piece, whereas a mean (SD) of 2.5 +/- 0.9 resections were needed for EMR (P < .05). The mean (SD) areas of the specimen were 3.63 +/- 1.20 cm(2) in the ESDH group and 1.83 +/- 0.78 cm(2) in the EMR group (P < .0001). ESDH was performed with a larger amount of fluid for injection and hydrodissection compared with EMR (78.1 +/- 32.8 mL vs 20.9 +/- 7.6 mL; P < .001). The procedural duration was longer for ESDH than for EMR (28.2 +/- 11.9 minutes vs 12.2 +/- 4.9 minutes; P < .001). ESDH and EMR caused bleedings in 6 of 12 and 5 of 13 of the cases (P = .09), respectively. Hemostasis could be achieved in all cases. There was no perforation in either group.

LIMITATIONS

Resection of artificial non-neoplastic lesions, small numbers, an animal trial.

CONCLUSIONS

ESDH achieves complete resection of esophageal lesions significantly more frequently with a fewer number of specimens than EMR. ESDH is more time consuming, but the procedural duration seems to be shorter than conventional ESD because there is no need for exchange of devices for injection and cutting. The easy use of water-jet-assisted repeated injections of fluids may explain why ESDH was as safe as EMRC.

Treatment strategy after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) is indicated for patients with early gastric cancer who have a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Histological examination of the resected specimen may indicate a possible risk of LNM or a positive resection margin. These patients are considered to have undergone non-curative ER. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for such patients.

METHODS

A total of 298 patients who had non-curative ER were classified into those with a positive lateral margin only (group 1; 72 patients) and those with a possible risk of LNM (group 2; 226 patients).

RESULTS

Surgery was performed within 6 months of non-curative ER in 19 patients in group 1 and 144 in group 2. In group 1, nine patients were found to have local residual tumours, all limited to the mucosal layer without LNM. In Group 2, 13 patients had residual disease, including four local tumours without LNM, two local tumours with LNM and seven cases of LNM alone. The rate of LNM after surgery was 6.3 per cent in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Surgery remains the standard treatment after non-curative ER in patients with a possible risk of LNM.

Is gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multi-center study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To clarify optimal treatment guidelines for residual or local recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER).

METHODS

Eighty-six patients underwent gastrectomy due to incomplete ER and local recurrence after ER. The pathological findings of ER and gastrectomy specimens were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cause of gastrectomy was categorized into five groups; submucosal (sm) invasion without margin involvement, positive margin, margin not evaluable, high risk of lymph node metastasis and local recurrence after ER. According to the pathological findings of gastrectomy specimens, remnant cancer and lymph node metastases were found in 56 (65.1%) and in 5 patients (5.8%), respectively. At 10 gastrectomy specimens which were sm invasion without margin involvement, the scattered residual cancer cells were found around the ulcer scar in 2 (20%) patients. In 11 of 44 margin involvement specimens, no residual cancer or lymph node metastasis was found. In patients with local recurrence, mean duration from ER to surgery was 14.8 months, and 19% of patients were found to have sm or deeper depth of invasion.

CONCLUSION

Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection should be performed in patients with sm invasion with or without margin involvement. However, minimal approach other than gastrectomy could further be applied to selected patients.

EMR for early gastric cancer in Korea: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

EMR has been accepted as a treatment modality for selected cases of early gastric cancer (EGC) in Japan. However, long-term outcomes after EMR for EGC have not been fully documented.

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed the experiences of EMR for EGC in Korea, with emphasis on the long-term outcome.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective study.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively by use of the on-line database registry system. From January 2000 to December 2002, 514 EGCs in 506 patients were treated by EMR in 13 institutions in Korea. Median age of the patients was 60 years (range 45-83 years). The resection was regarded as incomplete if histopathologic examination revealed a positive resection margin or submucosal invasion or positive lymphovascular invasion or undifferentiated histologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

The most commonly used technique was circumferential precutting followed by snare resection (EMR-P, n = 269, 52.3%). Complete resection and incomplete resection after EMR were confirmed in 399 lesions (77.6%) and 103 lesions (20.0%), respectively. For completely resected mucosal cancers (n = 399), the median duration of follow-up was 23.5 months (range 5-70 months). In this group, local recurrence was detected in 24 cases (6.0%) with a median interval between EMR and recurrence of 17.9 months (range 3.5-51.7 months). There were 3 cases with perforation and 71 cases with bleeding. No deaths were related to recurrence of gastric cancer during the overall median follow-up period of 39 months.

LIMITATIONS

Multicenter retrospective design, no controls.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR is an effective therapeutic modality for selected cases of EGC in Korea.

Surgical indication for non-curative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. However, after ER additional surgery may be needed to manage the risks presented by residual cancer or lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

ER was performed on 344 gastric adenocarcinomas between November 2001 and April 2006 at the Korean National Cancer Center under the strict pre-procedural indication. The authors performed operations in 43 patients due to: residual mucosal cancer, a mucosal cancer larger than 3 cm, or a submucosal cancer regardless of size or margin involvement. ER and surgical specimens were reviewed and analyzed for residual cancer and lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Based on examinations of ER specimens, cancer was confined to the mucosal layer in 15 patients (34.9%) and invaded the submucosal layer in 28 patients (65.1%). Surgical specimens showed residual cancer in 17 patients (39.5%) and lymph node metastasis in four (9.3%). Neither residual cancer nor lymph node metastasis was found in patients with less than 500 microm submucosal invasion without margin involvement in ER specimens. In three of four patients with lymph node metastasis, the depth of submucosal invasion was 500 microm or more; the remaining patient had a 4-cm-sized differentiated mucosal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

When a pathologic evaluation of an ER specimen reveals more than 500 microm of submucosal invasion or a mucosal cancer of larger than 3 cm, surgery should be considered due to the risk of lymph node metastasis.

The role of surgery after incomplete endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a relatively new treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, cases of incomplete EMR resulting in a positive lateral margin or submucosal invasion (positive vertical margin) have been reported. We conducted this study to evaluate the role of surgery after incomplete EMR for EGC.

METHODS

We analyzed 19 patients who underwent gastrectomy as a result of an incomplete EMR. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of incomplete EMR: a positive lateral margin (LM) group (n = 9), a positive vertical margin (VM) group (n = 4), and a positive lateral and vertical margin (LM + VM) group (n = 6).

RESULTS

The positive residual tumor rate and the positive lymph node rate were 44.4% (4/9) and 0% (0/9) in the LM group, 50.0% (2/4) and 25.0% (1/4) in the VM group, and 83.3% (5/6) and 16.7% (1/6), LM + VM group, respectively. Curative resection was performed in all patients and there was no recurrence in 30.8 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Radical surgery is recommended for patients with a positive lateral resection margin or submucosal invasion, or both, after EMR for EGC, because of the possibility of residual tumor or lymph node metastasis.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer

Since 1991, laparoscopic surgery has been adopted for the treatment of gastric cancer, and it has been performed worldwide, especially in Japan and Korea. We reviewed the English-language literature to clarify the current status of and problems associated with laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection as treatment for gastric cancer. In Japan, early-stage gastric cancer (T1/T2, N0) is considered the only indication for laparoscopic gastrectomy. As yet, there is little high-level evidence based on long-term outcome supporting laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer, but reports have provided level 3 evidence that the procedure is technically safe, and that it yields better short-term outcomes than open surgery; that is, recovery is faster, hospital stay is shorter, there is less pain, and cosmesis is better. However, investigation into the oncological outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy as treatment for cancer is lacking. To establish laparoscopic surgery as a standard treatment for gastric cancer, multicenter randomized controlled trials to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery are necessary.

Clinicopathologic features and treatment of residual early cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection of the stomach

GOALS

We sometimes encounter residual or recurrent cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics of and optimal treatment for the residual cancers after EMR.

STUDY

Seventy-four patients with early gastric cancer were treated with EMR between 1994 and 2004. These patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: the curative group (n=59) and the noncurative group (n=15). The clinicopathologic data were compared between the 2 groups and the outcomes of additional therapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

In the noncurative group, the tumors were located significantly frequently on the upper or middle third of the stomach compared with the curative group (P<0.05). The number of fragments in EMR was significantly larger in the noncurative group than in the curative group (P<0.05). Fifteen patients required additional treatment because of the residual cancer. Nine (75%) of 12 patients requiring surgery underwent laparoscopic surgery. Three patients were treated by endoscopic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR with a single fragment and with a sufficient margin is useful for the complete resection of early gastric cancer. When residual cancer occurs, laparoscopic gastrectomy may be a good alternative.

Indications for gastrectomy after incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the number of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has increased, the appropriate strategy for treating those with incomplete resection has not been established.

METHODS

This study analyzed 726 cases of EGC in patients treated by EMR between 1991 and 2000, in order to clarify the en-bloc and complete resection rates. We classified patients with incomplete resection into four groups according to the estimated risk of residual cancer or lymph node (LN) metastasis, determined from pathological findings of EMR specimens. We then analyzed 45 patients with EGC treated surgically after incomplete EMR, with the aim of eliciting the risk of residual cancer and LN metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 726 patients, 529 (72.9%) had an en-bloc resection, while 378 (52.1%) had a complete resection. Three hundred and nine patients were found to have mucosal cancer and lateral cut-end-positive status with no LN metastasis (group A). In this group, 18 patients (5.8%) had residual cancer, with the lesions in the majority of patients being limited to the mucosal layer. Group B consisted of 14 patients with differentiated and submucosal (sm1) depth cancers, with 1 patient having residual cancer and 2 patients having LN metastasis. Fifteen patients were classified as group C, with sm2 or greater and vertical cut end-negative status, with 2 showing residual cancer and 1 showing LN metastasis. Group D included 10 patients with vertical cut end-positive status. Four of these patients had residual cancer while 1 had LN metastasis.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that patients in group A should have close follow-up or endoscopic treatment, while those in groups B, C, or D should be treated by gastrectomy associated with LN dissection.

Recurrent Intramucosal Gastric Carcinoma with Extensive Invasion to Duodenal Mucosa after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Case Report

The occurrence of early gastric carcinoma with invasion to the duodenum is supposed to be very low, although advanced cancers arising in the antrum can often invade the duodenal area. Generally, malignant invasion of the duodenum is difficult to diagnose preoperatively, as spread of gastric cancer to the duodenum is often infiltrative and invades through the submucosal or subserosal layer. We report an unusual case of an intramucosal gastric carcinoma with extensive duodenal invasion that was preoperatively diagnosed by endoscopy.

Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion: Feasibility of minimally invasive surgery

AIM: To explore the feasibility of performing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on subsets of submucosal gastric cancers that are unlikely to have regional lymph node metastasis.

METHODS: A total of 105 patients underwent radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for submucosal gastric cancer at our hospital from January 1995 to December 1995. Besides investigating many clinicopathological features such as tumor size, gross appearance, and differentiation, we measured the depth of invasion into submucosa minutely and analyzed the clinicopathologic features of these patients regarding lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS: The rate of lymph node metastasis in cases where the depth of invasion was < 500 μm, 500-2000 μm, or > 2000 μm was 9% (2/23), 19% (7/36), and 33% (15/46), respectively (P < 0.05). In univariate analysis, no significant correlation was found between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological characteristics such as age, sex, tumor location, gross appearance, tumor differentiation, Lauren’s classification, and lymphatic invasion. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (> 4 cm vs≤ 2 cm, odds ratio = 4.80, P = 0.04) and depth of invasion (> 2000 μm vs≤ 500 μm, odds ratio = 6.81, P = 0.02) were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis. Combining the depth and size in cases where the depth of invasion was less than 500 μm, we found that lymph node metastasis occurred where the tumor size was greater than 4 cm. In cases where the tumor size was less than 2 cm, lymph node metastasis was found only where the depth of tumor invasion was more than 2000 μm.

CONCLUSION: MIS can be applied to submucosal gastric cancer that is less than 2 cm in size and 500 μm in depth.

Double endoscopic intraluminal operation for upper digestive tract diseases: proposal of a novel procedure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic treatment of digestive tract diseases, such as early esophageal and gastric neoplasia, has become increasingly popular in recent years as an alternative to surgical procedures in the hope of providing an improved quality of life for these patients. However, one of the limitations of a conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, such as an aspiration mucosectomy and a strip biopsy, has been the size of the lesions to be resected. Both an aspiration mucosectomy and strip biopsy are useful variants for removing flat lesions measuring less than 20 mm in maximal diameter. To overcome such limitations, we devised a double endoscopic intraluminal operation (DEILO), which enables us to resect mucosal lesions by using 2 fine endoscopes and monopolar shears.

METHODS

DEILO was performed on patients with esophageal and gastric lesions measuring up to 40 mm in diameter. This novel technique is characterized by the use of 2 endoscopes (one for lifting the lesion and the other for cutting the lesions) inserted into the esophagus or stomach through an overtube. A mucosal resection is then performed by dissecting the mucosal margin with newly developed monopolar shears, thereby separating the mucosa from the submucosa.

RESULTS

A total of 25 lesions in the esophagus (8 lesions) and stomach (17 lesions) were resected by DEILO. The sizes of the esophageal lesions ranged from 8 to 40 mm in diameter (mean, 21.1 mm) whereas gastric lesions ranged from 8 to 30 mm (mean, 13.3 mm) in diameter, and histopathologic examinations revealed the resection margin to be clear and without any tumor. No complications or instances of recurrence were observed in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

DEILO is considered to be feasible for the mucosal resection of esophageal and gastric lesions measuring more than 10 mm in diameter without submucosal invasion, whereas conventional endoscopic mucosal resection is indicated for such lesions measuring less than 10 mm in size.

Treatment strategy of limited surgery in the treatment guidelines for gastric cancer in Japan

Surgical practice for gastric cancer in Japan is based on the Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines issued in 2001 by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. These recommendations list options for treatment of each stage of cancer, with clear distinctions between interventions recommended for routine use and those that should be confined to trial settings until further evidence for their curative potential becomes available. In this review, we discuss standard surgery, local resection, segmental resection, and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) as examples of limited resection and describe in detail the indications for limited lymph-node dissection in cases of early-stage gastric cancer. At present, evidence does not support the conclusion that limited surgery is effective for local resection or for improving quality of life. Thus, use of limited surgery should be considered an experimental approach both in Japan and the West. We conclude that surgeons who are familiar with the criteria for selecting surgical procedures should decide on a case-by-case basis which technique is most appropriate. Choices should be made with consideration of the stage of the cancer, invasiveness of the surgical procedure, and the patient's history. For all procedures, the patient must give informed consent and the surgeons must accurately assess the success of the operation after surgery.

Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG) for cancer: our 10 years' experience

To evaluate laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG), we examined the outcome of its use over the last 10 years. From December 1991 to December 2001, 116 patients with early gastric cancer underwent LADG in the surgical department of Oita Medical University and Koga hospital by the same surgical staffs. An operation record and clinical sheets were reviewed to obtain the operative findings, clinical course, and pathologic findings of resected specimens to evaluate the usefulness of LADG in the management of early gastric cancer. In all LADG procedures, regional lymph nodes dissection (D1+alpha) was successfully performed using laparoscopy. The mean operative duration and blood loss were 234 minutes and 139 mL, respectively. There were only four major complications, including pneumonia, leakage of anastomosis, pancreatic injury, and anastomotic stenosis, but all these cases were successfully treated conservatively. The mean length of postoperative stay was 16.3 +/- 2.5 days. All patients except one, who died not of cancer but of cerebral bleeding, were alive without recurrence or port-site metastasis during mean follow-up period of 45 months. We successfully performed 116 LADG procedures over 10 years. This procedure is recommended for the treatment of patients with early gastric cancer because of the associated good prognosis and several benefits, including less invasiveness and early recovery.

The biologic features of intramucosal gastric carcinoma with lymph node metastasis

This review concentrates on the clinicopathologic studies and molecular biologic studies of intramucosal gastric carcinomas (IMGCs) with lymph node metastasis that have been published to date. There have been several reports in which IMGCs with lymph node metastasis were compared with IMGCs without lymph node metastasis from the view of clinicopathologic features. However, there have been a few reports in which IMGCs with lymph node metastasis were compared with IMGCs without lymph node metastasis from the view of molecular biologic features. In general, IMGCs with lymph node metastasis have been commonly reported to be large lesions, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and associated with peptic ulcer, in comparison with IMGCs without lymph node metastasis. Regarding genetic studies or molecular biologic studies, only DNA distribution pattern, proliferative cell nuclear antigen and the monoclonal antibody Ki-67, or matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 have been investigated in IMGCs with lymph node metastasis. The malignant potential of the carcinoma cells cannot been evaluated by a clinicopathologic study with the use of hematoxylin and eosin staining. It may be unavoidable that minimal operation is widely accepted for the treatment of IMGCs. It may be more essential to establish the staging by both clinicopathologic and molecular biologic examinations to rule out the presence of IMGCs with lymph node metastasis.

[Surgery of early gastric cancer. Twenty-five year experience]

AIM

To study the influence of the depth of parietal invasion (mucosal-submucosal), the presence or absence of ganglionic invasion and type of gastrectomy performed (subtotal or total) on survival in patients with early gastric cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal study.

PATIENTS

A clinical-pathologic study of 101 patients who underwent surgery for early gastric cancer was performed. Probability of survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier and logrank tests and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox test.

RESULTS

Mucosal involvement was found in 46 patients (45.5%) and submucosal involvement in 55 patients (54.5%). The presence of ganglionic metastases was greater in tumors reaching the submucosa (14 [25.5%]) than in those limited to the mucosa (4 [8.7%]). Partial gastrectomy was performed according to tumor location in 84 patients (83.2%), total gastrectomy was performed in 16 patients (15.8%) and 1 wedge resection was performed. The mean postoperative follow-up was 84.04 55.89 months (range: 2-264). Comparison of survival in patients with tumors limited to the mucosal or submucosal layers revealed a p-value of 0.06 (NS). Comparison of survival in patients with metastases and in those without metastases revealed a p-value of < 0.0001. Comparison of survival between patients who underwent total gastrectomy and those who underwent partial gastrectomy showed a p-value of 0.38 (NS). Postoperative mortality was nil. Overall survival at 5 years was 79.24% and at 10 years was 68.14%. Multivariate analysis revealed that ganglionic involvement and depth of parietal invasion influenced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival is influenced by ganglionic involvement but not by submucosal invasion. Partial gastrectomy may be an appropriate procedure since survival is similar to that associated with total gastrectomy.

Evaluation of the necessity for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for patients with submucosal invasive gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

When cancer cells are found in the submucosal layer of an endoscopically resected specimen, patients are recommended to undergo gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. If it were possible to identify those patients in whom the risk of lymph node metastasis was negligible, it might be possible to avoid surgery.

METHODS

Among those who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 1980 to 1999, 1091 patients with a cancer invading the submucosa were studied. Clinicopathological factors (sex, age, tumour location, macroscopic type, size, ulceration, histological type, lymphatic-vascular involvement and degree of submucosal penetration) were investigated for their possible association with lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastases were found in 222 patients (20.3 per cent). Univariate analysis showed that larger tumour size (more than 30 mm), undifferentiated histological type, lymphatic-vascular involvement and massive submucosal penetration had a significant association with lymph node metastasis. Tumour size, histological type and lymphatic-vascular involvement were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. By combining these three factors with submucosal penetration of less than 500 microm, 117 patients could be selected as having a minimal risk of lymph node metastasis (95 per cent confidence interval 0-3.1 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy may not be necessary for patients with gastric cancer invading the submucosa who fulfil the above conditions

Laparoscopic gastric resection

This article focuses on laparoscopic gastric resections for neoplastic disease, gastric cancer, and gastric mesenchymal tumors. Established oncologic principles governing resections for neoplastic disease must not be overlooked in the laparoscopic approach to surgical management. Evidence-based information on surgical management of gastric cancer and stromal stomach tumors is presented, and the laparoscopic procedures that can be undertaken without compromising the clinical outcome are surveyed.

TIPS allowing for an endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer in a cirrhotic patient with severe hypertensive gastropathy: report of a case

This report describes the use of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in a cirrhotic patient with early gastric cancer, presenting with gastroesophageal varices and severe hypertensive gastropathy, in order to perform an endoscopic mucosal resection. The patient first underwent a TIPS to reduce the hypertensive gastropathy and thereafter was successfully treated by an endoscopic mucosal resection. Owing to the high operative risk, the treatment of gastric cancer in cirrhotic patients needs to be individualized. New procedures such as TIPS and an endoscopic mucosal resection may be useful in selected high-risk patients.

Indication for and outcome of laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Since 1991, laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy has been used for patients with early gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the outcome of 40 patients who underwent this operation and to examine the indications based on a retrospective histological study of 248 resected cases of early gastric cancer.

METHODS

Operating time, blood loss, length of skin incision, and postoperative hospital stay and complications were examined using the operation records and medical charts. The presence or absence of lymph node metastasis, tumour size, site, gross type, histological type, depth of invasion, presence or absence of ulceration, and status of lymph node metastasis were investigated in 248 early gastric cancers.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 3 h and 48 min and the mean length of skin incision was 5.8 cm. Although one patient who had suffered from chronic bronchitis developed pneumonia and wound dehiscence, no other patients had a postoperative complication. The mean hospital stay after operation was 16 days and all patients were alive without recurrence at a median follow-up of 21 months. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer was 2 per cent (three of 130) in mucosal cancers and 14 per cent (17 of 118) in submucosal cancers. These lesions could have been completely resected by laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

All 40 patients were treated successfully by laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy without significant complications and with no recurrences to date. Pathological study of conventionally resected stomach and lymph nodes confirmed that laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy would be a safe and useful operation for most early gastric cancers.